1 00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:00,016 The following content is provided under a Creative 2 00:00:00,016 --> 00:00:00,022 Commons license. 3 00:00:00,022 --> 00:00:00,038 Your support will help MIT OpenCourseWare continue to 4 00:00:00,038 --> 00:00:00,054 offer high quality educational resources for free. 5 00:00:00,054 --> 00:00:00,072 To make a donation or view additional materials from 6 00:00:00,072 --> 00:00:00,088 hundreds of MIT courses, visit MIT OpenCourseWare at 7 00:00:00,088 --> 00:00:00,110 ocw.mit.edu. 8 00:00:00,110 --> 00:00:23,660 PROFESSOR: OK, let's get started here. 9 00:00:23,660 --> 00:00:26,350 Go ahead and take 10 more seconds on the clicker 10 00:00:26,350 --> 00:00:29,100 question, which probably looks all too familiar at this 11 00:00:29,100 --> 00:00:35,770 point, if you went to recitation yesterday. 12 00:00:35,770 --> 00:00:38,370 All right, and let's see how we do here. 13 00:00:38,370 --> 00:00:38,900 OK. 14 00:00:38,900 --> 00:00:41,540 So, let's talk about this for one second. 15 00:00:41,540 --> 00:00:44,830 So what we're asking here, if we can settle down and listen 16 00:00:44,830 --> 00:00:47,440 up, is which equations can be used if we're talking about 17 00:00:47,440 --> 00:00:50,590 converting wavelength to energy for an electron. 18 00:00:50,590 --> 00:00:53,260 Remember, the key word here is electron. 19 00:00:53,260 --> 00:00:56,060 This might look familiar to the first part of problem one 20 00:00:56,060 --> 00:00:59,230 on the exam, and problem one on the exam is what tended to 21 00:00:59,230 --> 00:01:02,290 be the huge problem on the exam. 22 00:01:02,290 --> 00:01:06,310 I think over 2/3 of you decided on the exam to use 23 00:01:06,310 --> 00:01:09,530 this first equation, e equals h c over wavelength. 24 00:01:09,530 --> 00:01:13,250 So I just want to reiterate one more time, why can we not 25 00:01:13,250 --> 00:01:17,720 use this equation if we're talking about an electron? 26 00:01:17,720 --> 00:01:19,500 C. OK, good, good, I'm hearing it. 27 00:01:19,500 --> 00:01:20,990 So the answer is c. 28 00:01:20,990 --> 00:01:23,430 What you need to do is you need to ask yourself if you're 29 00:01:23,430 --> 00:01:25,810 trying to convert from wavelength to energy for an 30 00:01:25,810 --> 00:01:29,820 electron, and you are tempted, because we are all tempted to 31 00:01:29,820 --> 00:01:33,800 use this equation, and if you were tempted, say, does an 32 00:01:33,800 --> 00:01:35,280 electron travel at the speed of light? 33 00:01:35,280 --> 00:01:38,150 And if the answer is no, an electron does not travel at 34 00:01:38,150 --> 00:01:40,570 the speed of light, light travels at the speed of light, 35 00:01:40,570 --> 00:01:43,290 then you want to stay away from using this equation. 36 00:01:43,290 --> 00:01:46,440 And I know how tempting it is to do that, but we have other 37 00:01:46,440 --> 00:01:49,320 equations we can use -- the DeBroglie wavelength, and this 38 00:01:49,320 --> 00:01:52,560 is just a combination of energy equals 1/2 m v squared, 39 00:01:52,560 --> 00:01:54,740 and the definition of momentum, so we can combine 40 00:01:54,740 --> 00:01:56,540 those things to get it. 41 00:01:56,540 --> 00:01:59,110 You might be wondering why I'm telling you this now, you've 42 00:01:59,110 --> 00:02:01,500 already -- if you've lost points on that, lost the 43 00:02:01,500 --> 00:02:04,200 points on it, and what I'm saying to you is if there are 44 00:02:04,200 --> 00:02:07,790 parts of exam 1 that you did not do well on, you will have 45 00:02:07,790 --> 00:02:10,900 a chance to show us again that you now understand that 46 00:02:10,900 --> 00:02:12,360 material on the final. 47 00:02:12,360 --> 00:02:15,940 One quarter of the final is going to be exam 1 material, 48 00:02:15,940 --> 00:02:18,290 and what that means is when we look at your grade at the end 49 00:02:18,290 --> 00:02:21,090 of the semester, and we take a look at what you got on exam 50 00:02:21,090 --> 00:02:24,810 1, and you're right at that borderline, and we say well, 51 00:02:24,810 --> 00:02:27,630 what happened, did they understand more at the end of 52 00:02:27,630 --> 00:02:30,090 the semester, did the concepts kind of 53 00:02:30,090 --> 00:02:31,710 solidify over the semester? 54 00:02:31,710 --> 00:02:34,210 And if they did and if you showed us that they did, then 55 00:02:34,210 --> 00:02:36,840 you're going to get bumped up into that next grade category. 56 00:02:36,840 --> 00:02:39,730 So keep that in mind as you're reviewing the exam, sometimes 57 00:02:39,730 --> 00:02:42,150 if things don't go as well as you want them to, the 58 00:02:42,150 --> 00:02:45,180 temptation is just to put that exam away forever and ever. 59 00:02:45,180 --> 00:02:47,720 But the reality is that new material builds on that 60 00:02:47,720 --> 00:02:54,610 material, and specifically exam 1 a, question 1 a that 61 00:02:54,610 --> 00:02:56,740 deals with converting wavelength to 62 00:02:56,740 --> 00:02:58,410 energy for an electron. 63 00:02:58,410 --> 00:03:01,610 I really want you guys know this and to understand it, so 64 00:03:01,610 --> 00:03:04,800 I can guarantee you that you will see this on the final. 65 00:03:04,800 --> 00:03:08,640 Specifically, question 1, part a. 66 00:03:08,640 --> 00:03:10,260 You will see something very, very similar 67 00:03:10,260 --> 00:03:11,750 to this on the final. 68 00:03:11,750 --> 00:03:14,930 If you are thinking about 1 thing to go back and study on 69 00:03:14,930 --> 00:03:20,420 exam 1, 1 a is a really good choice for that. 70 00:03:20,420 --> 00:03:22,820 This is important to me, so you're going to 71 00:03:22,820 --> 00:03:24,110 see it on the final. 72 00:03:24,110 --> 00:03:27,960 So if you have friends that aren't here, you might want to 73 00:03:27,960 --> 00:03:30,270 mention it to them, or maybe not, maybe this is your reward 74 00:03:30,270 --> 00:03:33,480 for coming to class, which is fine with me as well. 75 00:03:33,480 --> 00:03:33,840 All right. 76 00:03:33,840 --> 00:03:36,070 So I want to talk a little bit about exam 1. 77 00:03:36,070 --> 00:03:39,320 I know most you picked up your examine in recitation. 78 00:03:39,320 --> 00:03:43,020 If you didn't, any extra exams can be picked up in the 79 00:03:43,020 --> 00:03:47,410 Chemistry Education office, that's room 2204. 80 00:03:47,410 --> 00:03:51,780 So, the class average for the exam was a 68%, which is 81 00:03:51,780 --> 00:03:54,890 actually a strong, solid average for an exam 1 grade in 82 00:03:54,890 --> 00:03:57,610 the fall semester of 511-1. 83 00:03:57,610 --> 00:04:01,280 What we typically see is something right in this range, 84 00:04:01,280 --> 00:04:05,060 either ranging from the 50's for an exam 1 average to 85 00:04:05,060 --> 00:04:08,110 occasionally getting into the 70's, but most commonly what 86 00:04:08,110 --> 00:04:13,220 we've seen for exam 1 averages is 60, 61 -- those low 60's. 87 00:04:13,220 --> 00:04:18,120 So in many ways, seeing this 68 here, this is a great sign 88 00:04:18,120 --> 00:04:21,740 that we are off to a good start for this semester. 89 00:04:21,740 --> 00:04:24,060 And I do want to address, because I know many of you, 90 00:04:24,060 --> 00:04:27,130 this is only your second exam at MIT, and perhaps you've 91 00:04:27,130 --> 00:04:30,750 never gotten an exam back that didn't start with a 90 or 92 00:04:30,750 --> 00:04:33,570 start with an 80 in terms of the grades. 93 00:04:33,570 --> 00:04:36,910 So one thing you need to keep in mind is don't just look at 94 00:04:36,910 --> 00:04:37,870 the number grade. 95 00:04:37,870 --> 00:04:40,730 The reason that we give you these letters grade categories 96 00:04:40,730 --> 00:04:44,190 is that you can understand what it actually means, what 97 00:04:44,190 --> 00:04:47,150 your exam score actually says in terms of how we perceive 98 00:04:47,150 --> 00:04:49,360 you as understanding the material. 99 00:04:49,360 --> 00:04:53,030 So, for example, and this is the same categories that were 100 00:04:53,030 --> 00:04:56,900 shared in recitation, so I apologize for repeating, but I 101 00:04:56,900 --> 00:04:59,770 know sometimes when you get an exam back, no more information 102 00:04:59,770 --> 00:05:02,180 comes into your head except obsessing over the exam, so 103 00:05:02,180 --> 00:05:05,130 I'm just going to say it one more time, and that is between 104 00:05:05,130 --> 00:05:08,540 88 and 100, so that's 20% of you got an A. This is just 105 00:05:08,540 --> 00:05:11,810 absolutely fantastic, you really nailed this very hard 106 00:05:11,810 --> 00:05:14,140 material and these hard questions on the exam where 107 00:05:14,140 --> 00:05:17,850 you had to both use equations and solve problems, but also 108 00:05:17,850 --> 00:05:20,280 understand the concept in order to get yourself started 109 00:05:20,280 --> 00:05:21,910 on solving the problem. 110 00:05:21,910 --> 00:05:26,690 The same with the B, the B range was between 69 and 87 -- 111 00:05:26,690 --> 00:05:30,280 anywhere in between those ranges, you've got a B, some 112 00:05:30,280 --> 00:05:32,100 sort of B on the exam. 113 00:05:32,100 --> 00:05:35,360 So again, if you're in the A or the B category here, this 114 00:05:35,360 --> 00:05:38,330 is really something to be proud of, you really earned 115 00:05:38,330 --> 00:05:39,130 these grades. 116 00:05:39,130 --> 00:05:43,650 You know these exams, our 511-1 exams, we're not giving 117 00:05:43,650 --> 00:05:45,900 you points here, there are no give me, easy points, you 118 00:05:45,900 --> 00:05:47,870 earned every single one of these points. 119 00:05:47,870 --> 00:05:51,100 So, A and B here, these are refrigerator-worthy grades, 120 00:05:51,100 --> 00:05:52,690 hang those up in your dorm. 121 00:05:52,690 --> 00:05:54,560 This is something to feel good about. 122 00:05:54,560 --> 00:05:55,090 All right. 123 00:05:55,090 --> 00:05:59,890 So, for those of you that got between a 51 and a 68, this is 124 00:05:59,890 --> 00:06:01,690 somewhere in the C range. 125 00:06:01,690 --> 00:06:04,240 For some people, they feel comfortable being in the C 126 00:06:04,240 --> 00:06:08,280 range, other people really do not like being in this range. 127 00:06:08,280 --> 00:06:10,950 We understand that, there is plenty of room up there with 128 00:06:10,950 --> 00:06:11,940 the A's and the B's. 129 00:06:11,940 --> 00:06:15,930 You are welcome to come up to these higher ranges starting 130 00:06:15,930 --> 00:06:17,360 with the next exam. 131 00:06:17,360 --> 00:06:20,010 And what I want to tell you if you are in the C range, and 132 00:06:20,010 --> 00:06:22,430 this is not a place that you want to be in, anyone that's 133 00:06:22,430 --> 00:06:26,910 got below the class average, so below a 68 -- or a 68 or 134 00:06:26,910 --> 00:06:29,850 below, is eligible for free tutoring, and I put the 135 00:06:29,850 --> 00:06:32,250 website on the front page of your notes. 136 00:06:32,250 --> 00:06:34,700 This means you get a one-on-one tutor paid for by 137 00:06:34,700 --> 00:06:36,950 the Chemistry Department to help you if it's concepts 138 00:06:36,950 --> 00:06:40,315 you're not quite up on, if it's exam strategy that you 139 00:06:40,315 --> 00:06:42,020 need to work on more. 140 00:06:42,020 --> 00:06:44,520 Whatever it is that you need to work on, we want to help 141 00:06:44,520 --> 00:06:45,350 you get there. 142 00:06:45,350 --> 00:06:47,680 So, if you have a grade that you're not happy with, that 143 00:06:47,680 --> 00:06:52,040 you're feeling upset or discouraged about, please, I'm 144 00:06:52,040 --> 00:06:54,050 happy to talk to all of you about your grades 145 00:06:54,050 --> 00:06:54,940 individually. 146 00:06:54,940 --> 00:06:58,070 You can come talk to me, bring your exam, and we'll go over 147 00:06:58,070 --> 00:06:59,810 what the strategy should be in terms of you 148 00:06:59,810 --> 00:07:01,070 succeeding on the next exam. 149 00:07:01,070 --> 00:07:03,300 You can do the same thing with all of your TAs are more than 150 00:07:03,300 --> 00:07:05,370 happy to meet with each and every one of you. 151 00:07:05,370 --> 00:07:07,640 And then in addition to that, we can set you up with a tutor 152 00:07:07,640 --> 00:07:11,010 if you are in the C range or below, in terms 153 00:07:11,010 --> 00:07:13,220 of this first exam. 154 00:07:13,220 --> 00:07:13,570 All right. 155 00:07:13,570 --> 00:07:16,720 So 44 to 50, this is going to be in the D range. 156 00:07:16,720 --> 00:07:19,390 And then anything below a 44 is going to be 157 00:07:19,390 --> 00:07:20,880 failing on this exam. 158 00:07:20,880 --> 00:07:22,860 And also keep in mind, for those of you that are 159 00:07:22,860 --> 00:07:25,470 freshman, you need at least a C to pass the class. 160 00:07:25,470 --> 00:07:29,270 So, if you did get a D or an F on the first exam, you are 161 00:07:29,270 --> 00:07:32,980 going to need to really evaluate why that happened and 162 00:07:32,980 --> 00:07:35,100 make some changes, and we're absolutely here 163 00:07:35,100 --> 00:07:36,530 to help you do that. 164 00:07:36,530 --> 00:07:40,030 So the real key is identifying where the problem is -- is it 165 00:07:40,030 --> 00:07:42,240 with understanding the concepts, are you in a study 166 00:07:42,240 --> 00:07:44,190 group that's dragging you along but you're not 167 00:07:44,190 --> 00:07:45,340 understanding? 168 00:07:45,340 --> 00:07:47,300 Do you kind of panic when you get in the exam? 169 00:07:47,300 --> 00:07:49,270 There are all sorts of scenarios we can talk about 170 00:07:49,270 --> 00:07:51,270 and we want to talk about them with you. 171 00:07:51,270 --> 00:07:54,610 Seriously, even if we had a huge range in this exam from 172 00:07:54,610 --> 00:07:58,420 17 to 100, if you're sitting there and you're the 17, and 173 00:07:58,420 --> 00:08:01,505 actually there's more than 1 so don't feel alone, if you're 174 00:08:01,505 --> 00:08:05,210 a 17 or you're a 20, it's not time to give up, it's not time 175 00:08:05,210 --> 00:08:06,740 to drop the class and say I'm no good at 176 00:08:06,740 --> 00:08:08,070 chemistry, I can't do this. 177 00:08:08,070 --> 00:08:11,840 You still can, this is your first couple of exams, 178 00:08:11,840 --> 00:08:14,400 certainly your first in this class, potentially one of your 179 00:08:14,400 --> 00:08:17,690 first at MIT, so there's tons of room to improve 180 00:08:17,690 --> 00:08:18,450 from here on out. 181 00:08:18,450 --> 00:08:21,340 This is only 100 points out of 750. 182 00:08:21,340 --> 00:08:23,610 So, the same thing goes if you did really well, you still 183 00:08:23,610 --> 00:08:26,180 have 650 other points that you need to deal with. 184 00:08:26,180 --> 00:08:28,930 So, make sure you don't just rest on your high score from 185 00:08:28,930 --> 00:08:31,270 this first exam. 186 00:08:31,270 --> 00:08:34,150 So, OK, so that's pretty much what I wanted to say about the 187 00:08:34,150 --> 00:08:38,280 exam, and in terms of there's tons of resources if things 188 00:08:38,280 --> 00:08:39,610 didn't work out quite as you wanted. 189 00:08:39,610 --> 00:08:42,320 If you feel upset in any way, please come and talk to me. 190 00:08:42,320 --> 00:08:44,370 We want you to love chemistry and feel good about your 191 00:08:44,370 --> 00:08:45,480 ability to do it. 192 00:08:45,480 --> 00:08:48,380 Nobody get into MIT by mistake, so you all deserve to 193 00:08:48,380 --> 00:08:50,650 be sitting here, and you all can pass this class and do 194 00:08:50,650 --> 00:08:53,650 well in it, so we can help you get there no matter what. 195 00:08:53,650 --> 00:08:56,080 You all absolutely can do this. 196 00:08:56,080 --> 00:08:58,590 And then one more time, to reiterate, in case anyone 197 00:08:58,590 --> 00:09:01,990 missed it, 1 a, make sure you understand that, I feel like 198 00:09:01,990 --> 00:09:02,700 that's important. 199 00:09:02,700 --> 00:09:03,920 And actually all of 1 -- 200 00:09:03,920 --> 00:09:06,200 I really feel like the photoelectric effect is 201 00:09:06,200 --> 00:09:08,710 important for understanding all of these energy concepts. 202 00:09:08,710 --> 00:09:12,380 So, as you go on in this class, make sure you don't go 203 00:09:12,380 --> 00:09:14,030 on before you go back and make sure you 204 00:09:14,030 --> 00:09:16,380 understand that problem. 205 00:09:16,380 --> 00:09:22,260 All right, so let's move on to material for exam 2 now, and 206 00:09:22,260 --> 00:09:25,550 we're already three lectures into exam 2 material. 207 00:09:25,550 --> 00:09:29,370 And I do want to say that in terms of 511-1, what tends to 208 00:09:29,370 --> 00:09:33,140 happen is the exam scores go up and up and up, in terms of 209 00:09:33,140 --> 00:09:36,250 as we go from exam 1, to exam 2, to exam 3. 210 00:09:36,250 --> 00:09:38,470 One of these reasons is we are building on material, the 211 00:09:38,470 --> 00:09:40,510 other reason is you'll be shocked at how much better you 212 00:09:40,510 --> 00:09:43,830 are at taking an exam just a few weeks from now. 213 00:09:43,830 --> 00:09:47,660 So this will be on, starting with the Lewis structures, so 214 00:09:47,660 --> 00:09:50,300 go back in your notes -- if this doesn't sound familiar, 215 00:09:50,300 --> 00:09:54,030 if you spent too much time -- or not too much time, spent a 216 00:09:54,030 --> 00:09:56,520 lot of time studying exam 1 and didn't move on here. 217 00:09:56,520 --> 00:09:58,400 Today we're going to talk about the breakdown of the 218 00:09:58,400 --> 00:09:59,550 octet rule. 219 00:09:59,550 --> 00:10:02,310 Cases where we don't have eight electrons around our 220 00:10:02,310 --> 00:10:04,600 Lewis structures, then we'll move on to 221 00:10:04,600 --> 00:10:06,260 talking about ionic bonds. 222 00:10:06,260 --> 00:10:08,590 We had already talked about covalent bonds, and then we 223 00:10:08,590 --> 00:10:11,060 talked about Lewis structures, which describe the electron 224 00:10:11,060 --> 00:10:13,060 configuration in covalent bonds. 225 00:10:13,060 --> 00:10:16,160 So now let's think about the other extreme of ionic bonds, 226 00:10:16,160 --> 00:10:19,390 and then we'll talk about polar covalent bonds to end, 227 00:10:19,390 --> 00:10:23,670 if we get there or will start with that in class on Monday. 228 00:10:23,670 --> 00:10:26,330 Also, public service announcement for all of you, 229 00:10:26,330 --> 00:10:28,620 voter registration in Massachusetts, which is where 230 00:10:28,620 --> 00:10:32,620 we are, is on Monday, the deadline if you want to 231 00:10:32,620 --> 00:10:33,800 register to vote. 232 00:10:33,800 --> 00:10:36,750 There's some websites up there that can guide you through 233 00:10:36,750 --> 00:10:38,850 registering and also can guide you through, if you need an 234 00:10:38,850 --> 00:10:41,480 absentee ballot for your home state. 235 00:10:41,480 --> 00:10:44,500 And I actually saw, and I saw a 5.111 student manning, 236 00:10:44,500 --> 00:10:47,230 there's some booths around MIT that will register you or get 237 00:10:47,230 --> 00:10:48,790 you an absentee ballot. 238 00:10:48,790 --> 00:10:52,120 So, the deadline's coming soon, so patriotic duty, I 239 00:10:52,120 --> 00:10:54,580 need to remind you of that as your chemistry teacher -- 240 00:10:54,580 --> 00:10:56,940 chemistry issues are important in politics as well. 241 00:10:56,940 --> 00:11:00,540 So make sure you get registered to vote. 242 00:11:00,540 --> 00:11:02,330 I just remembered one more announcement, too, that I did 243 00:11:02,330 --> 00:11:05,770 want to mention, some of you may have friends in 511-2 and 244 00:11:05,770 --> 00:11:08,610 have heard their class average for exam 1. 245 00:11:08,610 --> 00:11:11,100 And I want to tell you, this happens every year, their 246 00:11:11,100 --> 00:11:14,040 average was 15 points higher than our average. 247 00:11:14,040 --> 00:11:16,090 Last year, their average was 15 points 248 00:11:16,090 --> 00:11:17,140 higher than our average. 249 00:11:17,140 --> 00:11:18,690 This is for exam 1. 250 00:11:18,690 --> 00:11:23,660 This is what tends to happen to 511-2 grades as 251 00:11:23,660 --> 00:11:24,430 the exam goes on. 252 00:11:24,430 --> 00:11:25,800 This is what happens to 511-1. 253 00:11:25,800 --> 00:11:27,600 You guys are in a good spot. 254 00:11:27,600 --> 00:11:30,160 Also, I want to point out that what's not important is just 255 00:11:30,160 --> 00:11:32,610 that number grade, but also the letter that goes with it. 256 00:11:32,610 --> 00:11:36,990 So, for example, if you got a 69 in this class on this exam, 257 00:11:36,990 --> 00:11:38,260 that's a B minus. 258 00:11:38,260 --> 00:11:41,870 If you got a 69 on your exam in 511-2, that's a D, you 259 00:11:41,870 --> 00:11:42,920 didn't pass the exam. 260 00:11:42,920 --> 00:11:45,970 So keep that in mind when your friend might have gotten a 261 00:11:45,970 --> 00:11:49,670 higher number grade than you and you know you understand 262 00:11:49,670 --> 00:11:51,490 the similar material just as well. 263 00:11:51,490 --> 00:11:54,600 Similarly, an 80 in this class on the exam was a B plus, a 264 00:11:54,600 --> 00:11:58,790 very high B. An 80 in that class is going to be a C. So, 265 00:11:58,790 --> 00:12:01,890 just don't worry so much about exactly where that average 266 00:12:01,890 --> 00:12:03,330 lies, you really want to think about what the 267 00:12:03,330 --> 00:12:04,510 letter grade means. 268 00:12:04,510 --> 00:12:05,290 OK, I've said enough. 269 00:12:05,290 --> 00:12:05,650 I just -- 270 00:12:05,650 --> 00:12:07,550 I hate to see people discouraged, and I know that a 271 00:12:07,550 --> 00:12:10,030 few people have been feeling discouraged, so that's my 272 00:12:10,030 --> 00:12:14,030 long-winded explanation of exam 1 grades. 273 00:12:14,030 --> 00:12:14,390 All right. 274 00:12:14,390 --> 00:12:17,890 So, let's move on with life though, so talking about the 275 00:12:17,890 --> 00:12:20,070 breakdown of the octet rule. 276 00:12:20,070 --> 00:12:22,400 The first example where we're going to see a breakdown is 277 00:12:22,400 --> 00:12:25,470 any time we have an odd number of valence electrons. 278 00:12:25,470 --> 00:12:28,900 This is probably the easiest to explain and to think about, 279 00:12:28,900 --> 00:12:31,740 because if we have an odd number that means that we 280 00:12:31,740 --> 00:12:34,440 can't have our octet rule, because our octet rule works 281 00:12:34,440 --> 00:12:36,140 by pairing electrons. 282 00:12:36,140 --> 00:12:40,020 And if we have an odd number, we automatically have an odd 283 00:12:40,020 --> 00:12:41,440 electron out. 284 00:12:41,440 --> 00:12:44,560 So, if we look at an example, the methyl radical, we can 285 00:12:44,560 --> 00:12:47,120 first think about how we draw the Lewis structure -- we draw 286 00:12:47,120 --> 00:12:49,150 the skeletal structure here. 287 00:12:49,150 --> 00:12:50,900 And then what we're going to do is add up our valence 288 00:12:50,900 --> 00:12:55,580 electrons -- we have 3 times 1 for the hydrogen atoms, carbon 289 00:12:55,580 --> 00:12:58,730 has 4 valence electrons, so we have a total of 7. 290 00:12:58,730 --> 00:13:02,000 If we want to fill all of our valence shells in each of 291 00:13:02,000 --> 00:13:06,010 these atoms, we're going to need a total of 14 electrons. 292 00:13:06,010 --> 00:13:07,770 So, what we see we're left with is that we 293 00:13:07,770 --> 00:13:10,340 have 7 bonding electrons. 294 00:13:10,340 --> 00:13:14,020 So we can fill in 6 of those straightforward here, because 295 00:13:14,020 --> 00:13:16,370 we know that we need to make 3 different bonds. 296 00:13:16,370 --> 00:13:18,670 And now we're left over with 1 electron, we 297 00:13:18,670 --> 00:13:19,890 can't make a bond. 298 00:13:19,890 --> 00:13:24,190 So, what we'll do is carbon does not have an octet yet. 299 00:13:24,190 --> 00:13:27,195 We can't get it one, but we can do the best we can and 300 00:13:27,195 --> 00:13:30,890 help it out with adding that extra electron onto the carbon 301 00:13:30,890 --> 00:13:33,420 atom, so that at least we're getting as close as possible 302 00:13:33,420 --> 00:13:36,380 to filling our octets. 303 00:13:36,380 --> 00:13:40,280 This is what we call a radical species or a free radical. 304 00:13:40,280 --> 00:13:43,090 Free radical or radical species is essentially any 305 00:13:43,090 --> 00:13:46,580 type of a molecule that has this unpaired electron on one 306 00:13:46,580 --> 00:13:49,890 of the atoms. This might look really strange, we're used to 307 00:13:49,890 --> 00:13:51,180 seeing octets. 308 00:13:51,180 --> 00:13:54,630 But you'll realize, if you calculate the formal charge on 309 00:13:54,630 --> 00:13:56,470 this molecule, that it's not the worst 310 00:13:56,470 --> 00:13:58,190 situation ever for carbon. 311 00:13:58,190 --> 00:14:01,680 At least it's formal charge is zero, even if it doesn't have 312 00:14:01,680 --> 00:14:03,830 -- it would rather have an extra bond 313 00:14:03,830 --> 00:14:05,420 and have a full octet. 314 00:14:05,420 --> 00:14:08,120 But it's not the worst scenario that we can imagine. 315 00:14:08,120 --> 00:14:11,170 But still, radicals tend to be incredibly reactive because 316 00:14:11,170 --> 00:14:13,030 they do want to fill that octet. 317 00:14:13,030 --> 00:14:16,000 So, what happens when you have a radical is it tends to react 318 00:14:16,000 --> 00:14:18,640 with the first thing that it runs into, especially highly 319 00:14:18,640 --> 00:14:21,450 reactive radicals that are not stabilized in some other way, 320 00:14:21,450 --> 00:14:24,030 which you'll tend to talk about it organic chemistry -- 321 00:14:24,030 --> 00:14:26,510 how you can stabilize radicals. 322 00:14:26,510 --> 00:14:29,330 So the term free radical should sound familiar to you, 323 00:14:29,330 --> 00:14:32,390 whether you've heard it in chemistry before, or you 324 00:14:32,390 --> 00:14:35,330 haven't heard it in chemistry, but maybe have heard it, I 325 00:14:35,330 --> 00:14:37,710 don't know, commercials for facial 326 00:14:37,710 --> 00:14:40,150 products or other things. 327 00:14:40,150 --> 00:14:44,350 People like to talk about free radicals, and they're sort of 328 00:14:44,350 --> 00:14:46,680 the hero that gets rid of free radicals, which are 329 00:14:46,680 --> 00:14:47,320 antioxidants. 330 00:14:47,320 --> 00:14:51,450 So you hear in a lot of different creams or products 331 00:14:51,450 --> 00:14:54,120 or vitamins that they have antioxidants in them, which 332 00:14:54,120 --> 00:14:55,840 get rid of free radicals. 333 00:14:55,840 --> 00:14:58,010 The reason you would want to get rid of free radicals is 334 00:14:58,010 --> 00:15:00,630 that free radicals can damage DNA, so 335 00:15:00,630 --> 00:15:01,810 they're incredibly reactive. 336 00:15:01,810 --> 00:15:04,120 It makes sense that if they hit a strand of DNA, they're 337 00:15:04,120 --> 00:15:06,250 going to react with the DNA, you end up breaking the 338 00:15:06,250 --> 00:15:09,320 strands of DNA and causing DNA damage. 339 00:15:09,320 --> 00:15:12,580 So, this is actually what happens in aging because we 340 00:15:12,580 --> 00:15:14,950 have a lot of free radicals in our body. 341 00:15:14,950 --> 00:15:17,940 We can introduce them artificially, for example, 342 00:15:17,940 --> 00:15:20,760 cigarette smoke has a lot of really dangerous free radicals 343 00:15:20,760 --> 00:15:24,000 that get into the cells in your lungs, which damage your 344 00:15:24,000 --> 00:15:26,280 lung DNA, which can cause lung cancer. 345 00:15:26,280 --> 00:15:29,290 But also, all of us are living and breathing, which means 346 00:15:29,290 --> 00:15:33,250 we're having metabolism go on in our body, which means that 347 00:15:33,250 --> 00:15:37,550 as we use oxygen and as we metabolize our food, we are 348 00:15:37,550 --> 00:15:40,850 actually producing free radicals as well. 349 00:15:40,850 --> 00:15:44,510 So it's kind of a paradox because we need them because 350 00:15:44,510 --> 00:15:47,780 they are a natural by-product of these important processes, 351 00:15:47,780 --> 00:15:50,070 but then they can go on and damage cells, which is what 352 00:15:50,070 --> 00:15:54,160 kind of is causing aging and can lead to cancer. 353 00:15:54,160 --> 00:15:58,090 We have enzymes in our body that repair damage that is 354 00:15:58,090 --> 00:16:00,730 done by free radicals, that will put the strands of DNA 355 00:16:00,730 --> 00:16:01,710 back together. 356 00:16:01,710 --> 00:16:04,370 And we also have antioxidants in our body. 357 00:16:04,370 --> 00:16:08,920 So, you might know that, for example, very brightly colored 358 00:16:08,920 --> 00:16:12,830 fruit is full of antioxidants, they're full of chemicals that 359 00:16:12,830 --> 00:16:14,880 will neutralize free radicals. 360 00:16:14,880 --> 00:16:17,850 Lots of vitamins are also antioxidants, so we have 361 00:16:17,850 --> 00:16:20,870 vitamin A on the top there and vitamin E. 362 00:16:20,870 --> 00:16:22,980 So, the most common thing we think of when we think of free 363 00:16:22,980 --> 00:16:25,110 radicals is very reactive, bad for your 364 00:16:25,110 --> 00:16:28,250 body, causes DNA damage. 365 00:16:28,250 --> 00:16:30,530 But the reality is that free radicals are also 366 00:16:30,530 --> 00:16:31,990 essential for life. 367 00:16:31,990 --> 00:16:34,530 So this is kind of interesting to think about. 368 00:16:34,530 --> 00:16:38,080 And, for example, certain enzymes or proteins actually 369 00:16:38,080 --> 00:16:41,950 use free radicals in order to carry out the reactions that 370 00:16:41,950 --> 00:16:43,540 they carry out in your body. 371 00:16:43,540 --> 00:16:46,280 So, for example, this is a picture or a snapshot of a 372 00:16:46,280 --> 00:16:49,350 protein, this is a crystal structure of ribonucleotide 373 00:16:49,350 --> 00:16:51,830 reductase is what it's called. 374 00:16:51,830 --> 00:16:56,100 It's an enzyme that catalyzes the reaction of an essential 375 00:16:56,100 --> 00:16:59,980 step in both DNA synthesis and also DNA repair, and it 376 00:16:59,980 --> 00:17:04,090 requires having radicals within its active site in 377 00:17:04,090 --> 00:17:05,830 order to carry out the chemistry. 378 00:17:05,830 --> 00:17:08,910 So, this is kind of a neat paradox, because radicals 379 00:17:08,910 --> 00:17:13,350 damage DNA, but in order to repair your DNA, you need 380 00:17:13,350 --> 00:17:15,970 certain enzymes, and those enzymes require different 381 00:17:15,970 --> 00:17:17,610 types of free radicals. 382 00:17:17,610 --> 00:17:20,090 So, free radicals are definitely very interesting, 383 00:17:20,090 --> 00:17:22,720 and once we get -- or hopefully you will get into 384 00:17:22,720 --> 00:17:24,680 organic chemistry at some point and get to really think 385 00:17:24,680 --> 00:17:28,530 about what they do in terms of a radical mechanism. 386 00:17:28,530 --> 00:17:31,120 We can think about radicals that are also more stable, so 387 00:17:31,120 --> 00:17:35,690 let's do another example with the molecule nitric acid. 388 00:17:35,690 --> 00:17:40,220 So we can again, draw the skeleton here, and just by 389 00:17:40,220 --> 00:17:42,510 looking at it we might not know it's a radical, but as we 390 00:17:42,510 --> 00:17:45,190 start to count valence electrons, we should be able 391 00:17:45,190 --> 00:17:48,790 to figure it out very quickly, because what we have is 11 392 00:17:48,790 --> 00:17:50,350 valence electrons. 393 00:17:50,350 --> 00:17:53,630 We need 16 electrons to have full octets. 394 00:17:53,630 --> 00:17:56,270 So, we're left with 5 bonding electrons. 395 00:17:56,270 --> 00:17:59,760 We put a double bond in between our nitrogen and our 396 00:17:59,760 --> 00:18:03,840 oxygen, so what we're left over with is this single 397 00:18:03,840 --> 00:18:06,830 bonding electron, and we'll put that on the nitrogen here. 398 00:18:06,830 --> 00:18:09,140 And I'll explain why we put it on the nitrogen and not the 399 00:18:09,140 --> 00:18:11,080 oxygen in just a minute. 400 00:18:11,080 --> 00:18:16,350 But what we find is then once we fill in the rest of the 401 00:18:16,350 --> 00:18:19,480 valence electrons in terms of lone pairs, this is the 402 00:18:19,480 --> 00:18:21,460 structure that we get. 403 00:18:21,460 --> 00:18:24,340 And if you add up all of the formal charges on the nitrogen 404 00:18:24,340 --> 00:18:27,450 and on the oxygen, what you'll see is they're both 0. 405 00:18:27,450 --> 00:18:30,600 So if you happen to try drawing this structure and you 406 00:18:30,600 --> 00:18:33,710 put the lone pair on oxygen and then you figured out the 407 00:18:33,710 --> 00:18:36,900 formal charge and saw that you had a split charge, a plus 1 408 00:18:36,900 --> 00:18:39,440 and a minus 1, the first thing you might want to try is 409 00:18:39,440 --> 00:18:41,430 putting it on the other atom, and once you did that you'd 410 00:18:41,430 --> 00:18:42,990 see that you had a better structure 411 00:18:42,990 --> 00:18:46,500 with no formal charge. 412 00:18:46,500 --> 00:18:49,300 I have to mention what nitric oxide does, because it's a 413 00:18:49,300 --> 00:18:50,850 very interesting molecule. 414 00:18:50,850 --> 00:18:54,670 Don't get it confused with nitrous oxide, which is happy 415 00:18:54,670 --> 00:18:56,880 gas, that's n o 2. 416 00:18:56,880 --> 00:19:00,880 This is nitric oxide, and it's actually much more interesting 417 00:19:00,880 --> 00:19:02,430 than nitrous oxide. 418 00:19:02,430 --> 00:19:04,690 It's a signaling molecule in your body, it's one of the 419 00:19:04,690 --> 00:19:08,050 very few signaling molecules that is a gas, and obviously, 420 00:19:08,050 --> 00:19:09,440 it's also a radical. 421 00:19:09,440 --> 00:19:12,350 What happens with n o is that it's produced in the 422 00:19:12,350 --> 00:19:15,210 endothelium of your blood vessels, so the inner lining 423 00:19:15,210 --> 00:19:20,280 of your blood vessels, and it signals for smooth muscle that 424 00:19:20,280 --> 00:19:23,180 line your blood vessels to relax, which causes 425 00:19:23,180 --> 00:19:25,900 vasodilation , and by vasodilation, I just mean a 426 00:19:25,900 --> 00:19:27,850 widening of the blood vessels. 427 00:19:27,850 --> 00:19:31,320 So, n o signals for your blood vessels to get wider and allow 428 00:19:31,320 --> 00:19:33,070 more blood to flow through. 429 00:19:33,070 --> 00:19:35,860 And if you think about what consequences this could have, 430 00:19:35,860 --> 00:19:39,320 in terms of places where they have high altitude, so they 431 00:19:39,320 --> 00:19:42,080 have lower oxygen levels, do you think that they produce 432 00:19:42,080 --> 00:19:47,440 more or less and n o their body? 433 00:19:47,440 --> 00:19:48,030 More? 434 00:19:48,030 --> 00:19:49,750 Yeah, it turns out they do produce more. 435 00:19:49,750 --> 00:19:52,810 The reason they produce more is that they want to have more 436 00:19:52,810 --> 00:19:55,340 blood flowing through their veins so that they can get 437 00:19:55,340 --> 00:19:59,060 more oxygenated blood into different parts of their body. 438 00:19:59,060 --> 00:20:02,770 N o is also a target in the pharmaceutical industry. 439 00:20:02,770 --> 00:20:06,260 A very famous one that became famous I guess over 10 years 440 00:20:06,260 --> 00:20:10,700 ago now, and this is from a drug that actually targets one 441 00:20:10,700 --> 00:20:14,440 of n o's receptors, and this drug has the net effect of 442 00:20:14,440 --> 00:20:18,190 vasodilation or widening of blood vessels in a certain 443 00:20:18,190 --> 00:20:19,650 area in the body. 444 00:20:19,650 --> 00:20:22,880 So this is viagra, some of you may be familiar, I think 445 00:20:22,880 --> 00:20:24,880 everyone's heard of viagra. 446 00:20:24,880 --> 00:20:27,370 Now you know how viagra works. 447 00:20:27,370 --> 00:20:31,770 Viagra breaks down, or it inhibits the breakdown of n 448 00:20:31,770 --> 00:20:35,010 o's binding partner in just certain areas, not everywhere 449 00:20:35,010 --> 00:20:36,910 in your body. 450 00:20:36,910 --> 00:20:40,060 So, in those areas, what happens is you get more n o 451 00:20:40,060 --> 00:20:42,330 signaling, you get more vasodilation, you get 452 00:20:42,330 --> 00:20:44,220 increased blood flow. 453 00:20:44,220 --> 00:20:45,770 So that's a little bit of pharmacology 454 00:20:45,770 --> 00:20:47,750 for you here today. 455 00:20:47,750 --> 00:20:50,480 All right, so let's talk about one more example in terms of 456 00:20:50,480 --> 00:20:52,990 the breakdown of the octet rule with radicals. 457 00:20:52,990 --> 00:20:57,230 Let's think about molecular oxygen. 458 00:20:57,230 --> 00:21:00,970 So let's go ahead and quickly draw this Lewis structure. 459 00:21:00,970 --> 00:21:02,840 We have o 2. 460 00:21:02,840 --> 00:21:04,130 The second thing we need to do is 461 00:21:04,130 --> 00:21:06,900 figure out valence electrons. 462 00:21:06,900 --> 00:21:11,060 6 plus 6, so we would expect to see 12. 463 00:21:11,060 --> 00:21:17,850 For a complete octet we would need 8 electrons each, so 16. 464 00:21:17,850 --> 00:21:25,250 So in terms of bonding electrons, what we have is 4 465 00:21:25,250 --> 00:21:26,190 bonding electrons. 466 00:21:26,190 --> 00:21:29,890 So, we can go ahead and fill those in as a double bond 467 00:21:29,890 --> 00:21:32,200 between the two oxygens. 468 00:21:32,200 --> 00:21:36,140 So, what we end up having left, and this would be step 469 00:21:36,140 --> 00:21:40,820 six then because five was just filling in that, is 12 minus 470 00:21:40,820 --> 00:21:45,890 4, so we have 8 lone pair electrons left. 471 00:21:45,890 --> 00:21:51,290 So we can just fill it in to our oxygens like this. 472 00:21:51,290 --> 00:21:53,970 All right, so using everything we've learned about Lewis 473 00:21:53,970 --> 00:21:58,730 structures, we here have the structure of molecular oxygen. 474 00:21:58,730 --> 00:22:01,100 And I just want to point out for anyone that gets confused, 475 00:22:01,100 --> 00:22:05,500 when we talk about oxygen as an atom, that's o, but 476 00:22:05,500 --> 00:22:08,240 molecular oxygen is actually o 2, the same for molecular 477 00:22:08,240 --> 00:22:09,960 hydrogen, for example. 478 00:22:09,960 --> 00:22:12,430 All right, so let's look at what the actual Lewis 479 00:22:12,430 --> 00:22:15,780 structure is for molecular oxygen, and it turns out that 480 00:22:15,780 --> 00:22:19,030 actually we don't have a double bond, we have a single 481 00:22:19,030 --> 00:22:21,030 bond, and we have two radicals. 482 00:22:21,030 --> 00:22:23,820 And any time we have two radicals, we talk about what's 483 00:22:23,820 --> 00:22:26,220 called a biradical. 484 00:22:26,220 --> 00:22:30,480 And while using this exception to the Lewis structure rule, 485 00:22:30,480 --> 00:22:33,390 to the octet rule for odd numbers of valence electrons 486 00:22:33,390 --> 00:22:37,020 can clue us into the fact that we have a radical, there's 487 00:22:37,020 --> 00:22:40,220 really no way for us to use Lewis structures to predict 488 00:22:40,220 --> 00:22:42,970 when we have a biradical, right, because we would just 489 00:22:42,970 --> 00:22:45,660 predict that we would get this Lewis structure here. 490 00:22:45,660 --> 00:22:48,270 So, when I first introduced Lewis structures, I said these 491 00:22:48,270 --> 00:22:51,790 are great, they're really easy to use and they work about 90% 492 00:22:51,790 --> 00:22:53,080 of the time. 493 00:22:53,080 --> 00:22:55,750 This falls into that 10% that Lewis structures 494 00:22:55,750 --> 00:22:56,930 don't work for us. 495 00:22:56,930 --> 00:23:00,260 It turns out, in order to understand that this is the 496 00:23:00,260 --> 00:23:03,950 electron configuration for o 2, we need to use something 497 00:23:03,950 --> 00:23:07,870 called molecular orbital theory, and just wait till 498 00:23:07,870 --> 00:23:10,190 next Wednesday and we will tell you what that is, and we 499 00:23:10,190 --> 00:23:12,970 will, in fact, use it for oxygen. 500 00:23:12,970 --> 00:23:15,650 But until that point, I'll just tell you that molecular 501 00:23:15,650 --> 00:23:19,150 orbital theory takes into account quantum mechanics, 502 00:23:19,150 --> 00:23:21,060 which Lewis theory does not. 503 00:23:21,060 --> 00:23:23,950 So that's why, in fact, there are those 10% of cases that 504 00:23:23,950 --> 00:23:26,960 Lewis structures don't work for. 505 00:23:26,960 --> 00:23:29,850 All right, the second case of exceptions to the octet rule 506 00:23:29,850 --> 00:23:32,530 are when we have octet deficient molecules. 507 00:23:32,530 --> 00:23:34,570 So basically, this means we're going to have a molecule 508 00:23:34,570 --> 00:23:38,530 that's stable, even though it doesn't have a complete octet. 509 00:23:38,530 --> 00:23:41,450 And these tend to happen in group 13 molecules, and 510 00:23:41,450 --> 00:23:44,790 actually happen almost exclusively in group 13 511 00:23:44,790 --> 00:23:48,210 molecules, specifically with boron and aluminum. 512 00:23:48,210 --> 00:23:51,010 So, any time you see a Lewis structure with boron or 513 00:23:51,010 --> 00:23:53,760 aluminum, you want to just remember that I should look 514 00:23:53,760 --> 00:23:57,080 out to make sure that these might have an incomplete 515 00:23:57,080 --> 00:24:01,070 octet, so look out for that when you see those atoms. 516 00:24:01,070 --> 00:24:05,910 So, let's look at b f 3 as our example here. 517 00:24:05,910 --> 00:24:09,290 And what we see for b f 3 is the number of valence 518 00:24:09,290 --> 00:24:13,420 electrons that we have are 24, because the valence number of 519 00:24:13,420 --> 00:24:16,330 electrons for boron is 3, and then 3 520 00:24:16,330 --> 00:24:19,910 times 7 for each fluorine. 521 00:24:19,910 --> 00:24:24,070 For total filled octets we need 32, so that means we need 522 00:24:24,070 --> 00:24:25,420 8 bonding electrons. 523 00:24:25,420 --> 00:24:28,920 So, let's assign two to each bond here, and then we're 524 00:24:28,920 --> 00:24:31,160 going to have two extra bonding electrons, so let's 525 00:24:31,160 --> 00:24:33,350 just arbitrarily pick a fluorine to give 526 00:24:33,350 --> 00:24:35,850 a double bond to. 527 00:24:35,850 --> 00:24:38,340 And then we can fill in the lone pair electrons, we have 528 00:24:38,340 --> 00:24:40,250 16 left over. 529 00:24:40,250 --> 00:24:42,660 So thinking about what the formal charge is, if we want 530 00:24:42,660 --> 00:24:45,470 to figure out the formal charge for the boron here, 531 00:24:45,470 --> 00:24:48,590 what we're talking about is the valence number for boron, 532 00:24:48,590 --> 00:24:52,430 which is 3, minus 0 because there are no lone pairs, minus 533 00:24:52,430 --> 00:24:55,450 1/2 of 8 because there are eight shared electrons. 534 00:24:55,450 --> 00:24:58,520 We get a formal charge of minus 1. 535 00:24:58,520 --> 00:25:01,380 What is our formal charge since we learned this on 536 00:25:01,380 --> 00:25:05,250 Monday for thinking about the double 537 00:25:05,250 --> 00:25:07,770 bonded fluorine in boron? 538 00:25:07,770 --> 00:25:10,280 So, look at your notes and look at the fluorine that has 539 00:25:10,280 --> 00:25:12,940 a double bond with it, and I want you to go ahead and tell 540 00:25:12,940 --> 00:25:32,030 me what that formal charge should be. 541 00:25:32,030 --> 00:25:46,650 All right, let's take 10 more seconds on that. 542 00:25:46,650 --> 00:25:50,400 OK, so 49%. 543 00:25:50,400 --> 00:25:54,800 So, let's go look back at the notes, we'll talk about why 544 00:25:54,800 --> 00:25:58,610 about 50% of you are right, and 50% need to review, which 545 00:25:58,610 --> 00:26:00,880 I totally understand you haven't had time to do yet, 546 00:26:00,880 --> 00:26:04,190 your formal charge rules from Monday's class, there were 547 00:26:04,190 --> 00:26:05,520 other things going on. 548 00:26:05,520 --> 00:26:08,490 But let's talk about how we figure out formal charge. 549 00:26:08,490 --> 00:26:12,390 Formal charge is just the number of valence electrons 550 00:26:12,390 --> 00:26:14,720 you have. So fluorine has 7. 551 00:26:14,720 --> 00:26:17,140 You should be able to look at a periodic table and see that 552 00:26:17,140 --> 00:26:18,550 fluorine has seven. 553 00:26:18,550 --> 00:26:21,760 What we subtract from that is the number of lone pair 554 00:26:21,760 --> 00:26:25,280 electrons, and there are four lone pair electrons on this 555 00:26:25,280 --> 00:26:28,770 double bonded fluorine, so it's minus 4. 556 00:26:28,770 --> 00:26:32,150 Then we subtract 1/2 of the shared electrons. 557 00:26:32,150 --> 00:26:34,870 Well we have a double bond with boron here, so we have a 558 00:26:34,870 --> 00:26:37,050 total of 4 shared electrons. 559 00:26:37,050 --> 00:26:41,350 And when we do the subtraction here, what we end up with is a 560 00:26:41,350 --> 00:26:46,180 formal charge plus 1 on the double bonded fluorine. 561 00:26:46,180 --> 00:26:48,580 Without even doing a calculation, what do you think 562 00:26:48,580 --> 00:26:50,540 that the formal charge should be on you 563 00:26:50,540 --> 00:26:52,940 single bonded fluorines? 564 00:26:52,940 --> 00:26:53,400 Good. 565 00:26:53,400 --> 00:26:56,700 OK, it should be 0 and it is 0. 566 00:26:56,700 --> 00:27:01,420 The reason it's zero in terms of calculating it is 7 minus 6 567 00:27:01,420 --> 00:27:04,150 lone pair electrons minus 1/2 half of 2 shared 568 00:27:04,150 --> 00:27:05,840 electrons is 0. 569 00:27:05,840 --> 00:27:09,140 The reason that you all told me, I think, and I hope, is 570 00:27:09,140 --> 00:27:12,890 that you know that the formal charge on individual atoms has 571 00:27:12,890 --> 00:27:15,120 to equal the total charge on the molecule. 572 00:27:15,120 --> 00:27:18,030 So if we already have a minus 1 and a plus 1, and we know we 573 00:27:18,030 --> 00:27:20,740 have no charge in the molecule, and we only have one 574 00:27:20,740 --> 00:27:23,640 type of atom left to talk about, that formal charge had 575 00:27:23,640 --> 00:27:25,240 better be 0. 576 00:27:25,240 --> 00:27:25,690 OK. 577 00:27:25,690 --> 00:27:27,940 So this looks pretty good in terms of a Lewis structure, we 578 00:27:27,940 --> 00:27:29,760 figured out our formal charges. 579 00:27:29,760 --> 00:27:32,080 These also look pretty good, too, we don't have too much 580 00:27:32,080 --> 00:27:33,800 charge separation. 581 00:27:33,800 --> 00:27:37,640 But what actually it turns out is that if you experimentally 582 00:27:37,640 --> 00:27:41,060 look at what type of bonds you have, it turns out that all 583 00:27:41,060 --> 00:27:44,840 three of the b f bonds are equal in length, and they all 584 00:27:44,840 --> 00:27:48,160 have a length that would correspond to a single bond. 585 00:27:48,160 --> 00:27:51,790 So, experimentally, we know we have to throw out this Lewis 586 00:27:51,790 --> 00:27:54,430 structure here, we have some more information, let's think 587 00:27:54,430 --> 00:27:57,430 about how this could happen. 588 00:27:57,430 --> 00:28:00,330 So this could happen, for example, is if we take this 589 00:28:00,330 --> 00:28:03,490 two of the electrons that are in the b f double bond and we 590 00:28:03,490 --> 00:28:06,810 put it right on to the fluorine here, so now we have 591 00:28:06,810 --> 00:28:08,280 all single bonds. 592 00:28:08,280 --> 00:28:11,630 And let's think about what the formal charge situation would 593 00:28:11,630 --> 00:28:13,970 be in this case here. 594 00:28:13,970 --> 00:28:16,990 What happens here is now we would have a formal charge of 595 00:28:16,990 --> 00:28:20,770 0 on the boron, we'd have a formal charge of 0 on all of 596 00:28:20,770 --> 00:28:22,760 the fluorine molecules as well. 597 00:28:22,760 --> 00:28:25,480 So, it turns out that actually looking at formal charge, even 598 00:28:25,480 --> 00:28:28,220 though the first case didn't look too bad, this case 599 00:28:28,220 --> 00:28:28,970 actually looks a lot better. 600 00:28:28,970 --> 00:28:32,320 We have absolutely no formal charge separation whatsoever. 601 00:28:32,320 --> 00:28:35,390 It turns out again, boron and aluminum, those are the two 602 00:28:35,390 --> 00:28:36,890 that you want to look out for. 603 00:28:36,890 --> 00:28:39,970 They can be perfectly happy without a full octet, they're 604 00:28:39,970 --> 00:28:44,510 perfectly happy with 6 instead of 8 in terms of electrons in 605 00:28:44,510 --> 00:28:45,410 their valence shell. 606 00:28:45,410 --> 00:28:48,650 So that is our exception the number two. 607 00:28:48,650 --> 00:28:51,230 We have one more exception and this is a valence shell 608 00:28:51,230 --> 00:28:53,950 expansion, and this can be the hardest to look out for, 609 00:28:53,950 --> 00:28:57,770 students tend to forget to look for this one, but it's 610 00:28:57,770 --> 00:28:59,860 very important as well, because there are a lot of 611 00:28:59,860 --> 00:29:01,610 structures that are affected for this . 612 00:29:01,610 --> 00:29:04,660 And this is only applicable if we're talking about a central 613 00:29:04,660 --> 00:29:08,520 atom that has an n value or a principle quantum number 614 00:29:08,520 --> 00:29:11,420 that's equal to or greater than three. 615 00:29:11,420 --> 00:29:16,110 What happens when we have n that's equal to or greater to 616 00:29:16,110 --> 00:29:19,790 three, is that now, in addition to s orbitals and p 617 00:29:19,790 --> 00:29:23,090 orbitals, what else do we have available to us? 618 00:29:23,090 --> 00:29:24,350 D orbitals, great. 619 00:29:24,350 --> 00:29:28,470 So what we see is we have some empty d orbitals, which means 620 00:29:28,470 --> 00:29:31,310 that we can have more than eight electrons that fit 621 00:29:31,310 --> 00:29:33,400 around that central atom. 622 00:29:33,400 --> 00:29:35,380 If you're looking to see if this is going to happen, do 623 00:29:35,380 --> 00:29:37,020 you think this would happen with a large or 624 00:29:37,020 --> 00:29:41,350 small central atom? 625 00:29:41,350 --> 00:29:43,430 So think of it in terms of just fitting. 626 00:29:43,430 --> 00:29:47,320 We've got to fit more than 8 electrons around here. 627 00:29:47,320 --> 00:29:50,860 Yeah, so it's going to be, we need to have a large central 628 00:29:50,860 --> 00:29:53,050 atom in order for this to take place. 629 00:29:53,050 --> 00:29:55,470 Literally, we just need to fit everything around is probably 630 00:29:55,470 --> 00:29:58,050 the easiest way to think about it. 631 00:29:58,050 --> 00:30:02,160 And what happens is it also tends to have small atoms that 632 00:30:02,160 --> 00:30:02,860 it's bonded to. 633 00:30:02,860 --> 00:30:06,900 Again, just think of it in terms of all fitting in there. 634 00:30:06,900 --> 00:30:10,160 So, let's take an example p c l 5. 635 00:30:10,160 --> 00:30:12,660 The first example is the more straightforward example, 636 00:30:12,660 --> 00:30:15,240 because let's start to draw the Lewis structure, and what 637 00:30:15,240 --> 00:30:19,250 we see is that phosphorous has five chlorines around it. 638 00:30:19,250 --> 00:30:21,980 So we already know if we want to form five bonds we've 639 00:30:21,980 --> 00:30:23,120 broken our octet rule. 640 00:30:23,120 --> 00:30:25,570 But let's go through and figure this out and see how 641 00:30:25,570 --> 00:30:26,660 that happens. 642 00:30:26,660 --> 00:30:29,900 What we know is we need 40 valence electrons, 643 00:30:29,900 --> 00:30:31,090 we have those -- 644 00:30:31,090 --> 00:30:35,410 5 from the phosphorous, and we have 7 from each of the 645 00:30:35,410 --> 00:30:39,190 chlorine atoms. If we were to fill out all of those octets, 646 00:30:39,190 --> 00:30:42,850 that would be 48 electrons. 647 00:30:42,850 --> 00:30:45,710 So what we end up with when we do our Lewis structure 648 00:30:45,710 --> 00:30:48,270 calculation is that we only have 8 bonding electrons 649 00:30:48,270 --> 00:30:49,560 available to us. 650 00:30:49,560 --> 00:30:52,270 So we can fill those in between the phosphorous and 651 00:30:52,270 --> 00:30:55,240 the chlorine, those 8 bonding electrons. 652 00:30:55,240 --> 00:30:59,000 So, this is obviously a problem. 653 00:30:59,000 --> 00:31:04,080 To make 5 p c l bonds we need 10 shared electrons, and we 654 00:31:04,080 --> 00:31:06,990 know that that's the situation because it's called p c l 5 655 00:31:06,990 --> 00:31:10,530 and not p c l 4, so we can go right ahead and add in that 656 00:31:10,530 --> 00:31:13,220 extra electron pair. 657 00:31:13,220 --> 00:31:16,350 So we've used up 10 for bonding, so that means what we 658 00:31:16,350 --> 00:31:19,740 have left is 30 lone pair electrons, and I would not 659 00:31:19,740 --> 00:31:22,120 recommend filling all of these in your notes right now, you 660 00:31:22,120 --> 00:31:24,500 can go back and do that, but just know the rest end up 661 00:31:24,500 --> 00:31:27,300 filling up the octets for all of the chlorines. 662 00:31:27,300 --> 00:31:30,450 So, in this first case where you actually need to make more 663 00:31:30,450 --> 00:31:33,170 than for bonds, you will immediately know you need to 664 00:31:33,170 --> 00:31:37,240 use this exception to the Lewis structure octet rule, 665 00:31:37,240 --> 00:31:39,130 but sometimes it won't be as obvious. 666 00:31:39,130 --> 00:31:43,090 So, let's look at c r o 4, the 2 minus version here, so a 667 00:31:43,090 --> 00:31:47,530 chromate ion, and if we draw the skeletal structure, we 668 00:31:47,530 --> 00:31:51,940 have four things that the chromate needs to bond to. 669 00:31:51,940 --> 00:31:54,200 So, let's do the Lewis structure again. 670 00:31:54,200 --> 00:31:57,320 When we figure out the valence electrons, we have total, we 671 00:31:57,320 --> 00:32:01,760 have 6 from the chromium, we have 6 from each of the 672 00:32:01,760 --> 00:32:06,450 different oxygens, and where did this 2 come from? 673 00:32:06,450 --> 00:32:07,780 Yup, the negative charge. 674 00:32:07,780 --> 00:32:10,600 So, remember, we have 2 extra electrons hanging out in our 675 00:32:10,600 --> 00:32:12,520 molecule, so we need to include those. 676 00:32:12,520 --> 00:32:13,670 We have a total of 32. 677 00:32:13,670 --> 00:32:16,870 40 are needed to fill up octets. 678 00:32:16,870 --> 00:32:20,820 So again, we have 8 bonding electrons available, so we can 679 00:32:20,820 --> 00:32:24,560 go ahead and fill these in between each of the bonds. 680 00:32:24,560 --> 00:32:27,850 What happens is that we then have 24 lone pair electrons 681 00:32:27,850 --> 00:32:31,810 left, and we can fill those in like this. 682 00:32:31,810 --> 00:32:34,350 And the problem comes now when we figure 683 00:32:34,350 --> 00:32:35,810 out the formal charge. 684 00:32:35,810 --> 00:32:38,310 So, when we do that what we find is that the chromium has 685 00:32:38,310 --> 00:32:42,510 a formal charge of plus 1, and that each of the oxygens has a 686 00:32:42,510 --> 00:32:44,040 total charge of minus 1. 687 00:32:44,040 --> 00:32:47,240 So we actually have a bit of charge separation here. 688 00:32:47,240 --> 00:32:49,560 Without even doing a calculation, what is the total 689 00:32:49,560 --> 00:32:53,420 charge of these that are added up? 690 00:32:53,420 --> 00:32:55,140 OK, it's minus 2, that's right. 691 00:32:55,140 --> 00:32:57,850 We know that the total charge of each of the formal charges 692 00:32:57,850 --> 00:33:00,290 has to add up to minus 2, because that's the charge in 693 00:33:00,290 --> 00:33:01,210 our molecule. 694 00:33:01,210 --> 00:33:04,130 We can also just calculate it -- the chromate gives us a 695 00:33:04,130 --> 00:33:07,030 plus 2, then we have 4 times minus 1 for each of the 696 00:33:07,030 --> 00:33:09,600 oxygens, so we have a minus 2. 697 00:33:09,600 --> 00:33:11,950 So, we have some charge separation here, and in some 698 00:33:11,950 --> 00:33:15,380 cases, if we're not at n equals 3 or higher, there's 699 00:33:15,380 --> 00:33:17,470 really nothing we can do about it, this would be the best 700 00:33:17,470 --> 00:33:18,580 structure we can do. 701 00:33:18,580 --> 00:33:22,530 But since we have these d orbitals available, we can use 702 00:33:22,530 --> 00:33:25,100 them, and it turns out that experimentally this is what's 703 00:33:25,100 --> 00:33:29,180 found, that the length and the strength are not single bonds, 704 00:33:29,180 --> 00:33:32,855 but they're actually something between a single bond and a 705 00:33:32,855 --> 00:33:33,970 double bond. 706 00:33:33,970 --> 00:33:37,220 So how do we get a 1 and 1/2 bond, for example, what's the 707 00:33:37,220 --> 00:33:39,710 term that let's us do that? 708 00:33:39,710 --> 00:33:40,360 Resonance. 709 00:33:40,360 --> 00:33:40,920 That's right. 710 00:33:40,920 --> 00:33:43,130 So that's exactly what's happening here. 711 00:33:43,130 --> 00:33:46,160 So, if we went ahead and drew this structure here where we 712 00:33:46,160 --> 00:33:51,230 have now two double bonds and two single bonds, that would 713 00:33:51,230 --> 00:33:54,920 be in resonance with another structure where we have two 714 00:33:54,920 --> 00:33:58,220 double bonds instead to these two oxygens, and now, single 715 00:33:58,220 --> 00:34:00,020 bonds to these two oxygens. 716 00:34:00,020 --> 00:34:02,810 We can actually also have several other resonance 717 00:34:02,810 --> 00:34:04,140 structures as well. 718 00:34:04,140 --> 00:34:06,500 Remember, the definition of a resonance structure is where 719 00:34:06,500 --> 00:34:09,470 all the atoms stay the same, but what we can do is move 720 00:34:09,470 --> 00:34:11,830 around the electrons -- we're moving around those extra two 721 00:34:11,830 --> 00:34:14,280 electrons that can be in double bonds. 722 00:34:14,280 --> 00:34:17,140 So, why don't you tell me how many other resonance 723 00:34:17,140 --> 00:34:27,170 structures you would expect to see for this chromate ion? 724 00:34:27,170 --> 00:34:50,960 All right, let's take 10 more seconds on this. 725 00:34:50,960 --> 00:34:51,640 All right. 726 00:34:51,640 --> 00:34:52,260 This is good. 727 00:34:52,260 --> 00:34:55,980 I know this is a real split response, but the right answer 728 00:34:55,980 --> 00:34:58,360 is the one that is indicated in the graph 729 00:34:58,360 --> 00:34:59,930 here that it's four. 730 00:34:59,930 --> 00:35:02,380 This takes a little bit of time to get used to thinking 731 00:35:02,380 --> 00:35:04,890 about all the different Lewis structures you can have. So, 732 00:35:04,890 --> 00:35:06,990 you guys should all go back home if you can't see it 733 00:35:06,990 --> 00:35:10,330 immediately right now and try drawing out those four other 734 00:35:10,330 --> 00:35:12,360 Lewis structures, for chromate, 735 00:35:12,360 --> 00:35:13,700 there are four others. 736 00:35:13,700 --> 00:35:16,240 You'll probably get a chance to literally do this example 737 00:35:16,240 --> 00:35:19,420 in recitation where you draw out all four, but it's even 738 00:35:19,420 --> 00:35:21,500 better to make sure you understand it before you get 739 00:35:21,500 --> 00:35:22,450 to that point. 740 00:35:22,450 --> 00:35:25,800 So, we can go back to the class notes. 741 00:35:25,800 --> 00:35:28,280 So it turns out there's four other Lewis structures, so 742 00:35:28,280 --> 00:35:30,410 basically just think about all the other different 743 00:35:30,410 --> 00:35:32,910 combinations where you can have single and double bonds, 744 00:35:32,910 --> 00:35:35,350 and when you draw those out, you end up with four. 745 00:35:35,350 --> 00:35:37,730 So, for every single one of these Lewis structures, we 746 00:35:37,730 --> 00:35:40,680 could figure out what the formal charges are, and what 747 00:35:40,680 --> 00:35:43,600 we would find is that it's 0 on the chromium, it's 0 for 748 00:35:43,600 --> 00:35:46,630 the double bonded oxygens, and it's going to be negative 1 749 00:35:46,630 --> 00:35:48,320 for the single bonded oxygens. 750 00:35:48,320 --> 00:35:52,050 So, what you can see is that in this situation, we end up 751 00:35:52,050 --> 00:35:55,310 having less formal charge separation, and that's what 752 00:35:55,310 --> 00:35:58,180 we're looking for, that's the more stable structure. 753 00:35:58,180 --> 00:36:02,570 So any time you can have an expanded octet -- an expanded 754 00:36:02,570 --> 00:36:05,940 valence shell, where you have n is equal to or greater than 755 00:36:05,940 --> 00:36:09,510 3, and by expanding and adding more electrons into that 756 00:36:09,510 --> 00:36:12,380 valence shell, you lower the charge separation, 757 00:36:12,380 --> 00:36:13,560 you want to do that. 758 00:36:13,560 --> 00:36:17,000 I also want to point out, I basically said there's 6 759 00:36:17,000 --> 00:36:19,600 different ways we can draw this in terms of drawing all 760 00:36:19,600 --> 00:36:20,880 the resonance structures. 761 00:36:20,880 --> 00:36:23,340 You might be wondering if you have to figure out the formal 762 00:36:23,340 --> 00:36:25,810 charge for each structure individually, and the answer 763 00:36:25,810 --> 00:36:28,560 is no, you can pick any single structure and the formal 764 00:36:28,560 --> 00:36:30,360 charges will work out the same. 765 00:36:30,360 --> 00:36:32,900 So, for example, if you pick this structure and your friend 766 00:36:32,900 --> 00:36:35,590 picks this structure, you'll both get the right answer that 767 00:36:35,590 --> 00:36:38,930 there's just the negative 1 on the oxygens and no other 768 00:36:38,930 --> 00:36:42,130 formal charges in the molecule. 769 00:36:42,130 --> 00:36:42,480 All right. 770 00:36:42,480 --> 00:36:45,880 So those are the end of our exceptions to the octet rule 771 00:36:45,880 --> 00:36:48,080 for Lewis structures, that's everything we're going to say 772 00:36:48,080 --> 00:36:49,670 about Lewis structures. 773 00:36:49,670 --> 00:36:52,040 And remember, that when we talk about Lewis structures, 774 00:36:52,040 --> 00:36:55,140 what they tell us is the electron configuration in 775 00:36:55,140 --> 00:36:57,520 covalent bonds, so that valence shell electron 776 00:36:57,520 --> 00:36:58,740 configuration. 777 00:36:58,740 --> 00:37:02,100 So we talked a lot about covalent bonds before we got 778 00:37:02,100 --> 00:37:05,290 into Lewis structures, and then how to represent covalent 779 00:37:05,290 --> 00:37:07,490 bonds by Lewis structures. 780 00:37:07,490 --> 00:37:10,730 So now I'll say a little bit about ionic bonds, which are 781 00:37:10,730 --> 00:37:14,080 the other extreme, and when you have an ionic bond, what 782 00:37:14,080 --> 00:37:18,420 you have now is a complete transfer of either one or many 783 00:37:18,420 --> 00:37:22,370 electrons between two atoms. So the key word for covalent 784 00:37:22,370 --> 00:37:25,440 bond was electron sharing, the key word for ionic bonds is 785 00:37:25,440 --> 00:37:27,660 electron transfer. 786 00:37:27,660 --> 00:37:30,700 And the bonding between the two atoms ends up resulting 787 00:37:30,700 --> 00:37:33,700 from an attraction that we're very familiar with, which is 788 00:37:33,700 --> 00:37:36,130 the Coulomb or the electrostatic attraction 789 00:37:36,130 --> 00:37:37,930 between the negatively charged and the 790 00:37:37,930 --> 00:37:41,610 positively charged ions. 791 00:37:41,610 --> 00:37:42,690 So let's take an example. 792 00:37:42,690 --> 00:37:45,940 The easiest one to think about is where we have a negative 1 793 00:37:45,940 --> 00:37:47,360 and a positive 1 ion. 794 00:37:47,360 --> 00:37:51,460 So this is salt, n a c l -- actually lots of things are 795 00:37:51,460 --> 00:37:54,610 call salt, but this is what we think of a table salt. 796 00:37:54,610 --> 00:37:57,970 So, let's think about what we have to do if we want the form 797 00:37:57,970 --> 00:38:01,690 sodium chloride from the neutral sodium and chlorine 798 00:38:01,690 --> 00:38:04,570 atoms. So, the first thing that we're going to need to do 799 00:38:04,570 --> 00:38:08,540 is we need to convert sodium into sodium plus. 800 00:38:08,540 --> 00:38:10,610 What does this process look like to you? 801 00:38:10,610 --> 00:38:13,470 Is this one of those periodic trends, perhaps? 802 00:38:13,470 --> 00:38:17,150 Can anyone name what we're looking at here? 803 00:38:17,150 --> 00:38:18,930 Exactly, ionization energy. 804 00:38:18,930 --> 00:38:21,050 So, if we're going to talk about the energy difference 805 00:38:21,050 --> 00:38:23,420 here, what we're going to be talking about is the 806 00:38:23,420 --> 00:38:27,150 ionization energy, or the energy it takes to rip off an 807 00:38:27,150 --> 00:38:32,370 electron from sodium in order to form the sodium plus ion. 808 00:38:32,370 --> 00:38:34,080 So, we can just put right here, that's 494 809 00:38:34,080 --> 00:38:37,200 kilojoules per mole. 810 00:38:37,200 --> 00:38:39,880 The next thing that we want to look at is chlorine, so in 811 00:38:39,880 --> 00:38:42,680 terms of chlorine we need to go to chlorine minus, so we 812 00:38:42,680 --> 00:38:44,860 actually need to add an electron. 813 00:38:44,860 --> 00:38:48,370 This is actually the reverse of one of the periodic trends 814 00:38:48,370 --> 00:38:49,120 we talked about. 815 00:38:49,120 --> 00:38:53,160 Which trend is that this is the reverse of? 816 00:38:53,160 --> 00:38:54,500 Electron affinity, right. 817 00:38:54,500 --> 00:38:57,330 Because if we go backwards we're saying how badly does 818 00:38:57,330 --> 00:38:59,310 chlorine want to grab an electron? 819 00:38:59,310 --> 00:39:02,360 Chlorine wants to do this very badly, and it turns out the 820 00:39:02,360 --> 00:39:05,060 electron affinity for chlorine is huge, it's 349 kilojoules 821 00:39:05,060 --> 00:39:08,790 per mole, but remember, we're going in reverse, so we need 822 00:39:08,790 --> 00:39:13,820 to talk about it as negative 349 kilojoules per mole. 823 00:39:13,820 --> 00:39:17,060 So if we talk about the sum of what's happening here, what we 824 00:39:17,060 --> 00:39:20,480 need to do is think about going from the neutrals to the 825 00:39:20,480 --> 00:39:24,420 ions, so we can just add those two energies together, and 826 00:39:24,420 --> 00:39:28,690 what we end up with is plus 145 kilojoules per mole, in 827 00:39:28,690 --> 00:39:30,590 order to go from neutral sodium in 828 00:39:30,590 --> 00:39:33,350 chlorine to the ions. 829 00:39:33,350 --> 00:39:36,440 So, the problem here is that we have to actually put energy 830 00:39:36,440 --> 00:39:39,730 into our system, so this doesn't seem favorable, right. 831 00:39:39,730 --> 00:39:42,200 What's favorable is when we actually get energy out and 832 00:39:42,200 --> 00:39:45,420 our energy gets lower, but what we're saying here is that 833 00:39:45,420 --> 00:39:47,850 we actually need to put in energy. 834 00:39:47,850 --> 00:39:49,720 So another way to say this is this process 835 00:39:49,720 --> 00:39:51,820 actually requires energy. 836 00:39:51,820 --> 00:39:55,290 It does not emit energy, it does not give off excess 837 00:39:55,290 --> 00:39:57,340 energy, it requires energy. 838 00:39:57,340 --> 00:40:00,230 So, we need to think about how can we solve this problem in 839 00:40:00,230 --> 00:40:03,240 terms of thinking about ionic bonds, and the answer is 840 00:40:03,240 --> 00:40:04,590 Coulomb attraction. 841 00:40:04,590 --> 00:40:07,460 So there's one more force that we need to talk about, and 842 00:40:07,460 --> 00:40:10,160 that is when we talk about the attraction between the 843 00:40:10,160 --> 00:40:13,520 negatively and the positively charged ions, such that we 844 00:40:13,520 --> 00:40:15,150 form sodium chloride. 845 00:40:15,150 --> 00:40:18,900 So this process here has a delta energy, a change in 846 00:40:18,900 --> 00:40:22,570 energy of negative 589 kilojoules per mole. 847 00:40:22,570 --> 00:40:25,230 So that's huge, we're giving off a lot of energy by this 848 00:40:25,230 --> 00:40:26,140 attraction. 849 00:40:26,140 --> 00:40:30,820 So if we add up the net energy for all of this process, all 850 00:40:30,820 --> 00:40:35,220 we need to do is add negative 589 to plus 145. 851 00:40:35,220 --> 00:40:38,480 So what we end up getting is the net energy change is going 852 00:40:38,480 --> 00:40:42,700 to be negative 444 kilojoules per mole, so you can see that, 853 00:40:42,700 --> 00:40:46,490 in fact, it is very favorable for neutral sodium and neutral 854 00:40:46,490 --> 00:40:53,090 chloride to form sodium chloride in an ionic bond. 855 00:40:53,090 --> 00:40:56,680 And the net increase then, is a decrease in energy. 856 00:40:56,680 --> 00:40:59,880 So, I just gave you the number in terms of what that Coulomb 857 00:40:59,880 --> 00:41:02,710 potential would be in attraction, but we can I 858 00:41:02,710 --> 00:41:06,480 easily calculate it as well using this equation here where 859 00:41:06,480 --> 00:41:10,440 the energy is equal to the charge on each of the ions, 860 00:41:10,440 --> 00:41:13,070 and this is just multiplied by the value of charge for an 861 00:41:13,070 --> 00:41:17,880 electron divided by 4 pi epsilon nought times r, are r 862 00:41:17,880 --> 00:41:21,420 is just the distance in terms of the bond length we could 863 00:41:21,420 --> 00:41:22,330 talk about. 864 00:41:22,330 --> 00:41:24,790 So, let's calculate and make sure that I didn't tell you a 865 00:41:24,790 --> 00:41:25,690 false number here. 866 00:41:25,690 --> 00:41:28,440 Let's say we do the calculation with the bond 867 00:41:28,440 --> 00:41:30,460 length that we've looked up, which is 2 . 868 00:41:30,460 --> 00:41:33,040 3 6 angstroms for the bond length 869 00:41:33,040 --> 00:41:34,520 between sodium and chloride. 870 00:41:34,520 --> 00:41:37,230 So we should be able to figure out the Coulombic 871 00:41:37,230 --> 00:41:37,710 attraction for this. 872 00:41:37,710 --> 00:41:47,540 So, if we talk about the energy of attraction, we need 873 00:41:47,540 --> 00:41:52,140 to multiply plus 1, that's the charge on the sodium, times 874 00:41:52,140 --> 00:41:56,370 minus 1, the charge on the chlorine, times the charge in 875 00:41:56,370 --> 00:41:58,030 an electron, 1 . 876 00:41:58,030 --> 00:42:04,640 6 0 2 times 10 the negative 19 Coulombs, and that's all 877 00:42:04,640 --> 00:42:12,470 divided by 4 pi, and then I've written out epsilon nought in 878 00:42:12,470 --> 00:42:14,610 your notes, so I won't write it on the board. 879 00:42:14,610 --> 00:42:17,910 And then r, so r is going to be 2 . 880 00:42:17,910 --> 00:42:23,170 3 6 and times -- what is angstrom, everyone? 881 00:42:23,170 --> 00:42:26,080 Yup, 10 to the negative 10. 882 00:42:26,080 --> 00:42:30,190 So 10 to the negative 10 meters. 883 00:42:30,190 --> 00:42:34,780 So, if we do this calculation here, what we end up with is 884 00:42:34,780 --> 00:42:42,770 negative 9.774 times 10 to the negative 19 joules. 885 00:42:42,770 --> 00:42:46,310 So that's what we have in terms of our energy. 886 00:42:46,310 --> 00:42:49,330 That does not look the same as what we saw -- yup, do you 887 00:42:49,330 --> 00:42:49,910 have a question? 888 00:42:49,910 --> 00:42:54,720 STUDENT: [INAUDIBLE] 889 00:42:54,720 --> 00:42:56,690 PROFESSOR: OK. 890 00:42:56,690 --> 00:42:58,770 Luckily, although, I did not write it in my own notes, I 891 00:42:58,770 --> 00:43:01,090 did it when I put in my calculator, thank you. 892 00:43:01,090 --> 00:43:04,040 So you need to square this value here and then you should 893 00:43:04,040 --> 00:43:07,600 get this value right here, negative 9.77. 894 00:43:07,600 --> 00:43:11,320 All right, so what we need to do though is convert from 895 00:43:11,320 --> 00:43:13,560 joules into kilojoules per mole, because that's what we 896 00:43:13,560 --> 00:43:14,650 were using. 897 00:43:14,650 --> 00:43:20,580 So if we multiply that number there by kilojoules per mole 898 00:43:20,580 --> 00:43:25,540 -- or excuse me, first kilojoules per joule, so we 899 00:43:25,540 --> 00:43:30,430 have 1,000 joules in every kilojoule. 900 00:43:30,430 --> 00:43:35,830 And then we multiply that by Avagadro's number, 6.022 times 901 00:43:35,830 --> 00:43:40,490 10 to the 23 per mole. 902 00:43:40,490 --> 00:43:45,770 What we end up with is negative 589 903 00:43:45,770 --> 00:43:48,090 kilojoules per mole. 904 00:43:48,090 --> 00:43:51,570 So this is that same Coulombic attraction that we saw in the 905 00:43:51,570 --> 00:43:53,290 first place. 906 00:43:53,290 --> 00:43:57,100 So, notice that you will naturally get out a negative 907 00:43:57,100 --> 00:43:59,760 charge here, remember negative means an attractive force in 908 00:43:59,760 --> 00:44:02,450 this case, because you have the plus and 909 00:44:02,450 --> 00:44:05,390 the minus 1 in here. 910 00:44:05,390 --> 00:44:09,630 So we should be able to easily do that calculation, and what 911 00:44:09,630 --> 00:44:12,060 we end up getting matches up with what I just told you, 912 00:44:12,060 --> 00:44:14,470 luckily, and thank you for catching the square, that's an 913 00:44:14,470 --> 00:44:17,070 important part in getting the right answer. 914 00:44:17,070 --> 00:44:21,120 So, experimentally then, what we find is that the change in 915 00:44:21,120 --> 00:44:23,070 energy for this reaction is negative 444 916 00:44:23,070 --> 00:44:25,850 kilojoules per mole. 917 00:44:25,850 --> 00:44:28,980 If we look experimentally what we see, it's actually a little 918 00:44:28,980 --> 00:44:32,800 bit different, it's negative 411 kilojoules per mole. 919 00:44:32,800 --> 00:44:36,530 So, in terms of this class, this is the method that we're 920 00:44:36,530 --> 00:44:38,470 going to use, and we're going to say this gets us close 921 00:44:38,470 --> 00:44:41,070 enough such that we can make comparisons and have a 922 00:44:41,070 --> 00:44:43,870 meaningful conversations about different types of ionic bonds 923 00:44:43,870 --> 00:44:46,070 and the attraction between them. 924 00:44:46,070 --> 00:44:49,500 But let's think about where this discrepancy comes from, 925 00:44:49,500 --> 00:44:53,710 and before I do that I want to point out, one term we use a 926 00:44:53,710 --> 00:44:57,190 lot is change in energy for a reaction where, for example, 927 00:44:57,190 --> 00:44:58,640 you break a bond. 928 00:44:58,640 --> 00:45:02,520 Remember that the negative of the change in energy is what's 929 00:45:02,520 --> 00:45:04,570 called delta e sub d. 930 00:45:04,570 --> 00:45:07,630 We first saw this when we first introduced the idea of 931 00:45:07,630 --> 00:45:08,330 covalent bonds. 932 00:45:08,330 --> 00:45:14,600 Do you remember what this term here means, delta e sub d? 933 00:45:14,600 --> 00:45:17,750 A little bit and some no's, which this was pre-exam, I 934 00:45:17,750 --> 00:45:19,550 understand, you still need to review those notes, it's 935 00:45:19,550 --> 00:45:21,320 dissociation energy. 936 00:45:21,320 --> 00:45:24,950 So you get a negative energy out by breaking the bond. 937 00:45:24,950 --> 00:45:29,360 The dissociation energy means how much energy that bond is 938 00:45:29,360 --> 00:45:31,870 worth in terms of strength, so it's the opposite of the 939 00:45:31,870 --> 00:45:35,350 energy you get out of breaking the bond -- or excuse me, the 940 00:45:35,350 --> 00:45:37,680 energy that you get out of forming the bond. 941 00:45:37,680 --> 00:45:40,090 It's the amount of energy you need to put in to break the 942 00:45:40,090 --> 00:45:42,620 bond is dissociation energy. 943 00:45:42,620 --> 00:45:44,470 It takes this much energy to dissociate your 944 00:45:44,470 --> 00:45:44,860 bond, excuse me. 945 00:45:44,860 --> 00:45:45,230 All right. 946 00:45:45,230 --> 00:45:48,670 So, let's take a look here at our predictions, so I just put 947 00:45:48,670 --> 00:45:51,070 them both ways so we don't get confused. 948 00:45:51,070 --> 00:45:53,730 The dissociation energy is 444. 949 00:45:53,730 --> 00:45:55,570 The change in energy for forming the 950 00:45:55,570 --> 00:45:57,630 bond is negative 444. 951 00:45:57,630 --> 00:46:00,220 We made the following approximations, which explain 952 00:46:00,220 --> 00:46:03,350 why, in fact, we got a different experimental energy, 953 00:46:03,350 --> 00:46:04,540 if we look at that. 954 00:46:04,540 --> 00:46:07,060 The first thing is that we ignored any repulsive 955 00:46:07,060 --> 00:46:07,730 interactions. 956 00:46:07,730 --> 00:46:12,220 If you think about salt, it's not just two single atoms that 957 00:46:12,220 --> 00:46:13,390 you are talking about. 958 00:46:13,390 --> 00:46:16,090 It's actually in a whole network or whole lattice of 959 00:46:16,090 --> 00:46:18,920 other molecules, so you actually have some other 960 00:46:18,920 --> 00:46:21,730 chlorines around that are going to be having repulsive 961 00:46:21,730 --> 00:46:25,310 interactions with our chlorine that we're talking about. 962 00:46:25,310 --> 00:46:27,630 We're going to ignore those, make the approximation that 963 00:46:27,630 --> 00:46:30,840 those don't matter, at this point, in these calculations. 964 00:46:30,840 --> 00:46:33,370 And the result for that is that we end up with a larger 965 00:46:33,370 --> 00:46:36,670 dissociation energy than the experimental value. 966 00:46:36,670 --> 00:46:38,750 That's because the bond is going to be a little bit more 967 00:46:38,750 --> 00:46:41,780 broken than it was in our calculation, because we do 968 00:46:41,780 --> 00:46:44,870 have these repulsive interactions. 969 00:46:44,870 --> 00:46:48,040 The other thing that we did is that we treated both sodium 970 00:46:48,040 --> 00:46:51,250 and the chlorine as point charges. 971 00:46:51,250 --> 00:46:53,380 And this is what actually allowed us to make this 972 00:46:53,380 --> 00:46:56,290 calculation and calculate the Coulomb potential so easily, 973 00:46:56,290 --> 00:46:58,320 we just treated them as if they're point charges. 974 00:46:58,320 --> 00:47:01,270 We're ignoring quantum mechanics in this -- this is 975 00:47:01,270 --> 00:47:04,020 sort of the class where we ignore quantum mechanics, we 976 00:47:04,020 --> 00:47:05,550 ignored it for Lewis structures, 977 00:47:05,550 --> 00:47:06,730 we're ignoring it here. 978 00:47:06,730 --> 00:47:10,170 We will be back to paying a lot of attention to quantum 979 00:47:10,170 --> 00:47:13,630 mechanics in lecture 14 when we talk about MO theory, but 980 00:47:13,630 --> 00:47:15,560 for now, these are approximations, these are 981 00:47:15,560 --> 00:47:18,220 models where we don't take it into consideration. 982 00:47:18,220 --> 00:47:21,010 And I think you'll agree that we come reasonably close such 983 00:47:21,010 --> 00:47:23,360 that we'll be able to make comparisons between different 984 00:47:23,360 --> 00:47:24,580 kinds of ionic bonds. 985 00:47:24,580 --> 00:47:27,050 All right. 986 00:47:27,050 --> 00:47:29,690 So, the last thing I want to introduce today is talking 987 00:47:29,690 --> 00:47:31,840 about polar covalent bonds. 988 00:47:31,840 --> 00:47:34,150 We've now covered the two extremes. 989 00:47:34,150 --> 00:47:38,070 One extreme is complete total electron sharing -- if we have 990 00:47:38,070 --> 00:47:41,560 a perfectly covalent bond, we have perfect sharing. 991 00:47:41,560 --> 00:47:45,870 The other is electron transfer in terms of ionic bonds. 992 00:47:45,870 --> 00:47:49,340 So when we talk about a polar covalent bond, what we're now 993 00:47:49,340 --> 00:47:53,010 talking about is an unequal sharing of electrons between 994 00:47:53,010 --> 00:47:54,100 two atoms. 995 00:47:54,100 --> 00:47:56,450 So, this is essentially something we've seen before, 996 00:47:56,450 --> 00:47:59,350 we just never formally talked about what we would call it. 997 00:47:59,350 --> 00:48:02,830 This is any time you have a bond forming between two 998 00:48:02,830 --> 00:48:06,340 non-metals that have different electronegativities, so, for 999 00:48:06,340 --> 00:48:10,200 example, hydrogen choride, h c l. 1000 00:48:10,200 --> 00:48:13,880 The electronegativity for hydrogen is 2.2, for 1001 00:48:13,880 --> 00:48:15,940 chlorine it's 3.2. 1002 00:48:15,940 --> 00:48:19,120 And in general, what we say is we consider a difference in 1003 00:48:19,120 --> 00:48:22,330 terms of a first approximation if the difference in 1004 00:48:22,330 --> 00:48:24,280 electronegativity is more than 0. 1005 00:48:24,280 --> 00:48:27,560 5, so this is on the Pauling electronegativity scale. 1006 00:48:27,560 --> 00:48:31,850 So what we end up having is we sort of have a kind of, and 1007 00:48:31,850 --> 00:48:34,840 what we call it is a partial negative charge on the 1008 00:48:34,840 --> 00:48:37,220 chlorine, and a partial positive 1009 00:48:37,220 --> 00:48:38,720 charge in the hydrogen. 1010 00:48:38,720 --> 00:48:41,150 The reason we have that is because the chlorine's more 1011 00:48:41,150 --> 00:48:43,970 electronegative, it wants to pull more of that shared 1012 00:48:43,970 --> 00:48:45,770 electron density to itself. 1013 00:48:45,770 --> 00:48:47,900 If it has more electron density, it's going to have a 1014 00:48:47,900 --> 00:48:50,350 little bit of a negative charge and the hydrogen's 1015 00:48:50,350 --> 00:48:53,150 going to be left with a little bit of a positive charge. 1016 00:48:53,150 --> 00:48:56,420 So, we can compare this, for example to, molecular hydrogen 1017 00:48:56,420 --> 00:48:58,940 where they're going to have that complete sharing, so 1018 00:48:58,940 --> 00:49:02,380 there's not going to be a delta plus or a delta minus, 1019 00:49:02,380 --> 00:49:05,300 delta is going to be equal to zero on each of the atoms. 1020 00:49:05,300 --> 00:49:09,670 They are completely sharing their electrons. 1021 00:49:09,670 --> 00:49:13,000 And we can also explain this in another way by talking 1022 00:49:13,000 --> 00:49:16,670 about a dipole moment where we have a charged distribution 1023 00:49:16,670 --> 00:49:19,340 that results in this dipole, this electric dipole. 1024 00:49:19,340 --> 00:49:22,540 And we talk about this using the term mu, which is a 1025 00:49:22,540 --> 00:49:24,290 measurement of what the dipole is. 1026 00:49:24,290 --> 00:49:28,610 A dipole is always written in terms of writing an arrow from 1027 00:49:28,610 --> 00:49:31,040 the positive charge to the negative charge. 1028 00:49:31,040 --> 00:49:33,780 In chemistry, we are always incredibly interested in what 1029 00:49:33,780 --> 00:49:36,900 the electrons are doing, so we tend to pay attention to them 1030 00:49:36,900 --> 00:49:37,900 in terms of arrows. 1031 00:49:37,900 --> 00:49:40,500 Oh, the electrons are going over to the chlorine, so we're 1032 00:49:40,500 --> 00:49:43,290 going to draw our arrow toward the chlorine atom. 1033 00:49:43,290 --> 00:49:47,530 So, we measure this here, so mu is equal to q times r, the 1034 00:49:47,530 --> 00:49:49,040 distance between the two. 1035 00:49:49,040 --> 00:49:52,960 And q, that charge is just equal to the partial negative 1036 00:49:52,960 --> 00:49:57,460 or the partial positive times the charge on the electron. 1037 00:49:57,460 --> 00:50:01,540 So this is measured in Coulomb meters, you won't ever see a 1038 00:50:01,540 --> 00:50:03,990 measurement of electronegativity in Coulomb 1039 00:50:03,990 --> 00:50:06,700 meters -- we tend to talk about it in terms of debye or 1040 00:50:06,700 --> 00:50:12,310 1 d, or sometimes there's no units at all, so the d is just 1041 00:50:12,310 --> 00:50:15,970 assumed, and it's because 1 debye is just equal to this 1042 00:50:15,970 --> 00:50:18,770 very tiny number of Coulomb meters and it's a lot easier 1043 00:50:18,770 --> 00:50:21,850 to work with debye's here. 1044 00:50:21,850 --> 00:50:25,470 So, when we talk about polar molecules, we can actually 1045 00:50:25,470 --> 00:50:29,040 extend our idea of talking about polar bonds to talking 1046 00:50:29,040 --> 00:50:30,170 about polar molecules. 1047 00:50:30,170 --> 00:50:32,860 So, actually let's start with that on Monday. 1048 00:50:32,860 --> 00:50:35,380 So everyone have a great weekend.