1 00:00:01,000 --> 00:00:04,000 The following content is provided by MIT OpenCourseWare 2 00:00:04,000 --> 00:00:06,000 under a Creative Commons license. 3 00:00:06,000 --> 00:00:10,000 Additional information about our license and MIT 4 00:00:10,000 --> 00:00:15,000 OpenCourseWare in general is available at ocw.mit.edu. 5 00:00:15,000 --> 00:00:19,000 Today I would like to start by discussing a timeline. 6 00:00:19,000 --> 00:00:25,000 And you will see in a moment what this timeline has to do 7 00:00:25,000 --> 00:00:28,000 with. It is obviously only a partial 8 00:00:28,000 --> 00:00:33,000 timeline. But let's start here in 1916, 9 00:00:33,000 --> 00:00:39,000 as we have done this semester, by talking about the Lewis 10 00:00:39,000 --> 00:00:43,000 theory of electronic structure. 11 00:00:43,000 --> 00:00:50,000 12 00:00:50,000 --> 00:00:56,000 And his electron pair theory is something we are going to come 13 00:00:56,000 --> 00:01:02,000 back to a couple of times during lecture today. 14 00:01:02,000 --> 00:01:07,000 Let's move on to 1954. 1954 was an important year in 15 00:01:07,000 --> 00:01:13,000 electronic structure theory, because in that year there was 16 00:01:13,000 --> 00:01:19,000 awarded, to Linus Pauling, the Nobel Prize in chemistry. 17 00:01:19,000 --> 00:01:23,000 Let me write down Pauling here. 18 00:01:23,000 --> 00:01:30,000 19 00:01:30,000 --> 00:01:33,000 And if you are interested in knowing something about what 20 00:01:33,000 --> 00:01:36,000 Pauling was awarded the Nobel Prize in chemistry for, 21 00:01:36,000 --> 00:01:39,000 I will show you over here on the side boards. 22 00:01:39,000 --> 00:02:05,000 23 00:02:05,000 --> 00:02:10,000 What you are going to see here, if you read this citation for 24 00:02:10,000 --> 00:02:15,000 Linus Carl Pauling in 1954 for the Nobel Prize in chemistry, 25 00:02:15,000 --> 00:02:18,000 his prize was awarded principally for his 26 00:02:18,000 --> 00:02:22,000 contributions to our understanding of the nature of 27 00:02:22,000 --> 00:02:26,000 the chemical bond. If you think back to the 28 00:02:26,000 --> 00:02:31,000 elegant title of the paper by Lewis that we started out our 29 00:02:31,000 --> 00:02:36,000 discussion of acid-base theory with, it was a paper entitled 30 00:02:36,000 --> 00:02:40,000 "The Atom and the Molecule." And now we have gotten to Pauling, 31 00:02:40,000 --> 00:02:45,000 in 1954, who is being awarded a Nobel Prize in chemistry for the 32 00:02:45,000 --> 00:02:50,000 nature of the chemical bond. That also is the title of a 33 00:02:50,000 --> 00:02:54,000 very famous chemistry book by Linus Pauling entitled "The 34 00:02:54,000 --> 00:03:00,000 Nature of the Chemical Bond." That was published by Cornell 35 00:03:00,000 --> 00:03:04,000 University Press originally, because it stemmed from his set 36 00:03:04,000 --> 00:03:08,000 of lectures at Cornell, the Baker lectures, 37 00:03:08,000 --> 00:03:11,000 in the 1950s. As we talk about electronic 38 00:03:11,000 --> 00:03:14,000 structure theory, I would like you to keep in 39 00:03:14,000 --> 00:03:18,000 mind the way in which these different geniuses were 40 00:03:18,000 --> 00:03:22,000 approaching the problem, a problem that we are going to 41 00:03:22,000 --> 00:03:26,000 launch in on today and spend the next few lectures on. 42 00:03:26,000 --> 00:03:30,000 We will move up here to 1966. 43 00:03:30,000 --> 00:03:35,000 44 00:03:35,000 --> 00:03:42,000 In 1966 there was awarded a Nobel Prize to Mulliken. 45 00:03:42,000 --> 00:03:49,000 46 00:03:49,000 --> 00:03:53,000 Not to be confused with Milliken. 47 00:03:53,000 --> 00:04:08,000 48 00:04:08,000 --> 00:04:12,000 We are going from 1954 to 1966. 49 00:04:12,000 --> 00:04:34,000 50 00:04:34,000 --> 00:04:37,000 You are going to find, as you explore the Nobel Prize 51 00:04:37,000 --> 00:04:41,000 website, that there are a lot of informational links on these 52 00:04:41,000 --> 00:04:43,000 people. You can go and read 53 00:04:43,000 --> 00:04:46,000 biographies. You can read some of their 54 00:04:46,000 --> 00:04:48,000 writings. In the case of Linus Pauling, 55 00:04:48,000 --> 00:04:52,000 you have links to all the pages of all of his research 56 00:04:52,000 --> 00:04:55,000 notebooks, spanning more than 60 years of research. 57 00:04:55,000 --> 00:05:00,000 Those are pretty interesting supportive materials. 58 00:05:00,000 --> 00:05:03,000 In the case of Robert S. Mulliken, he is being cited for 59 00:05:03,000 --> 00:05:07,000 his contributions to the molecular orbital method, 60 00:05:07,000 --> 00:05:10,000 which we will also call the molecular orbital theory. 61 00:05:10,000 --> 00:05:13,000 We have the Lewis theory. We have, in the case of 62 00:05:13,000 --> 00:05:17,000 Pauling, I am going to say the nature of the chemical bond, 63 00:05:17,000 --> 00:05:20,000 described in terms of valance bond theory. 64 00:05:20,000 --> 00:05:23,000 We will come back to that in a moment. 65 00:05:23,000 --> 00:05:26,000 And then, in the case of Mulliken, we have a Nobel Prize 66 00:05:26,000 --> 00:05:33,000 for molecular orbital theory. And I just would like to show 67 00:05:33,000 --> 00:05:36,000 you something kind of neat, here. 68 00:05:36,000 --> 00:05:43,000 This has to do with the fact that if I go to the section 69 00:05:43,000 --> 00:05:48,000 labeled other resources, I can click on MIT digital 70 00:05:48,000 --> 00:05:53,000 thesis library. Then I can choose a page of 71 00:05:53,000 --> 00:06:01,000 Mulliken's thesis to display. And that is because Robert S. 72 00:06:01,000 --> 00:06:06,000 Mulliken was Course 5 1917. Let's hear it for Course 5 73 00:06:06,000 --> 00:06:09,000 chemistry. [APPLAUSE] Robert S. 74 00:06:09,000 --> 00:06:15,000 Mulliken was one of you guys, and he graduated in 1917. 75 00:06:15,000 --> 00:06:21,000 His undergraduate chemistry thesis at MIT was entitled "The 76 00:06:21,000 --> 00:06:27,000 Effective Structure on the Activity of the Hydroxyl Group 77 00:06:27,000 --> 00:06:31,000 in Alcohols." Submitted by Robert S. 78 00:06:31,000 --> 00:06:33,000 Mulliken. There is his signature. 79 00:06:33,000 --> 00:06:37,000 Isn't it cool to have your undergraduate thesis linked in 80 00:06:37,000 --> 00:06:39,000 from the Nobel Prize website? Robert S. 81 00:06:39,000 --> 00:06:41,000 Mulliken for molecular orbital theory. 82 00:06:41,000 --> 00:06:44,000 And you can see, even as you read his 83 00:06:44,000 --> 00:06:47,000 undergraduate thesis, he was talking about the effect 84 00:06:47,000 --> 00:06:50,000 of structure on the activity of the hydroxyl group. 85 00:06:50,000 --> 00:06:54,000 He had the idea that if you knew something about the 86 00:06:54,000 --> 00:06:56,000 structure of the molecule, even back then, 87 00:06:56,000 --> 00:07:00,000 you could make predictions about the properties of the 88 00:07:00,000 --> 00:07:04,000 molecule. And that is what we really want 89 00:07:04,000 --> 00:07:09,000 to be able to do in chemistry, because we want to be able to 90 00:07:09,000 --> 00:07:12,000 control function as much as possible. 91 00:07:12,000 --> 00:07:16,000 I will take that way for now and we'll come back in a moment 92 00:07:16,000 --> 00:07:21,000 because I am going to mention to you that in 1998 there was 93 00:07:21,000 --> 00:07:26,000 another Nobel Prize given for advances in our understanding of 94 00:07:26,000 --> 00:07:30,000 electronic structure of molecules. 95 00:07:30,000 --> 00:07:35,000 And this one was a shared prize, rather than these three 96 00:07:35,000 --> 00:07:40,000 other ones that I mentioned. Well, two others. 97 00:07:40,000 --> 00:07:45,000 Lewis was neglected from that category, unfortunately. 98 00:07:45,000 --> 00:07:51,000 In 1998 Kohn and Pople shared the Nobel Prize for furthering 99 00:07:51,000 --> 00:07:57,000 our understanding of how to describe electronic structure of 100 00:07:57,000 --> 00:08:02,000 molecules. And this is a theory that we 101 00:08:02,000 --> 00:08:06,000 are not going to be talking about too much explicitly here 102 00:08:06,000 --> 00:08:10,000 in 5.112 this semester, but if you go on in chemistry, 103 00:08:10,000 --> 00:08:13,000 you will be exposed to it more and more. 104 00:08:13,000 --> 00:08:16,000 It is called density functional theory. 105 00:08:16,000 --> 00:08:20,000 It is one of the most expedient ways to use computers to get 106 00:08:20,000 --> 00:08:24,000 electronic structure information about molecules. 107 00:08:24,000 --> 00:08:29,000 And so, that method has become extremely important. 108 00:08:29,000 --> 00:08:33,000 And I will just show you a little piece of information from 109 00:08:33,000 --> 00:08:36,000 that website, so we go to 1998. 110 00:08:36,000 --> 00:08:41,000 And, under the John Pople section, I am going to go to 111 00:08:41,000 --> 00:08:44,000 interview. He has given an interview on 112 00:08:44,000 --> 00:08:49,000 different topics relating to his involvement in chemistry. 113 00:08:49,000 --> 00:08:53,000 One short piece of that interview is entitled "Interest 114 00:08:53,000 --> 00:08:57,000 in Quantum Mechanics and Development of Computer 115 00:08:57,000 --> 00:09:02,000 Techniques." We are going to take a look at 116 00:09:02,000 --> 00:09:06,000 that and hopefully, if the audio and video are both 117 00:09:06,000 --> 00:09:10,000 working, you will be able to see John Pople talking a little bit 118 00:09:10,000 --> 00:09:13,000 about this important area of chemistry. 119 00:09:13,000 --> 00:09:18,000 We just don't have time for fixing audio/video problems in 120 00:09:18,000 --> 00:09:20,000 real-time here, unfortunately. 121 00:09:20,000 --> 00:09:23,000 Therefore, what I would like you to do is go to 122 00:09:23,000 --> 00:09:27,000 NobelPrize.org, Chemistry Laureates on Pople, 123 00:09:27,000 --> 00:09:30,000 and actually watch that five-minute segment of his 124 00:09:30,000 --> 00:09:35,000 interview that has to do with his feelings about electronic 125 00:09:35,000 --> 00:09:41,000 structure theory and advice to students on that topic. 126 00:09:41,000 --> 00:09:47,000 127 00:09:47,000 --> 00:09:50,000 And I will summarize his comments here -- 128 00:09:50,000 --> 00:10:05,000 129 00:10:05,000 --> 00:10:11,000 -- by saying that the goal of studying electronic structure of 130 00:10:11,000 --> 00:10:16,000 molecules is to try to get predictive power about molecular 131 00:10:16,000 --> 00:10:20,000 systems. And we want predictive power in 132 00:10:20,000 --> 00:10:25,000 terms of the 3D structure of molecules. 133 00:10:25,000 --> 00:10:30,000 134 00:10:30,000 --> 00:10:34,000 We know how to represent connectivity in molecules in two 135 00:10:34,000 --> 00:10:37,000 dimensions. We have been doing that already 136 00:10:37,000 --> 00:10:41,000 quite a bit this semester. But we would like to know, 137 00:10:41,000 --> 00:10:44,000 if you know which atoms are bonded to which. 138 00:10:44,000 --> 00:10:48,000 And then how does that translate into the intricate 139 00:10:48,000 --> 00:10:52,000 three-dimensional structures that molecules can have? 140 00:10:52,000 --> 00:10:57,000 Also, molecules can have color. That is an important property 141 00:10:57,000 --> 00:11:01,000 of a molecular system. In addition to which, 142 00:11:01,000 --> 00:11:06,000 molecules can be magnetic. So, magnetism is one of the 143 00:11:06,000 --> 00:11:10,000 important properties of molecular systems. 144 00:11:10,000 --> 00:11:15,000 And, as they aggregate into extended solid materials, 145 00:11:15,000 --> 00:11:20,000 the way in which magnetic molecules interact to produce 146 00:11:20,000 --> 00:11:25,000 macroscopic magnetic phenomena is very much an area of interest 147 00:11:25,000 --> 00:11:30,000 to chemists. People want to design molecular 148 00:11:30,000 --> 00:11:35,000 magnets in order to be able to make materials that have desired 149 00:11:35,000 --> 00:11:40,000 properties that will be useful to us in building things. 150 00:11:40,000 --> 00:11:44,000 And then, of course, we have molecules that are 151 00:11:44,000 --> 00:11:47,000 redox-active. And redox properties are very 152 00:11:47,000 --> 00:11:51,000 important. We would like to be able to sit 153 00:11:51,000 --> 00:11:56,000 down with our computer and draw out a structure. 154 00:11:56,000 --> 00:12:00,000 We would like to be able to pop it into its optimum 3D geometry 155 00:12:00,000 --> 00:12:04,000 and find out what that is. We would like to then know how 156 00:12:04,000 --> 00:12:09,000 easy is it to remove an electron from that system or how easy it 157 00:12:09,000 --> 00:12:11,000 is to add an electron to that system. 158 00:12:11,000 --> 00:12:14,000 Can we sit down and, right from the start, 159 00:12:14,000 --> 00:12:18,000 use theory to predict properties like the energies 160 00:12:18,000 --> 00:12:22,000 associated with electron transfer to and from a molecular 161 00:12:22,000 --> 00:12:26,000 system? That would be important if we 162 00:12:26,000 --> 00:12:31,000 are going to do what I talked about last time in terms of 163 00:12:31,000 --> 00:12:35,000 inventing systems to transform light energy into chemical 164 00:12:35,000 --> 00:12:40,000 energy in terms of the water splitting reaction I discussed 165 00:12:40,000 --> 00:12:44,000 last time. Also, molecules have acid-base 166 00:12:44,000 --> 00:12:47,000 chemistry. And this is one of the most 167 00:12:47,000 --> 00:12:52,000 pervasive forms of chemical reactivity that we can discuss. 168 00:12:52,000 --> 00:12:56,000 And so, we really have been talking, so far in my lectures, 169 00:12:56,000 --> 00:13:02,000 about redox chemistry and acid-base chemistry. 170 00:13:02,000 --> 00:13:05,000 And, as I go on, during the next few lectures, 171 00:13:05,000 --> 00:13:10,000 we are going to be also talking about properties like color and 172 00:13:10,000 --> 00:13:14,000 magnetism and 3D structure from theoretical considerations. 173 00:13:14,000 --> 00:13:18,000 Acid-base is one type of reactivity, but then also there 174 00:13:18,000 --> 00:13:22,000 are all kinds of different modes of reactivity that can be 175 00:13:22,000 --> 00:13:26,000 classified in different ways. Just to give you an example, 176 00:13:26,000 --> 00:13:31,000 there is a class of reactions in organic chemistry called 177 00:13:31,000 --> 00:13:37,000 electrocyclic reactions. We will be talking a little bit 178 00:13:37,000 --> 00:13:43,000 about reactions of that sort. And then there is something 179 00:13:43,000 --> 00:13:49,000 that Professor Ceyer referred to earlier in the semester as 180 00:13:49,000 --> 00:13:56,000 stability and the idea that this can take on both kinetic and 181 00:13:56,000 --> 00:14:00,000 thermodynamic forms. And so, we would want, 182 00:14:00,000 --> 00:14:04,000 from first principles, to be able to sit down and 183 00:14:04,000 --> 00:14:08,000 consider a molecular system composed of whatever elements 184 00:14:08,000 --> 00:14:12,000 from whatever part of the periodic table it is composed, 185 00:14:12,000 --> 00:14:16,000 and just how these properties follow naturally from the 186 00:14:16,000 --> 00:14:20,000 collection of elements that you have put together into a 187 00:14:20,000 --> 00:14:23,000 molecule. This is really chemistry and 188 00:14:23,000 --> 00:14:28,000 this is what we would like to be able to do. 189 00:14:28,000 --> 00:14:33,000 In this next part, what I would like to do is just 190 00:14:33,000 --> 00:14:40,000 spend a little time right here in 1957 because that is when 191 00:14:40,000 --> 00:14:46,000 Ronald Gillespie published his VSEPR theory. 192 00:14:46,000 --> 00:15:00,000 193 00:15:00,000 --> 00:15:05,000 Ronald Gillespie is now kind of in the twilight of his career. 194 00:15:05,000 --> 00:15:10,000 He has published on his "Lifetime in Chemistry." And so, 195 00:15:10,000 --> 00:15:15,000 you can Google Ronald Gillespie and find information about him 196 00:15:15,000 --> 00:15:21,000 and his VSEPR theory that will go well beyond what you will 197 00:15:21,000 --> 00:15:25,000 find in that section devoted to it in your textbook. 198 00:15:25,000 --> 00:15:30,000 This VSEPR theory, it is an acronym. 199 00:15:30,000 --> 00:16:00,000 And it stands for Valance-Shell Electron-Pair Repulsion theory. 200 00:16:00,000 --> 00:16:05,000 I tell you, the closer you get to the board the less easily you 201 00:16:05,000 --> 00:16:08,000 can see the things on that board. 202 00:16:08,000 --> 00:16:12,000 When we talk about VSEPR theory, Ronald Gillespie 203 00:16:12,000 --> 00:16:17,000 formulates it simply in terms of five basic considerations. 204 00:16:17,000 --> 00:16:21,000 The first of these, you can tell very easily from 205 00:16:21,000 --> 00:16:27,000 the name, and that is that electron pairs repel each other. 206 00:16:27,000 --> 00:16:34,000 207 00:16:34,000 --> 00:16:38,000 And note here I am underlining the word "pairs." And that is 208 00:16:38,000 --> 00:16:42,000 because we know that electrons are all negatively charged 209 00:16:42,000 --> 00:16:45,000 particles. And so they should all 210 00:16:45,000 --> 00:16:48,000 individually repel each other. And they do, 211 00:16:48,000 --> 00:16:50,000 in fact. But, based on the ideas of 212 00:16:50,000 --> 00:16:54,000 Lewis, you will see that Gillespie is formulating this 213 00:16:54,000 --> 00:16:59,000 theory, taking the notion of the electron pair as the fundamental 214 00:16:59,000 --> 00:17:04,000 unit to consider. And he is saying that electron 215 00:17:04,000 --> 00:17:09,000 pairs are somehow organized in space in a manner that they 216 00:17:09,000 --> 00:17:12,000 repel each other, and they try to occupy 217 00:17:12,000 --> 00:17:15,000 different regions of space from one another. 218 00:17:15,000 --> 00:17:20,000 And this is going to be useful in terms of predicting the 3D 219 00:17:20,000 --> 00:17:24,000 structure of molecules, and this is what this theory is 220 00:17:24,000 --> 00:17:27,000 devoted to. And, two molecules can have 221 00:17:27,000 --> 00:17:31,000 single bonds, or they can have double bonds, 222 00:17:31,000 --> 00:17:37,000 or they can have triple bonds between pairs of atoms. 223 00:17:37,000 --> 00:17:41,000 Maybe we will see this semester also that molecules can have 224 00:17:41,000 --> 00:17:46,000 quadruple bonds between pairs of atoms if the orbitals are 225 00:17:46,000 --> 00:17:49,000 available for that. But in the VSEPR theory, 226 00:17:49,000 --> 00:17:55,000 in this context multiple bonds are treated like single bonds. 227 00:17:55,000 --> 00:18:09,000 228 00:18:09,000 --> 00:18:12,000 You might suspect that that type of approximation is a 229 00:18:12,000 --> 00:18:15,000 little crude and that it might lead to certain guesses that 230 00:18:15,000 --> 00:18:19,000 might turn out not to be quite right, but actually it is a 231 00:18:19,000 --> 00:18:22,000 useful enough approximation for the prediction of the 232 00:18:22,000 --> 00:18:26,000 three-dimensional structures of a lot of different molecules 233 00:18:26,000 --> 00:18:29,000 that we are actually going to adopt for the purposes of our 234 00:18:29,000 --> 00:18:34,000 treatment of VSEPR theory. Number three: 235 00:18:34,000 --> 00:18:40,000 if you have multiple central atoms, -- 236 00:18:40,000 --> 00:18:47,000 237 00:18:47,000 --> 00:18:49,000 - they are treated independently. 238 00:18:49,000 --> 00:18:55,000 239 00:18:55,000 --> 00:18:58,000 And you will see what I mean by that in a moment. 240 00:18:58,000 --> 00:19:00,000 You should see, from that statement, 241 00:19:00,000 --> 00:19:04,000 that in the context of VSEPR theory, we are going to be 242 00:19:04,000 --> 00:19:08,000 trying to identify central atoms and peripheral atoms that are 243 00:19:08,000 --> 00:19:11,000 attached all to the central atom. 244 00:19:11,000 --> 00:19:16,000 And there may be one or more central atoms in a molecule that 245 00:19:16,000 --> 00:19:22,000 themselves are interconnected. And, four, we have two kinds of 246 00:19:22,000 --> 00:19:26,000 electron pairs that we consider in VSEPR theory. 247 00:19:26,000 --> 00:19:31,000 We have lone pairs, and we have bond pairs. 248 00:19:31,000 --> 00:19:35,000 249 00:19:35,000 --> 00:19:39,000 And lone pairs occupy more space -- 250 00:19:39,000 --> 00:19:48,000 251 00:19:48,000 --> 00:19:51,000 -- than bond pairs do. 252 00:19:51,000 --> 00:19:55,000 253 00:19:55,000 --> 00:20:00,000 And we will discuss the reason for that in a moment. 254 00:20:00,000 --> 00:20:04,000 Finally, I want to give you rule number five for 3D 255 00:20:04,000 --> 00:20:07,000 structure prediction using VSEPR. 256 00:20:07,000 --> 00:20:13,000 That is that lone pairs are not included in the description of 257 00:20:13,000 --> 00:20:17,000 the structure. And you will see what I mean by 258 00:20:17,000 --> 00:20:22,000 that in a moment. The idea is that the names that 259 00:20:22,000 --> 00:20:27,000 we give to different molecular structures have to do with the 260 00:20:27,000 --> 00:20:32,000 3D arrangement in space of the nuclei only and not the 261 00:20:32,000 --> 00:20:35,000 electrons. 262 00:20:35,000 --> 00:20:40,000 263 00:20:40,000 --> 00:20:44,000 The lone pairs are not included in the structure description. 264 00:20:44,000 --> 00:20:51,000 265 00:20:51,000 --> 00:20:55,000 This is reserved for the nuclei. 266 00:20:55,000 --> 00:21:00,000 Now, let's do a couple of examples. 267 00:21:00,000 --> 00:21:05,000 And, in introducing these examples, I will also be giving 268 00:21:05,000 --> 00:21:10,000 you some more of the shorthand that is associated with VSEPR 269 00:21:10,000 --> 00:21:13,000 treatment of molecular structure. 270 00:21:13,000 --> 00:21:17,000 Let's talk about this one here. 271 00:21:17,000 --> 00:21:24,000 272 00:21:24,000 --> 00:21:29,000 I have drawn here a very simple Lewis dot structure for a 273 00:21:29,000 --> 00:21:32,000 hydrogen sulfide molecule, H2S. 274 00:21:32,000 --> 00:21:35,000 And for a molecule like this, we really only have two 275 00:21:35,000 --> 00:21:40,000 possibilities for the structure because you have three nuclei. 276 00:21:40,000 --> 00:21:44,000 And so, either they can all be arranged -- we are going to 277 00:21:44,000 --> 00:21:48,000 assume that nuclei are not going to fuse together and be one on 278 00:21:48,000 --> 00:21:52,000 top of another because those positively charged nuclei do 279 00:21:52,000 --> 00:21:56,000 indeed repel each other very successfully -- and so, 280 00:21:56,000 --> 00:22:02,000 therefore, we could either have a linear or a bent structure. 281 00:22:02,000 --> 00:22:11,000 282 00:22:11,000 --> 00:22:19,000 And we can approach that question using the VSEPR theory 283 00:22:19,000 --> 00:22:25,000 very nicely. We start out by recognizing 284 00:22:25,000 --> 00:22:30,000 that we have two lone pairs. 285 00:22:30,000 --> 00:22:35,000 286 00:22:35,000 --> 00:22:39,000 That would be this one and this one in the Lewis dot structure 287 00:22:39,000 --> 00:22:44,000 that are not interacting with both hydrogen and sulfur nuclei. 288 00:22:44,000 --> 00:22:49,000 And we will call those E. And then we have two bond 289 00:22:49,000 --> 00:22:50,000 pairs. 290 00:22:50,000 --> 00:22:58,000 291 00:22:58,000 --> 00:23:02,000 And we will refer to those each as X. 292 00:23:02,000 --> 00:23:07,000 And then we have a single central atom. 293 00:23:07,000 --> 00:23:15,000 We have a central sulfur atom. And the central atom is usually 294 00:23:15,000 --> 00:23:22,000 given the label A. And so, that means that we have 295 00:23:22,000 --> 00:23:30,000 a system here of the type AX two E two. 296 00:23:30,000 --> 00:23:36,000 And if you look at the general class of molecules of the type 297 00:23:36,000 --> 00:23:42,000 AX two E two, it turns out that we can draw 298 00:23:42,000 --> 00:23:46,000 their structures this way. 299 00:23:46,000 --> 00:23:52,000 300 00:23:52,000 --> 00:23:55,000 What I am trying to indicate in this structure is that one of 301 00:23:55,000 --> 00:23:59,000 these lone pairs is coming up and out of the board this way 302 00:23:59,000 --> 00:24:04,000 and the other one is going back behind the board the other way. 303 00:24:04,000 --> 00:24:08,000 These are our two bond pairs that I am representing as lines. 304 00:24:08,000 --> 00:24:12,000 Bond pairs occupy less space than lone pairs do, 305 00:24:12,000 --> 00:24:16,000 and that is because you have two electrons interacting with 306 00:24:16,000 --> 00:24:20,000 two positively charged nuclei. Whereas, in the case of a lone 307 00:24:20,000 --> 00:24:25,000 pair, you have a single pair of electrons interacting only with 308 00:24:25,000 --> 00:24:29,000 a singly positively charged nuclei. 309 00:24:29,000 --> 00:24:34,000 Two nuclei cause a greater localization in space of bond 310 00:24:34,000 --> 00:24:37,000 pairs, as compared with lone pairs. 311 00:24:37,000 --> 00:24:43,000 And the angle here that this vector associated with the lone 312 00:24:43,000 --> 00:24:48,000 pair direction makes to the hydrogen is something 313 00:24:48,000 --> 00:24:53,000 approximately tetrahedral. Actually, probably larger than 314 00:24:53,000 --> 00:24:59,000 tetrahedral in this case because the H-S-H angle is smaller than 315 00:24:59,000 --> 00:25:07,000 tetrahedral in H two S. But this is an angle certainly 316 00:25:07,000 --> 00:25:12,000 greater than 90 degrees. And that is one of our angles 317 00:25:12,000 --> 00:25:18,000 of the type E-A-X that describes the interaction of a lone pair 318 00:25:18,000 --> 00:25:23,000 with a bond pair. What we want to do is maximize 319 00:25:23,000 --> 00:25:28,000 those E-A-E and E-A-X angles because, as I was saying 320 00:25:28,000 --> 00:25:33,000 earlier, a lone pair of electrons requires a greater 321 00:25:33,000 --> 00:25:40,000 amount of space than does a bond pair of electrons. 322 00:25:40,000 --> 00:25:43,000 The magnitude of the repulsions, if we get back to 323 00:25:43,000 --> 00:25:46,000 the word repulsion in the name of this theory, 324 00:25:46,000 --> 00:25:50,000 the greatest repulsions are found between lone pairs. 325 00:25:50,000 --> 00:25:54,000 And so, next we have repulsions between lone pairs and bond 326 00:25:54,000 --> 00:25:56,000 pairs. And then, finally, 327 00:25:56,000 --> 00:26:00,000 the weakest repulsions in the system will be between bond 328 00:26:00,000 --> 00:26:03,000 pairs. And so, the best 329 00:26:03,000 --> 00:26:08,000 three-dimensional structure given by this theory is that 330 00:26:08,000 --> 00:26:13,000 which minimizes these different repulsions in the system. 331 00:26:13,000 --> 00:26:18,000 If we considered the linear structure, then what we would 332 00:26:18,000 --> 00:26:23,000 have to do is put all the electrons in the same plane of 333 00:26:23,000 --> 00:26:27,000 the molecule. And these angles here would 334 00:26:27,000 --> 00:26:31,000 have to be 90. And, overall, 335 00:26:31,000 --> 00:26:35,000 this would be a higher energy structure because of the 336 00:26:35,000 --> 00:26:40,000 necessity of putting in an E lone pair at 90 degrees to a 337 00:26:40,000 --> 00:26:44,000 couple of bond pairs and so on around the molecule. 338 00:26:44,000 --> 00:26:49,000 Three dimensionally in space, this quasi-tetrahedral geometry 339 00:26:49,000 --> 00:26:54,000 gets the four pairs of electrons of the molecule the farthest 340 00:26:54,000 --> 00:27:00,000 apart in space and minimizes electron pair repulsion. 341 00:27:00,000 --> 00:27:03,000 And that leads, therefore, to a description of 342 00:27:03,000 --> 00:27:06,000 the structure as bent. The structure is called bent 343 00:27:06,000 --> 00:27:11,000 rather than tetrahedral because we include only the nuclei in 344 00:27:11,000 --> 00:27:15,000 the way that we refer to the structure of the molecule. 345 00:27:15,000 --> 00:27:18,000 And we do not include those electron pairs. 346 00:27:18,000 --> 00:27:22,000 Let me give you a feel for how this looks. 347 00:27:22,000 --> 00:27:36,000 348 00:27:36,000 --> 00:27:40,000 And in this picture that I am going to show you, 349 00:27:40,000 --> 00:27:46,000 which will recall to mind some that I showed you in my first 350 00:27:46,000 --> 00:27:51,000 couple of lectures, you will see that what I have 351 00:27:51,000 --> 00:27:57,000 here is an electron density isosurface for the H two S 352 00:27:57,000 --> 00:28:02,000 molecule. And you can see here one of the 353 00:28:02,000 --> 00:28:04,000 S-H bonds. Here is another S-H bond. 354 00:28:04,000 --> 00:28:08,000 Over here is that region in space where the electron density 355 00:28:08,000 --> 00:28:11,000 isosurface is associated with lone pairs. 356 00:28:11,000 --> 00:28:15,000 And you can see that certainly the electron density is a lot 357 00:28:15,000 --> 00:28:19,000 more tightly contracted in the region between the sulfurs and 358 00:28:19,000 --> 00:28:23,000 the hydrogens than it is elsewhere, where it bulges out. 359 00:28:23,000 --> 00:28:26,000 And you can see that effect of getting the eight valance 360 00:28:26,000 --> 00:28:30,000 electrons in this molecule as far apart from each other in 361 00:28:30,000 --> 00:28:34,000 space as you can. And then, furthermore, 362 00:28:34,000 --> 00:28:39,000 the coloring in this diagram represents the propensity of 363 00:28:39,000 --> 00:28:44,000 electrons at that point in space to come together as pairs. 364 00:28:44,000 --> 00:28:49,000 In effect, that coloring is the three-dimensional manifestation 365 00:28:49,000 --> 00:28:53,000 of the Pauli principle mapped onto an electron density 366 00:28:53,000 --> 00:28:58,000 isosurface for the H two S *molecule. 367 00:28:58,000 --> 00:29:03,000 This type of picture is very nicely associated with the VSEPR 368 00:29:03,000 --> 00:29:06,000 representation of molecular structure. 369 00:29:06,000 --> 00:29:10,000 And I am going to go through another example. 370 00:29:10,000 --> 00:29:15,000 I am numbering this off so as not to distract you with that 371 00:29:15,000 --> 00:29:17,000 picture. 372 00:29:17,000 --> 00:29:22,000 373 00:29:22,000 --> 00:29:30,000 This next example is SF four. 374 00:29:30,000 --> 00:29:42,000 375 00:29:42,000 --> 00:29:46,000 Let me draw out a Lewis dot structure of this. 376 00:29:46,000 --> 00:30:04,000 377 00:30:04,000 --> 00:30:07,000 As you are looking at this Lewis dot structure, 378 00:30:07,000 --> 00:30:11,000 one of the things you should do is to see if the number of 379 00:30:11,000 --> 00:30:14,000 electrons that I am including in my drawing is, 380 00:30:14,000 --> 00:30:18,000 in fact, the correct number of valance electrons for this 381 00:30:18,000 --> 00:30:20,000 system. And that is easy to do. 382 00:30:20,000 --> 00:30:25,000 You know that fluorine is in Group 19 of the Periodic Table. 383 00:30:25,000 --> 00:30:30,000 You know that sulfur is in Group 6 of the Periodic Table. 384 00:30:30,000 --> 00:30:34,000 And so you can quickly figure out how many valance electrons 385 00:30:34,000 --> 00:30:37,000 there should be. And, hopefully, 386 00:30:37,000 --> 00:30:41,000 I have indicated all of them on my drawing, and no more than all 387 00:30:41,000 --> 00:30:45,000 of them. What you might not like about a 388 00:30:45,000 --> 00:30:49,000 drawing like this is that while each fluorine has been 389 00:30:49,000 --> 00:30:53,000 represented as an octet, as being associated with eight 390 00:30:53,000 --> 00:30:57,000 electrons, four pairs of electrons, the central sulfur 391 00:30:57,000 --> 00:31:00,000 atom seems to be, in this drawing, 392 00:31:00,000 --> 00:31:04,000 associated with ten electrons, -- 393 00:31:04,000 --> 00:31:07,000 -- doesn't it? That seems to be a violation of 394 00:31:07,000 --> 00:31:10,000 the octet rule. And I will defer that 395 00:31:10,000 --> 00:31:13,000 observation for now, but it is an interesting 396 00:31:13,000 --> 00:31:16,000 feature of this. And, when you do yourself write 397 00:31:16,000 --> 00:31:21,000 down Lewis structures as a prelude to subjecting them to 398 00:31:21,000 --> 00:31:25,000 the valence bond theory of Pauling or to the valence shell 399 00:31:25,000 --> 00:31:29,000 electron pair repulsion theory of Gillespie or the molecular 400 00:31:29,000 --> 00:31:34,000 orbital theory of Mulliken or the density functional theory of 401 00:31:34,000 --> 00:31:37,000 Kohn and Pople, you should be sticking with the 402 00:31:37,000 --> 00:31:42,000 basics here and making sure you are working with the right 403 00:31:42,000 --> 00:31:47,000 number of valance electrons -- -- because your whole initial 404 00:31:47,000 --> 00:31:50,000 description of the molecular system is going to revolve 405 00:31:50,000 --> 00:31:53,000 around the correct distribution in space of this number of 406 00:31:53,000 --> 00:31:56,000 valance electrons that these atoms that you are including in 407 00:31:56,000 --> 00:31:59,000 the molecule bring into play. And then you are going to see 408 00:31:59,000 --> 00:32:02,000 if you can predict properties based on that. 409 00:32:02,000 --> 00:32:12,000 That is what we do first. And, in terms of bond pairs, 410 00:32:12,000 --> 00:32:20,000 based on that structure, we have four. 411 00:32:20,000 --> 00:32:30,000 And, in terms of lone pairs, we have one. 412 00:32:30,000 --> 00:32:37,000 Therefore, the type of system that we are working with here is 413 00:32:37,000 --> 00:32:42,000 AX four E. This is one of the possible 414 00:32:42,000 --> 00:32:49,000 types, when you have five units, surrounding a central atom. 415 00:32:49,000 --> 00:32:56,000 And the most typical type of geometry that arises when we 416 00:32:56,000 --> 00:33:04,000 have five units surrounding a central atom is as follows. 417 00:33:04,000 --> 00:33:08,000 The atom A at the center is intended to be here. 418 00:33:08,000 --> 00:33:13,000 And then I am going to draw five balls. 419 00:33:13,000 --> 00:33:18,000 You can think of them as representing either lone pairs 420 00:33:18,000 --> 00:33:23,000 or fluorine atoms. And I am going to color two of 421 00:33:23,000 --> 00:33:29,000 them to distinguish them from the others. 422 00:33:29,000 --> 00:33:33,000 And this structure is called TBP. 423 00:33:33,000 --> 00:33:41,000 And that standards for trigonal bipyramidal. 424 00:33:41,000 --> 00:33:47,000 425 00:33:47,000 --> 00:33:51,000 And the reason I have colored this type different from that 426 00:33:51,000 --> 00:33:54,000 type is that in a trigonal bipyramidal structure, 427 00:33:54,000 --> 00:33:56,000 there are two possible environments, 428 00:33:56,000 --> 00:34:00,000 either for a lone pair of electrons or for a bond pair of 429 00:34:00,000 --> 00:34:04,000 electrons. You can have axial, 430 00:34:04,000 --> 00:34:10,000 and the axial position is easily distinguished from the 431 00:34:10,000 --> 00:34:13,000 equatorial position -- 432 00:34:13,000 --> 00:34:18,000 433 00:34:18,000 --> 00:34:23,000 -- by virtue of the fact that an atom or a lone pair in the 434 00:34:23,000 --> 00:34:28,000 axial position makes 90 degree angles, three of them to its 435 00:34:28,000 --> 00:34:31,000 neighbors. Whereas, an atom in the 436 00:34:31,000 --> 00:34:35,000 equatorial position makes two 90 degree angles with respect to 437 00:34:35,000 --> 00:34:38,000 its neighbors. It is three versus two that 438 00:34:38,000 --> 00:34:42,000 will help you distinguish axial from equatorial. 439 00:34:42,000 --> 00:34:45,000 And understanding that about this molecular geometry, 440 00:34:45,000 --> 00:34:49,000 you can see that for the SF four molecule there are 441 00:34:49,000 --> 00:34:53,000 two possibilities. Note that when I am drawing a 442 00:34:53,000 --> 00:34:57,000 wedge here that means that the atom connected to the central 443 00:34:57,000 --> 00:35:01,000 atom is coming out of the plane at us. 444 00:35:01,000 --> 00:35:06,000 And the dashed bond means that it is going back behind the 445 00:35:06,000 --> 00:35:12,000 plane so that viewed from the top, this thing would look 446 00:35:12,000 --> 00:35:17,000 simply like a Mercedes Benz symbol, just to understand that 447 00:35:17,000 --> 00:35:23,000 about the wedges and dash nomenclature on these systems. 448 00:35:23,000 --> 00:35:29,000 And so, the two possibilities that we have for our system is, 449 00:35:29,000 --> 00:35:35,000 we can either put our lone pair E up here and our four bond 450 00:35:35,000 --> 00:35:41,000 pairs X down here. Or, we can have the lone pair 451 00:35:41,000 --> 00:35:47,000 equatorial and our bond pairs, two of them axial and two of 452 00:35:47,000 --> 00:35:51,000 them equatorial. As in the case of H two S, 453 00:35:51,000 --> 00:35:57,000 we had two structures to distinguish between linear 454 00:35:57,000 --> 00:36:01,000 and bent. Over here, we have a structure 455 00:36:01,000 --> 00:36:06,000 with an equatorial lone pair or with an axial lone pair for SF 456 00:36:06,000 --> 00:36:09,000 four. And when you look at the top 457 00:36:09,000 --> 00:36:14,000 one and realize that you have only two of these very bad lone 458 00:36:14,000 --> 00:36:17,000 pair-bond pair contacts at 90 degrees, whereas, 459 00:36:17,000 --> 00:36:22,000 on the bottom one we have three of these bad lone pair-bond pair 460 00:36:22,000 --> 00:36:27,000 contacts at 90 degrees, you might be inclined to pick, 461 00:36:27,000 --> 00:36:30,000 in fact, this top one. 462 00:36:30,000 --> 00:36:35,000 463 00:36:35,000 --> 00:36:39,000 And that would be right because it minimizes the number of the 464 00:36:39,000 --> 00:36:41,000 worst kind of repulsions. In this case, 465 00:36:41,000 --> 00:36:43,000 lone pair bond pair at 90 degrees. 466 00:36:43,000 --> 00:36:48,000 And when we give this structure a name, we are not going to call 467 00:36:48,000 --> 00:36:52,000 it trigonal bipyramidal because we do not include the lone pair. 468 00:36:52,000 --> 00:36:56,000 We only include the positions of the nuclei in the naming of 469 00:36:56,000 --> 00:37:01,000 the molecular structure. This one is called a seesaw. 470 00:37:01,000 --> 00:37:06,000 471 00:37:06,000 --> 00:37:11,000 Some of you may be aware that there is a piece of playground 472 00:37:11,000 --> 00:37:17,000 equipment known as a seesaw. You probably don't get a chance 473 00:37:17,000 --> 00:37:20,000 to play on them anymore very much. 474 00:37:20,000 --> 00:37:23,000 Neither do I. This is more fun, 475 00:37:23,000 --> 00:37:27,000 anyway. And what I am showing you now 476 00:37:27,000 --> 00:37:32,000 on these side screens is a picture of the electron density 477 00:37:32,000 --> 00:37:38,000 isosurface for the SF four molecule. 478 00:37:38,000 --> 00:37:41,000 And hopefully, you can see that it looks like 479 00:37:41,000 --> 00:37:43,000 a seesaw. These two fluorines down here 480 00:37:43,000 --> 00:37:48,000 would be the legs of the seesaw. And then you would sit either 481 00:37:48,000 --> 00:37:52,000 here or here and then lean forward and put your hands on 482 00:37:52,000 --> 00:37:55,000 the lone pair and then rock up and down somehow. 483 00:37:55,000 --> 00:37:58,000 I don't know. Anyway. 484 00:37:58,000 --> 00:38:01,000 In this system, you should be able to see that 485 00:38:01,000 --> 00:38:04,000 the lone pair on the sulfur, which is here, 486 00:38:04,000 --> 00:38:08,000 is definitely in this equatorial position, 487 00:38:08,000 --> 00:38:12,000 so the electro-density isosurface has a nice dark-blue 488 00:38:12,000 --> 00:38:16,000 color where we find that lone pair on the sulfur. 489 00:38:16,000 --> 00:38:20,000 And then the four flourines are organized, according to the 490 00:38:20,000 --> 00:38:25,000 predictions of VSEPR theory, with these 90 degree angles to 491 00:38:25,000 --> 00:38:30,000 the flourines that are oriented in the axial. 492 00:38:30,000 --> 00:38:35,000 The two flourines are axial. And then here is our two 493 00:38:35,000 --> 00:38:40,000 equatorial flourines here spinning around in the belt of 494 00:38:40,000 --> 00:38:43,000 this system. We could also say that you 495 00:38:43,000 --> 00:38:49,000 would be sitting on the axial positions if you were going to 496 00:38:49,000 --> 00:38:55,000 ride on this particular seesaw. Now, I would like to proceed in 497 00:38:55,659 --> 00:32:34,000 time briefly back from '57 to 498 00:32:34,000 --> 00:39:00,000 499 00:39:00,000 --> 00:39:02,000 Because we need to discuss some of the issues of the valance 500 00:39:02,000 --> 00:39:05,000 bond theory that Pauling brought into the quantum mechanical 501 00:39:05,000 --> 00:39:07,000 treatment of molecules. 502 00:39:07,000 --> 00:39:36,000 503 00:39:36,000 --> 00:39:42,000 What I am representing here are a couple of hydrogen atoms 1S 504 00:39:42,000 --> 00:39:47,000 orbitals at a distance. We have (H)A 1s and we have the 505 00:39:47,000 --> 00:39:51,000 1s of hydrogen labeled B. 506 00:39:51,000 --> 00:39:58,000 And we are going to say that at some infinite separation between 507 00:39:58,000 --> 00:40:04,000 the two, they would not really know much about the spin of the 508 00:40:04,000 --> 00:40:09,000 electron on the partner hydrogen. 509 00:40:09,000 --> 00:40:13,000 But as we bring them close together, the spin is going to 510 00:40:13,000 --> 00:40:17,000 become very important. And that is by virtue of the 511 00:40:17,000 --> 00:40:20,000 Pauli principle. And you should remember that 512 00:40:20,000 --> 00:40:25,000 one of the ways of formulating the Pauli principle is that no 513 00:40:25,000 --> 00:40:29,000 two electrons in a quantum mechanical system can have the 514 00:40:29,000 --> 00:40:33,000 same set of four quantum numbers. 515 00:40:33,000 --> 00:40:36,000 As these two hydrogens get close together, 516 00:40:36,000 --> 00:40:42,000 the stable situation for the electrons coming from the two 517 00:40:42,000 --> 00:40:46,000 have opposite spin, so I am drawing with spin-up 518 00:40:46,000 --> 00:40:50,000 and one with spin-down. And then you are going to 519 00:40:50,000 --> 00:40:56,000 notice that here in the center of our H two molecule, 520 00:40:56,000 --> 00:41:02,000 now, is a region of overlap and of constructive interference of 521 00:41:02,000 --> 00:41:08,000 those 1s-orbital wave functions from the two sides. 522 00:41:08,000 --> 00:41:12,000 In this representation of the ground state of the molecule, 523 00:41:12,000 --> 00:41:14,000 the Pauli principle is satisfied. 524 00:41:14,000 --> 00:41:18,000 And we can put this pair of electrons into an orbital. 525 00:41:18,000 --> 00:41:22,000 And when that orbital is represented that way, 526 00:41:22,000 --> 00:41:25,000 it is cylindrically symmetric. 527 00:41:25,000 --> 00:41:35,000 528 00:41:35,000 --> 00:41:37,000 And we call that a sigma bond. 529 00:41:37,000 --> 00:41:46,000 530 00:41:46,000 --> 00:41:50,000 In chemistry we talk often about the properties of sigma 531 00:41:50,000 --> 00:41:53,000 bonds. We talk about also the 532 00:41:53,000 --> 00:41:56,000 properties of things called pi bonds. 533 00:41:56,000 --> 00:42:00,000 And we can even have delta bonds. 534 00:42:00,000 --> 00:42:07,000 Just as I was talking about bond multiplicity a moment ago 535 00:42:07,000 --> 00:42:13,000 with reference to VSEPR, let me give you here an 536 00:42:13,000 --> 00:42:18,000 x,y-plane. I am drawing in perspective an 537 00:42:18,000 --> 00:42:23,000 x,y-plane. And in this x,y-plane we are 538 00:42:23,000 --> 00:42:30,000 going to have, actually, six atomic nuclei. 539 00:42:30,000 --> 00:42:35,000 And our z direction is perpendicular to this plane 540 00:42:35,000 --> 00:42:40,000 drawn in perspective. And I am drawing in here the 541 00:42:40,000 --> 00:42:46,000 positions of four hydrogen and two carbon nuclei. 542 00:42:46,000 --> 00:42:52,000 And when I draw them in like that, you are going to see that 543 00:42:52,000 --> 00:42:58,000 all the valence orbitals of this system, except for two, 544 00:42:58,000 --> 00:43:04,000 lie in that x,y-plane. And the two that lie out of 545 00:43:04,000 --> 00:43:08,000 that x,y-plane, I will show you here, 546 00:43:08,000 --> 00:43:14,000 are p orbitals that go above and below the plane. 547 00:43:14,000 --> 00:43:20,000 And I am shading in the negative phase lobe of these pz 548 00:43:20,000 --> 00:43:24,000 orbitals. This is pz from carbon A and 549 00:43:24,000 --> 00:43:30,000 this is a pz from carbon B. And you can see that these are 550 00:43:30,000 --> 00:43:35,000 oriented in a side-on fashion, so that the overlap area that 551 00:43:35,000 --> 00:43:40,000 can occur is a side-to-side overlap of two neighboring P 552 00:43:40,000 --> 00:43:44,000 orbitals, like this. And the distinguishing feature 553 00:43:44,000 --> 00:43:49,000 here, as compared to my description of the sigma bond 554 00:43:49,000 --> 00:43:55,000 over there, is that it is not cylindrically symmetric. 555 00:43:55,000 --> 00:44:01,000 This bond has a nodal surface, which is the x,y-plane, 556 00:44:01,000 --> 00:44:09,000 where the phase changes as you pass from above that plane to 557 00:44:09,000 --> 00:44:14,000 below that plane. We have a nodal surface, 558 00:44:14,000 --> 00:44:19,000 a node containing the internuclear axis. 559 00:44:19,000 --> 00:44:27,000 The type of bond that I have drawn there is distinct from a 560 00:44:27,000 --> 00:44:32,000 sigma bond. It is a pi bond. 561 00:44:32,000 --> 00:44:37,000 562 00:44:37,000 --> 00:44:39,000 That bond over there, the sigma bond, 563 00:44:39,000 --> 00:44:42,000 has no nodal surfaces passing through the internuclear axis. 564 00:44:42,000 --> 00:44:46,000 If I draw the internuclear axis here, you can see that it has 565 00:44:46,000 --> 00:44:50,000 the same phase no matter where you are with respect to that 566 00:44:50,000 --> 00:44:52,000 axis. Plus, plus, plus everywhere. 567 00:44:52,000 --> 00:44:55,000 And here, if these lobes of these two pz orbitals are 568 00:44:55,000 --> 00:44:58,000 considered to be positive in the positive z direction, 569 00:44:58,000 --> 00:45:02,000 then as we go this way, we pass through the x,y-plane 570 00:45:02,000 --> 00:45:06,000 and get down into negative z. We now have negative phase, 571 00:45:06,000 --> 00:45:10,000 as indicated by the purple shading down here. 572 00:45:10,000 --> 00:45:14,000 The fact that that happens only once with respect to this 573 00:45:14,000 --> 00:45:18,000 internuclear axis is what tells us that it is a pi bond. 574 00:45:18,000 --> 00:45:22,000 If there were two such nodal surfaces, then we would have a 575 00:45:22,000 --> 00:45:24,000 delta bond, and so on. And next time, 576 00:45:24,000 --> 00:45:29,000 we are going to start talking about the progression from these 577 00:45:29,000 --> 00:45:33,000 ideas onto hybridization. And then from there onto 578 00:45:33,743 --> 00:45:36,000 molecular orbital theory.