1 00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:00,272 The following content is provided under a Creative 2 00:00:00,272 --> 00:00:00,374 Commons license. 3 00:00:00,374 --> 00:00:00,646 Your support will help MIT OpenCourseWare continue to 4 00:00:00,646 --> 00:00:00,918 offer high quality educational resources for free. 5 00:00:00,918 --> 00:00:01,224 To make a donation or view additional materials from 6 00:00:01,224 --> 00:00:01,496 hundreds of MIT courses, visit MIT OpenCourseWare at 7 00:00:01,496 --> 00:00:01,550 ocw.mit.edu. 8 00:00:01,550 --> 00:00:22,550 PROFESSOR: All right. 9 00:00:22,550 --> 00:00:25,240 It's 12:05, so why don't you go ahead and take 10 more 10 00:00:25,240 --> 00:00:27,540 seconds on the clicker question today. 11 00:00:30,170 --> 00:00:32,070 This is about the periodic trends that we 12 00:00:32,070 --> 00:00:36,720 discussed on Wednesday. 13 00:00:36,720 --> 00:00:40,430 So specifically, what we're asking here is as we go across 14 00:00:40,430 --> 00:00:44,170 the periodic table, we want to consider which has the smaller 15 00:00:44,170 --> 00:00:45,440 ionization energy. 16 00:00:45,440 --> 00:00:46,540 All right. 17 00:00:46,540 --> 00:00:49,555 So, let's focus our attention up here now, whether it's 18 00:00:49,555 --> 00:00:52,890 between aluminum or whether it's between phosphorous. 19 00:00:52,890 --> 00:00:55,130 And I also wanted you to identify why it's also 20 00:00:55,130 --> 00:00:58,350 important to understand why we have these trends, not just to 21 00:00:58,350 --> 00:01:00,010 memorize the trend itself. 22 00:01:00,010 --> 00:01:02,610 So, it turns out that the majority of you got the 23 00:01:02,610 --> 00:01:05,150 correct answer, which is that it's aluminum. 24 00:01:05,150 --> 00:01:08,850 The reason it's aluminum is because aluminum has a lower z 25 00:01:08,850 --> 00:01:13,920 effective, so it's not being pulled in as tightly by the 26 00:01:13,920 --> 00:01:16,610 nucleus, and if it's not being pulled in as tightly, you're 27 00:01:16,610 --> 00:01:19,330 going to have to put in less energy in order to ionize it, 28 00:01:19,330 --> 00:01:21,860 so that's why it's actually going to have the smaller 29 00:01:21,860 --> 00:01:23,260 ionization energy. 30 00:01:23,260 --> 00:01:26,300 So it looks like not too many more than half of you got this 31 00:01:26,300 --> 00:01:29,270 correct, so make sure you can look at your periodic table 32 00:01:29,270 --> 00:01:32,120 and figure out how to think about ionization energy in 33 00:01:32,120 --> 00:01:35,760 terms of z effective, not just in terms of memorizing what 34 00:01:35,760 --> 00:01:38,240 that trend is. 35 00:01:38,240 --> 00:01:44,460 All right, so we can go to today's notes, and in terms of 36 00:01:44,460 --> 00:01:46,550 the notes, what we're going to start with is finishing 37 00:01:46,550 --> 00:01:49,700 material that's going to be relevant for exam 1, and I 38 00:01:49,700 --> 00:01:51,810 told you on Wednesday that actually I'd give you some 39 00:01:51,810 --> 00:01:55,030 information today in terms of what you need to do to prepare 40 00:01:55,030 --> 00:01:56,270 for exam 1. 41 00:01:56,270 --> 00:01:59,240 So you should have gotten two handouts as you came in, and 42 00:01:59,240 --> 00:02:01,830 if you didn't, please raise your hand and a TA will come 43 00:02:01,830 --> 00:02:04,380 to you and get you that second handout. 44 00:02:04,380 --> 00:02:08,340 But the second one says "exam instructions and logistics." 45 00:02:08,340 --> 00:02:10,510 So, if everyone can pull that out. 46 00:02:10,510 --> 00:02:12,540 So this is going to tell you pretty much everything you 47 00:02:12,540 --> 00:02:15,270 need to know in terms of getting ready for the exam, 48 00:02:15,270 --> 00:02:17,210 which is next Wednesday. 49 00:02:17,210 --> 00:02:20,310 So when you go home today or some time this weekend, make 50 00:02:20,310 --> 00:02:22,130 sure you read this page in detail. 51 00:02:22,130 --> 00:02:25,100 I'm just going to go over a few of the main points here. 52 00:02:25,100 --> 00:02:29,180 So, the first is that what we're going over notes today 53 00:02:29,180 --> 00:02:32,900 and also on Monday, the exam material ends at the end 54 00:02:32,900 --> 00:02:34,860 lecture notes from lecture 9. 55 00:02:34,860 --> 00:02:38,080 So that was Wednesday's class -- not at the end of 56 00:02:38,080 --> 00:02:40,350 Wednesday's class, but at the end of the lecture notes. 57 00:02:40,350 --> 00:02:42,130 So we're going to finish up with those today. 58 00:02:42,130 --> 00:02:44,850 I'll be really, really clear when we get through them, and 59 00:02:44,850 --> 00:02:47,640 that's where you can stop in terms of studying for this. 60 00:02:47,640 --> 00:02:50,680 Also, on everything that was on problem-sets 1 through 3. 61 00:02:50,680 --> 00:02:54,220 So, you turned in p-set 3 today, but we'll have the 62 00:02:54,220 --> 00:02:56,860 answers posted for you this afternoon, so you can start 63 00:02:56,860 --> 00:03:01,280 studying from p-set 3, even as early as tonight, if you want 64 00:03:01,280 --> 00:03:04,700 to, because those answers will be there for you. 65 00:03:04,700 --> 00:03:07,920 So, in terms of what it is that you need to prepare and 66 00:03:07,920 --> 00:03:11,670 bring with you for the exam, you need to bring your MIT ID, 67 00:03:11,670 --> 00:03:14,380 especially if you haven't been showing up regularly to your 68 00:03:14,380 --> 00:03:18,070 recitations and you aren't 100% sure if your TA knows 69 00:03:18,070 --> 00:03:20,270 exactly who you are, you need to make sure you have your MIT 70 00:03:20,270 --> 00:03:21,500 ID with you. 71 00:03:21,500 --> 00:03:23,680 You can't take the exam unless you're registered for the 72 00:03:23,680 --> 00:03:26,600 class, and we need to make sure we can verify that. 73 00:03:26,600 --> 00:03:29,190 You also need to bring a calculator, of course, because 74 00:03:29,190 --> 00:03:32,020 we'll be solving problems that involve calculations. 75 00:03:32,020 --> 00:03:34,440 You can bring any calculator you want, we don't actually 76 00:03:34,440 --> 00:03:37,440 have restrictions for calculator types here, but 77 00:03:37,440 --> 00:03:40,230 what you can't do, is you can't program any relevant 78 00:03:40,230 --> 00:03:44,110 chemical or information about constants in there. 79 00:03:44,110 --> 00:03:46,970 It's OK to use certain fundamental constants that 80 00:03:46,970 --> 00:03:49,860 come in a lot of calculators, so there's nothing we can do 81 00:03:49,860 --> 00:03:50,740 about that. 82 00:03:50,740 --> 00:03:51,760 That's OK. 83 00:03:51,760 --> 00:03:54,690 If you're wondering what's OK or what's not OK, it's very 84 00:03:54,690 --> 00:03:57,180 clearly written out in this handout, so make sure you read 85 00:03:57,180 --> 00:03:59,850 through it, because it is your responsibility to make sure 86 00:03:59,850 --> 00:04:02,420 that your calculator does not have anything extra 87 00:04:02,420 --> 00:04:03,480 programmed in it. 88 00:04:03,480 --> 00:04:06,115 And if you have your calculator all set up as you 89 00:04:06,115 --> 00:04:08,120 love and you don't want to change it, then maybe you 90 00:04:08,120 --> 00:04:11,010 should just go and get an $8.00 scientific calculator 91 00:04:11,010 --> 00:04:13,200 that doesn't have any of the graphing functions, because 92 00:04:13,200 --> 00:04:15,580 you don't actually need them, so that's a better option for 93 00:04:15,580 --> 00:04:18,330 you, you can do that as well. 94 00:04:18,330 --> 00:04:21,010 And I had mentioned several times that you do not need to 95 00:04:21,010 --> 00:04:23,800 memorize the majority of the equations and you don't need 96 00:04:23,800 --> 00:04:26,080 to memorize any physical constants. 97 00:04:26,080 --> 00:04:29,950 So if you flip the info page over on the back here, what 98 00:04:29,950 --> 00:04:33,340 you'll see is the periodic table, this is the same one 99 00:04:33,340 --> 00:04:35,925 that I've handed out in the last two lectures -- the 100 00:04:35,925 --> 00:04:38,490 periodic table without any electron configurations. 101 00:04:38,490 --> 00:04:40,740 This is exactly the sheet here, it's exactly what you'll 102 00:04:40,740 --> 00:04:42,000 get on exam day. 103 00:04:42,000 --> 00:04:44,870 You'll also see that they have all the physical constants 104 00:04:44,870 --> 00:04:48,660 that you're going to need, and also a bunch of the actual 105 00:04:48,660 --> 00:04:51,090 equations that we've been using in the first couple 106 00:04:51,090 --> 00:04:52,040 weeks here. 107 00:04:52,040 --> 00:04:54,300 So you don't need to memorize any of this, you're actually 108 00:04:54,300 --> 00:04:55,430 going to be handed this. 109 00:04:55,430 --> 00:04:59,060 There are a few equations that you need to memorize -- those 110 00:04:59,060 --> 00:05:01,960 are the very simple -- very, very simple equations, such as 111 00:05:01,960 --> 00:05:04,820 e equals h times nu -- hopefully you don't have to 112 00:05:04,820 --> 00:05:06,880 sit down and try to memorize that, hopefully we all know 113 00:05:06,880 --> 00:05:07,730 that already. 114 00:05:07,730 --> 00:05:10,280 But just to be really clear, I've written out exactly which 115 00:05:10,280 --> 00:05:13,190 equations you do have to memorize on the front here, so 116 00:05:13,190 --> 00:05:17,730 long as you know those, the rest you can just look up. 117 00:05:17,730 --> 00:05:21,870 And in terms of using these equations in solving problems 118 00:05:21,870 --> 00:05:25,460 on the exam, and also using these constants, make sure if 119 00:05:25,460 --> 00:05:27,870 you think there might be any chance you're going to get any 120 00:05:27,870 --> 00:05:30,210 little part of a problem wrong or do a calculation 121 00:05:30,210 --> 00:05:33,280 inaccurately, you need to write out every single step of 122 00:05:33,280 --> 00:05:36,340 your thinking as you write out these problems. We can't give 123 00:05:36,340 --> 00:05:38,700 you any partial credit whatsoever if we can't see 124 00:05:38,700 --> 00:05:39,610 your thought process. 125 00:05:39,610 --> 00:05:42,460 So it's important to write out the equation you use, you need 126 00:05:42,460 --> 00:05:44,720 to write out the constants that you use to 127 00:05:44,720 --> 00:05:45,800 fill in that equation. 128 00:05:45,800 --> 00:05:48,710 And that we need to see your work to get full credit, and 129 00:05:48,710 --> 00:05:51,400 then especially if you get things wrong, we need to know 130 00:05:51,400 --> 00:05:53,640 where it went wrong, because we do try to give as much 131 00:05:53,640 --> 00:05:56,910 partial credit as possible in these exams, since there are a 132 00:05:56,910 --> 00:05:59,250 lot of places where small mistakes can result in the 133 00:05:59,250 --> 00:06:01,220 wrong answer. 134 00:06:01,220 --> 00:06:04,620 So also, along those lines in terms of test taking, make 135 00:06:04,620 --> 00:06:07,780 sure you also box your answers and that you keep track of 136 00:06:07,780 --> 00:06:10,370 significant figures and that you also remember to include 137 00:06:10,370 --> 00:06:10,700 your units. 138 00:06:10,700 --> 00:06:13,380 These are just little things that can add up, so you just 139 00:06:13,380 --> 00:06:15,100 want to make sure you're on top of those. 140 00:06:15,100 --> 00:06:17,580 And your TAs on Tuesday are going to share a lot of other 141 00:06:17,580 --> 00:06:21,140 types of sort of exam strategies in thinking about 142 00:06:21,140 --> 00:06:23,900 how you can approach an exam when we're in a time situation 143 00:06:23,900 --> 00:06:27,160 like we are, so they'll share some of their experience with 144 00:06:27,160 --> 00:06:31,290 you in terms of taking these timed exams. 145 00:06:31,290 --> 00:06:34,980 So, in terms of practicing this weekend, I mentioned that 146 00:06:34,980 --> 00:06:37,180 instead of getting a problem-set today, what I am 147 00:06:37,180 --> 00:06:40,410 going to be posting is optional extra problems. So 148 00:06:40,410 --> 00:06:42,700 they're optional, but they're very, very, very highly 149 00:06:42,700 --> 00:06:45,150 encouraged that you do these, because this is going to give 150 00:06:45,150 --> 00:06:47,390 you practice for the types of problems that are going to be 151 00:06:47,390 --> 00:06:48,410 on the exam. 152 00:06:48,410 --> 00:06:52,170 We're also posting a practice exam for you to take, so after 153 00:06:52,170 --> 00:06:54,960 you're completely done your studying, it's good to have 154 00:06:54,960 --> 00:06:57,510 everything done before you take the practice exam, and 155 00:06:57,510 --> 00:06:59,410 then sit down just with this sheet here and your 156 00:06:59,410 --> 00:07:02,330 calculator, and ideally a timer, and make sure you can 157 00:07:02,330 --> 00:07:05,260 do the practice exam in the allotted amount of time. 158 00:07:05,260 --> 00:07:07,960 So that way you can have an idea if, oh, I do really 159 00:07:07,960 --> 00:07:10,220 understand this but I'm a little bit slow, maybe I need 160 00:07:10,220 --> 00:07:13,930 to practice this one type of problem a little bit longer so 161 00:07:13,930 --> 00:07:15,860 I can get up to speed so I'm going to be able to get 162 00:07:15,860 --> 00:07:19,550 through all this in terms of the exam time. 163 00:07:19,550 --> 00:07:19,830 All right. 164 00:07:19,830 --> 00:07:22,700 So let's move on to today's topics. 165 00:07:22,700 --> 00:07:25,420 So, as I said, we're finishing up with what we left off with 166 00:07:25,420 --> 00:07:28,180 yesterday -- or excuse me, on Wednesday. 167 00:07:28,180 --> 00:07:31,340 This includes atomic radius and the idea of isoelectronic 168 00:07:31,340 --> 00:07:34,450 atoms. So that's going to be the end of the exam 1 169 00:07:34,450 --> 00:07:38,710 material, and then we'll move on to exam 2 material, which 170 00:07:38,710 --> 00:07:41,600 is kind of exciting, because we've been talking about just 171 00:07:41,600 --> 00:07:45,080 individual atoms and ions up to this point, and now we can 172 00:07:45,080 --> 00:07:46,700 talk about molecules, so we're going to start 173 00:07:46,700 --> 00:07:48,100 talking about bonding. 174 00:07:48,100 --> 00:07:51,220 So for some you that are less interested in maybe the 175 00:07:51,220 --> 00:07:54,010 physical structure of an individual atom, now some more 176 00:07:54,010 --> 00:07:56,350 exciting material for you might be coming up if you like 177 00:07:56,350 --> 00:07:59,780 to think about how, instead, molecules behave, either 178 00:07:59,780 --> 00:08:01,660 within bonding, within themselves, or with other 179 00:08:01,660 --> 00:08:03,650 molecules, that's what we're going to be heading to 180 00:08:03,650 --> 00:08:06,780 in this next unit. 181 00:08:06,780 --> 00:08:09,920 So, we need to finish up with periodic trends. 182 00:08:09,920 --> 00:08:12,050 And first, on your lecture notes, I 183 00:08:12,050 --> 00:08:13,920 start with atomic radius. 184 00:08:13,920 --> 00:08:16,430 I was so proud of myself getting the lecture notes 185 00:08:16,430 --> 00:08:18,750 finished early and handing them in to CopyTech, and then 186 00:08:18,750 --> 00:08:20,440 I realized we didn't do 187 00:08:20,440 --> 00:08:22,370 electronegativity on Wednesday. 188 00:08:22,370 --> 00:08:25,880 So, if you can flip your lecture notes over and just 189 00:08:25,880 --> 00:08:27,690 write on the blank space, we're going to cover 190 00:08:27,690 --> 00:08:32,870 electronegativity first here, and specifically, you can go 191 00:08:32,870 --> 00:08:35,870 back and fill this in to your lecture 9 notes, if you want 192 00:08:35,870 --> 00:08:38,300 to stay organized, but I just suggest just writing it on 193 00:08:38,300 --> 00:08:41,880 lecture 10 notes now and going back. 194 00:08:41,880 --> 00:08:45,160 You can still keep organized, which hopefully most of you 195 00:08:45,160 --> 00:08:48,770 like to do, and get it in the right place in the notes. 196 00:08:48,770 --> 00:08:57,510 So, when we're talking about the idea of electronegativity, 197 00:08:57,510 --> 00:09:00,540 essentially what we're talking about is the ability for an 198 00:09:00,540 --> 00:09:05,300 atom to attract electron density from another atom. 199 00:09:05,300 --> 00:09:08,330 So it's just a measure of how much does one given atom want 200 00:09:08,330 --> 00:09:10,715 to pull away electron density from, let's 201 00:09:10,715 --> 00:09:12,470 say, an adjacent atom. 202 00:09:12,470 --> 00:09:14,960 So it's actually very related to what we're talking about 203 00:09:14,960 --> 00:09:16,890 when we said electron affinity, and it's also 204 00:09:16,890 --> 00:09:21,020 related to ionization energy, and we can call 205 00:09:21,020 --> 00:09:23,930 electronegativity by symbol here, and it turns out that 206 00:09:23,930 --> 00:09:28,780 it's going to be proportional to 1/2 of the electron 207 00:09:28,780 --> 00:09:34,740 affinity of a given atom, plus the ionization energy. 208 00:09:34,740 --> 00:09:36,340 So, in other words, we can just think of 209 00:09:36,340 --> 00:09:39,290 electronegativity as being the average of that ionization 210 00:09:39,290 --> 00:09:41,290 energy and the electron affinity. 211 00:09:41,290 --> 00:09:43,550 This should make sense, because if an atom has a very 212 00:09:43,550 --> 00:09:47,360 high electron affinity, that means it's really happy taking 213 00:09:47,360 --> 00:09:50,440 an electron from another atom, or taking a free electron -- 214 00:09:50,440 --> 00:09:51,970 that that's very favorable. 215 00:09:51,970 --> 00:09:54,720 If something has a high ionization energy, it means 216 00:09:54,720 --> 00:09:56,730 that it really, really, really does not want 217 00:09:56,730 --> 00:09:58,280 to give up an electron. 218 00:09:58,280 --> 00:10:00,830 So you can think about how these 2 things combined are 219 00:10:00,830 --> 00:10:03,890 going to be electronegativity, which is a measure of how much 220 00:10:03,890 --> 00:10:06,430 an atom wants to pull electron density away 221 00:10:06,430 --> 00:10:08,300 from another atom. 222 00:10:08,300 --> 00:10:12,100 So, if we think about electronegativity as a 223 00:10:12,100 --> 00:10:16,450 periodic trend, we can just draw our nice periodic table 224 00:10:16,450 --> 00:10:19,650 here, and let's separate it into quadrants. 225 00:10:19,650 --> 00:10:22,320 So if we think about the upper right hand part of the 226 00:10:22,320 --> 00:10:25,280 quadrant, well, this is where we're going to have high 227 00:10:25,280 --> 00:10:28,960 electron affinity and high ionization energy, so we're 228 00:10:28,960 --> 00:10:34,340 also going to see high electronegativity here. 229 00:10:34,340 --> 00:10:37,980 And in contrast, in the lower left hand part of the periodic 230 00:10:37,980 --> 00:10:41,200 table, these 2 quantities are low, so also what we're going 231 00:10:41,200 --> 00:10:46,740 to see is low electronegativity. 232 00:10:46,740 --> 00:10:49,680 And if we talk about what's going on in areas, or with 233 00:10:49,680 --> 00:10:52,210 atoms that have high electronegativity, and we 234 00:10:52,210 --> 00:10:56,130 think about whether they're electron donors or electron 235 00:10:56,130 --> 00:10:59,500 acceptors, what would you expect for an atom that has 236 00:10:59,500 --> 00:11:00,690 high electronegativity? 237 00:11:00,690 --> 00:11:04,280 Is it going to be an electron donor or acceptor? 238 00:11:04,280 --> 00:11:04,650 Great. 239 00:11:04,650 --> 00:11:07,030 Yup, it's going to be an electron acceptor, it wants to 240 00:11:07,030 --> 00:11:09,730 accept electrons, it wants to accept electron density. 241 00:11:09,730 --> 00:11:14,310 So, in contrast, if it has a low electronegativity, this 242 00:11:14,310 --> 00:11:21,540 then is going to be an electron donor. 243 00:11:21,540 --> 00:11:24,020 All right, so it's very common to talk about 244 00:11:24,020 --> 00:11:26,470 electronegativity of different atoms, and you can look up 245 00:11:26,470 --> 00:11:27,580 tables of these. 246 00:11:27,580 --> 00:11:29,760 Often what you'll see is not a table based on this 247 00:11:29,760 --> 00:11:32,330 definition, but something that's called the Pauling 248 00:11:32,330 --> 00:11:34,000 definition of electronegativity, but it's 249 00:11:34,000 --> 00:11:37,350 exactly the same idea and the same trend as this more 250 00:11:37,350 --> 00:11:39,320 numerical way to think about what the meaning of 251 00:11:39,320 --> 00:11:40,730 electronegativity is. 252 00:11:40,730 --> 00:11:44,620 All right, so now we can move on to the start of today's 253 00:11:44,620 --> 00:11:46,740 notes, which is atomic radius. 254 00:11:46,740 --> 00:11:50,870 So this, in fact, is going to be our last principle that 255 00:11:50,870 --> 00:11:54,690 we're going to talk about in terms of periodic trends. 256 00:11:54,690 --> 00:11:57,500 So this is actually the most straightforward, so sometimes 257 00:11:57,500 --> 00:11:59,880 it's nice to end with the easiest concept, and that's 258 00:11:59,880 --> 00:12:01,110 what we're doing here. 259 00:12:01,110 --> 00:12:03,520 And if we're talking about atomic radius, essentially 260 00:12:03,520 --> 00:12:06,000 we're talking about atomic size. 261 00:12:06,000 --> 00:12:08,930 And immediately it should probably come into your head 262 00:12:08,930 --> 00:12:12,070 that we don't actually have an atomic radius that we can talk 263 00:12:12,070 --> 00:12:12,530 about, right? 264 00:12:12,530 --> 00:12:15,130 What I just spent many lectures discussing is the 265 00:12:15,130 --> 00:12:19,500 fact that we can not know how far away an electron is from 266 00:12:19,500 --> 00:12:22,350 the nucleus, so we can't actually know the radius of a 267 00:12:22,350 --> 00:12:23,520 certain atom. 268 00:12:23,520 --> 00:12:25,010 And that's true. 269 00:12:25,010 --> 00:12:28,030 An atom's not a defined sphere, for example. 270 00:12:28,030 --> 00:12:31,320 We can't define it as an exact radius in terms of the 271 00:12:31,320 --> 00:12:33,840 definition we might think of classically. 272 00:12:33,840 --> 00:12:36,470 So, keep that in mind when we're talking about atomic 273 00:12:36,470 --> 00:12:39,400 radius, I'm not suddenly changing my story and saying, 274 00:12:39,400 --> 00:12:41,270 yes, we do have a distinct radius. 275 00:12:41,270 --> 00:12:43,890 Instead, what people have done is come up with different ways 276 00:12:43,890 --> 00:12:46,160 to think about how they can define a radius. 277 00:12:46,160 --> 00:12:48,680 And one common way to think about it, is to think about 278 00:12:48,680 --> 00:12:52,780 the value of r, or the radius, below which 90% of that 279 00:12:52,780 --> 00:12:55,060 electron density is going to be contained. 280 00:12:55,060 --> 00:12:57,060 So we're not saying it's all the electron 281 00:12:57,060 --> 00:12:58,830 density, it's just 90%. 282 00:12:58,830 --> 00:13:01,700 Because we know as we go to infinity, even though the 283 00:13:01,700 --> 00:13:04,890 density gets smaller and smaller and smaller, we still 284 00:13:04,890 --> 00:13:07,980 have electron density very far away from the nucleus. 285 00:13:07,980 --> 00:13:11,130 So, what we're going to define is just let's just capture 90% 286 00:13:11,130 --> 00:13:12,950 of that electron density. 287 00:13:12,950 --> 00:13:15,280 So, that's one way to think about it, and there's also 288 00:13:15,280 --> 00:13:16,620 another way, and this is the way that your 289 00:13:16,620 --> 00:13:17,790 book presents it. 290 00:13:17,790 --> 00:13:21,510 If you, in fact, have two of the same atom right next to 291 00:13:21,510 --> 00:13:23,650 each other, let's say you have a crystal, or let's say you're 292 00:13:23,650 --> 00:13:27,350 talking about a metal, what you can do is just look at the 293 00:13:27,350 --> 00:13:31,010 distance between the two nuclei, and split that in 1/2, 294 00:13:31,010 --> 00:13:33,410 and take the atomic radius that way. 295 00:13:33,410 --> 00:13:35,760 So, these are two different definitions of how to think 296 00:13:35,760 --> 00:13:38,500 about atomic radius, but really what you find when 297 00:13:38,500 --> 00:13:40,500 these are measured is they come up with almost the 298 00:13:40,500 --> 00:13:43,570 identical values, so there are tables you can look up of 299 00:13:43,570 --> 00:13:47,430 atomic radii and see these values, and you can trust them 300 00:13:47,430 --> 00:13:50,670 that, yes, they work for both this definition and for this 301 00:13:50,670 --> 00:13:54,770 definition here, in most cases. 302 00:13:54,770 --> 00:13:56,710 And what we've been talking about with all of these 303 00:13:56,710 --> 00:14:00,390 properties are, of course, how can we figure out what that is 304 00:14:00,390 --> 00:14:02,850 for a certain atom by looking at the periodic table, so we 305 00:14:02,850 --> 00:14:04,130 want to think about the periodic 306 00:14:04,130 --> 00:14:06,190 trend for atomic radius. 307 00:14:06,190 --> 00:14:09,460 And we know as we go across a row in the periodic table, 308 00:14:09,460 --> 00:14:12,340 what's happening is that z effective or the effective 309 00:14:12,340 --> 00:14:14,920 pull on the nucleus is increasing. 310 00:14:14,920 --> 00:14:18,100 So would you expect, therefore, as we go across a 311 00:14:18,100 --> 00:14:23,040 row for the atomic radius, to increase or to decrease? 312 00:14:23,040 --> 00:14:23,350 Good. 313 00:14:23,350 --> 00:14:24,020 OK, yes. 314 00:14:24,020 --> 00:14:26,880 We are expecting to see that it decreases because it's 315 00:14:26,880 --> 00:14:30,430 feeling a stronger pull, all the electrons are being pulled 316 00:14:30,430 --> 00:14:33,860 in closer to the nucleus, so that atomic size is going to 317 00:14:33,860 --> 00:14:35,530 get smaller. 318 00:14:35,530 --> 00:14:38,530 This is in contrast to what's happening as we go down a 319 00:14:38,530 --> 00:14:39,800 periodic table. 320 00:14:39,800 --> 00:14:42,660 So as we go down we're now adding electrons to further 321 00:14:42,660 --> 00:14:45,240 and further away shells, so what we're going to see is 322 00:14:45,240 --> 00:14:47,580 that the atomic radius is going to increase as we're 323 00:14:47,580 --> 00:14:52,290 going down the periodic table. 324 00:14:52,290 --> 00:14:54,610 And we can look at an example here. 325 00:14:54,610 --> 00:14:57,410 If we start in the upper left hand corner of the periodic 326 00:14:57,410 --> 00:15:00,470 table with lithium, you can see that as we go down the 327 00:15:00,470 --> 00:15:03,270 table, what you're seeing is that that atomic radius is 328 00:15:03,270 --> 00:15:05,860 actually increasing, as we would expect. 329 00:15:05,860 --> 00:15:09,060 Whereas, if we go across a row, what we see is that the 330 00:15:09,060 --> 00:15:11,330 atomic radius is decreasing. 331 00:15:11,330 --> 00:15:14,210 So, again, this is one of the more straightforward trends. 332 00:15:14,210 --> 00:15:15,960 You just need to remember what's happening to z 333 00:15:15,960 --> 00:15:18,450 effective, which really tells us what's happening with all 334 00:15:18,450 --> 00:15:21,170 the trends, and once you know z effective, you can figure 335 00:15:21,170 --> 00:15:24,140 out, for example, what direction the atomic radius 336 00:15:24,140 --> 00:15:26,130 should be going into. 337 00:15:26,130 --> 00:15:28,190 So, that's it for periodic trends. 338 00:15:28,190 --> 00:15:29,950 We have talked about four different ones. 339 00:15:29,950 --> 00:15:33,780 We talked about ionization energy, electron affinity, we 340 00:15:33,780 --> 00:15:35,530 talked about electronegativity, which is 341 00:15:35,530 --> 00:15:38,610 just kind of a combination of the first two, and then ended 342 00:15:38,610 --> 00:15:41,190 with atomic radius here. 343 00:15:41,190 --> 00:15:44,190 And what you might have noted is although we described how 344 00:15:44,190 --> 00:15:46,950 to make predictions about these properties, I didn't 345 00:15:46,950 --> 00:15:49,090 talk too much about what it actually means, what the 346 00:15:49,090 --> 00:15:51,680 ramifications of these different properties are. 347 00:15:51,680 --> 00:15:53,830 And the reason we didn't do that is because we're actually 348 00:15:53,830 --> 00:15:56,940 going to spend much of the rest of the course relating 349 00:15:56,940 --> 00:16:00,360 these different properties to the properties of molecules in 350 00:16:00,360 --> 00:16:03,950 terms of bonding, and also in terms of chemical reactions. 351 00:16:03,950 --> 00:16:07,890 So, for example, if we have a very electronegative atom 352 00:16:07,890 --> 00:16:10,820 within a certain molecule, what you'll actually find is 353 00:16:10,820 --> 00:16:15,740 that it does affect how the molecule is going to take part 354 00:16:15,740 --> 00:16:17,820 in different chemical or biological reactions. 355 00:16:17,820 --> 00:16:20,420 And this will become more and more clear as we actually talk 356 00:16:20,420 --> 00:16:22,740 about these reactions and talk about bonding. 357 00:16:22,740 --> 00:16:24,930 But you need to be able to predict what kind of 358 00:16:24,930 --> 00:16:27,690 properties a certain atom's going to have within a 359 00:16:27,690 --> 00:16:29,500 molecule, whether you're talking about something, for 360 00:16:29,500 --> 00:16:31,730 example, that's very electronegative, or something 361 00:16:31,730 --> 00:16:33,960 that is not electronegative at all, it is going to make a 362 00:16:33,960 --> 00:16:36,560 difference in terms of thinking about how molecules 363 00:16:36,560 --> 00:16:37,790 are structured and also how they 364 00:16:37,790 --> 00:16:41,310 interact with other molecules. 365 00:16:41,310 --> 00:16:43,780 However, I can give you at least one example while we're 366 00:16:43,780 --> 00:16:47,100 still on just talking about atoms. So we haven't gotten to 367 00:16:47,100 --> 00:16:50,150 molecules yet, we're just talking about single atoms or 368 00:16:50,150 --> 00:16:53,350 single ions, but what's nice is just talking about this 369 00:16:53,350 --> 00:16:56,130 very straightforward principle of atomic radius. 370 00:16:56,130 --> 00:17:00,110 We can already use that in terms of single ions to think 371 00:17:00,110 --> 00:17:03,240 about a really complex biological issue, which is to 372 00:17:03,240 --> 00:17:05,030 talk about ion channels. 373 00:17:05,030 --> 00:17:07,310 So, that is just a quick example for some of you, you 374 00:17:07,310 --> 00:17:10,070 might be very familiar with ion channels, others might not 375 00:17:10,070 --> 00:17:12,870 know what these are, so I'll just tell you quite briefly 376 00:17:12,870 --> 00:17:15,570 that ion channels are these very massive 377 00:17:15,570 --> 00:17:17,540 transmembrane proteins. 378 00:17:17,540 --> 00:17:21,600 Essentially, what they are is it's a protein that spans the 379 00:17:21,600 --> 00:17:23,760 membrane of a cell. 380 00:17:23,760 --> 00:17:26,560 And what they do is they regulate the influx of ions 381 00:17:26,560 --> 00:17:27,920 across that cell. 382 00:17:27,920 --> 00:17:30,420 So the influx of ions from the outside of the cell to the 383 00:17:30,420 --> 00:17:32,440 inside of the cell, for example. 384 00:17:32,440 --> 00:17:35,980 And you can think of ion channels as being gated, by 385 00:17:35,980 --> 00:17:39,340 gated it means the gate can be closed and no ions are going 386 00:17:39,340 --> 00:17:41,500 through, as in this case here. 387 00:17:41,500 --> 00:17:45,660 Or you can talk about the gate being open, and in this case, 388 00:17:45,660 --> 00:17:48,670 you can see that you will have an influx of ions. 389 00:17:48,670 --> 00:17:52,060 So, ion channels are important for maintaining a voltage 390 00:17:52,060 --> 00:17:54,820 difference between the inside of the cell and outside of the 391 00:17:54,820 --> 00:17:57,560 cell, and they're found in all sorts of cell types in your 392 00:17:57,560 --> 00:18:00,520 body, but if you think about where they're most prevalent, 393 00:18:00,520 --> 00:18:04,380 it turns out that they're most prevalent in muscle cells and 394 00:18:04,380 --> 00:18:07,360 also in nerve cells, so in your neurons. 395 00:18:07,360 --> 00:18:10,810 And essentially, what they do in neurons is they underlie 396 00:18:10,810 --> 00:18:14,250 those nerve impulses, or those, essentially what we 397 00:18:14,250 --> 00:18:17,450 call electrical signaling between neurons -- you might 398 00:18:17,450 --> 00:18:21,020 also call that the action potential of the neurons. 399 00:18:21,020 --> 00:18:24,510 So essentially, they regulate this action potential, and 400 00:18:24,510 --> 00:18:28,160 they do so by helping to establish and then control the 401 00:18:28,160 --> 00:18:30,810 voltage gradient within the cells. so, essentially, 402 00:18:30,810 --> 00:18:34,070 they're establishing or controlling or changing the 403 00:18:34,070 --> 00:18:37,640 difference between the charge inside the cell and the charge 404 00:18:37,640 --> 00:18:39,480 outside cell. 405 00:18:39,480 --> 00:18:42,320 And when we talk about any type of ion channel, there are 406 00:18:42,320 --> 00:18:44,590 just tons of different kinds of ion channels, and you can 407 00:18:44,590 --> 00:18:46,620 characterize them in a few different ways. 408 00:18:46,620 --> 00:18:48,700 So, for example, you could characterize them in terms of 409 00:18:48,700 --> 00:18:51,370 how they're gated, and basically how they open or 410 00:18:51,370 --> 00:18:54,030 close -- that's one way to talk about different types. 411 00:18:54,030 --> 00:18:56,420 Another way to talk about different types is to think 412 00:18:56,420 --> 00:18:58,920 about which ion they're selected for. 413 00:18:58,920 --> 00:19:02,090 And all ion channels are selective for a single type of 414 00:19:02,090 --> 00:19:06,030 ion, and we can think about how that selectivity takes 415 00:19:06,030 --> 00:19:08,640 place, and that's where this idea of atomic radius is going 416 00:19:08,640 --> 00:19:10,280 to become very important. 417 00:19:10,280 --> 00:19:13,780 So, for example, if we look at sodium channels, and sodium 418 00:19:13,780 --> 00:19:16,340 channels are some of the particularly prevalent ones 419 00:19:16,340 --> 00:19:19,010 when we're talking about neurons, if you think about 420 00:19:19,010 --> 00:19:22,880 the cell membrane, and this little green cartoon is me 421 00:19:22,880 --> 00:19:26,090 trying to show a sodium channel here, and in this 422 00:19:26,090 --> 00:19:28,910 case, you can see that it's closed, such that no ions are 423 00:19:28,910 --> 00:19:30,080 getting through. 424 00:19:30,080 --> 00:19:33,240 However, when that gate is opened, the sodium channel is 425 00:19:33,240 --> 00:19:36,570 now going to be incredibly selective and only let through 426 00:19:36,570 --> 00:19:39,320 sodium ions and no other type of ion. 427 00:19:39,320 --> 00:19:41,480 And this is really interesting to think about because you can 428 00:19:41,480 --> 00:19:44,300 imagine in our body we have concentrations of all types of 429 00:19:44,300 --> 00:19:47,780 ions, and specifically, some seem very, very similar to 430 00:19:47,780 --> 00:19:48,460 each other. 431 00:19:48,460 --> 00:19:51,520 So we could think about comparing the potassium ion to 432 00:19:51,520 --> 00:19:52,850 a sodium ion. 433 00:19:52,850 --> 00:19:54,740 They have the same charge of plus one. 434 00:19:54,740 --> 00:19:57,130 The only thing that's different is that they're one 435 00:19:57,130 --> 00:20:02,000 down on the periodic table, potassium is down one row, so 436 00:20:02,000 --> 00:20:03,890 it's going to be a little bigger, but when we're 437 00:20:03,890 --> 00:20:06,900 thinking about size, it maybe does not seem that significant 438 00:20:06,900 --> 00:20:08,370 to talk about the size. 439 00:20:08,370 --> 00:20:10,500 But what we find out is that it is. 440 00:20:10,500 --> 00:20:13,690 So, what happens, this is another view of a sodium 441 00:20:13,690 --> 00:20:15,930 channel, so this is actually looking a little bit more at 442 00:20:15,930 --> 00:20:17,330 the protein structure. 443 00:20:17,330 --> 00:20:19,980 What all of these channels have is what's called a 444 00:20:19,980 --> 00:20:23,100 selectivity filter, so this filter filters out the type of 445 00:20:23,100 --> 00:20:25,990 ion that's going to be allowed through. 446 00:20:25,990 --> 00:20:27,560 And there's two parts of the filter. 447 00:20:27,560 --> 00:20:30,310 First we need to select for actual charge. 448 00:20:30,310 --> 00:20:32,780 So the way that it does this is the filter is actually 449 00:20:32,780 --> 00:20:35,490 lined with all of this negative charge, and for those 450 00:20:35,490 --> 00:20:38,330 of you that are more into biology or biochemistry, 451 00:20:38,330 --> 00:20:41,020 that's because of negatively charged amino acid residues, 452 00:20:41,020 --> 00:20:44,680 but all you need to think about is that it has negative 453 00:20:44,680 --> 00:20:48,360 charge in the inside of this pore, and what happens then is 454 00:20:48,360 --> 00:20:50,650 that if something has a positive charge, it's going to 455 00:20:50,650 --> 00:20:54,000 be stabilized to enter this pore, whereas any negative 456 00:20:54,000 --> 00:20:55,470 ions are going to be repelled. 457 00:20:55,470 --> 00:20:58,510 So that's the first step in being selective, but now how 458 00:20:58,510 --> 00:20:59,920 do we differentiate between these sodium 459 00:20:59,920 --> 00:21:00,920 and potassium ions. 460 00:21:00,920 --> 00:21:04,640 And the answer is just really beautifully simple, and it's 461 00:21:04,640 --> 00:21:07,340 just that the pore gets really, really tiny, to the 462 00:21:07,340 --> 00:21:10,000 point that it gets so small that all that can fit through 463 00:21:10,000 --> 00:21:14,880 this pore is one a single ion, one single sodium ion, 464 00:21:14,880 --> 00:21:18,760 solvated by one single water molecule. 465 00:21:18,760 --> 00:21:21,360 And that's all that's big enough to pass through or 466 00:21:21,360 --> 00:21:23,120 small enough to pass through. 467 00:21:23,120 --> 00:21:26,820 And if we go up even just one row on the periodic table to 468 00:21:26,820 --> 00:21:30,200 potassium, what we actually see is now that it's going to 469 00:21:30,200 --> 00:21:33,070 be too large, and, in fact, a potassium solvated with one 470 00:21:33,070 --> 00:21:36,620 water molecule won't go through our channel. 471 00:21:36,620 --> 00:21:39,480 So, this is just one example of how these properties can 472 00:21:39,480 --> 00:21:41,760 already, even our understanding just talking 473 00:21:41,760 --> 00:21:44,760 about single atoms, can already make an impact in 474 00:21:44,760 --> 00:21:47,600 these biological systems. And actually, a question that 475 00:21:47,600 --> 00:21:50,400 might come up, I just explained, the sodium channel, 476 00:21:50,400 --> 00:21:53,260 you might say, well, how do potassium channels work then, 477 00:21:53,260 --> 00:21:55,830 because I can understand how you can filter something big 478 00:21:55,830 --> 00:21:57,820 out, but how do you filter out something small. 479 00:21:57,820 --> 00:22:00,590 And it turns out that size exclusion is also the 480 00:22:00,590 --> 00:22:04,420 principle that's in play with potassium channels as well, 481 00:22:04,420 --> 00:22:06,800 but in this case it's a little more complex, because what 482 00:22:06,800 --> 00:22:10,780 happens is these negative residues the are in the pore 483 00:22:10,780 --> 00:22:13,120 need to stabilize the potassium as it goes through, 484 00:22:13,120 --> 00:22:16,920 and the potassium is large enough to make all the 485 00:22:16,920 --> 00:22:19,930 contacts it needs, but the sodium, which you can picture 486 00:22:19,930 --> 00:22:23,410 being smaller, actually can't reach all of the stabilizing 487 00:22:23,410 --> 00:22:25,770 charges that it needs to to get through the pore. 488 00:22:25,770 --> 00:22:28,380 So, again, it is based on size, it's a little bit less 489 00:22:28,380 --> 00:22:30,790 intuitive than the idea of just straining out all of the 490 00:22:30,790 --> 00:22:31,340 potassium ions. 491 00:22:31,340 --> 00:22:34,950 But again, many of these ion channels have this size 492 00:22:34,950 --> 00:22:37,700 exclusion pore, it's a very important part of them. 493 00:22:37,700 --> 00:22:41,890 All right, so that was a quick aside on thinking about how 494 00:22:41,890 --> 00:22:43,960 these properties can, in fact, relate to 495 00:22:43,960 --> 00:22:45,800 something in our body. 496 00:22:45,800 --> 00:22:49,340 Let's move on to the last topic in terms of this first 497 00:22:49,340 --> 00:22:51,650 exam, which is thinking about the idea of isoelectronic 498 00:22:51,650 --> 00:22:56,000 atoms, or isoelectronic ions. 499 00:22:56,000 --> 00:22:58,950 And isoelectronic is very straightforward, it just means 500 00:22:58,950 --> 00:23:01,520 having the same electron configuration. 501 00:23:01,520 --> 00:23:04,890 The easiest way to look at this is just to do an example. 502 00:23:04,890 --> 00:23:07,220 So let's take the example of neon. 503 00:23:07,220 --> 00:23:10,680 This has the electron configuration of 1 s 2, 2 504 00:23:10,680 --> 00:23:12,530 s 2, and 2 p 6. 505 00:23:12,530 --> 00:23:16,140 It looks like we're cut off the screen a little bit here, 506 00:23:16,140 --> 00:23:18,600 but you can see I've just circled it there. 507 00:23:18,600 --> 00:23:21,150 So we can go ahead and think about, well, are there any 508 00:23:21,150 --> 00:23:23,130 other atoms that are going to have the same electron 509 00:23:23,130 --> 00:23:23,790 configuration? 510 00:23:23,790 --> 00:23:26,110 The answer to that is definitely no -- if they had 511 00:23:26,110 --> 00:23:27,732 the same electron configuration, they would, in 512 00:23:27,732 --> 00:23:29,200 fact, be neon. 513 00:23:29,200 --> 00:23:31,590 But we can think about different ions that have this 514 00:23:31,590 --> 00:23:33,070 electron configuration. 515 00:23:33,070 --> 00:23:36,510 So for example, if we think about fluorine, that has an 516 00:23:36,510 --> 00:23:41,570 electron configuration of 1 s 2, 2 s 2, 2 p 5, so all we 517 00:23:41,570 --> 00:23:44,210 would need to do is add one more electron to get the same 518 00:23:44,210 --> 00:23:46,270 configuration as for neon. 519 00:23:46,270 --> 00:23:49,300 So if we want to write out what that would be, it would 520 00:23:49,300 --> 00:23:55,980 just be to say that f minus is isoelectronic with neon. 521 00:23:55,980 --> 00:24:00,770 So, we can say that -- if we have neon here and we want to 522 00:24:00,770 --> 00:24:03,860 think about what's isoelectronic, f minus would 523 00:24:03,860 --> 00:24:04,170 be isoelectronic. 524 00:24:04,170 --> 00:24:10,230 We also have oxygen -- what would the charge on oxygen be? 525 00:24:10,230 --> 00:24:10,690 Um-hmm, right. 526 00:24:10,690 --> 00:24:12,240 2 minus. 527 00:24:12,240 --> 00:24:16,110 Then also, nitrogen, 3 minus -- these are all going to be 528 00:24:16,110 --> 00:24:18,080 isoelectronic with neon. 529 00:24:18,080 --> 00:24:20,540 We can go in the other direction, so let's go to 530 00:24:20,540 --> 00:24:24,020 sodium, but we would need to take away an electron to make 531 00:24:24,020 --> 00:24:25,670 it isoelectronic. 532 00:24:25,670 --> 00:24:30,710 So we would say sodium plus, or magnesium 2 plus, we can 533 00:24:30,710 --> 00:24:36,960 just keep going -- aluminum 3 plus, silicone 4 plus, and we 534 00:24:36,960 --> 00:24:40,080 can go on and on in either direction all the way across 535 00:24:40,080 --> 00:24:42,670 and down the periodic table. 536 00:24:42,670 --> 00:24:45,380 So, that's the idea of isoelectronic ions. 537 00:24:45,380 --> 00:24:48,260 These are all isoelectronic, they all have the same 538 00:24:48,260 --> 00:24:50,980 electron configuration. 539 00:24:50,980 --> 00:24:53,110 And we can also think about going back to 540 00:24:53,110 --> 00:24:54,830 atomic size for a second. 541 00:24:54,830 --> 00:24:58,130 What the relationship is between these ions and their 542 00:24:58,130 --> 00:25:03,470 parent atoms. So, for example, if we think of the fluorine 543 00:25:03,470 --> 00:25:08,190 minus case, would you expect fluorine minus to be larger or 544 00:25:08,190 --> 00:25:11,940 smaller than neutral fluorine? 545 00:25:11,940 --> 00:25:12,350 Okay. 546 00:25:12,350 --> 00:25:14,840 I heard mostly larger, but a little bit of a mix in there, 547 00:25:14,840 --> 00:25:17,780 and it turns out that larger is correct. 548 00:25:17,780 --> 00:25:20,750 And we can think about why -- essentially we have fluorine 549 00:25:20,750 --> 00:25:22,980 and now we're adding another electron. 550 00:25:22,980 --> 00:25:25,260 So you can picture that fluorine is going to get 551 00:25:25,260 --> 00:25:27,060 larger in this case. 552 00:25:27,060 --> 00:25:28,330 And that would be true for all of the 553 00:25:28,330 --> 00:25:30,320 negatively charged ions. 554 00:25:30,320 --> 00:25:32,970 So, by the same logic, that means that all of our 555 00:25:32,970 --> 00:25:36,330 positively charged ions are, in fact, going to be smaller 556 00:25:36,330 --> 00:25:39,370 in terms of radius, compared to their neutral parents. 557 00:25:39,370 --> 00:25:42,640 Not only are we taking away an electron here, but we're also 558 00:25:42,640 --> 00:25:45,810 going to decrease shielding, so the electrons that are 559 00:25:45,810 --> 00:25:48,220 already in there are going to feel a higher z effective and 560 00:25:48,220 --> 00:25:53,640 will be pulling and the atom will be getting smaller. 561 00:25:53,640 --> 00:25:56,670 And this is just a picture showing some of these sizes 562 00:25:56,670 --> 00:25:57,500 with their parent. 563 00:25:57,500 --> 00:26:01,620 So, for example, a lithium here, you can see how lithium 564 00:26:01,620 --> 00:26:05,200 plus is smaller than the actual lithium atom in its 565 00:26:05,200 --> 00:26:06,190 neutral state. 566 00:26:06,190 --> 00:26:10,610 Whereas for fluorine, fluorine is smaller than f minus is the 567 00:26:10,610 --> 00:26:13,570 one that's the outer shell shown here. 568 00:26:13,570 --> 00:26:15,960 So, let's do a clicker question on isoelectronic 569 00:26:15,960 --> 00:26:22,450 atoms. And now we're asking you to look at krypton, so the 570 00:26:22,450 --> 00:26:24,240 atomic mass is 36. 571 00:26:24,240 --> 00:26:26,760 You can actually just grab that handout, the second 572 00:26:26,760 --> 00:26:29,830 handout on the exam and look at the periodic table there. 573 00:26:29,830 --> 00:26:32,200 So, which of the following ions listed is isoelectronic 574 00:26:32,200 --> 00:26:43,950 with krypton? 575 00:26:43,950 --> 00:26:58,050 OK, let's take 10 seconds on that. 576 00:26:58,050 --> 00:26:58,520 OK, good. 577 00:26:58,520 --> 00:27:03,170 This might be our all-time high, 89% got this right. 578 00:27:03,170 --> 00:27:04,170 This is great. 579 00:27:04,170 --> 00:27:07,980 So, selenium 2 minus is what's going to be isoelectronic, 580 00:27:07,980 --> 00:27:10,610 because if you add two electrons to selenium, you'll 581 00:27:10,610 --> 00:27:13,490 get the same electron configuration that you have 582 00:27:13,490 --> 00:27:14,470 for krypton here. 583 00:27:14,470 --> 00:27:18,070 OK, I think we can safely go back to notes. 584 00:27:18,070 --> 00:27:20,345 So, I said I would announce it, that's the 585 00:27:20,345 --> 00:27:22,000 end of exam 1 material. 586 00:27:22,000 --> 00:27:24,350 So, if you compartmentalize things in your brain in 587 00:27:24,350 --> 00:27:28,250 certain ways, put that off into the end of the exam 1 588 00:27:28,250 --> 00:27:29,470 part of your brain, and now we're going to 589 00:27:29,470 --> 00:27:31,010 move on to exam 2. 590 00:27:31,010 --> 00:27:33,220 Remember, for exam 2, you still need to know and 591 00:27:33,220 --> 00:27:36,290 understand everything you learned in exam 1, but you can 592 00:27:36,290 --> 00:27:41,400 put off learning it completely until we get through, at 593 00:27:41,400 --> 00:27:44,660 least, next Wednesday before we start maybe spending time 594 00:27:44,660 --> 00:27:47,580 on these concepts outside of class. 595 00:27:47,580 --> 00:27:51,035 So, we're going to start with talking about bonding, and any 596 00:27:51,035 --> 00:27:54,090 time we have a chemical bond, basically what we're talking 597 00:27:54,090 --> 00:27:56,860 about is having two atoms where the arrangement of their 598 00:27:56,860 --> 00:28:00,640 nuclei and they're electrons are such that the bonded atoms 599 00:28:00,640 --> 00:28:04,720 results in a lower energy than for the separate atoms. So we 600 00:28:04,720 --> 00:28:07,480 know we always want to have our systems in as low an 601 00:28:07,480 --> 00:28:10,450 energy as possible, so it makes sense that a bond would 602 00:28:10,450 --> 00:28:13,740 happen any time we got a lower energy when we combine two 603 00:28:13,740 --> 00:28:18,110 atoms, versus when we keep them separate. 604 00:28:18,110 --> 00:28:20,290 So specifically, today we're going to talk 605 00:28:20,290 --> 00:28:22,020 about covalent bonds. 606 00:28:22,020 --> 00:28:25,560 A covalent bond is any time we have a pair of electrons that 607 00:28:25,560 --> 00:28:28,470 is shared between two different atoms. And the key 608 00:28:28,470 --> 00:28:31,900 word for covalent bonds is the idea of being shared. 609 00:28:31,900 --> 00:28:37,130 The two electrons, for example, we see in the h 2 610 00:28:37,130 --> 00:28:39,830 molecule, they don't belong to one or the other atom, they're 611 00:28:39,830 --> 00:28:41,050 actually shared. 612 00:28:41,050 --> 00:28:44,040 And what we'll see later, is that the sharing is not always 613 00:28:44,040 --> 00:28:46,180 equal -- in the case of h 2, it is 614 00:28:46,180 --> 00:28:47,420 completely equal sharing. 615 00:28:47,420 --> 00:28:50,950 In some cases, because of things like electronegativity, 616 00:28:50,950 --> 00:28:53,970 one atom will take away more of the electron density than 617 00:28:53,970 --> 00:28:56,490 the other atom, but they're still shared, even if they're 618 00:28:56,490 --> 00:28:58,710 not always evenly shared. 619 00:28:58,710 --> 00:29:01,350 So, in talking about covalent bonds, we should be able to 620 00:29:01,350 --> 00:29:04,920 still apply a more general definition of a chemical bond, 621 00:29:04,920 --> 00:29:08,270 which should tell us that the h 2 molecule is going to be 622 00:29:08,270 --> 00:29:11,990 lower in energy than if we looked at 2 separate hydrogen 623 00:29:11,990 --> 00:29:12,870 atom molecules. 624 00:29:12,870 --> 00:29:15,480 So, let's see if that's actually the case. 625 00:29:15,480 --> 00:29:18,150 So if I tell you that the energy for single hydrogen 626 00:29:18,150 --> 00:29:22,540 atom is negative 13 12 kilojoules per mole. 627 00:29:22,540 --> 00:29:25,240 If we want to talk about two hydrogen atoms, then we just 628 00:29:25,240 --> 00:29:29,130 need to double that, so that's going to be negative 2 6 2 4 629 00:29:29,130 --> 00:29:32,230 kilojoules per mole that we're talking about in terms of a 630 00:29:32,230 --> 00:29:33,940 single hydrogen atom. 631 00:29:33,940 --> 00:29:37,310 So, let's compare this to the energy of the h 2 molecule, 632 00:29:37,310 --> 00:29:39,630 and we find that that's negative 3,048 633 00:29:39,630 --> 00:29:40,380 kilojoules per mole. 634 00:29:40,380 --> 00:29:45,130 So, in fact, yes, we did confirm that these covalent 635 00:29:45,130 --> 00:29:48,610 bond, at least in the case of hydrogen, we have confirmed by 636 00:29:48,610 --> 00:29:51,510 the numbers that we are at a lower energy state when we 637 00:29:51,510 --> 00:29:55,660 talk about the bonded atom versus the individual atom. 638 00:29:55,660 --> 00:29:58,460 And when we talk about covalent bonds, there's 2 639 00:29:58,460 --> 00:30:00,990 properties that we'll mostly focus on, and that's going to 640 00:30:00,990 --> 00:30:04,860 be thinking about the bond strength or the energy by 641 00:30:04,860 --> 00:30:07,450 which it stabilized when it bonds. 642 00:30:07,450 --> 00:30:10,140 And we can also talk about the bond length, so we might be 643 00:30:10,140 --> 00:30:13,270 interested in what the bond length is, what the distance 644 00:30:13,270 --> 00:30:15,450 between these two nuclei are. 645 00:30:15,450 --> 00:30:18,910 And we can actually better visualize this if we plot how 646 00:30:18,910 --> 00:30:21,540 that energy changes as a function of 647 00:30:21,540 --> 00:30:24,180 internuclear distance. 648 00:30:24,180 --> 00:30:27,000 And when I say internuclear distance, we actually call 649 00:30:27,000 --> 00:30:28,670 this r here. 650 00:30:28,670 --> 00:30:31,020 It's kind of ironic that we put this in the same lecture 651 00:30:31,020 --> 00:30:34,320 as we talk about atomic radii, which we also call r, but 652 00:30:34,320 --> 00:30:36,260 they're two different r's, so you need to keep them 653 00:30:36,260 --> 00:30:38,760 separated in terms of what you're talking about. 654 00:30:38,760 --> 00:30:42,400 When we're talking about r for internuclear distance, we're 655 00:30:42,400 --> 00:30:45,180 talking about the distance between two different nuclei 656 00:30:45,180 --> 00:30:48,900 in a bond, in a covalent bond. 657 00:30:48,900 --> 00:30:52,000 So, if we look at this graph where what we're charting is 658 00:30:52,000 --> 00:30:54,820 the internuclear distance, so the distance between these two 659 00:30:54,820 --> 00:30:58,700 hydrogen atoms, as a function of energy, what we are going 660 00:30:58,700 --> 00:31:00,810 to see is a curve that looks like this -- this is the 661 00:31:00,810 --> 00:31:04,430 general curve that you'll see for any covalent bond, and 662 00:31:04,430 --> 00:31:07,020 we'll explain where that comes from in a minute. 663 00:31:07,020 --> 00:31:10,430 I want to point out that the zero energy is defined as when 664 00:31:10,430 --> 00:31:15,040 you have a naked proton where the electron has popped out -- 665 00:31:15,040 --> 00:31:17,970 that's what we've defined as zero energy up to this point 666 00:31:17,970 --> 00:31:20,740 when we're talking about single atoms. So, for starters 667 00:31:20,740 --> 00:31:22,880 we'll keep that as our zero energy, we're going to change 668 00:31:22,880 --> 00:31:26,150 it soon to make something that makes more sense in terms of 669 00:31:26,150 --> 00:31:28,610 bonding, but we'll keep that as zero for now. 670 00:31:28,610 --> 00:31:32,370 So, we see that the two h atoms separate have a certain 671 00:31:32,370 --> 00:31:34,650 energy that's lower than when the electron's 672 00:31:34,650 --> 00:31:36,040 not with the atom. 673 00:31:36,040 --> 00:31:38,650 And then even lower down, we have our 674 00:31:38,650 --> 00:31:42,120 bonded hydrogen molecule. 675 00:31:42,120 --> 00:31:43,940 So, we can think about the different kinds of 676 00:31:43,940 --> 00:31:45,620 interactions that are taking place. 677 00:31:45,620 --> 00:31:48,820 I said what hold the bonds together, what holds two atoms 678 00:31:48,820 --> 00:31:52,510 together is the attractive force we have between each 679 00:31:52,510 --> 00:31:55,200 electron and the other nucleus. 680 00:31:55,200 --> 00:31:57,840 That's the huge force that we're talking about in terms 681 00:31:57,840 --> 00:32:01,120 of making a bond stable, but there are also repulsive 682 00:32:01,120 --> 00:32:03,360 forces, so you can imagine we're going to have 683 00:32:03,360 --> 00:32:06,800 electron-electron repulsion between the two electrons if 684 00:32:06,800 --> 00:32:08,460 we're bringing them closer together. 685 00:32:08,460 --> 00:32:11,370 And the real killer is if we get too close we're even going 686 00:32:11,370 --> 00:32:14,750 to have nuclear-nuclear repulsion between the nuclei 687 00:32:14,750 --> 00:32:16,320 of the two atoms. 688 00:32:16,320 --> 00:32:19,090 So, this makes this chart shown in pink make a lot more 689 00:32:19,090 --> 00:32:22,720 sense, because if we're way out at very far distances, 690 00:32:22,720 --> 00:32:25,310 essentially what we have here is we're talking about two 691 00:32:25,310 --> 00:32:28,270 separate atoms. They're not interacting at all so that's 692 00:32:28,270 --> 00:32:31,870 why the energy is the same as that for two individual atoms, 693 00:32:31,870 --> 00:32:33,430 that's what we're dealing with. 694 00:32:33,430 --> 00:32:36,350 As we get closer together, we start get lower 695 00:32:36,350 --> 00:32:38,040 and lower in energy. 696 00:32:38,040 --> 00:32:40,550 The reason is because the predominant force at this 697 00:32:40,550 --> 00:32:43,400 point is going to be the attraction that's being felt 698 00:32:43,400 --> 00:32:46,930 between the nuclei and the electrons in each of the 699 00:32:46,930 --> 00:32:51,120 atoms. At some point you're going to hit a well here, 700 00:32:51,120 --> 00:32:56,140 which is the point where it's most stabilized or at it's 701 00:32:56,140 --> 00:32:56,520 lowest energy. 702 00:32:56,520 --> 00:32:58,790 So, when we think about a bond length, this is going to be 703 00:32:58,790 --> 00:33:01,470 the length of our bond here, that makes sense because it's 704 00:33:01,470 --> 00:33:03,320 going to want to be at that distance that 705 00:33:03,320 --> 00:33:05,140 minimizes the energy. 706 00:33:05,140 --> 00:33:08,010 But as we keep getting closer, even though as we get closer, 707 00:33:08,010 --> 00:33:10,390 the attraction is going to get stronger between the two 708 00:33:10,390 --> 00:33:11,990 nuclei and the electrons. 709 00:33:11,990 --> 00:33:14,610 We're also going to start to have the repulsive forces 710 00:33:14,610 --> 00:33:17,640 become more prominent here, and, in fact, they take over 711 00:33:17,640 --> 00:33:21,050 at some point, becoming the more prevalent of the forces, 712 00:33:21,050 --> 00:33:22,910 so as you get closer, the electron-electron repulsions, 713 00:33:22,910 --> 00:33:26,950 and eventually the nucleus-nucleus repulsion is 714 00:33:26,950 --> 00:33:29,070 going to mean that your energy is just absolutely 715 00:33:29,070 --> 00:33:32,550 skyrocketing, so it just keeps going up and up as you get 716 00:33:32,550 --> 00:33:36,300 closer to zero here. 717 00:33:36,300 --> 00:33:39,030 So, when we want to talk about the information that we can 718 00:33:39,030 --> 00:33:41,480 get out of looking at a chart like this, well, the first 719 00:33:41,480 --> 00:33:43,720 thing I did tell you was that this is going to be the bond 720 00:33:43,720 --> 00:33:46,890 length, so the distance r where the energy is lowest, 721 00:33:46,890 --> 00:33:49,720 but we can also talk about something called dissociation 722 00:33:49,720 --> 00:33:54,170 energy, that's going to be this distance right here or 723 00:33:54,170 --> 00:33:56,520 the energy that is this value. 724 00:33:56,520 --> 00:33:59,790 And the dissociation energy is very intuitive in terms of 725 00:33:59,790 --> 00:34:02,570 what it means, it means how much energy you need to put 726 00:34:02,570 --> 00:34:05,320 into the molecule in order to disassociate it into its 727 00:34:05,320 --> 00:34:09,650 individual atoms. And so we can actually think about how 728 00:34:09,650 --> 00:34:12,460 do we calculate what the dissociation energy should be 729 00:34:12,460 --> 00:34:16,270 for h 2, so let's go ahead and do this. 730 00:34:16,270 --> 00:34:20,760 So, if we talk about dissociating h 2, we're going 731 00:34:20,760 --> 00:34:25,260 from the h 2 molecule, and breaking this bond right in 732 00:34:25,260 --> 00:34:28,540 half, so we now have two individual 733 00:34:28,540 --> 00:34:31,090 hydrogen atoms here. 734 00:34:31,090 --> 00:34:35,020 So we need to take the energy for the two atoms, which we 735 00:34:35,020 --> 00:34:39,070 know is -- so let's take our dissociation energy is going 736 00:34:39,070 --> 00:34:48,360 to be equal to negative 2 6 2 4 kilojoules per mole, and we 737 00:34:48,360 --> 00:34:52,420 want to subtract the energy of the hydrogen molecule itself, 738 00:34:52,420 --> 00:35:00,560 so that's going to be negative 3 0 4 8 kilojoules per mole. 739 00:35:00,560 --> 00:35:03,770 So, what we get for the disassociation energy for a 740 00:35:03,770 --> 00:35:11,880 hydrogen atom is 424 kilojoules per mole. 741 00:35:11,880 --> 00:35:14,680 So what that means is that's how much energy we would have 742 00:35:14,680 --> 00:35:17,890 to put in to a hydrogen molecule in order to get it to 743 00:35:17,890 --> 00:35:25,110 split apart into its two atoms. 744 00:35:25,110 --> 00:35:28,280 So, another way to talk about dissociation energy is simply 745 00:35:28,280 --> 00:35:32,150 to call it bond strength, it's the same thing, they're equal 746 00:35:32,150 --> 00:35:32,690 to each other. 747 00:35:32,690 --> 00:35:36,150 If we know that this is it the dissociation energy for a 748 00:35:36,150 --> 00:35:39,250 hydrogen atom, we can also say the bond strength for hydrogen 749 00:35:39,250 --> 00:35:43,090 molecule is 424. 750 00:35:43,090 --> 00:35:45,520 So, there's actually another way to graph it where we can 751 00:35:45,520 --> 00:35:48,550 directly graph the dissociation energy or the 752 00:35:48,550 --> 00:35:49,620 bond strengths. 753 00:35:49,620 --> 00:35:53,000 So I said before when we were talking about single atoms, we 754 00:35:53,000 --> 00:35:55,770 always define the zero energy as when an electron was 755 00:35:55,770 --> 00:36:00,120 actually ejected, but now, when we talk about chemical 756 00:36:00,120 --> 00:36:03,010 reactions taking place, it's very, very rare that we're 757 00:36:03,010 --> 00:36:05,940 actually going to be talking about anything that gets to 758 00:36:05,940 --> 00:36:06,660 this point here. 759 00:36:06,660 --> 00:36:10,990 It's much more relevant to set our zero point energy as the 760 00:36:10,990 --> 00:36:14,790 separation of a bond in terms of talking about the reactions 761 00:36:14,790 --> 00:36:16,850 that we'll usually be dealing with here. 762 00:36:16,850 --> 00:36:20,300 So, let's change our graph where we now have this zero 763 00:36:20,300 --> 00:36:23,700 point set as the two individuals hydrogen atoms, 764 00:36:23,700 --> 00:36:27,780 and then we see that our h 2 molecule is at the negative of 765 00:36:27,780 --> 00:36:30,640 the dissociation energy, or the negative what that bond 766 00:36:30,640 --> 00:36:31,600 strength is. 767 00:36:31,600 --> 00:36:33,630 So we know what that number would be, it would be negative 768 00:36:33,630 --> 00:36:37,710 424 kilojoules per mole that we see here. 769 00:36:37,710 --> 00:36:41,380 So, what this let's us do now is directly compare, for 770 00:36:41,380 --> 00:36:45,420 example, the strength of a bond in terms of a hydrogen 771 00:36:45,420 --> 00:36:48,760 atom and hydrogen molecule, compared to any kind of 772 00:36:48,760 --> 00:36:51,350 molecule that we want to graph on top of it. 773 00:36:51,350 --> 00:36:54,040 So, let's, for example, look at nitrogen. 774 00:36:54,040 --> 00:36:58,020 So n 2, we can do the chart here in green, so it's the 775 00:36:58,020 --> 00:37:02,120 green dotted line, and what we see is that we have now 776 00:37:02,120 --> 00:37:04,000 defined this energy as where the 2 777 00:37:04,000 --> 00:37:05,870 nitrogen atoms are separated. 778 00:37:05,870 --> 00:37:08,710 So what we can actually directly compare is the 779 00:37:08,710 --> 00:37:12,230 dissociation energy or the bond strength of nitrogen 780 00:37:12,230 --> 00:37:14,350 versus hydrogen. 781 00:37:14,350 --> 00:37:16,960 So, if we think about this, which would you say has a 782 00:37:16,960 --> 00:37:17,930 stronger bond? 783 00:37:17,930 --> 00:37:21,810 Is it going to be hydrogen or nitrogen? 784 00:37:21,810 --> 00:37:23,530 Yup, it's going to be nitrogen. 785 00:37:23,530 --> 00:37:26,140 And the reason we can see that by looking at this graph is 786 00:37:26,140 --> 00:37:28,940 that we see that nitrogen when it's bonded is in an even 787 00:37:28,940 --> 00:37:31,200 lower well than we saw for hydrogen. 788 00:37:31,200 --> 00:37:33,420 It's going to be a stronger bond because it's more 789 00:37:33,420 --> 00:37:38,130 stabilized when it when it comes together as a molecule. 790 00:37:38,130 --> 00:37:42,020 We can also think about the distance, the bond distance. 791 00:37:42,020 --> 00:37:43,350 So, which would you say is going to be 792 00:37:43,350 --> 00:37:44,350 shorter in this case? 793 00:37:44,350 --> 00:37:47,980 Is a hydrogen bond shorter, or is a nitrogen-nitrogen triple 794 00:37:47,980 --> 00:37:50,310 bond going to be shorter? 795 00:37:50,310 --> 00:37:52,790 Um-hmm, again, we can get this information 796 00:37:52,790 --> 00:37:54,370 directly from our graph. 797 00:37:54,370 --> 00:37:57,450 We see that the radius is shorter, so that means that 798 00:37:57,450 --> 00:38:00,460 the nitrogen-nitrogen bond is going to be shorter. 799 00:38:00,460 --> 00:38:03,340 We can know this information even if we just knew that the 800 00:38:03,340 --> 00:38:05,880 bond was stronger, we wouldn't need to look at a graph here, 801 00:38:05,880 --> 00:38:08,890 because it turns out that if you have a stronger bond, that 802 00:38:08,890 --> 00:38:11,650 also means that you have a shorter bond -- those ywo are 803 00:38:11,650 --> 00:38:12,260 correlated. 804 00:38:12,260 --> 00:38:15,810 And something that we'll see later on is that triple bonds, 805 00:38:15,810 --> 00:38:18,880 for example, are going to be stronger than a corresponding 806 00:38:18,880 --> 00:38:21,130 double bond or a corresponding single bond. 807 00:38:21,130 --> 00:38:23,720 So, if we talked about a nitrogen-nitrogen single 808 00:38:23,720 --> 00:38:26,550 versus double versus triple bond, the triple bond will be 809 00:38:26,550 --> 00:38:29,600 the shortest and it will be the strongest. 810 00:38:29,600 --> 00:38:32,300 So, that's basically the idea of how we are going to be 811 00:38:32,300 --> 00:38:33,870 thinking about covalent bonds. 812 00:38:33,870 --> 00:38:37,420 It's also important, once we start talking about molecules, 813 00:38:37,420 --> 00:38:39,840 to have a way to represent them, and also to be able to 814 00:38:39,840 --> 00:38:43,410 look at a shorthand notation for a certain molecule and 815 00:38:43,410 --> 00:38:45,310 understand what the bond is. 816 00:38:45,310 --> 00:38:48,370 So, for example, down here I wrote that it was n 2 and that 817 00:38:48,370 --> 00:38:51,300 it was h 2, but when I re-wrote the molecules up 818 00:38:51,300 --> 00:38:54,490 here, you saw that it's an h h single bond where it's a 819 00:38:54,490 --> 00:38:56,630 nitrogen-nitrogen triple bond. 820 00:38:56,630 --> 00:39:00,140 So any chemist should be able to just look at n 2 and know 821 00:39:00,140 --> 00:39:02,500 that it's a triple bond, but that's not something that 822 00:39:02,500 --> 00:39:04,950 we've learned how did to do yet, so let's go ahead and 823 00:39:04,950 --> 00:39:07,950 start a new topic that's going to allow us to have some sort 824 00:39:07,950 --> 00:39:11,150 of sense of what the valence electron configuration, which 825 00:39:11,150 --> 00:39:13,770 includes whether something's a single or double or a triple 826 00:39:13,770 --> 00:39:17,850 bond can be figured out for any given molecule. 827 00:39:17,850 --> 00:39:20,320 So, to do this, what I'm going to do is introduce the topic 828 00:39:20,320 --> 00:39:21,510 of Lewis structures. 829 00:39:21,510 --> 00:39:24,290 We're going to really get into this next class, but I just 830 00:39:24,290 --> 00:39:27,250 want to introduce it to you to give us a start, and many of 831 00:39:27,250 --> 00:39:30,310 you have used Lewis structures in high school, but we'll be 832 00:39:30,310 --> 00:39:33,340 doing some much more challenging Lewis structures, 833 00:39:33,340 --> 00:39:37,140 I can assure you, in this class here. 834 00:39:37,140 --> 00:39:41,160 So, a Lewis structure is basically an organizing 835 00:39:41,160 --> 00:39:46,740 property of bonding, of molecules, which is the idea 836 00:39:46,740 --> 00:39:49,890 that when we're thinking about bonding, the key is to achieve 837 00:39:49,890 --> 00:39:53,420 a full valence shell in each of the individual atoms. So we 838 00:39:53,420 --> 00:39:58,090 want to have in an h h bond, for example, a full shell for 839 00:39:58,090 --> 00:40:01,550 each of the hydrogen atoms. And G.N. Lewis is the 840 00:40:01,550 --> 00:40:05,050 scientist that is credited, and who did, in fact, come up 841 00:40:05,050 --> 00:40:08,690 with this idea for the way to represent this, so the other 842 00:40:08,690 --> 00:40:11,630 parts of this idea, another way to phrase it is that the 843 00:40:11,630 --> 00:40:14,300 electrons are going to be distributed in such a way that 844 00:40:14,300 --> 00:40:18,650 we have what are called full octets for each of the atoms, 845 00:40:18,650 --> 00:40:21,790 and basically that's the same thing as saying we have a full 846 00:40:21,790 --> 00:40:24,130 valence shell, and this is something that Lewis was able 847 00:40:24,130 --> 00:40:28,320 to recognize very, very early, way before we had quantum 848 00:40:28,320 --> 00:40:31,390 mechanics to describe what these orbitals were, but it 849 00:40:31,390 --> 00:40:34,630 makes sense a full valence shell means for most atoms 850 00:40:34,630 --> 00:40:38,820 that we have a full s orbital plus a full p orbital, so 851 00:40:38,820 --> 00:40:42,200 we're going to have a total of four orbitals that are each 852 00:40:42,200 --> 00:40:45,300 filled with eight electrons, so that's why we see that we 853 00:40:45,300 --> 00:40:48,570 need an octet here. 854 00:40:48,570 --> 00:40:52,320 And the idea is that when you do these Lewis dot structures, 855 00:40:52,320 --> 00:40:55,180 we're representing electrons with dots, which we'll see in 856 00:40:55,180 --> 00:40:57,260 a minute, and each dot is going to 857 00:40:57,260 --> 00:40:59,600 represent a valence electron. 858 00:40:59,600 --> 00:41:02,080 So, hopefully, you remember what we mean by valence 859 00:41:02,080 --> 00:41:04,570 electrons versus core electrons. 860 00:41:04,570 --> 00:41:07,340 Core electrons are all those electrons held in really tight 861 00:41:07,340 --> 00:41:10,640 with the nucleus in the inner shells, whereas the valence 862 00:41:10,640 --> 00:41:12,830 electrons are only those electrons that are in the 863 00:41:12,830 --> 00:41:16,720 outer-most shell, or at your highest value of n of the 864 00:41:16,720 --> 00:41:19,110 principal quantum number. 865 00:41:19,110 --> 00:41:22,740 So, Lewis structures are really a model for a way to 866 00:41:22,740 --> 00:41:26,220 think about what the valence electron configuration is, and 867 00:41:26,220 --> 00:41:29,130 as I said, it's not based on quantum mechanics, it's 868 00:41:29,130 --> 00:41:33,140 something that Lewis observed far, far before quantum 869 00:41:33,140 --> 00:41:34,860 mechanics were discovered. 870 00:41:34,860 --> 00:41:38,230 So he came up with the ideas that led to the idea of Lewis 871 00:41:38,230 --> 00:41:41,230 structures in the very early 1900's. 872 00:41:41,230 --> 00:41:44,440 So you might ask well, why are we using this model if it 873 00:41:44,440 --> 00:41:47,000 clearly doesn't take into account quantum mechanics? 874 00:41:47,000 --> 00:41:49,420 And the reason that we use it is that it is incredibly 875 00:41:49,420 --> 00:41:52,580 accurate, and allows us to very, very quickly predict and 876 00:41:52,580 --> 00:41:55,810 to predict accurately, in most cases, what the electron 877 00:41:55,810 --> 00:41:58,760 configuration of molecules are going to be. 878 00:41:58,760 --> 00:42:00,530 So this is really useful. 879 00:42:00,530 --> 00:42:02,730 We don't always want to go and solve the Schrodinger 880 00:42:02,730 --> 00:42:05,790 equation, and in fact, once we start talking about molecules, 881 00:42:05,790 --> 00:42:08,270 I can imagine none of you, as much as you love math or 882 00:42:08,270 --> 00:42:10,110 physics, want to be trying to solve this Schrodinger 883 00:42:10,110 --> 00:42:12,310 equation in that case either. 884 00:42:12,310 --> 00:42:15,260 So, what Lewis structures allow us to do is over 90% of 885 00:42:15,260 --> 00:42:18,180 the time be correct in terms of figuring out what the 886 00:42:18,180 --> 00:42:20,130 electron configuration is. 887 00:42:20,130 --> 00:42:22,150 And we won't just use them in this class. 888 00:42:22,150 --> 00:42:25,760 If you actually go to any of the chemistry labs at MIT, if 889 00:42:25,760 --> 00:42:28,670 you go over to building 18 and look in the organic labs where 890 00:42:28,670 --> 00:42:31,670 they're synthesizing new molecules or making up new 891 00:42:31,670 --> 00:42:35,680 reactions, what you'll see if you open anyone's notebook, 892 00:42:35,680 --> 00:42:39,210 their lab notebook, assuming they keep a nice lab notebook, 893 00:42:39,210 --> 00:42:42,150 is that they will have Lewis structures drawn in there that 894 00:42:42,150 --> 00:42:44,280 explain the reactions that they're going to be 895 00:42:44,280 --> 00:42:45,680 doing for that day. 896 00:42:45,680 --> 00:42:48,900 And I mean this means way past all the chemistry they've 897 00:42:48,900 --> 00:42:51,160 taken, they're now graduate students or they're now 898 00:42:51,160 --> 00:42:53,900 professors, and they're still writing out Lewis structures. 899 00:42:53,900 --> 00:42:56,420 Now they're writing a more abbreviated form, which you'll 900 00:42:56,420 --> 00:42:59,950 probably get to if you take organic chemistry, but really 901 00:42:59,950 --> 00:43:02,130 it's the exact same idea. 902 00:43:02,130 --> 00:43:05,220 And this goes all the way back to 1902. 903 00:43:05,220 --> 00:43:09,240 In fact, Lewis was an American scientist, so he was trained 904 00:43:09,240 --> 00:43:13,340 in America, and he actually was a professor here at MIT 905 00:43:13,340 --> 00:43:18,660 from 1905 all the way to about 1911 or 1912, and these are 906 00:43:18,660 --> 00:43:23,590 some notes from 1902, and you can't see them very well, but 907 00:43:23,590 --> 00:43:27,520 this was essentially an early form of Lewis structures, and 908 00:43:27,520 --> 00:43:29,640 this was called the cubicle atom. 909 00:43:29,640 --> 00:43:32,030 So, basically what he's showing in these cubes is that 910 00:43:32,030 --> 00:43:34,510 there are eight spaces that need to be filled up 911 00:43:34,510 --> 00:43:35,960 to have a full cube. 912 00:43:35,960 --> 00:43:38,700 So in order to fill them, he would have to have eight 913 00:43:38,700 --> 00:43:41,350 electrons or an octet around the cubes. 914 00:43:41,350 --> 00:43:45,460 So what we're seeing is this is notes from 1902 -- he 915 00:43:45,460 --> 00:43:48,750 actually didn't publish any of this work or these ideas that 916 00:43:48,750 --> 00:43:52,120 led to Lewis structures until 1916, but his early class 917 00:43:52,120 --> 00:43:55,590 notes were used as evidence about how long ago he actually 918 00:43:55,590 --> 00:43:57,080 came up with the idea of it. 919 00:43:57,080 --> 00:43:59,690 So it's really neat to think that your counterparts 100 920 00:43:59,690 --> 00:44:02,230 years ago right here at MIT could have been sitting in a 921 00:44:02,230 --> 00:44:05,570 class where they had Lewis as their lecturer, and he's 922 00:44:05,570 --> 00:44:07,980 putting forth these ideas -- these are actually his lecture 923 00:44:07,980 --> 00:44:11,160 notes, even though it wasn't even published yet, and giving 924 00:44:11,160 --> 00:44:13,680 this idea of Lewis structure, which is exactly what we keep 925 00:44:13,680 --> 00:44:16,720 using today in order to make a lot of these predictions. 926 00:44:16,720 --> 00:44:19,910 So, let's see how some of this works, and hopefully your 927 00:44:19,910 --> 00:44:22,540 counterparts from 100 years ago would also be able to 928 00:44:22,540 --> 00:44:25,700 think about how this works, even if they don't have the 929 00:44:25,700 --> 00:44:29,410 quantum mechanics behind the individual electron 930 00:44:29,410 --> 00:44:32,500 configurations for atoms. So I said that we want to be 931 00:44:32,500 --> 00:44:35,280 talking about valence electrons here, so that means 932 00:44:35,280 --> 00:44:38,700 if we're talking about, for example, the octet rule for an 933 00:44:38,700 --> 00:44:42,350 f f molecule where we have two fluorine atoms, we need to 934 00:44:42,350 --> 00:44:45,610 write the valence electrons as dots around them. 935 00:44:45,610 --> 00:44:48,220 So let's do a quick clicker question, and you tell me how 936 00:44:48,220 --> 00:44:52,100 many valence electrons does fluorine have? 937 00:44:52,100 --> 00:44:54,850 Remember, valence electrons are different from core, 938 00:44:54,850 --> 00:44:57,030 they're only the outer-most electrons in 939 00:44:57,030 --> 00:45:03,410 the outer-most shell. 940 00:45:03,410 --> 00:45:04,960 So, 10 seconds on this, this should 941 00:45:04,960 --> 00:45:17,510 be fast. OK, great. 942 00:45:17,510 --> 00:45:19,340 Good job on the clicker questions today. 943 00:45:19,340 --> 00:45:21,840 So we have seven valence electrons. 944 00:45:21,840 --> 00:45:24,570 So, let's go back to the notes, and let's fill these 945 00:45:24,570 --> 00:45:26,570 in, seven electrons. 946 00:45:26,570 --> 00:45:28,780 Another way you could have known them was to look at 947 00:45:28,780 --> 00:45:32,040 Lewis' notes here, where if look at this box carefully you 948 00:45:32,040 --> 00:45:35,510 see there are seven dots around the cube, so there are 949 00:45:35,510 --> 00:45:38,080 his seven valence electrons. 950 00:45:38,080 --> 00:45:41,660 So, we see is when we use the octet rule to look at fluorine 951 00:45:41,660 --> 00:45:45,000 molecule, we're combining two fluorine atoms, and what we 952 00:45:45,000 --> 00:45:48,380 end up with is an f f molecule where they're sharing two 953 00:45:48,380 --> 00:45:51,360 electrons, so making that covalent bond. 954 00:45:51,360 --> 00:45:54,890 But that each individual fluorine atom has eight 955 00:45:54,890 --> 00:45:56,860 electrons, or full octet around it. 956 00:45:56,860 --> 00:45:59,710 We can think about where those electrons came from, so we got 957 00:45:59,710 --> 00:46:03,610 seven from the blue electrons here, seven as shown in green 958 00:46:03,610 --> 00:46:07,470 here, but each individual fluorine atom has eight, even 959 00:46:07,470 --> 00:46:10,640 though two of those are being shared between both of them. 960 00:46:10,640 --> 00:46:13,250 So, the octet rule is a general rule that you'll for 961 00:46:13,250 --> 00:46:16,700 all of the atoms. There are some exceptions, which we'll 962 00:46:16,700 --> 00:46:20,160 get to later, but the only a big exception here is with 963 00:46:20,160 --> 00:46:23,090 hydrogen, which has a special stability that's associated 964 00:46:23,090 --> 00:46:24,470 with two electrons. 965 00:46:24,470 --> 00:46:26,420 This should make a lot of sense, because we know that a 966 00:46:26,420 --> 00:46:32,940 hydrogen has 1 s as it's outer-most or valence orbital, 967 00:46:32,940 --> 00:46:37,690 so it can be filled up just with two 1 s electrons. 968 00:46:37,690 --> 00:46:40,320 And we give different names, depending on what kind of 969 00:46:40,320 --> 00:46:43,280 electrons we're dealing with, so, for example, with h c l 970 00:46:43,280 --> 00:46:45,760 here, we can talk about having bonded 971 00:46:45,760 --> 00:46:48,060 versus lone pair electrons. 972 00:46:48,060 --> 00:46:50,990 So, in terms of the c l atom, we need to talk about each 973 00:46:50,990 --> 00:46:52,470 atom individually. 974 00:46:52,470 --> 00:47:01,030 How many bonding electrons does c l have? 975 00:47:01,030 --> 00:47:01,540 All right. 976 00:47:01,540 --> 00:47:05,000 Let's see, we've got a mixed response here, it turns out it 977 00:47:05,000 --> 00:47:06,540 has two bonding electrons. 978 00:47:06,540 --> 00:47:09,290 I heard some people say one, and that's a good guess, 979 00:47:09,290 --> 00:47:11,300 remember they're actually sharing. 980 00:47:11,300 --> 00:47:14,630 So these two electrons, they belong to chlorine, they also 981 00:47:14,630 --> 00:47:17,250 belong to hydrogen, but they do, in fact, belong to 982 00:47:17,250 --> 00:47:17,920 chlorine as well. 983 00:47:17,920 --> 00:47:20,750 There's no one person owning them, so they both have two 984 00:47:20,750 --> 00:47:22,480 electrons here that are bonding. 985 00:47:22,480 --> 00:47:26,510 So how many lone pair electrons do we have? 986 00:47:26,510 --> 00:47:26,850 OK. 987 00:47:26,850 --> 00:47:29,810 I hear six and three, so both are sort of right, we have 6 988 00:47:29,810 --> 00:47:31,400 lone pair electrons, which means that we 989 00:47:31,400 --> 00:47:35,180 have three lone pairs. 990 00:47:35,180 --> 00:47:39,560 So, in terms of thinking about how to draw a Lewis structure, 991 00:47:39,560 --> 00:47:42,740 I won't go through this today or any day in terms of just 992 00:47:42,740 --> 00:47:45,230 reading through the rules, you can read that yourself. 993 00:47:45,230 --> 00:47:47,760 But what we'll do is go through each of these rules in 994 00:47:47,760 --> 00:47:48,900 terms of an example. 995 00:47:48,900 --> 00:47:52,060 So, what will start with on Monday is doing the most 996 00:47:52,060 --> 00:47:54,670 simple example of methane using these 997 00:47:54,670 --> 00:47:56,130 Lewis structure rules. 998 00:47:56,130 --> 00:47:59,400 So, don't forget to study this weekend and get those extra 999 00:47:59,400 --> 00:48:02,840 practice problems from the course website.