1 00:00:12,545 --> 00:00:14,420 STEVEN HALL: So there are a couple challenges 2 00:00:14,420 --> 00:00:16,580 that you need to think about when 3 00:00:16,580 --> 00:00:18,600 you're using this approach. 4 00:00:18,600 --> 00:00:20,990 One is it's important to explain to the students what's 5 00:00:20,990 --> 00:00:22,410 going on. 6 00:00:22,410 --> 00:00:24,622 If you just start doing this and say, 7 00:00:24,622 --> 00:00:26,330 this is what we're going to do, and don't 8 00:00:26,330 --> 00:00:29,000 tell the students why you're going to do it, 9 00:00:29,000 --> 00:00:31,850 that's problematic. 10 00:00:31,850 --> 00:00:36,500 I think it's important to think of the students as partners. 11 00:00:36,500 --> 00:00:40,480 Explain what's going on, they're much more likely to buy into it 12 00:00:40,480 --> 00:00:45,660 and maybe get used to the new approach. 13 00:00:45,660 --> 00:00:48,110 One of the things I do is I present some data, 14 00:00:48,110 --> 00:00:51,780 because it's MIT and students are persuaded by data. 15 00:00:51,780 --> 00:00:54,800 And what the data says is that generally the more active 16 00:00:54,800 --> 00:00:57,230 a learning exercise, the more that students learn. 17 00:00:57,230 --> 00:00:59,060 And there's some really good data 18 00:00:59,060 --> 00:01:01,620 in the literature that shows that, 19 00:01:01,620 --> 00:01:06,350 so I explain to students that the reason I'm doing this 20 00:01:06,350 --> 00:01:09,090 is to increase their level of understanding, 21 00:01:09,090 --> 00:01:12,830 especially at the conceptual level as opposed 22 00:01:12,830 --> 00:01:17,380 to the analytic level of just doing a problem using, 23 00:01:17,380 --> 00:01:18,141 the equations. 24 00:01:18,141 --> 00:01:20,390 STUDENT: I've never had a recitation like this before. 25 00:01:20,390 --> 00:01:22,760 Actually working on problems with everybody else 26 00:01:22,760 --> 00:01:25,340 and kind of going through and struggling through it, 27 00:01:25,340 --> 00:01:27,140 but eventually understanding a lot better 28 00:01:27,140 --> 00:01:30,050 what was done in lecture through, I guess, a more hands 29 00:01:30,050 --> 00:01:30,740 on approach. 30 00:01:35,375 --> 00:01:37,000 STEVEN HALL: Do the students like this? 31 00:01:37,000 --> 00:01:40,060 Well, I have a little bit of feedback. 32 00:01:40,060 --> 00:01:45,340 I do think that, initially, they're apprehensive. 33 00:01:45,340 --> 00:01:50,050 They're not used to being so exposed in the classroom. 34 00:01:50,050 --> 00:01:51,234 They can hide, usually. 35 00:01:51,234 --> 00:01:52,900 If they don't want to answer a question, 36 00:01:52,900 --> 00:01:54,790 they don't raise their hand. 37 00:01:54,790 --> 00:01:57,910 But in a situation like this, everyone's answer is visible. 38 00:01:57,910 --> 00:02:01,900 So initially, I do think they are a little bit uncomfortable. 39 00:02:01,900 --> 00:02:03,880 I think they get comfortable very quickly 40 00:02:03,880 --> 00:02:07,300 and get used to it. 41 00:02:07,300 --> 00:02:11,080 At the end of the day, at the end of the class when 42 00:02:11,080 --> 00:02:14,950 they evaluate it, I've found that students really 43 00:02:14,950 --> 00:02:19,450 like this approach, that they like this sort of recitation 44 00:02:19,450 --> 00:02:21,430 much more than conventional recitations, 45 00:02:21,430 --> 00:02:25,180 and often comment about that in the course evaluation. 46 00:02:25,180 --> 00:02:27,490 So even though there might be a little bit 47 00:02:27,490 --> 00:02:31,720 of initial reluctance, I think most students would really 48 00:02:31,720 --> 00:02:33,720 like this approach.