1 00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:02,400 The following content is provided under a creative 2 00:00:02,400 --> 00:00:03,850 commons license. 3 00:00:03,850 --> 00:00:06,840 Your support will help MIT OpenCourseWare continue to 4 00:00:06,840 --> 00:00:10,560 offer high quality educational resources for free. 5 00:00:10,560 --> 00:00:13,365 To make a donation or view additional materials from 6 00:00:13,365 --> 00:00:17,500 hundreds of MIT courses, visit MIT OpenCourseWare at 7 00:00:17,500 --> 00:00:18,750 ocw.mit.edu. 8 00:00:21,972 --> 00:00:23,450 JOCELYN: Hi. 9 00:00:23,450 --> 00:00:27,130 Jocelyn here and today we're going to go over fall 2009 10 00:00:27,130 --> 00:00:30,440 exam three problem number four. 11 00:00:30,440 --> 00:00:31,720 Starting with part A-- 12 00:00:34,520 --> 00:00:36,580 let's read the problem. 13 00:00:36,580 --> 00:00:40,940 In the 1920s, Jack Breitbart of Revlon laboratories found 14 00:00:40,940 --> 00:00:44,830 that acne could be treated by the use of benzoyl peroxide. 15 00:00:44,830 --> 00:00:49,240 The oxygen-oxygen bond in peroxide is weak and under the 16 00:00:49,240 --> 00:00:52,200 influence of modest heating, benzoyl peroxide readily 17 00:00:52,200 --> 00:00:55,870 decompose to form free radicals according to the 18 00:00:55,870 --> 00:00:57,650 reaction given. 19 00:00:57,650 --> 00:01:02,150 The rate of decomposition is measured at 92 degrees C at 20 00:01:02,150 --> 00:01:05,660 various concentrations and found to be-- 21 00:01:05,660 --> 00:01:08,220 and you're given two different concentrations and two 22 00:01:08,220 --> 00:01:09,870 different rates. 23 00:01:09,870 --> 00:01:13,270 So part A asks, determine the order of reaction for the 24 00:01:13,270 --> 00:01:14,980 decomposition of benzoyl peroxide. 25 00:01:18,560 --> 00:01:24,370 The first thing to do is, when asked for the order of the 26 00:01:24,370 --> 00:01:29,420 decomposition reaction, we want to think about the 27 00:01:29,420 --> 00:01:31,220 general rate loss, right? 28 00:01:31,220 --> 00:01:32,155 We're given concentrations. 29 00:01:32,155 --> 00:01:34,390 We're given rates. 30 00:01:34,390 --> 00:01:36,030 We're asked for the order. 31 00:01:36,030 --> 00:01:39,350 Something you might want to have written down on your 32 00:01:39,350 --> 00:01:46,290 equation sheet or look up is the general rate law equation. 33 00:01:46,290 --> 00:01:48,630 Remember that students taking these exams did have an 34 00:01:48,630 --> 00:01:52,715 equation sheet so they could have this ready. 35 00:01:52,715 --> 00:01:55,220 The important part is that you know when to use this 36 00:01:55,220 --> 00:01:58,130 equation, what each of the terms mean. 37 00:01:58,130 --> 00:02:01,060 So r is the rate. 38 00:02:04,220 --> 00:02:05,790 k is a rate constant. 39 00:02:12,030 --> 00:02:14,620 It is a function of temperature, but if you're at 40 00:02:14,620 --> 00:02:17,520 the same temperature, that rate constant will not change. 41 00:02:17,520 --> 00:02:19,560 It's constant. 42 00:02:19,560 --> 00:02:20,810 c is your concentration. 43 00:02:26,430 --> 00:02:31,660 And n is your reaction order. 44 00:02:37,060 --> 00:02:41,670 So this would be the place to start for this question. 45 00:02:41,670 --> 00:02:44,690 And now we know that we're solving for n. 46 00:02:44,690 --> 00:02:49,050 So what is n in this case? 47 00:02:51,700 --> 00:02:54,190 Looking at what we're given, we can write 48 00:02:54,190 --> 00:02:55,440 two different equations. 49 00:02:58,540 --> 00:03:04,770 The first line gives us a specific rate for a specific 50 00:03:04,770 --> 00:03:07,140 concentration. 51 00:03:07,140 --> 00:03:11,830 The second line gives us another rate for a second 52 00:03:11,830 --> 00:03:14,100 concentration. 53 00:03:14,100 --> 00:03:18,490 So now we have two equations and two unknowns. 54 00:03:18,490 --> 00:03:24,050 That means we can solve for one of the unknowns and then 55 00:03:24,050 --> 00:03:26,170 could solve for the other one if we wanted to, but here we 56 00:03:26,170 --> 00:03:27,290 only care about n. 57 00:03:27,290 --> 00:03:30,000 So how I'm going to choose to solve this and you may choose 58 00:03:30,000 --> 00:03:31,250 to do it differently-- 59 00:03:31,250 --> 00:03:37,500 I'm going to divide the first line by the second line and I 60 00:03:37,500 --> 00:03:49,390 get rate one over rate two equals c1 divided by c2 all to 61 00:03:49,390 --> 00:03:52,090 the n power. 62 00:03:52,090 --> 00:03:55,010 So that made the k drop out, which is one of the unknowns 63 00:03:55,010 --> 00:03:58,040 that I don't care about because the problem isn't 64 00:03:58,040 --> 00:04:00,350 asking for that. 65 00:04:00,350 --> 00:04:02,720 Now all we need to do is solve for n. 66 00:04:02,720 --> 00:04:06,320 So if we remember algebra, we're going to take the log of 67 00:04:06,320 --> 00:04:07,570 both sides. 68 00:04:14,930 --> 00:04:18,250 Because of the properties of the log, we can 69 00:04:18,250 --> 00:04:19,500 bring the n out front. 70 00:04:25,990 --> 00:04:27,952 So n equals-- 71 00:04:40,110 --> 00:04:43,390 and plugging in the numbers given in the problem-- 72 00:04:43,390 --> 00:04:45,370 they're given in the same units so everything will 73 00:04:45,370 --> 00:04:47,650 cancel out and that's good-- 74 00:04:47,650 --> 00:04:51,300 we get that the n equals one. 75 00:04:51,300 --> 00:04:54,970 So this is a first order reaction. 76 00:04:54,970 --> 00:04:57,480 Now you could've probably done that by inspection if you're 77 00:04:57,480 --> 00:05:02,250 familiar with the rate law and how to determine that by just 78 00:05:02,250 --> 00:05:04,855 seeing that as the concentration went down by a 79 00:05:04,855 --> 00:05:07,680 fourth, the rate also went down by a fourth. 80 00:05:07,680 --> 00:05:11,730 However, the question asks for you to determine the order of 81 00:05:11,730 --> 00:05:15,910 reaction and so we were looking for more of a 82 00:05:15,910 --> 00:05:19,770 derivation of the problem instead of just an inspection 83 00:05:19,770 --> 00:05:23,760 because that shows that you have a familiarity with the 84 00:05:23,760 --> 00:05:27,780 general rate law equation. 85 00:05:27,780 --> 00:05:29,380 So now moving to part B-- 86 00:05:34,210 --> 00:05:37,850 we are asked, on the plot below, sketch the variation in 87 00:05:37,850 --> 00:05:41,180 energy with extent of reaction for the decomposition of 88 00:05:41,180 --> 00:05:42,770 benzoyl peroxide. 89 00:05:42,770 --> 00:05:48,580 Assume that the ratio of activation energy to-- 90 00:05:48,580 --> 00:05:51,290 delta e, which is the energy of the reaction-- 91 00:05:51,290 --> 00:05:54,170 equals -2.5. 92 00:05:54,170 --> 00:06:00,200 Label the energy states and label the delta e of reaction, 93 00:06:00,200 --> 00:06:03,710 the activation energy for the forward reaction and the 94 00:06:03,710 --> 00:06:07,200 activation energy for the backward reaction. 95 00:06:07,200 --> 00:06:09,260 So that's asking us to do a lot. 96 00:06:09,260 --> 00:06:12,230 So first we're going to write down, what are we actually 97 00:06:12,230 --> 00:06:13,480 asked to do? 98 00:06:19,430 --> 00:06:26,490 So the main thing is that we're asked for the variation 99 00:06:26,490 --> 00:06:34,240 in energy with the extent of reaction. 100 00:06:34,240 --> 00:06:37,280 So as the reaction progresses, what's the 101 00:06:37,280 --> 00:06:39,090 energy of the molecule? 102 00:06:39,090 --> 00:06:42,560 The energy state that it's going through? 103 00:06:42,560 --> 00:06:54,920 In that plot, we're asked to label the energy states of the 104 00:06:54,920 --> 00:07:09,330 reactant and product and we're asked to label 105 00:07:09,330 --> 00:07:12,210 the delta e of reaction. 106 00:07:12,210 --> 00:07:17,450 So what's the net change in energy as well as the 107 00:07:17,450 --> 00:07:22,820 activation, both forward and backward? 108 00:07:27,430 --> 00:07:30,040 I would always write this to the side or scrap piece of 109 00:07:30,040 --> 00:07:32,400 paper or something because this is a lot of things to put 110 00:07:32,400 --> 00:07:35,700 on one plot and this will be a nice reference to help us to 111 00:07:35,700 --> 00:07:40,630 make sure we answered all the things the question is asking. 112 00:07:40,630 --> 00:07:45,730 So on the plot given, which I'll reproduce here, it has 113 00:07:45,730 --> 00:07:53,992 axes of extent of reaction and energy. 114 00:07:58,660 --> 00:08:02,900 The first thing to do would be to label the beginning and 115 00:08:02,900 --> 00:08:05,740 start energy states. 116 00:08:05,740 --> 00:08:12,310 So because we know at 92 degrees C, this-- 117 00:08:12,310 --> 00:08:14,610 the benzoyl peroxide-- 118 00:08:14,610 --> 00:08:18,010 decomposes readily, we can assume that there's 119 00:08:18,010 --> 00:08:20,640 a decrease in energy. 120 00:08:20,640 --> 00:08:22,620 So we'll have our products start at a 121 00:08:22,620 --> 00:08:25,760 higher energy than our-- 122 00:08:25,760 --> 00:08:27,440 sorry-- our reactant start at a higher 123 00:08:27,440 --> 00:08:29,430 energy than our products. 124 00:08:29,430 --> 00:08:32,525 And because the question asks us to label that, we're going 125 00:08:32,525 --> 00:08:34,593 to put in the actual labels. 126 00:09:00,750 --> 00:09:03,350 And so that's your reactant and then we 127 00:09:03,350 --> 00:09:05,250 have the radical product. 128 00:09:21,330 --> 00:09:26,480 Now that we have our beginning and end energy states, we need 129 00:09:26,480 --> 00:09:29,230 to think about what's happening in the middle. 130 00:09:29,230 --> 00:09:33,160 A clue is that he talks about the activation energy, right? 131 00:09:33,160 --> 00:09:35,370 And we know that most processes that we talk about 132 00:09:35,370 --> 00:09:37,850 have a certain activation energy. 133 00:09:37,850 --> 00:09:41,650 You can't just go straight from the 134 00:09:41,650 --> 00:09:43,930 molecule to the radical. 135 00:09:43,930 --> 00:09:47,900 You have to have a little bit of energy cuffed. 136 00:09:47,900 --> 00:09:52,410 And so we know we're going to have some type of hill that we 137 00:09:52,410 --> 00:09:54,650 have to go over. 138 00:09:54,650 --> 00:09:59,160 Furthermore, in the problem he states that the activation 139 00:09:59,160 --> 00:10:05,700 energy divided by the delta e is -2.5. 140 00:10:05,700 --> 00:10:11,520 So we know that because this is a negative delta e-- 141 00:10:11,520 --> 00:10:17,580 so this is our delta e here and it's negative-- 142 00:10:17,580 --> 00:10:21,060 our activation energy is two and a half times as large as 143 00:10:21,060 --> 00:10:24,110 that net change in energy. 144 00:10:24,110 --> 00:10:26,435 So we want to kind of just eyeball that in here. 145 00:10:31,130 --> 00:10:33,820 You didn't have to be exact, but relatively-- 146 00:10:33,820 --> 00:10:36,320 it's going to be larger than twice the 147 00:10:36,320 --> 00:10:38,820 distance between here. 148 00:10:38,820 --> 00:10:43,450 And remember that activation energy is the hill, the energy 149 00:10:43,450 --> 00:10:47,390 costs that you have to go through to get to your lower 150 00:10:47,390 --> 00:10:49,796 energy state in the product size. 151 00:10:49,796 --> 00:10:53,670 So now that we have all of our energy states, we want to draw 152 00:10:53,670 --> 00:10:55,630 a smooth curve to show the variation of 153 00:10:55,630 --> 00:10:57,380 energy with the reaction. 154 00:10:57,380 --> 00:11:05,300 So connecting all these points, we get two valleys and 155 00:11:05,300 --> 00:11:05,940 a hill, right? 156 00:11:05,940 --> 00:11:08,450 We have two stable energy states and we have an 157 00:11:08,450 --> 00:11:11,430 activated complex corresponding to the 158 00:11:11,430 --> 00:11:14,940 activation energy there. 159 00:11:14,940 --> 00:11:19,120 So we have our energy diagram, but we need to go back to what 160 00:11:19,120 --> 00:11:24,490 the question is asking and see that we've labeled the energy 161 00:11:24,490 --> 00:11:27,910 states, we've labeled the delta e of reaction, but we 162 00:11:27,910 --> 00:11:29,950 need to label both the forward and 163 00:11:29,950 --> 00:11:32,040 backwards activation energy. 164 00:11:32,040 --> 00:11:34,650 And this is one of the things people had issues with-- 165 00:11:34,650 --> 00:11:38,120 the backward activation. 166 00:11:38,120 --> 00:11:39,900 So forward activation is pretty self 167 00:11:39,900 --> 00:11:41,360 explanatory, right? 168 00:11:41,360 --> 00:11:47,170 It's the energy we need to overcome the activation of 169 00:11:47,170 --> 00:11:53,910 this process and so this is the Ea of the forward. 170 00:11:53,910 --> 00:11:58,500 Now the activation energy of the backward reaction is just 171 00:11:58,500 --> 00:12:01,100 the same concept, but going backwards. 172 00:12:01,100 --> 00:12:05,820 So if we started down here, what is the energy we need to 173 00:12:05,820 --> 00:12:09,360 get over this activation barrier? 174 00:12:09,360 --> 00:12:18,090 And so that's this full energy, this full amount of 175 00:12:18,090 --> 00:12:20,330 energy here. 176 00:12:20,330 --> 00:12:23,650 And so we can see that it's bigger than the activation 177 00:12:23,650 --> 00:12:26,910 energy for the forward reaction by the 178 00:12:26,910 --> 00:12:30,110 delta e of the reaction. 179 00:12:30,110 --> 00:12:34,510 So going back to our checklist here, we've answered all over 180 00:12:34,510 --> 00:12:39,500 the questions and so we can move to part C. 181 00:12:39,500 --> 00:12:42,580 So part C asks us, on the same plot above-- 182 00:12:42,580 --> 00:12:45,980 which we have over here to the right-- 183 00:12:45,980 --> 00:12:48,910 sketch the variation in energy with extent of reaction for 184 00:12:48,910 --> 00:12:52,370 the decomposition of benzoyl peroxide under the influence 185 00:12:52,370 --> 00:12:54,810 of a catalyst. 186 00:12:54,810 --> 00:12:57,420 So with a catalyst-- 187 00:12:57,420 --> 00:12:59,610 first to answer this question, we need to know what a 188 00:12:59,610 --> 00:13:02,200 catalyst does. 189 00:13:02,200 --> 00:13:04,970 And in class, we learned that a catalyst will lower the 190 00:13:04,970 --> 00:13:09,470 activation barrier, thus allowing for the reaction to 191 00:13:09,470 --> 00:13:10,570 proceed faster. 192 00:13:10,570 --> 00:13:15,750 You don't necessarily get more product because that's 193 00:13:15,750 --> 00:13:19,890 governed by a different set of laws, but you do get the 194 00:13:19,890 --> 00:13:21,510 product faster. 195 00:13:21,510 --> 00:13:31,210 And so the way we can change this is that instead of having 196 00:13:31,210 --> 00:13:34,005 our activation barrier up there, we can say it's going 197 00:13:34,005 --> 00:13:37,956 to be somewhere here. 198 00:13:37,956 --> 00:13:44,390 It's going to be lowered by the presence of the catalyst. 199 00:13:44,390 --> 00:13:48,870 So we want to make a smooth curve again and connect this 200 00:13:48,870 --> 00:13:52,770 lower activation barrier. 201 00:13:52,770 --> 00:13:55,920 And you'd want to label this-- 202 00:13:55,920 --> 00:13:59,540 I'll label it in white-- 203 00:13:59,540 --> 00:14:08,920 this is the catalyzed curve there. 204 00:14:08,920 --> 00:14:11,380 As long as you've showed that the activation barrier was 205 00:14:11,380 --> 00:14:15,480 lowered by the presence of a catalyst, that's fine. 206 00:14:15,480 --> 00:14:17,610 That was what the question was asking for. 207 00:14:17,610 --> 00:14:21,720 So we've labeled everything, answered all the questions and 208 00:14:21,720 --> 00:14:23,550 we're done with this problem.