1 00:00:01,620 --> 00:00:03,220 JOSHUA CHEONG: Hi. 2 00:00:03,220 --> 00:00:05,270 Joshua here. 3 00:00:05,270 --> 00:00:06,714 So excited to do is vlog. 4 00:00:06,714 --> 00:00:08,130 This is kind of like my first time 5 00:00:08,130 --> 00:00:12,060 doing a vlog in front of a real public audience, 6 00:00:12,060 --> 00:00:15,050 and so some of the things I really 7 00:00:15,050 --> 00:00:18,660 liked about yesterday was-- I mean, 8 00:00:18,660 --> 00:00:22,020 honestly, yesterday was one of the most mind-blowing sessions. 9 00:00:22,020 --> 00:00:27,670 I got so many simple, yet I can see how very effective 10 00:00:27,670 --> 00:00:32,500 videoing doing, and being a talk show host techniques. 11 00:00:32,500 --> 00:00:38,210 And I see how that can connect to my life. 12 00:00:38,210 --> 00:00:41,070 Yeah, the first one I thought that really stood out 13 00:00:41,070 --> 00:00:47,550 for me was the one on looking at a member of your audience 14 00:00:47,550 --> 00:00:51,600 like your family member or a professor behind the camera, 15 00:00:51,600 --> 00:00:53,110 so it's not just a camera. 16 00:00:53,110 --> 00:00:55,460 So I mean, yeah. 17 00:00:55,460 --> 00:00:58,620 But the funny thing is speaking of this tip, 18 00:00:58,620 --> 00:01:00,290 I kind of forgot it, and I'm looking 19 00:01:00,290 --> 00:01:03,760 at the camera thinking of the camera, so it's a bit ironic. 20 00:01:03,760 --> 00:01:06,640 I guess many of these things require a lot of practice, 21 00:01:06,640 --> 00:01:08,460 and that's kind of like what I need 22 00:01:08,460 --> 00:01:11,050 to do and get out of the zone of thinking 23 00:01:11,050 --> 00:01:12,590 that I'm in front of a camera. 24 00:01:12,590 --> 00:01:15,040 I mean, usually, every time you press a camera, 25 00:01:15,040 --> 00:01:16,060 there's this red button. 26 00:01:16,060 --> 00:01:19,232 Sometimes I think maybe if that red button was eliminated, 27 00:01:19,232 --> 00:01:20,690 a lot of things would be different. 28 00:01:23,220 --> 00:01:27,510 Yeah, so I mean, I guess one of my questions 29 00:01:27,510 --> 00:01:30,860 I would like to ask as well is what kind of face, what 30 00:01:30,860 --> 00:01:33,500 would be an appropriate member of the audience 31 00:01:33,500 --> 00:01:35,160 that I would like to put there? 32 00:01:35,160 --> 00:01:37,730 I mean, if I put someone who is very 33 00:01:37,730 --> 00:01:39,990 respectable like my professor, then I 34 00:01:39,990 --> 00:01:43,120 guess the whole tone, tonality of my voice, 35 00:01:43,120 --> 00:01:45,160 the whole choice of my vocabulary 36 00:01:45,160 --> 00:01:49,580 would try to be more serious. 37 00:01:49,580 --> 00:01:52,010 But at the same time, I guess if I put someone 38 00:01:52,010 --> 00:01:56,240 like a two-year-old in my imagination in front of camera, 39 00:01:56,240 --> 00:01:59,880 I probably would not talk in the same tonality. 40 00:01:59,880 --> 00:02:04,690 So I guess what would an appropriate member 41 00:02:04,690 --> 00:02:08,530 of the audience be in front of the camera? 42 00:02:08,530 --> 00:02:12,680 Well, some of the other tips I got that really stood out 43 00:02:12,680 --> 00:02:18,490 for me was-- yeah. 44 00:02:18,490 --> 00:02:24,510 For example, the idea of doing it 45 00:02:24,510 --> 00:02:30,130 in a ridiculous way, so basically, George 46 00:02:30,130 --> 00:02:33,760 had us come in front of the camera-- 47 00:02:33,760 --> 00:02:36,600 not the camera but in front of the screen-- 48 00:02:36,600 --> 00:02:42,530 and read off the script, and some interesting things is he 49 00:02:42,530 --> 00:02:46,260 tried his best to tell us to say it in many different ways. 50 00:02:46,260 --> 00:02:49,110 But although we tried, we kind of like 51 00:02:49,110 --> 00:02:50,800 said it almost the same way. 52 00:02:50,800 --> 00:02:53,460 And I kind of realized it myself. 53 00:02:53,460 --> 00:02:58,340 And the funny thing about that is, well, 54 00:02:58,340 --> 00:02:59,950 I guess somehow wired in our brain 55 00:02:59,950 --> 00:03:06,140 to think that there is probably the best way of saying it, 56 00:03:06,140 --> 00:03:08,990 and then after we have adapted that way of saying it, 57 00:03:08,990 --> 00:03:13,040 we find it very difficult to draw away from that. 58 00:03:13,040 --> 00:03:16,880 But the key element in this process that stood out for me 59 00:03:16,880 --> 00:03:18,600 is saying repeat. 60 00:03:18,600 --> 00:03:19,450 Oh, that's good. 61 00:03:19,450 --> 00:03:21,250 Oh, you recorded that well. 62 00:03:21,250 --> 00:03:22,690 But can we do that again? 63 00:03:22,690 --> 00:03:25,730 And you would do it like over and over and over again, 64 00:03:25,730 --> 00:03:28,360 but every time we do it, you want to be different. 65 00:03:28,360 --> 00:03:32,670 And so stepping out of your zone and doing something crazy 66 00:03:32,670 --> 00:03:36,840 would help you and aid you in the process of coming up 67 00:03:36,840 --> 00:03:39,250 with variations of ways to say it. 68 00:03:39,250 --> 00:03:42,480 And I think the beauty of recording 69 00:03:42,480 --> 00:03:47,630 is probably that you could get the best version 70 00:03:47,630 --> 00:03:50,570 and use the best version in your edits, 71 00:03:50,570 --> 00:03:53,060 rather than in a live performance 72 00:03:53,060 --> 00:03:55,820 when you only have one shot, and it's 73 00:03:55,820 --> 00:03:58,340 kind of like if you don't make it, it's over. 74 00:03:58,340 --> 00:04:02,510 So I guess it's a bit different then. 75 00:04:02,510 --> 00:04:05,240 But at the same time, it gives me 76 00:04:05,240 --> 00:04:08,260 that understanding of like you have to keep repeating. 77 00:04:08,260 --> 00:04:09,830 It's kind of like doing many things. 78 00:04:09,830 --> 00:04:12,720 If you do well at, you probably have to repeat many times 79 00:04:12,720 --> 00:04:14,480 to get it done right. 80 00:04:14,480 --> 00:04:18,110 And I guess it's no different here. 81 00:04:18,110 --> 00:04:22,210 Yeah, and overall, I think it's a very, very good learning 82 00:04:22,210 --> 00:04:24,130 experience that I have. 83 00:04:24,130 --> 00:04:29,100 I'm actually super excited, and I've always come to ask myself, 84 00:04:29,100 --> 00:04:32,760 why did I choose to make videos? 85 00:04:32,760 --> 00:04:36,300 Why video rather than like anything else? 86 00:04:36,300 --> 00:04:40,810 And I've thought that, well, videos in education 87 00:04:40,810 --> 00:04:44,740 are not just videos to educate, but it's also to excite. 88 00:04:44,740 --> 00:04:47,680 And that's what I want to bring. 89 00:04:47,680 --> 00:04:51,650 And my view is I don't see that it should just be about, 90 00:04:51,650 --> 00:04:52,750 oh, I learned something. 91 00:04:52,750 --> 00:04:56,410 Oh, I'm just becoming smart. 92 00:04:56,410 --> 00:04:58,570 But rather, it should be something 93 00:04:58,570 --> 00:05:02,390 that, oh, my goodness, I didn't believe I didn't know this. 94 00:05:02,390 --> 00:05:07,270 It's so simple, but now that I've watched it, 95 00:05:07,270 --> 00:05:08,940 I used to think it was difficult, 96 00:05:08,940 --> 00:05:10,850 but now I know it's so simple. 97 00:05:10,850 --> 00:05:12,790 And I know that I can do it. 98 00:05:12,790 --> 00:05:17,430 It's kind of like being enlightened in some sense. 99 00:05:17,430 --> 00:05:19,960 Or rather, in another sense, it could 100 00:05:19,960 --> 00:05:23,390 be seeing something really normal 101 00:05:23,390 --> 00:05:27,930 and turning it extraordinary or seeing something really 102 00:05:27,930 --> 00:05:31,320 extraordinary, which I always thought was super complicated, 103 00:05:31,320 --> 00:05:33,950 and only a small group of people could 104 00:05:33,950 --> 00:05:38,580 do-- taking that and turning it into something 105 00:05:38,580 --> 00:05:39,940 that I can understand. 106 00:05:39,940 --> 00:05:43,270 I feel that that's quite empowering for anyone. 107 00:05:43,270 --> 00:05:46,140 And that's kind of I want to achieve here, 108 00:05:46,140 --> 00:05:52,690 and I hope I do with my pictures and my video eventually. 109 00:05:52,690 --> 00:05:55,900 I guess one of the hardest things I have with the script 110 00:05:55,900 --> 00:05:59,500 and with the way I want to share is 111 00:05:59,500 --> 00:06:05,510 that programming and software algorithms are 112 00:06:05,510 --> 00:06:07,530 very conceptual in nature, and they 113 00:06:07,530 --> 00:06:10,250 don't have a physical form. 114 00:06:10,250 --> 00:06:14,330 So usually, I have to choose like analogies 115 00:06:14,330 --> 00:06:17,910 that would be physical in nature that represent them. 116 00:06:17,910 --> 00:06:21,740 And one of the key points I learned about how do I 117 00:06:21,740 --> 00:06:25,750 avoid sounding like I'm dumbing down my audience, 118 00:06:25,750 --> 00:06:28,820 and I found that the tips that Josh gave 119 00:06:28,820 --> 00:06:43,580 was to give them a sort of a reply, something like preparing 120 00:06:43,580 --> 00:06:46,260 them to understand that this is the really simple way of saying 121 00:06:46,260 --> 00:06:46,420 it. 122 00:06:46,420 --> 00:06:49,160 So you would say something like, this the really simple way 123 00:06:49,160 --> 00:06:52,120 of saying it, but basically, blah, blah, blah. 124 00:06:52,120 --> 00:06:54,810 So that kind of like helps you prep the audience 125 00:06:54,810 --> 00:06:59,460 to understand that you're giving the simpler picture instead 126 00:06:59,460 --> 00:07:02,060 of something more complicated, I guess. 127 00:07:05,160 --> 00:07:08,380 And I look forward to the next few lessons, 128 00:07:08,380 --> 00:07:12,086 and it will be interesting.