1 00:00:12,590 --> 00:00:14,450 PROFESSOR: One of the things that's 2 00:00:14,450 --> 00:00:16,490 different about a recitation like this 3 00:00:16,490 --> 00:00:20,210 is that you're really coaching students as opposed 4 00:00:20,210 --> 00:00:21,570 to talking at them. 5 00:00:21,570 --> 00:00:25,580 So it takes a little bit of a different mindset. 6 00:00:25,580 --> 00:00:29,450 In a normal recitation, you prepare 50 minutes of material. 7 00:00:29,450 --> 00:00:31,250 And you would go in, and you'd be prepared 8 00:00:31,250 --> 00:00:33,290 to lecture for 50 minutes. 9 00:00:33,290 --> 00:00:36,120 In a recitation like this, you have to be much more flexible. 10 00:00:36,120 --> 00:00:40,670 You have to think about, how far do I let the students go? 11 00:00:40,670 --> 00:00:44,540 Do I need to go intervene or let them work it out a little bit? 12 00:00:44,540 --> 00:00:46,100 Sometimes it's important for students 13 00:00:46,100 --> 00:00:49,040 to really struggle a little bit to see 14 00:00:49,040 --> 00:00:53,090 what the central issue is, but letting them struggle too long 15 00:00:53,090 --> 00:00:53,960 is not productive. 16 00:00:53,960 --> 00:00:55,730 So it's very useful, at that point, 17 00:00:55,730 --> 00:00:59,090 to step in and try to help. 18 00:00:59,090 --> 00:01:02,420 I like to think of it as coaching rather than telling. 19 00:01:05,260 --> 00:01:09,200 If you were teaching students or athletes 20 00:01:09,200 --> 00:01:12,020 how to play soccer or baseball, you wouldn't just 21 00:01:12,020 --> 00:01:13,010 tell them about it. 22 00:01:13,010 --> 00:01:14,750 You would go out and show them. 23 00:01:14,750 --> 00:01:16,880 You would watch how they do it. 24 00:01:16,880 --> 00:01:20,230 You would correct big mistakes. 25 00:01:20,230 --> 00:01:22,634 As that got better, you'd correct small mistakes. 26 00:01:22,634 --> 00:01:24,050 And that's really the way to think 27 00:01:24,050 --> 00:01:26,383 about a recitation like this, that you're coaching them, 28 00:01:26,383 --> 00:01:29,870 you're helping shape the students' understanding 29 00:01:29,870 --> 00:01:32,306 so that they can become, hopefully, as expert 30 00:01:32,306 --> 00:01:33,430 as you are in the material. 31 00:01:41,270 --> 00:01:43,790 So most of us are used to knowing 32 00:01:43,790 --> 00:01:46,580 what's going to happen in the 50 minutes in the classroom. 33 00:01:46,580 --> 00:01:48,890 So you prepare a certain amount of material. 34 00:01:48,890 --> 00:01:51,594 You expect to go in and present that material. 35 00:01:51,594 --> 00:01:53,510 You might run a little short or a little long, 36 00:01:53,510 --> 00:01:57,290 but there aren't any big surprises. 37 00:01:57,290 --> 00:02:02,020 When you run an active recitation like this, well, 38 00:02:02,020 --> 00:02:05,040 what I typically do is I prepare more problems 39 00:02:05,040 --> 00:02:07,550 than I think I'll need, because I don't know 40 00:02:07,550 --> 00:02:10,490 how many I will actually use. 41 00:02:10,490 --> 00:02:14,900 And sometimes I use three or four, 42 00:02:14,900 --> 00:02:18,420 and sometimes we may only use one. 43 00:02:18,420 --> 00:02:21,380 And so one of the things you have to be prepared for 44 00:02:21,380 --> 00:02:24,620 is to adapt on the fly. 45 00:02:24,620 --> 00:02:28,460 You've got to be willing to be flexible and work a little bit 46 00:02:28,460 --> 00:02:31,700 without a net, because you're just not quite sure what's 47 00:02:31,700 --> 00:02:33,150 going to happen. 48 00:02:33,150 --> 00:02:36,140 And I've seen this in classroom instruction using 49 00:02:36,140 --> 00:02:39,980 active techniques as well, where I've asked a concept question 50 00:02:39,980 --> 00:02:43,130 and discovered, through this immediate feedback, 51 00:02:43,130 --> 00:02:46,560 that students have no idea what I'm talking about. 52 00:02:46,560 --> 00:02:48,800 Well, it would just be foolish at that point 53 00:02:48,800 --> 00:02:52,700 to plow ahead and keep talking about this thing they 54 00:02:52,700 --> 00:02:54,560 don't know about. 55 00:02:54,560 --> 00:02:56,540 You really have to adapt and figure out, 56 00:02:56,540 --> 00:02:58,220 what have I done wrong? 57 00:02:58,220 --> 00:03:01,010 How can I make this concept clearer, 58 00:03:01,010 --> 00:03:03,419 because I haven't really done a good job. 59 00:03:03,419 --> 00:03:04,960 This certainly is a lead compensator, 60 00:03:04,960 --> 00:03:08,690 but I almost always write it in-- a really good problem 61 00:03:08,690 --> 00:03:13,100 in recitation is one that's not tricky 62 00:03:13,100 --> 00:03:16,490 but that is likely to expose a misconception that students 63 00:03:16,490 --> 00:03:17,510 commonly have. 64 00:03:17,510 --> 00:03:20,220 So if you've taught a class for a while, 65 00:03:20,220 --> 00:03:24,920 you may discover that students often 66 00:03:24,920 --> 00:03:29,570 make the same kind of error when looking at a problem. 67 00:03:29,570 --> 00:03:32,750 And if that's the case, then a very good thing to do 68 00:03:32,750 --> 00:03:35,870 is to present a problem where they have the opportunity 69 00:03:35,870 --> 00:03:36,860 to make that mistake. 70 00:03:36,860 --> 00:03:38,606 You don't want them to make the mistake, 71 00:03:38,606 --> 00:03:39,980 but if they do make that mistake, 72 00:03:39,980 --> 00:03:42,700 it's then an opportunity for teaching, right? 73 00:03:42,700 --> 00:03:44,360 It's a teaching moment where you can 74 00:03:44,360 --> 00:03:48,260 explain why that might seem like the right answer, 75 00:03:48,260 --> 00:03:52,206 and why it's, in fact, not, and correct that misconception. 76 00:03:59,160 --> 00:04:03,150 One of the things I really like about this approach 77 00:04:03,150 --> 00:04:06,000 is that it's just fun. 78 00:04:06,000 --> 00:04:09,090 It's much more fun to spend 50 minutes 79 00:04:09,090 --> 00:04:12,730 coaching students, talking with them, chatting with them, 80 00:04:12,730 --> 00:04:15,000 getting to know them a little bit, 81 00:04:15,000 --> 00:04:18,930 understanding what they don't understand than it is to just 82 00:04:18,930 --> 00:04:21,870 talk at them for 50 minutes. 83 00:04:21,870 --> 00:04:24,090 So all other things being equal, I'd 84 00:04:24,090 --> 00:04:27,090 much prefer to do the stand up recitation 85 00:04:27,090 --> 00:04:29,044 than a conventional recitation. 86 00:04:29,044 --> 00:04:30,960 Of course, what really matters is the outcome, 87 00:04:30,960 --> 00:04:33,160 but I do think the outcomes are better. 88 00:04:33,160 --> 00:04:35,890 So in this case, it's a win-win situation. 89 00:04:35,890 --> 00:04:38,520 I really enjoy it, and I actually 90 00:04:38,520 --> 00:04:41,690 wouldn't do it any other way in the future.