1 00:00:00,120 --> 00:00:01,800 The following content is provided 2 00:00:01,800 --> 00:00:04,030 under a Creative Commons license. 3 00:00:04,030 --> 00:00:06,880 Your support will help MIT OpenCourseWare continue 4 00:00:06,880 --> 00:00:10,740 to offer high quality educational resources for free. 5 00:00:10,740 --> 00:00:13,350 To make a donation or view additional materials 6 00:00:13,350 --> 00:00:17,237 from hundreds of MIT courses, visit MIT OpenCourseWare 7 00:00:17,237 --> 00:00:17,862 at ocw.mit.edu. 8 00:00:21,630 --> 00:00:24,360 PROFESSOR: I'd like to try to cover two chapters in the book 9 00:00:24,360 --> 00:00:31,780 today-- not too much more of the sociobiology book. 10 00:00:31,780 --> 00:00:37,580 But some pretty interesting things still to talk about. 11 00:00:37,580 --> 00:00:41,590 So what does what's the brain to a sociobiologist? 12 00:00:41,590 --> 00:00:49,350 They say it's a reproductive organ just like every organ 13 00:00:49,350 --> 00:00:53,390 that any living thing is born with because they evolve 14 00:00:53,390 --> 00:00:57,770 by the processes of natural selection largely. 15 00:00:57,770 --> 00:01:00,300 And that's based on the maximal transmission of genes. 16 00:01:00,300 --> 00:01:06,980 So that's what they assume. 17 00:01:06,980 --> 00:01:10,930 So what would be the long-range evolutionary outcome 18 00:01:10,930 --> 00:01:17,830 if most people really had blank slate brains at birth? 19 00:01:17,830 --> 00:01:21,000 What would happen? 20 00:01:21,000 --> 00:01:27,320 If you take a society where everybody had blank slates-- 21 00:01:27,320 --> 00:01:30,975 everything was learned-- a common assumption 22 00:01:30,975 --> 00:01:32,330 when people have babies. 23 00:01:36,780 --> 00:01:40,700 So Alcock goes through a little thought experiment 24 00:01:40,700 --> 00:01:48,310 and he argues, I think pretty well, 25 00:01:48,310 --> 00:01:50,190 that they'd be taken advantage of. 26 00:01:50,190 --> 00:01:53,380 They'd be exploited by variants who 27 00:01:53,380 --> 00:01:56,710 had more targeted brains evolved to basically 28 00:01:56,710 --> 00:01:59,200 be more selfish and so forth. 29 00:01:59,200 --> 00:02:04,890 And so with genetic variation totally blank slate individuals 30 00:02:04,890 --> 00:02:07,140 would decrease and disappear. 31 00:02:07,140 --> 00:02:12,950 He talks about how that would happen and why it would happen. 32 00:02:12,950 --> 00:02:14,610 And he quotes Noam Chomsky there, 33 00:02:14,610 --> 00:02:21,080 "The blank slate brain is a dictator's dream." 34 00:02:21,080 --> 00:02:23,360 Yes, you would have dictators arise 35 00:02:23,360 --> 00:02:25,520 and take advantage of such people. 36 00:02:25,520 --> 00:02:28,260 Just educate them the way you want. 37 00:02:28,260 --> 00:02:31,510 All right, so let's go back to a topic 38 00:02:31,510 --> 00:02:34,440 from Scott's book about conditional strategies. 39 00:02:34,440 --> 00:02:37,720 And they say they are common in humans. 40 00:02:37,720 --> 00:02:41,010 Do you remember a conditional strategy in an insect 41 00:02:41,010 --> 00:02:45,490 that Scott-- I think Scott talked about this one? 42 00:02:45,490 --> 00:02:48,410 No, maybe he talked about a different one. 43 00:02:48,410 --> 00:02:52,800 Alcock talks about a dung beetle. 44 00:02:52,800 --> 00:02:55,870 It shows that the pre-programming of behavior 45 00:02:55,870 --> 00:02:56,920 is not rigid. 46 00:02:56,920 --> 00:02:59,560 It can be conditional. 47 00:02:59,560 --> 00:03:03,090 So he talks about the rove beetle 48 00:03:03,090 --> 00:03:05,990 that he actually did some studies of. 49 00:03:05,990 --> 00:03:08,310 He went to Costa Rica with another scientist 50 00:03:08,310 --> 00:03:11,910 and did these studies. 51 00:03:11,910 --> 00:03:19,960 It feeds on flies that collect at dung on the forest floor. 52 00:03:19,960 --> 00:03:22,090 The large males are territorial. 53 00:03:22,090 --> 00:03:23,990 They have very big jaws. 54 00:03:23,990 --> 00:03:28,100 And the smaller males seemed like they 55 00:03:28,100 --> 00:03:30,030 wouldn't stand a chance. 56 00:03:30,030 --> 00:03:34,330 They can't really fight with those big males. 57 00:03:34,330 --> 00:03:37,200 So what they do is they mimic female behavior. 58 00:03:37,200 --> 00:03:40,580 And they're actually courted by those big males. 59 00:03:40,580 --> 00:03:42,460 And while they're being courted, the catch 60 00:03:42,460 --> 00:03:43,735 flies and mate will females. 61 00:03:46,310 --> 00:03:50,730 The very same males though as they get bigger 62 00:03:50,730 --> 00:03:52,170 can change their behavior. 63 00:03:52,170 --> 00:03:54,350 They can change to male behavior. 64 00:03:54,350 --> 00:03:56,040 So it depends on the situation. 65 00:03:56,040 --> 00:03:59,600 In other words, they're programmed the same way. 66 00:03:59,600 --> 00:04:01,750 But it's conditional upon how big 67 00:04:01,750 --> 00:04:04,440 they are-- how much they've grown. 68 00:04:04,440 --> 00:04:06,920 And we've seen that in iguana. 69 00:04:06,920 --> 00:04:10,110 We've seen that in other beetles. 70 00:04:10,110 --> 00:04:13,490 This is the rove beetle. 71 00:04:13,490 --> 00:04:17,329 And see the dung beetles are very appropriate. 72 00:04:17,329 --> 00:04:19,769 They look like a piece of dung and the one on the left 73 00:04:19,769 --> 00:04:21,640 especially. 74 00:04:21,640 --> 00:04:24,910 But they're called that, of course, 75 00:04:24,910 --> 00:04:27,000 because that's how they see they feed 76 00:04:27,000 --> 00:04:29,230 on the flies that come to be dung. 77 00:04:34,300 --> 00:04:37,510 OK, so this is just what we said. 78 00:04:37,510 --> 00:04:40,510 Now, what about learning mechanisms? 79 00:04:40,510 --> 00:04:43,430 People like to think we learn everything. 80 00:04:43,430 --> 00:04:45,630 But learning mechanisms themselves 81 00:04:45,630 --> 00:04:49,180 have evolved in order to increase fitness. 82 00:04:52,000 --> 00:04:57,090 And so as a result, there's many different kinds of learning. 83 00:04:57,090 --> 00:05:00,320 And they've evolved too. 84 00:05:00,320 --> 00:05:06,100 And we can give examples of a kind that 85 00:05:06,100 --> 00:05:08,550 has evolved that's very different from other kinds. 86 00:05:08,550 --> 00:05:11,185 This was again in Scott's book. 87 00:05:14,070 --> 00:05:18,215 It's called conditional taste aversion or the poison bait 88 00:05:18,215 --> 00:05:18,715 effect. 89 00:05:22,480 --> 00:05:23,560 It just proved. 90 00:05:23,560 --> 00:05:27,415 And it actually caught a lot of attention 91 00:05:27,415 --> 00:05:30,600 when Garcia, who lived in California 92 00:05:30,600 --> 00:05:33,280 and made this discovery when it was first 93 00:05:33,280 --> 00:05:35,630 reported in the literature because it showed 94 00:05:35,630 --> 00:05:40,850 that Skinner's universal laws of enforcement learning 95 00:05:40,850 --> 00:05:43,200 are violated. 96 00:05:43,200 --> 00:05:46,210 It just doesn't work the way other the kinds of learning. 97 00:05:46,210 --> 00:05:47,850 You should know how it's different. 98 00:05:52,060 --> 00:05:55,870 The unconditioned response is they are getting ill 99 00:05:55,870 --> 00:05:58,560 from the effects of the poison. 100 00:05:58,560 --> 00:05:59,540 You know? 101 00:05:59,540 --> 00:06:02,270 And it doesn't have to occur right away 102 00:06:02,270 --> 00:06:06,620 whereas in experiments-- Skinner's and other people that 103 00:06:06,620 --> 00:06:11,370 did research on this-- it has to occur quite quickly. 104 00:06:11,370 --> 00:06:14,130 And one way to show that is that there's 105 00:06:14,130 --> 00:06:16,800 different kinds of negative reinforcement 106 00:06:16,800 --> 00:06:20,920 or negative reward that can have very different consequences 107 00:06:20,920 --> 00:06:23,410 on the learning of food preferences. 108 00:06:23,410 --> 00:06:25,640 So if every time they ingest something 109 00:06:25,640 --> 00:06:27,730 you give them an electric shock, you 110 00:06:27,730 --> 00:06:31,950 should be able to create a food aversion, right? 111 00:06:31,950 --> 00:06:34,490 It actually doesn't have very much effect 112 00:06:34,490 --> 00:06:37,230 on their future preferences. 113 00:06:37,230 --> 00:06:41,890 But if you take the same food-- a neutral food-- something 114 00:06:41,890 --> 00:06:43,940 that they normally would eat. 115 00:06:43,940 --> 00:06:46,410 But you then expose them to X-rays 116 00:06:46,410 --> 00:06:49,900 that make them feel sick. 117 00:06:49,900 --> 00:06:53,530 You do that after they eat or drink something. 118 00:06:53,530 --> 00:06:56,540 It results in avoidance of that substance subsequently-- 119 00:06:56,540 --> 00:06:57,960 very different effects. 120 00:06:57,960 --> 00:07:04,730 It's that feeling of nausea-- a feeling of illness which 121 00:07:04,730 --> 00:07:07,150 doesn't have to occur immediately 122 00:07:07,150 --> 00:07:11,790 that makes them avoid that food. 123 00:07:11,790 --> 00:07:14,990 It works best if it's a novel food. 124 00:07:14,990 --> 00:07:18,270 And we talked about that when we were discussing the Scott book. 125 00:07:18,270 --> 00:07:22,060 So we want other examples of channeled nature of learning 126 00:07:22,060 --> 00:07:25,470 abilities specific for humans and see 127 00:07:25,470 --> 00:07:26,930 if they're similar in animals. 128 00:07:26,930 --> 00:07:29,260 By channel, we mean specific kinds 129 00:07:29,260 --> 00:07:32,310 of learning that have evolved in the species. 130 00:07:32,310 --> 00:07:36,750 And these are the ones I could think of. 131 00:07:36,750 --> 00:07:42,720 Some of them are very obvious-- language acquisition-- 132 00:07:42,720 --> 00:07:46,660 our ability to anticipate the actions of others 133 00:07:46,660 --> 00:07:48,520 with a sense of other's intentions 134 00:07:48,520 --> 00:07:52,670 based on what we attend to and learn-- often 135 00:07:52,670 --> 00:07:56,810 studied in this department by Laura Schulz and other people. 136 00:07:56,810 --> 00:08:00,250 Learning of faces for later recognition? 137 00:08:00,250 --> 00:08:02,460 Yes, it's very special in humans. 138 00:08:02,460 --> 00:08:05,500 And we've evolved a special part of the brain that 139 00:08:05,500 --> 00:08:09,560 specializes in face learning. 140 00:08:09,560 --> 00:08:11,390 So do we share these abilities? 141 00:08:11,390 --> 00:08:15,090 Well, language acquisition-- the only animals 142 00:08:15,090 --> 00:08:17,590 we know that have something similar 143 00:08:17,590 --> 00:08:23,230 is the song birds in their learning of singing of songs. 144 00:08:26,560 --> 00:08:28,350 And that's not the kind of language 145 00:08:28,350 --> 00:08:31,250 we're talking about when we talk about humans. 146 00:08:31,250 --> 00:08:32,929 But it does have some similarities 147 00:08:32,929 --> 00:08:34,470 in the nature of brain mechanisms-- 148 00:08:34,470 --> 00:08:36,095 hemispheric dominance, for example. 149 00:08:38,710 --> 00:08:40,720 What about this ability to anticipate 150 00:08:40,720 --> 00:08:41,860 the actions of others? 151 00:08:41,860 --> 00:08:45,560 Particularly important in social life. 152 00:08:45,560 --> 00:08:48,640 We have a sense of what other people are intending to do. 153 00:08:48,640 --> 00:08:51,560 Are other animals like that? 154 00:08:51,560 --> 00:08:55,960 Well, certainly the other primates-- the social primates 155 00:08:55,960 --> 00:09:02,910 and apes are able to do that very well. 156 00:09:02,910 --> 00:09:07,160 And there's some evidence that in fact many other mammals 157 00:09:07,160 --> 00:09:09,260 can do that. 158 00:09:09,260 --> 00:09:15,130 But it it does require neocortex or in birds 159 00:09:15,130 --> 00:09:20,520 the neocortical equivalent homologous structures-- 160 00:09:20,520 --> 00:09:22,300 the hyperpallium and nidopallium. 161 00:09:25,660 --> 00:09:29,680 And learning of faces-- there have been studies now 162 00:09:29,680 --> 00:09:33,290 of those particular areas of the primate-- 163 00:09:33,290 --> 00:09:36,400 the infratemporal cortex seemed to be involved in face 164 00:09:36,400 --> 00:09:39,315 learning-- learning human faces and monkeys faces. 165 00:09:45,660 --> 00:09:48,290 There's other specific abilities that 166 00:09:48,290 --> 00:09:50,910 have evolved much more in some animals 167 00:09:50,910 --> 00:09:55,450 than others-- bird song is one example in the sparrows 168 00:09:55,450 --> 00:09:56,225 and finches. 169 00:09:59,210 --> 00:10:02,120 Some birds that cache their food and have 170 00:10:02,120 --> 00:10:04,200 to remember where they put it that's 171 00:10:04,200 --> 00:10:06,640 evolved very differently in different bird groups. 172 00:10:06,640 --> 00:10:09,090 Even in the same genus, you find birds-- 173 00:10:09,090 --> 00:10:10,730 some do are very good at it. 174 00:10:10,730 --> 00:10:12,030 Some are not. 175 00:10:12,030 --> 00:10:19,120 And they don't do it in their food foraging. 176 00:10:19,120 --> 00:10:21,305 And their brains are different. 177 00:10:21,305 --> 00:10:24,390 The hippocampus, in particular, is different. 178 00:10:24,390 --> 00:10:27,730 You could say maze learning in rats is something 179 00:10:27,730 --> 00:10:30,490 they've adapted specifically for so well 180 00:10:30,490 --> 00:10:35,901 that they often outperform college students in maze 181 00:10:35,901 --> 00:10:36,400 learning. 182 00:10:39,470 --> 00:10:42,050 And they just have that pretty small little brain. 183 00:10:47,020 --> 00:10:49,590 So why do humans engage in behaviors 184 00:10:49,590 --> 00:10:51,360 that seem to reduce fitness? 185 00:10:51,360 --> 00:10:53,450 And this has led to a lot of arguments. 186 00:10:53,450 --> 00:10:57,180 Some of them against-- are taken to-- they 187 00:10:57,180 --> 00:11:00,080 take the arguments to be against all of sociobiology. 188 00:11:00,080 --> 00:11:02,160 But remember, we talked about these things 189 00:11:02,160 --> 00:11:04,390 as Darwinian puzzles. 190 00:11:04,390 --> 00:11:06,620 And that's one of things that sociobiologists 191 00:11:06,620 --> 00:11:11,860 have done a lot of research on, assuming 192 00:11:11,860 --> 00:11:14,420 that they did evolve to increase fitness. 193 00:11:14,420 --> 00:11:17,830 But they may no longer do so in the current environments 194 00:11:17,830 --> 00:11:22,050 because we didn't involve the major period of our evolution. 195 00:11:22,050 --> 00:11:26,590 It's very different from modern life. 196 00:11:26,590 --> 00:11:30,520 And we talked about pet love previously. 197 00:11:30,520 --> 00:11:33,093 What about alcoholism? 198 00:11:33,093 --> 00:11:35,980 Why do so many people have a propensity 199 00:11:35,980 --> 00:11:38,260 to overindulge in alcohol? 200 00:11:38,260 --> 00:11:40,760 Not everybody does. 201 00:11:40,760 --> 00:11:43,360 And there are genetic differences 202 00:11:43,360 --> 00:11:46,447 in the people that have the tendency to become alcoholic. 203 00:11:46,447 --> 00:11:47,780 But why would that have evolved? 204 00:11:47,780 --> 00:11:51,580 Why would there be a gene that effects it? 205 00:11:51,580 --> 00:11:55,360 It must have had an adaptive function. 206 00:11:55,360 --> 00:11:59,480 Well, alcohol didn't used to be available in concentrated doses 207 00:11:59,480 --> 00:12:02,700 that you can go down to a liquor store and buy it-- or even 208 00:12:02,700 --> 00:12:04,680 at your grocery store. 209 00:12:04,680 --> 00:12:07,352 Those weren't the conditions that were present in most 210 00:12:07,352 --> 00:12:08,250 of our evolution . 211 00:12:08,250 --> 00:12:12,110 And what did alcohol mean to those people living 212 00:12:12,110 --> 00:12:16,880 in small groups and during hundreds of thousands of years? 213 00:12:16,880 --> 00:12:23,200 Well, it meant ripe fruit that produced some alcohol. 214 00:12:23,200 --> 00:12:28,480 So they ripen-- it means sugar and ripe fruit 215 00:12:28,480 --> 00:12:32,890 that provides good calories and energy. 216 00:12:32,890 --> 00:12:34,900 Altruism, of course, as we've talked 217 00:12:34,900 --> 00:12:38,390 about studied by Trivers and Alexander and other people, 218 00:12:38,390 --> 00:12:42,510 especially they talk about reciprocal altruism, 219 00:12:42,510 --> 00:12:46,960 which gives a reason why it would evolve supporting 220 00:12:46,960 --> 00:12:50,080 reciprocal altruism in genetic related people, 221 00:12:50,080 --> 00:12:53,230 but in unrelated people too. 222 00:12:53,230 --> 00:12:56,160 And that's why the reciprocity seems 223 00:12:56,160 --> 00:13:01,060 to have evolved because people that benefit from others help 224 00:13:01,060 --> 00:13:04,600 are more likely to return that later. 225 00:13:04,600 --> 00:13:06,690 And also there's a value in reputation 226 00:13:06,690 --> 00:13:08,380 for being charitable. 227 00:13:08,380 --> 00:13:12,910 What about use of spices and an even more difficult one, 228 00:13:12,910 --> 00:13:14,750 reductions in family size? 229 00:13:14,750 --> 00:13:16,885 Something we call the demographic transition 230 00:13:16,885 --> 00:13:20,900 where fertility rates have declined 231 00:13:20,900 --> 00:13:23,550 in some countries since the late 1800s. 232 00:13:23,550 --> 00:13:26,800 In some sense, the early 1900s. 233 00:13:26,800 --> 00:13:28,515 So let's talk about those two things. 234 00:13:32,270 --> 00:13:34,080 Many people thought for a long time 235 00:13:34,080 --> 00:13:37,130 that spices seemed to be a human luxury. 236 00:13:37,130 --> 00:13:38,930 It was treated that way. 237 00:13:38,930 --> 00:13:42,000 And yet, they are used-- they have such a widespread use. 238 00:13:42,000 --> 00:13:44,570 And people place great value on spices 239 00:13:44,570 --> 00:13:48,020 so much that it led to some of the early trade 240 00:13:48,020 --> 00:13:51,200 routes between East and West. 241 00:13:51,200 --> 00:13:54,260 It was treated as a Darwinian puzzle. 242 00:13:54,260 --> 00:13:56,740 But then studies were made. 243 00:13:56,740 --> 00:13:59,620 And there's a nice figure in your book 244 00:13:59,620 --> 00:14:03,670 that shows their antimicrobial properties. 245 00:14:03,670 --> 00:14:05,190 It's a very interesting table. 246 00:14:05,190 --> 00:14:11,420 You see on page 179 huge numbers of spices 247 00:14:11,420 --> 00:14:15,770 that all have-- some of them kill almost 100% 248 00:14:15,770 --> 00:14:17,610 of the bacteria there. 249 00:14:17,610 --> 00:14:20,820 The one at the top of the list is garlic. 250 00:14:20,820 --> 00:14:23,530 You kill everything in the food. 251 00:14:23,530 --> 00:14:25,800 It's as good as cooking. 252 00:14:25,800 --> 00:14:28,090 So if you cook and add garlic, you 253 00:14:28,090 --> 00:14:30,370 don't have to worry about bacteria. 254 00:14:30,370 --> 00:14:35,040 But there's many others that are pretty high on the list there. 255 00:14:35,040 --> 00:14:41,929 And at least a dozen that kill more than 75% of the bacteria 256 00:14:41,929 --> 00:14:43,220 in studies that have been done. 257 00:14:43,220 --> 00:14:44,803 And I just wanted to point out there's 258 00:14:44,803 --> 00:14:49,910 other things besides anti-bacterial actions 259 00:14:49,910 --> 00:14:53,640 of things that people consume that are 260 00:14:53,640 --> 00:14:56,780 additives, nevertheless, and not necessary to get energy 261 00:14:56,780 --> 00:14:58,580 from the food. 262 00:14:58,580 --> 00:15:03,970 The Masai and Batini tribal peoples in East Africa 263 00:15:03,970 --> 00:15:08,770 use additives that lower cholesterol. 264 00:15:08,770 --> 00:15:13,390 They add saponins and phenolics that reduce their cholesterol 265 00:15:13,390 --> 00:15:19,240 and reduce that harmful side effect of very high fat diet 266 00:15:19,240 --> 00:15:21,580 that they eat. 267 00:15:21,580 --> 00:15:25,050 All right, so let's talk about the other problem-- the greater 268 00:15:25,050 --> 00:15:28,080 one really-- the demographic transition. 269 00:15:28,080 --> 00:15:29,770 It was a big Darwinian puzzle. 270 00:15:29,770 --> 00:15:31,960 There's been a lot of arguments-- big literature 271 00:15:31,960 --> 00:15:33,270 on it. 272 00:15:33,270 --> 00:15:35,140 It's the decline in fertility. 273 00:15:38,380 --> 00:15:41,650 They looked at a number of different European countries 274 00:15:41,650 --> 00:15:49,610 that have been keeping records of births 275 00:15:49,610 --> 00:15:53,430 in their whole population in census taking 276 00:15:53,430 --> 00:15:55,200 for a long, long time. 277 00:15:55,200 --> 00:15:58,810 And the interesting thing about the demographic transition 278 00:15:58,810 --> 00:16:01,540 is that change to reduce fertility 279 00:16:01,540 --> 00:16:06,120 began well before birth control-- modern birth control 280 00:16:06,120 --> 00:16:07,087 methods developed. 281 00:16:07,087 --> 00:16:09,170 It's not that there were no birth control methods. 282 00:16:09,170 --> 00:16:11,770 They were available in ancient times. 283 00:16:11,770 --> 00:16:14,310 There were herbs that could be effective. 284 00:16:14,310 --> 00:16:18,220 But the availability of all the convenient ways 285 00:16:18,220 --> 00:16:20,700 we have for birth control did not develop. 286 00:16:20,700 --> 00:16:24,800 And, yet, we still had this population decline. 287 00:16:24,800 --> 00:16:28,420 So this is the way people have tried 288 00:16:28,420 --> 00:16:31,910 to deal with that-- sociobiologists. 289 00:16:31,910 --> 00:16:33,880 There were evolutionary advantages 290 00:16:33,880 --> 00:16:37,740 of timing of pregnancies. 291 00:16:37,740 --> 00:16:40,130 Getting pregnant too soon after a birth 292 00:16:40,130 --> 00:16:45,070 could reduce the chances of survival of the earlier born 293 00:16:45,070 --> 00:16:45,960 individual. 294 00:16:45,960 --> 00:16:51,050 And spacing had a great advantage. 295 00:16:51,050 --> 00:16:53,570 And, of course, there were advantages of acquiring wealth 296 00:16:53,570 --> 00:16:55,620 to pass on to children and grandchildren 297 00:16:55,620 --> 00:16:59,770 and increase their chances-- their genetic fitness-- 298 00:16:59,770 --> 00:17:02,365 their chances of surviving and reproducing. 299 00:17:05,230 --> 00:17:07,730 Alcock doesn't deal at all with the effects of overcrowding. 300 00:17:07,730 --> 00:17:09,105 And there's a lot of overcrowding 301 00:17:09,105 --> 00:17:11,710 in these parts of these countries 302 00:17:11,710 --> 00:17:13,599 that he's talking about. 303 00:17:13,599 --> 00:17:15,960 And certainly the animal studies of that, 304 00:17:15,960 --> 00:17:18,170 which have not been common. 305 00:17:18,170 --> 00:17:19,910 The best studies were done many years ago 306 00:17:19,910 --> 00:17:25,920 on rats that showed very clearly reductions in fertility 307 00:17:25,920 --> 00:17:28,930 and effects on the immune system in general 308 00:17:28,930 --> 00:17:33,190 so that they had more illness. 309 00:17:33,190 --> 00:17:37,330 And, also, I think it's probably important to realize 310 00:17:37,330 --> 00:17:40,270 that humans evolved under conditions of limited 311 00:17:40,270 --> 00:17:44,580 communication-- relatively small group sizes. 312 00:17:44,580 --> 00:17:49,125 So with the coming of rapid, long-distance communication 313 00:17:49,125 --> 00:17:55,670 and awareness of population sizes and their consequences, 314 00:17:55,670 --> 00:17:59,580 which has happened only very recently in evolutionary time. 315 00:17:59,580 --> 00:18:02,130 It certainly in highly educated peoples 316 00:18:02,130 --> 00:18:07,260 has an effect or at least could have. 317 00:18:07,260 --> 00:18:11,230 Then Alcock goes into another area 318 00:18:11,230 --> 00:18:13,580 that's been really controversial-- stirred up 319 00:18:13,580 --> 00:18:15,530 a lot of anger and everything. 320 00:18:15,530 --> 00:18:20,900 The way sociobiologists have studied rape. 321 00:18:20,900 --> 00:18:23,880 And this is an appendix question. 322 00:18:23,880 --> 00:18:30,310 And he quotes an argument against sociobiological ideas 323 00:18:30,310 --> 00:18:33,600 that rape is not very common. 324 00:18:33,600 --> 00:18:35,400 But it's common enough to assume there 325 00:18:35,400 --> 00:18:40,350 has to be some adaptive value or it would not exist at all. 326 00:18:40,350 --> 00:18:45,250 So this person argues that a substantial proportion 327 00:18:45,250 --> 00:18:48,990 of rapists failed to ejaculate in the victim. 328 00:18:48,990 --> 00:18:52,756 So does that refute sociobiological explanations 329 00:18:52,756 --> 00:18:53,255 of rape. 330 00:18:56,880 --> 00:18:59,100 This is a feminist-- Barbara Ehrenreich. 331 00:18:59,100 --> 00:19:03,870 She says that children sired by rapists in the past 332 00:19:03,870 --> 00:19:06,670 surely were more likely to die than those 333 00:19:06,670 --> 00:19:09,790 of paternal non-rapists. 334 00:19:09,790 --> 00:19:14,800 So rape cannot possibly be an evolved adaptation. 335 00:19:14,800 --> 00:19:18,850 She was quoted in the popular press for that. 336 00:19:18,850 --> 00:19:19,860 So was she right? 337 00:19:19,860 --> 00:19:22,780 And why would she make such a claim? 338 00:19:22,780 --> 00:19:26,620 Well, actually, well, think of the two-thirds 339 00:19:26,620 --> 00:19:29,790 that don't fail to ejaculate. 340 00:19:29,790 --> 00:19:32,660 So it's certain that argument certainly does the argument 341 00:19:32,660 --> 00:19:35,250 that a third of them don't doesn't refute 342 00:19:35,250 --> 00:19:37,740 sociobiological explanations at all. 343 00:19:40,610 --> 00:19:44,350 And as far as Ehrenreich's comments, 344 00:19:44,350 --> 00:19:48,200 the fact is many of them do survive. 345 00:19:48,200 --> 00:19:50,830 She may be making the claim because she does not 346 00:19:50,830 --> 00:19:54,270 want anyone to consider rape as natural. 347 00:19:54,270 --> 00:19:56,204 So we will deal with that. 348 00:19:56,204 --> 00:19:58,120 What does it mean to say something is natural? 349 00:19:58,120 --> 00:20:00,380 And is that any argument? 350 00:20:00,380 --> 00:20:02,700 Is that any moral argument? 351 00:20:02,700 --> 00:20:04,450 We'll certainly argue that it is not? 352 00:20:07,260 --> 00:20:11,380 Of course it depends on what you consider natural or not. 353 00:20:11,380 --> 00:20:15,610 So first of all, it's not a natural behavior 354 00:20:15,610 --> 00:20:16,610 in that it's common. 355 00:20:16,610 --> 00:20:18,920 It's practiced by only a small minority 356 00:20:18,920 --> 00:20:22,380 of men-- usually men-- an occasional woman. 357 00:20:22,380 --> 00:20:24,700 Hence it's not natural in the usual sense 358 00:20:24,700 --> 00:20:28,700 if by natural we mean common in a species. 359 00:20:28,700 --> 00:20:33,190 In some species, forced copulation is very widespread. 360 00:20:33,190 --> 00:20:36,390 And, in fact, some of the literature on this 361 00:20:36,390 --> 00:20:39,700 does call this rape. 362 00:20:39,700 --> 00:20:43,080 We talked about that-- forced copulation 363 00:20:43,080 --> 00:20:47,570 and traumatic copulation in many animals. 364 00:20:47,570 --> 00:20:50,220 But I also note, and Alcock notes, 365 00:20:50,220 --> 00:20:52,360 that it becomes more common in humans 366 00:20:52,360 --> 00:20:58,200 under certain conditions like wartime-- wartime conquests. 367 00:20:58,200 --> 00:21:00,720 So it could in that sense be considered 368 00:21:00,720 --> 00:21:05,270 a conditional strategy, however abhorrent that may seem. 369 00:21:05,270 --> 00:21:06,380 All right? 370 00:21:06,380 --> 00:21:12,550 So another issue is another appendix question. 371 00:21:12,550 --> 00:21:15,060 If men and women differ in how much they invest 372 00:21:15,060 --> 00:21:19,130 in parental care, is it strictly because of the nature 373 00:21:19,130 --> 00:21:23,590 of societal influences they experience when young? 374 00:21:23,590 --> 00:21:26,180 Which is what has been argued. 375 00:21:26,180 --> 00:21:29,680 Hasn't that shape their view of appropriate sex roles? 376 00:21:29,680 --> 00:21:33,220 How would you test it? 377 00:21:33,220 --> 00:21:35,340 This is what you'd have to do. 378 00:21:35,340 --> 00:21:40,610 For one thing, you could do-- we want 379 00:21:40,610 --> 00:21:43,730 to know if all male-female differences in parental care 380 00:21:43,730 --> 00:21:47,460 are learned because the statistics are overwhelming. 381 00:21:47,460 --> 00:21:55,010 Women spend much more of their time in parental care. 382 00:21:55,010 --> 00:21:56,910 Cross-cultural studies-- why is it 383 00:21:56,910 --> 00:22:01,790 that nearly all cultures are similar in this? 384 00:22:01,790 --> 00:22:04,890 I didn't say all, but most. 385 00:22:04,890 --> 00:22:07,730 There are a few exceptions. 386 00:22:07,730 --> 00:22:10,270 What about twin studies? 387 00:22:10,270 --> 00:22:13,510 Are variations in parental care genetically influenced? 388 00:22:13,510 --> 00:22:16,700 See, I don't know the answer to that one. 389 00:22:16,700 --> 00:22:18,300 And there are also-- in fact, this 390 00:22:18,300 --> 00:22:21,700 has occurred in scientists there's a deliberate 391 00:22:21,700 --> 00:22:28,560 attempt by caregivers to influence children-- to care 392 00:22:28,560 --> 00:22:32,130 more about taking care of children. 393 00:22:32,130 --> 00:22:34,630 What do you think the outcomes has been? 394 00:22:34,630 --> 00:22:37,580 Actually it doesn't make much difference? 395 00:22:37,580 --> 00:22:39,720 There is still big male-female difference. 396 00:22:44,160 --> 00:22:50,780 Another appendix question-- the reactions 397 00:22:50,780 --> 00:22:54,030 against the hypothesis that men have a predisposition 398 00:22:54,030 --> 00:22:57,090 to seek out multiple sex partners of high fertility 399 00:22:57,090 --> 00:22:59,070 in Lewontin. 400 00:22:59,070 --> 00:23:02,270 He simply gives his own example. 401 00:23:02,270 --> 00:23:02,960 I am a man. 402 00:23:02,960 --> 00:23:04,850 I don't go around screwing young girls. 403 00:23:04,850 --> 00:23:05,530 I am human. 404 00:23:05,530 --> 00:23:08,620 So I have to be explained. 405 00:23:08,620 --> 00:23:12,210 So what does a sociobiologist say? 406 00:23:12,210 --> 00:23:14,330 It's not about exceptions. 407 00:23:14,330 --> 00:23:18,670 It's about the more general rule. 408 00:23:18,670 --> 00:23:20,833 And some men claim loudly that they are monogamous. 409 00:23:24,560 --> 00:23:27,620 How do you deal with that? 410 00:23:27,620 --> 00:23:31,030 We already dealt with Lewontin. 411 00:23:31,030 --> 00:23:32,140 Why might he do this? 412 00:23:32,140 --> 00:23:35,520 Well, that can be helpful to him. 413 00:23:35,520 --> 00:23:38,530 It can convince his mate to be monogamous too. 414 00:23:38,530 --> 00:23:41,800 He wants to have-- she'll have only his kids. 415 00:23:41,800 --> 00:23:44,030 It may give the man more influence or power 416 00:23:44,030 --> 00:23:45,780 in social groups. 417 00:23:45,780 --> 00:23:50,050 And when these people that talk loudly about it, 418 00:23:50,050 --> 00:23:51,316 you begin to get suspicious. 419 00:23:53,930 --> 00:23:58,712 And we see examples of this in the news too often. 420 00:23:58,712 --> 00:24:00,170 They do it because they're covering 421 00:24:00,170 --> 00:24:01,810 for something they actually are doing. 422 00:24:07,316 --> 00:24:08,690 I know some of these things would 423 00:24:08,690 --> 00:24:11,650 be nice to explore a little further. 424 00:24:11,650 --> 00:24:13,425 But I want to go through both chapters. 425 00:24:16,060 --> 00:24:18,855 So let's deal with a few of the practical issues 426 00:24:18,855 --> 00:24:22,275 in thinking about and collecting data on adaptations. 427 00:24:25,500 --> 00:24:30,330 Let's first talk about the misuse of scientific findings 428 00:24:30,330 --> 00:24:34,710 or claims in service of political goals, 429 00:24:34,710 --> 00:24:37,990 including things concerning sociobiology 430 00:24:37,990 --> 00:24:41,330 or Darwinian theory. 431 00:24:41,330 --> 00:24:45,720 And sociobiologists, of course, are Darwinian theorists 432 00:24:45,720 --> 00:24:49,910 who are using Darwinian theory as their major tool. 433 00:24:49,910 --> 00:24:51,425 So we have the eugenics arguments. 434 00:24:54,190 --> 00:24:58,130 The Nazis claimed that their racism and even genocide 435 00:24:58,130 --> 00:24:59,440 was based on genetics. 436 00:25:02,500 --> 00:25:04,480 And then in the 19th century, there 437 00:25:04,480 --> 00:25:07,910 was Social Darwinism-- lot written about it. 438 00:25:07,910 --> 00:25:11,925 It was used to justify dominance and superiority of the rich. 439 00:25:14,850 --> 00:25:17,700 And then, of course, the claim that infidelity is natural, 440 00:25:17,700 --> 00:25:21,430 therefore understandable, therefore justifiable. 441 00:25:21,430 --> 00:25:23,040 We'll come back to that. 442 00:25:23,040 --> 00:25:27,090 Similarly, claims justifying the subjugation of women. 443 00:25:27,090 --> 00:25:32,870 All of these arguments have been made using scientific findings. 444 00:25:32,870 --> 00:25:35,640 But the arguments have always been flawed. 445 00:25:35,640 --> 00:25:38,250 So let's talk a little more about this. 446 00:25:38,250 --> 00:25:42,580 First of all, I want you to be able to see that just the way 447 00:25:42,580 --> 00:25:47,350 things are stated makes a big difference. 448 00:25:47,350 --> 00:25:54,780 Let's summarize sociobiological findings stating, 449 00:25:54,780 --> 00:25:58,210 first of all-- make it sound like people 450 00:25:58,210 --> 00:25:59,640 ought to behave in a certain way. 451 00:25:59,640 --> 00:26:02,360 And then restate the finding in a more objective way 452 00:26:02,360 --> 00:26:04,450 because there's more objective and less 453 00:26:04,450 --> 00:26:06,300 objective ways to state these findings. 454 00:26:10,200 --> 00:26:12,210 So, for example, take this statement. 455 00:26:12,210 --> 00:26:14,150 It is natural to being male for men 456 00:26:14,150 --> 00:26:16,510 to want to have power and dominance over others, 457 00:26:16,510 --> 00:26:18,380 including women. 458 00:26:18,380 --> 00:26:20,120 You say it like that. 459 00:26:20,120 --> 00:26:22,410 It sounds like it's approval. 460 00:26:22,410 --> 00:26:25,610 You approve of that or justify it in some way. 461 00:26:25,610 --> 00:26:27,540 But you can restate the actual finding. 462 00:26:27,540 --> 00:26:31,350 Men more than women have a tendency on average 463 00:26:31,350 --> 00:26:34,390 to strive for positions of power and dominance. 464 00:26:34,390 --> 00:26:36,790 Perfectly true, OK? 465 00:26:36,790 --> 00:26:40,109 But now it doesn't sound like-- you're being neutral. 466 00:26:40,109 --> 00:26:41,275 You're presenting a finding. 467 00:26:46,240 --> 00:26:52,550 A related thing using equating natural and good. 468 00:26:52,550 --> 00:26:55,300 I often tell my kids you go through a supermarket. 469 00:26:55,300 --> 00:26:58,700 And you read in these big letters all natural. 470 00:26:58,700 --> 00:27:00,921 It doesn't make it good. 471 00:27:00,921 --> 00:27:01,420 You know? 472 00:27:06,270 --> 00:27:09,530 Well, evolved traits have helped keep certain genes in the gene 473 00:27:09,530 --> 00:27:11,760 pool not because it was good for the individual, 474 00:27:11,760 --> 00:27:14,140 good for the group, or good for the species as a whole, 475 00:27:14,140 --> 00:27:17,030 but just because possession of these traits 476 00:27:17,030 --> 00:27:20,770 happen to be correlated with success in gene propagation. 477 00:27:20,770 --> 00:27:24,120 So no moral lessons can be drawn from the unfeeling 478 00:27:24,120 --> 00:27:26,125 blind process of natural selection. 479 00:27:30,220 --> 00:27:31,440 Come back to that one too. 480 00:27:31,440 --> 00:27:38,080 Medical issues-- an example of medical issue-- medical issues 481 00:27:38,080 --> 00:27:42,450 that can be illumined by sociobiological ideas-- 482 00:27:42,450 --> 00:27:44,840 take an adaptation approach. 483 00:27:44,840 --> 00:27:47,370 And these are things I can think of. 484 00:27:47,370 --> 00:27:49,870 Alcock discusses morning sickness. 485 00:27:49,870 --> 00:27:51,860 And there it's probably a little easier 486 00:27:51,860 --> 00:27:55,060 to understand how that could be adaptive. 487 00:27:55,060 --> 00:27:55,920 It seems horrible. 488 00:27:55,920 --> 00:27:58,369 Why should the woman get pregnant 489 00:27:58,369 --> 00:28:00,410 and have to go through this horrible thickness is 490 00:28:00,410 --> 00:28:03,480 much greater in some women than in others? 491 00:28:03,480 --> 00:28:07,590 But when they get morning sickness, for most of them, 492 00:28:07,590 --> 00:28:10,400 it's in the early period when that fetus is 493 00:28:10,400 --> 00:28:13,880 most vulnerable to the things she eating. 494 00:28:13,880 --> 00:28:17,730 And this keeps her from eating any really strange foods 495 00:28:17,730 --> 00:28:20,840 or particular kinds of foods. 496 00:28:20,840 --> 00:28:22,490 They also have very particular taste 497 00:28:22,490 --> 00:28:27,550 and probably signal some nutritional need. 498 00:28:27,550 --> 00:28:30,340 So that's the first one. 499 00:28:30,340 --> 00:28:32,380 And there have been studies of this 500 00:28:32,380 --> 00:28:33,880 that indicate that this is true. 501 00:28:33,880 --> 00:28:35,220 What about fever and pain? 502 00:28:38,090 --> 00:28:43,300 First of all, there have been some studies of fever. 503 00:28:43,300 --> 00:28:46,075 And we get fever when we have an infection. 504 00:28:46,075 --> 00:28:48,450 All right? 505 00:28:48,450 --> 00:28:51,550 Is that benefiting the body? 506 00:28:51,550 --> 00:28:54,140 There is some evidence-- there have been some studies 507 00:28:54,140 --> 00:28:58,500 that in fact it does improve the ability of the body 508 00:28:58,500 --> 00:29:00,150 to fight disease. 509 00:29:00,150 --> 00:29:02,310 But, yes, it can get out of hand. 510 00:29:02,310 --> 00:29:05,990 What happens say if a child gets a fever that 511 00:29:05,990 --> 00:29:08,750 runs up to 105 and higher? 512 00:29:11,670 --> 00:29:13,350 You know what can happen? 513 00:29:13,350 --> 00:29:16,110 I used to run fevers really high. 514 00:29:16,110 --> 00:29:18,970 And every time I got sick when I was a little child. 515 00:29:18,970 --> 00:29:20,040 What did my parents do? 516 00:29:20,040 --> 00:29:24,070 Well, they start putting cold packs on my head. 517 00:29:24,070 --> 00:29:27,470 They tried to cool me down. 518 00:29:27,470 --> 00:29:30,210 And I don't think they realized why they did it. 519 00:29:30,210 --> 00:29:33,020 They did it because it was a tradition in their families 520 00:29:33,020 --> 00:29:35,390 do this when you got very high fever. 521 00:29:35,390 --> 00:29:37,730 But what can happen? 522 00:29:37,730 --> 00:29:40,890 Seizures-- febrile fits. 523 00:29:40,890 --> 00:29:42,080 OK? 524 00:29:42,080 --> 00:29:47,370 And febrile fits in the very young can cause brain damage. 525 00:29:47,370 --> 00:29:51,080 They can wipe out part of the temporal lobe-- 526 00:29:51,080 --> 00:29:54,180 the amygdala in particular. 527 00:29:54,180 --> 00:29:56,460 So they get dangerous. 528 00:29:56,460 --> 00:30:02,260 But fever did evolve before biological, adaptive reasons. 529 00:30:02,260 --> 00:30:04,170 What about pain? 530 00:30:04,170 --> 00:30:07,390 Why do we have to suffer so much? 531 00:30:07,390 --> 00:30:09,670 Pain can be horrible, right? 532 00:30:09,670 --> 00:30:14,170 Well, take someone who has a congenital absence of pain. 533 00:30:14,170 --> 00:30:15,740 What are they like? 534 00:30:15,740 --> 00:30:20,460 They usually don't even survive to your age 535 00:30:20,460 --> 00:30:22,010 because they keep getting injured. 536 00:30:22,010 --> 00:30:24,450 They don't even change positions. 537 00:30:24,450 --> 00:30:27,090 They don't become comfortable enough to change positions 538 00:30:27,090 --> 00:30:29,170 when they're sitting or lying down. 539 00:30:29,170 --> 00:30:34,000 So they end up with circulation problems one after another. 540 00:30:34,000 --> 00:30:37,430 It takes a lot of extra care and help from others 541 00:30:37,430 --> 00:30:42,010 to survive that condition-- the absence of pain. 542 00:30:42,010 --> 00:30:43,945 It serves a very useful functions. 543 00:30:47,110 --> 00:30:50,010 I wonder sometimes when it comes to tooth pain. 544 00:30:50,010 --> 00:30:55,700 [LAUGHS] Pain in general is very adaptive. 545 00:30:55,700 --> 00:31:00,770 So let's talk about how studies-- we 546 00:31:00,770 --> 00:31:02,930 brought this up before. 547 00:31:02,930 --> 00:31:04,960 How do comparative studies help us 548 00:31:04,960 --> 00:31:07,140 understand some of these issues? 549 00:31:07,140 --> 00:31:09,780 Why are studies of the behavior of the white-fronted bee 550 00:31:09,780 --> 00:31:12,620 eaters, birds, relevant to human behavior. 551 00:31:12,620 --> 00:31:17,000 These are birds that have helpers at the nest. 552 00:31:17,000 --> 00:31:21,770 Both species have families that persist over long time periods. 553 00:31:21,770 --> 00:31:26,470 So they had similar selective pressures. 554 00:31:26,470 --> 00:31:31,150 Helping by helpers at the nest is by offspring, usually 555 00:31:31,150 --> 00:31:36,090 full siblings sharing about 50% of the genes with the ones 556 00:31:36,090 --> 00:31:39,190 that they're helping take care of. 557 00:31:39,190 --> 00:31:43,880 So they are improving their genetic fitness in that sense. 558 00:31:43,880 --> 00:31:45,730 So we can ask questions like, well, 559 00:31:45,730 --> 00:31:47,640 how beneficial is the helping? 560 00:31:47,640 --> 00:31:49,800 And this has been studied extensively 561 00:31:49,800 --> 00:31:52,450 in the white-fronted bee eaters. 562 00:31:52,450 --> 00:31:55,880 And in that species because of the habitat they live at-- 563 00:31:55,880 --> 00:32:01,240 there's a figure on page 198 that goes through this. 564 00:32:01,240 --> 00:32:04,480 Just to get one surviving chick it takes three adults 565 00:32:04,480 --> 00:32:07,100 to bring enough food for it because the adults have 566 00:32:07,100 --> 00:32:08,630 to feed themselves too. 567 00:32:08,630 --> 00:32:11,310 So they don't have much extra to give to the baby. 568 00:32:11,310 --> 00:32:13,100 And that's why two adults usually 569 00:32:13,100 --> 00:32:16,990 can't succeed in keeping one chick alive. 570 00:32:16,990 --> 00:32:20,340 And it takes five adults on average 571 00:32:20,340 --> 00:32:21,845 to have two surviving chicks. 572 00:32:26,820 --> 00:32:33,100 So two and a half for one-- that means three. 573 00:32:33,100 --> 00:32:34,900 But there's conflicts that arise. 574 00:32:34,900 --> 00:32:36,410 And this happens in the birds. 575 00:32:36,410 --> 00:32:39,130 It happens in humans. 576 00:32:39,130 --> 00:32:42,700 The fathers have conflicts with the male offspring 577 00:32:42,700 --> 00:32:44,830 that are helpers at the nest. 578 00:32:44,830 --> 00:32:46,735 And this can vary a lot. 579 00:32:46,735 --> 00:32:48,770 But it does happen. 580 00:32:48,770 --> 00:32:53,060 And what happens if the female mate dies? 581 00:32:53,060 --> 00:32:55,350 And there's a helper at the nest. 582 00:32:55,350 --> 00:32:59,490 Well, if the male gets another female mate, what 583 00:32:59,490 --> 00:33:02,450 does his male-- how does his male respond? 584 00:33:02,450 --> 00:33:04,640 Well, he will continue to take care of chicks 585 00:33:04,640 --> 00:33:06,890 if there still is full siblings. 586 00:33:06,890 --> 00:33:11,510 But when he starts having more, it's 587 00:33:11,510 --> 00:33:17,210 very common for the male helper at the nest to leave-- go off 588 00:33:17,210 --> 00:33:20,220 and form his own nest. 589 00:33:20,220 --> 00:33:24,020 They generally don't like to take care-- on average 590 00:33:24,020 --> 00:33:26,820 they don't stay around to take care of siblings 591 00:33:26,820 --> 00:33:31,070 where they share less than half the genes because it goes down 592 00:33:31,070 --> 00:33:37,430 like 25% if they're step-brothers and sisters. 593 00:33:37,430 --> 00:33:39,710 So the answers to all these questions 594 00:33:39,710 --> 00:33:41,305 have parallels in human behavior. 595 00:33:45,700 --> 00:33:47,790 And one of the ways I think you'll 596 00:33:47,790 --> 00:33:50,820 be interested in the studies of human marriage and step 597 00:33:50,820 --> 00:33:56,290 families-- predictions from the kind of thinking we've 598 00:33:56,290 --> 00:34:02,570 been using and they found that, for example, there's 599 00:34:02,570 --> 00:34:08,699 more conflict within step families-- a lot less stability 600 00:34:08,699 --> 00:34:14,159 at least in the cases when children are involved. 601 00:34:14,159 --> 00:34:17,139 They're not saying there's generally more conflict. 602 00:34:17,139 --> 00:34:19,166 But when children are involved, there's 603 00:34:19,166 --> 00:34:20,166 generally more conflict. 604 00:34:23,239 --> 00:34:28,644 The most dramatic thing I think is studies of child abuse. 605 00:34:32,219 --> 00:34:34,989 Sociobiologists have examined the records 606 00:34:34,989 --> 00:34:40,730 of people in families where child abuse has occurred. 607 00:34:40,730 --> 00:34:43,330 And they've looked at the frequency 608 00:34:43,330 --> 00:34:46,429 of criminal child abuse in families. 609 00:34:46,429 --> 00:34:51,250 So if you separate then the child abuse in families where 610 00:34:51,250 --> 00:34:56,150 the children are the genetic offspring of both parents 611 00:34:56,150 --> 00:34:59,750 and ones where only one parent, they're 612 00:34:59,750 --> 00:35:06,050 related to only one parent-- so they have a step parent-- 613 00:35:06,050 --> 00:35:09,740 there's much greater child abuse by step parents. 614 00:35:09,740 --> 00:35:14,250 And there it's mostly by step fathers. 615 00:35:14,250 --> 00:35:18,450 You'd have to look at the curve there on bar graph on page 202 616 00:35:18,450 --> 00:35:21,807 because the differences are really dramatic. 617 00:35:21,807 --> 00:35:22,390 They are huge. 618 00:35:25,570 --> 00:35:31,330 And then finally, you can look at divorce records and the more 619 00:35:31,330 --> 00:35:35,514 stepchildren there are, the greater the divorce rate. 620 00:35:35,514 --> 00:35:37,180 So these are just things you can collect 621 00:35:37,180 --> 00:35:40,380 by doing statistics on these records. 622 00:35:40,380 --> 00:35:41,505 And these are the findings. 623 00:35:47,290 --> 00:35:50,560 Alcock also goes through male-female differences 624 00:35:50,560 --> 00:35:52,970 in various abilities. 625 00:35:52,970 --> 00:35:55,190 And I'm asking here what differences 626 00:35:55,190 --> 00:35:57,700 aren't mentioned by Alcock. 627 00:35:57,700 --> 00:36:01,950 So I just want to mention a few of these differences 628 00:36:01,950 --> 00:36:04,130 in verbal abilities where women tend 629 00:36:04,130 --> 00:36:07,770 to have greater verbal ability on average. 630 00:36:07,770 --> 00:36:11,000 Spatial abilities-- and, again, you're 631 00:36:11,000 --> 00:36:12,820 going to find clear exceptions. 632 00:36:12,820 --> 00:36:17,370 But they are on average-- they're greater in males. 633 00:36:17,370 --> 00:36:22,250 Linear logic, quantitative analysis, 634 00:36:22,250 --> 00:36:27,750 computer programming-- tend to be greater in males. 635 00:36:27,750 --> 00:36:29,720 There's a nice study at MIT of this 636 00:36:29,720 --> 00:36:33,340 because about-- the study female programmers compared with men. 637 00:36:33,340 --> 00:36:35,830 And they examine the programs in detail. 638 00:36:35,830 --> 00:36:39,330 And they found out that, yeah, women 639 00:36:39,330 --> 00:36:43,860 don't use quite the same logic and so forth in their programs. 640 00:36:43,860 --> 00:36:49,200 But their programs work just as well. 641 00:36:49,200 --> 00:36:54,510 And then differences between social and emotional 642 00:36:54,510 --> 00:36:58,370 intelligence and other kinds of intelligence generally social 643 00:36:58,370 --> 00:37:00,730 and emotional intelligence and sensitivities 644 00:37:00,730 --> 00:37:03,340 are greater in women. 645 00:37:03,340 --> 00:37:04,880 I've talked about it, briefly, we'll 646 00:37:04,880 --> 00:37:10,210 talk about again when we talk about primate social life. 647 00:37:10,210 --> 00:37:13,350 So what is the naturalistic fallacy? 648 00:37:13,350 --> 00:37:16,820 I eluded to it earlier today. 649 00:37:16,820 --> 00:37:20,070 It's often made by people, including some scientists, 650 00:37:20,070 --> 00:37:21,403 who are opposed to sociobiology. 651 00:37:25,360 --> 00:37:27,740 The naturalistic fallacy is when they 652 00:37:27,740 --> 00:37:30,610 assume that any evolved tendency is natural 653 00:37:30,610 --> 00:37:34,470 and, therefore, it's acceptable and justifiable. 654 00:37:34,470 --> 00:37:39,570 And that is a clear fallacy that we've already mentioned. 655 00:37:39,570 --> 00:37:44,000 And you should think of clear examples of it 656 00:37:44,000 --> 00:37:45,650 because it's very common in the way 657 00:37:45,650 --> 00:37:49,560 we talk, the things we discuss within our families, 658 00:37:49,560 --> 00:37:50,250 and so forth. 659 00:37:56,390 --> 00:38:01,110 A related thing is this is we talked about rape. 660 00:38:01,110 --> 00:38:07,540 But here's what particularly feminists have argued. 661 00:38:07,540 --> 00:38:09,030 And you hear it all the time. 662 00:38:09,030 --> 00:38:12,830 You still hear this on the TV. 663 00:38:12,830 --> 00:38:15,070 All rape is an exercise in power. 664 00:38:15,070 --> 00:38:16,620 It's not about sex. 665 00:38:16,620 --> 00:38:20,370 It's not about sexual desires. 666 00:38:20,370 --> 00:38:25,750 It was first argued strongly in this book by Susan Brownmiller 667 00:38:25,750 --> 00:38:28,370 in '75 called Against Our Will. 668 00:38:28,370 --> 00:38:30,740 The whole book was on rape. 669 00:38:30,740 --> 00:38:33,540 And her views became very widespread. 670 00:38:33,540 --> 00:38:37,140 They've been taught to students at many universities, 671 00:38:37,140 --> 00:38:40,310 even in the high schools. 672 00:38:40,310 --> 00:38:47,760 It's led to perpetuation of various myths about rape. 673 00:38:47,760 --> 00:38:50,790 So is it true that all rape is an exercise in power and not 674 00:38:50,790 --> 00:38:52,030 about sexual desires? 675 00:38:52,030 --> 00:38:54,780 It's not true. 676 00:38:54,780 --> 00:38:57,750 It's also widespread among animals so certainly not 677 00:38:57,750 --> 00:38:59,210 in all species. 678 00:38:59,210 --> 00:39:04,380 It's used quite successfully in many animals. 679 00:39:04,380 --> 00:39:07,140 So what are some of the actual findings of studies 680 00:39:07,140 --> 00:39:09,510 that have collected real data on this? 681 00:39:09,510 --> 00:39:14,820 And he gives-- Alcock gives them on these pages in the book. 682 00:39:14,820 --> 00:39:18,820 And he's got to figure on it where he-- here's 683 00:39:18,820 --> 00:39:22,960 the age, for example, age distribution of rape victims. 684 00:39:22,960 --> 00:39:26,300 It differs very significantly from homicide victims. 685 00:39:26,300 --> 00:39:30,680 You just take rape victims and homicide victims-- 686 00:39:30,680 --> 00:39:32,940 female in both cases. 687 00:39:32,940 --> 00:39:37,160 The peak age for rape victims was 22 to 23. 688 00:39:37,160 --> 00:39:40,880 The peak age for murder victims was 32 to 33. 689 00:39:40,880 --> 00:39:43,180 And the distribution of that in that curve 690 00:39:43,180 --> 00:39:49,230 falls off with age a lot less steeply than for rape victims. 691 00:39:49,230 --> 00:39:54,540 That's just one of the pieces of data that have supported this. 692 00:39:54,540 --> 00:39:57,430 And we gave some of the earlier findings before. 693 00:40:03,330 --> 00:40:06,840 We mentioned this-- also maternal instincts 694 00:40:06,840 --> 00:40:10,150 being greater than paternal instincts on the average. 695 00:40:14,980 --> 00:40:19,120 Is the sociobiologist being irresponsible since people 696 00:40:19,120 --> 00:40:21,290 may misuse his conclusions? 697 00:40:21,290 --> 00:40:24,700 It's been argued that they should shut up about this. 698 00:40:27,592 --> 00:40:36,870 But I'd like to make this very clear. 699 00:40:36,870 --> 00:40:42,670 And I'm going to go to page 215 to make sure you understand 700 00:40:42,670 --> 00:40:46,180 what sociobiologists themselves actually believe 701 00:40:46,180 --> 00:40:49,425 about their science and about their morality. 702 00:40:55,120 --> 00:40:58,660 Richard Dawkins says, "My own philosophy of life 703 00:40:58,660 --> 00:41:02,300 begins with an explicit rejection of Darwinism 704 00:41:02,300 --> 00:41:05,270 as a normative principle for living, 705 00:41:05,270 --> 00:41:08,740 even while I extol it as the explanatory principle 706 00:41:08,740 --> 00:41:11,540 for life." 707 00:41:11,540 --> 00:41:13,180 It's not about morality. 708 00:41:13,180 --> 00:41:16,495 It's about the way evolution occurs. 709 00:41:19,060 --> 00:41:22,840 Remember George C. Williams who wrote the paper in 1966 that 710 00:41:22,840 --> 00:41:27,580 led to basically a revolution in thinking 711 00:41:27,580 --> 00:41:33,640 about the nature of natural selection and evolution. 712 00:41:33,640 --> 00:41:36,880 He's even more emphatic. 713 00:41:36,880 --> 00:41:38,710 "With what other than condemnation 714 00:41:38,710 --> 00:41:41,530 is a person with any moral sense to respond 715 00:41:41,530 --> 00:41:44,489 to assist in which the ultimate purpose in life 716 00:41:44,489 --> 00:41:45,905 is to be better than your neighbor 717 00:41:45,905 --> 00:41:55,675 at getting genes in the future generations." 718 00:41:55,675 --> 00:41:59,750 And he goes on and has very strong statements about that. 719 00:42:04,000 --> 00:42:06,140 "The fact that interactions among the members 720 00:42:06,140 --> 00:42:10,030 of the same species are also guided by adaptations 721 00:42:10,030 --> 00:42:13,610 of various sorts is no guarantee of happiness and harmony 722 00:42:13,610 --> 00:42:17,020 as dysfunctional step families and couples in sexual conflict 723 00:42:17,020 --> 00:42:18,790 demonstrated all too clearly." 724 00:42:18,790 --> 00:42:22,810 This is Alcock now he says, "If more people realized 725 00:42:22,810 --> 00:42:26,400 how are naturally selected brain acts in the service 726 00:42:26,400 --> 00:42:28,660 of our genes, then perhaps they would 727 00:42:28,660 --> 00:42:31,200 be less inclined to endure the consequences 728 00:42:31,200 --> 00:42:34,330 of natural selection-- a blind process that 729 00:42:34,330 --> 00:42:38,940 cares not a whiff about human beings or anything else." 730 00:42:38,940 --> 00:42:42,180 In fact he proposes-- he would like 731 00:42:42,180 --> 00:42:45,971 to see the establishment of a sex education class. 732 00:42:45,971 --> 00:42:47,720 And he argues how this could be effective. 733 00:42:52,450 --> 00:42:55,510 So I'm asking here this question. 734 00:42:55,510 --> 00:42:57,280 It's based on sociobiology. 735 00:42:57,280 --> 00:42:59,570 And I think it's a fantasy. 736 00:42:59,570 --> 00:43:00,985 Would it actually work? 737 00:43:00,985 --> 00:43:01,860 This is what I think. 738 00:43:01,860 --> 00:43:05,710 I think it would work only for true intellectuals, 739 00:43:05,710 --> 00:43:08,310 very rare, because those are people whose knowledge 740 00:43:08,310 --> 00:43:10,100 and reasoning actually influences 741 00:43:10,100 --> 00:43:15,000 their behavioral choices and their social life. 742 00:43:15,000 --> 00:43:16,780 They're very rare. 743 00:43:16,780 --> 00:43:20,210 And they're sort of like Sheldon on the Big Bang Theory. 744 00:43:22,770 --> 00:43:26,130 And so I think the class would most likely 745 00:43:26,130 --> 00:43:29,820 be a failure at most schools, if not all. 746 00:43:29,820 --> 00:43:33,100 That's the way I will leave it with Sheldon. 747 00:43:37,200 --> 00:43:38,850 That's all I want to say today. 748 00:43:38,850 --> 00:43:42,510 I'd like to know if anybody has any questions about what 749 00:43:42,510 --> 00:43:43,890 you've been working on. 750 00:43:43,890 --> 00:43:47,000 It's only a few people I think who are not here 751 00:43:47,000 --> 00:43:50,300 because they had other things that we 752 00:43:50,300 --> 00:43:53,200 let them delay their turning in of their topics. 753 00:43:53,200 --> 00:43:55,900 Most of you had the topics a week ago . 754 00:43:55,900 --> 00:43:57,110 But many of you didn't. 755 00:43:57,110 --> 00:44:01,520 So does anybody have any questions? 756 00:44:01,520 --> 00:44:03,020 If you don't want to make it public, 757 00:44:03,020 --> 00:44:05,220 then please come to me after class. 758 00:44:05,220 --> 00:44:07,990 I will stay here and talk to you about it. 759 00:44:07,990 --> 00:44:10,930 Do y'all have a topic? 760 00:44:10,930 --> 00:44:15,060 Do y'all know what you're going to do for sure? 761 00:44:15,060 --> 00:44:18,860 Because now you've only got until just before Thanksgiving 762 00:44:18,860 --> 00:44:21,170 to get that report. 763 00:44:21,170 --> 00:44:21,990 Yes? 764 00:44:21,990 --> 00:44:25,210 AUDIENCE: We will at least get feedback on the-- 765 00:44:25,210 --> 00:44:30,150 PROFESSOR: Oh, yeah, we will look at all those. 766 00:44:30,150 --> 00:44:34,360 And if we have a strong opinion about your choice, 767 00:44:34,360 --> 00:44:35,235 we will let you know. 768 00:44:35,235 --> 00:44:38,930 In most cases if you have a good understanding 769 00:44:38,930 --> 00:44:43,030 of that assignment, there won't be a problem. 770 00:44:43,030 --> 00:44:44,590 I don't want a neuroscience paper. 771 00:44:47,210 --> 00:44:48,540 Remember that. 772 00:44:48,540 --> 00:44:53,830 This has got to be focused on the topics of the class. 773 00:44:53,830 --> 00:44:56,200 We will go a little further in the class mostly 774 00:44:56,200 --> 00:45:02,420 with primate social behavior and with Konrad Lorenz's view 775 00:45:02,420 --> 00:45:04,740 of learning, which is much broader 776 00:45:04,740 --> 00:45:08,290 than modern studies in neuroscience 777 00:45:08,290 --> 00:45:10,590 and in behavioral studies too of learning. 778 00:45:10,590 --> 00:45:13,630 So I would like to go over some of that with you. 779 00:45:13,630 --> 00:45:15,520 So just a few more topics like this. 780 00:45:15,520 --> 00:45:17,320 And then it will be your turn. 781 00:45:17,320 --> 00:45:22,830 And I do expect people to come and here these talks, 782 00:45:22,830 --> 00:45:25,270 even though you'll only hear a third of them 783 00:45:25,270 --> 00:45:29,370 and because there will be major points. 784 00:45:29,370 --> 00:45:32,780 And I generally figure out some way 785 00:45:32,780 --> 00:45:37,200 to ask you about that a little bit on the final exam 786 00:45:37,200 --> 00:45:40,010 just so make sure you paid attention. 787 00:45:40,010 --> 00:45:44,440 If you come to the talks and read the slides, 788 00:45:44,440 --> 00:45:47,220 you won't have any trouble with that.