1 00:00:02,000 --> 00:00:08,000 We're going to start. 2 00:00:31,000 --> 00:00:37,000 We are going to start studying today, and for quite a while, 3 00:00:37,000 --> 00:00:43,000 the linear second-order differential equation with 4 00:00:42,000 --> 00:00:48,000 constant coefficients. In standard form, 5 00:00:46,000 --> 00:00:52,000 it looks like, there are various possible 6 00:00:51,000 --> 00:00:57,000 choices for the variable, unfortunately, 7 00:00:55,000 --> 00:01:01,000 so I hope it won't disturb you much if I use one rather than 8 00:01:01,000 --> 00:01:07,000 another. I'm going to write it this way 9 00:01:06,000 --> 00:01:12,000 in standard form. I'll use y as the dependent 10 00:01:09,000 --> 00:01:15,000 variable. Your book uses little p and 11 00:01:12,000 --> 00:01:18,000 little q. I'll probably switch to that by 12 00:01:16,000 --> 00:01:22,000 next time. But, for today, 13 00:01:18,000 --> 00:01:24,000 I'd like to use the most neutral letters I can find that 14 00:01:22,000 --> 00:01:28,000 won't interfere with anything else. 15 00:01:25,000 --> 00:01:31,000 So, of course call the constant coefficients, 16 00:01:28,000 --> 00:01:34,000 respectively, capital A and capital B. 17 00:01:33,000 --> 00:01:39,000 I'm going to assume for today that the right-hand side is 18 00:01:37,000 --> 00:01:43,000 zero. So, that means it's what we 19 00:01:40,000 --> 00:01:46,000 call homogeneous. The left-hand side must be in 20 00:01:44,000 --> 00:01:50,000 this form for it to be linear, it's second order because it 21 00:01:49,000 --> 00:01:55,000 involves a second derivative. These coefficients, 22 00:01:53,000 --> 00:01:59,000 A and B, are understood to be constant because, 23 00:01:57,000 --> 00:02:03,000 as I said, it has constant coefficients. 24 00:02:02,000 --> 00:02:08,000 Of course, that's not the most general linear equation there 25 00:02:06,000 --> 00:02:12,000 could be. In general, it would be more 26 00:02:08,000 --> 00:02:14,000 general by making this a function of the dependent 27 00:02:12,000 --> 00:02:18,000 variable, x or t, whatever it's called. 28 00:02:15,000 --> 00:02:21,000 Similarly, this could be a function of the dependent 29 00:02:18,000 --> 00:02:24,000 variable. Above all, the right-hand side 30 00:02:21,000 --> 00:02:27,000 can be a function of a variable rather than simply zero. 31 00:02:25,000 --> 00:02:31,000 In that case the equation is called inhomogeneous. 32 00:02:30,000 --> 00:02:36,000 But it has a different physical meaning, and therefore it's 33 00:02:34,000 --> 00:02:40,000 customary to study that after this. 34 00:02:36,000 --> 00:02:42,000 You start with this. This is the case we start with, 35 00:02:40,000 --> 00:02:46,000 and then by the middle of next week we will be studying more 36 00:02:44,000 --> 00:02:50,000 general cases. But, it's a good idea to start 37 00:02:47,000 --> 00:02:53,000 here. Your book starts with, 38 00:02:49,000 --> 00:02:55,000 in general, some theory of a general linear equation of 39 00:02:53,000 --> 00:02:59,000 second-order, and even higher order. 40 00:02:55,000 --> 00:03:01,000 I'm asking you to skip that for the time being. 41 00:03:00,000 --> 00:03:06,000 We'll come back to it next Wednesday, it two lectures, 42 00:03:03,000 --> 00:03:09,000 in other words. I think it's much better and 43 00:03:06,000 --> 00:03:12,000 essential for your problems at for you to get some experience 44 00:03:10,000 --> 00:03:16,000 with a simple type of equation. And then, you'll understand the 45 00:03:14,000 --> 00:03:20,000 general theory, how it applies, 46 00:03:16,000 --> 00:03:22,000 a lot better, I think. 47 00:03:17,000 --> 00:03:23,000 So, let's get experience here. The downside of that is that 48 00:03:21,000 --> 00:03:27,000 I'm going to have to assume a couple of things about the 49 00:03:25,000 --> 00:03:31,000 solution to this equation, how it looks; 50 00:03:27,000 --> 00:03:33,000 I don't think that will upset you too much. 51 00:03:32,000 --> 00:03:38,000 So, what I'm going to assume, and we will justify it in a 52 00:03:37,000 --> 00:03:43,000 couple lectures, that the general solution, 53 00:03:42,000 --> 00:03:48,000 that is, the solution involving arbitrary constants, 54 00:03:47,000 --> 00:03:53,000 looks like this. y is equal-- The arbitrary 55 00:03:51,000 --> 00:03:57,000 constants occur in a certain special way. 56 00:03:56,000 --> 00:04:02,000 There is c one y one plus c two y two. 57 00:04:03,000 --> 00:04:09,000 So, these are two arbitrary constants corresponding to the 58 00:04:06,000 --> 00:04:12,000 fact that we are solving a second-order equation. 59 00:04:09,000 --> 00:04:15,000 In general, the number of arbitrary constants in the 60 00:04:11,000 --> 00:04:17,000 solution is the same as the order of the equation because if 61 00:04:15,000 --> 00:04:21,000 it's a second-order equation because if it's a second-order 62 00:04:18,000 --> 00:04:24,000 equation, that means somehow or other, it may be concealed. 63 00:04:21,000 --> 00:04:27,000 But you're going to have to integrate something twice to get 64 00:04:25,000 --> 00:04:31,000 the answer. And therefore, 65 00:04:26,000 --> 00:04:32,000 there should be two arbitrary constants. 66 00:04:30,000 --> 00:04:36,000 That's very rough, but it sort of gives you the 67 00:04:34,000 --> 00:04:40,000 idea. Now, what are the y1 and y2? 68 00:04:38,000 --> 00:04:44,000 Well, as you can see, if these are arbitrary 69 00:04:42,000 --> 00:04:48,000 constants, if I take c2 to be zero and c1 to be one, 70 00:04:48,000 --> 00:04:54,000 that means that y1 must be a solution to the equation, 71 00:04:53,000 --> 00:04:59,000 and similarly y2. So, where y1 and y2 are 72 00:04:57,000 --> 00:05:03,000 solutions. Now, what that shows you is 73 00:05:02,000 --> 00:05:08,000 that the task of solving this equation is reduced, 74 00:05:05,000 --> 00:05:11,000 in some sense, to finding just two solutions 75 00:05:09,000 --> 00:05:15,000 of it, somehow. All we have to do is find two 76 00:05:12,000 --> 00:05:18,000 solutions, and then we will have solved the equation because the 77 00:05:17,000 --> 00:05:23,000 general solution is made up in this way by multiplying those 78 00:05:22,000 --> 00:05:28,000 two solutions by arbitrary constants and adding them. 79 00:05:26,000 --> 00:05:32,000 So, the problem is, where do we get that solutions 80 00:05:30,000 --> 00:05:36,000 from? But, first of all, 81 00:05:33,000 --> 00:05:39,000 or rather, second or third of all, the initial conditions 82 00:05:38,000 --> 00:05:44,000 enter into the, I haven't given you any initial 83 00:05:42,000 --> 00:05:48,000 conditions here, but if you have them, 84 00:05:45,000 --> 00:05:51,000 and I will illustrate them when I work problems, 85 00:05:49,000 --> 00:05:55,000 the initial conditions, well, the initial values are 86 00:05:54,000 --> 00:06:00,000 satisfied by choosing c1 and c2, are satisfied by choosing c1 87 00:05:59,000 --> 00:06:05,000 and c2 properly. So, in other words, 88 00:06:03,000 --> 00:06:09,000 if you have an initial value problem to solve, 89 00:06:08,000 --> 00:06:14,000 that will be taken care of by the way those constants, 90 00:06:14,000 --> 00:06:20,000 c, enter into the solution. Okay, without further ado, 91 00:06:19,000 --> 00:06:25,000 there is a standard example, which I wish I had looked up in 92 00:06:25,000 --> 00:06:31,000 the physics syllabus for the first semester. 93 00:06:30,000 --> 00:06:36,000 Did you study the spring-mass-dashpot system in 94 00:06:35,000 --> 00:06:41,000 8.01? I'm embarrassed having to ask 95 00:06:39,000 --> 00:06:45,000 you. You did? 96 00:06:40,000 --> 00:06:46,000 Raise your hands if you did. Okay, that means you all did. 97 00:06:44,000 --> 00:06:50,000 Well, just let me draw an instant picture to remind you. 98 00:06:49,000 --> 00:06:55,000 So, this is a two second review. 99 00:06:51,000 --> 00:06:57,000 I don't know how they draw the picture. 100 00:06:54,000 --> 00:07:00,000 Probably they don't draw picture at all. 101 00:06:57,000 --> 00:07:03,000 They have some elaborate system here of the thing running back 102 00:07:02,000 --> 00:07:08,000 and forth. Well, in the math, 103 00:07:04,000 --> 00:07:10,000 we do that all virtually. So, here's my system. 104 00:07:10,000 --> 00:07:16,000 That's a fixed thing. Here's a little spring. 105 00:07:14,000 --> 00:07:20,000 And, there's a little car on the track here, 106 00:07:18,000 --> 00:07:24,000 I guess. So, there's the mass, 107 00:07:21,000 --> 00:07:27,000 some mass in the little car, and motion is damped by what's 108 00:07:27,000 --> 00:07:33,000 called a dashpot. A dashpot is the sort of thing, 109 00:07:32,000 --> 00:07:38,000 you see them in everyday life as door closers. 110 00:07:35,000 --> 00:07:41,000 They're the thing up above that you never notice that prevent 111 00:07:40,000 --> 00:07:46,000 the door slamming shut. So, if you take one apart, 112 00:07:43,000 --> 00:07:49,000 it looks something like this. So, that's the dash pot. 113 00:07:47,000 --> 00:07:53,000 It's a chamber with a piston. This is a piston moving in and 114 00:07:51,000 --> 00:07:57,000 out, and compressing the air, releasing it, 115 00:07:54,000 --> 00:08:00,000 is what damps the motion of the thing. 116 00:07:57,000 --> 00:08:03,000 So, this is a dashpot, it's usually called. 117 00:08:02,000 --> 00:08:08,000 And, here's our mass in that little truck. 118 00:08:05,000 --> 00:08:11,000 And, here's the spring. And then, the equation which 119 00:08:09,000 --> 00:08:15,000 governs it is, let's call this x. 120 00:08:11,000 --> 00:08:17,000 I'm already changing, going to change the dependent 121 00:08:15,000 --> 00:08:21,000 variable from y to x, but that's just for the sake of 122 00:08:19,000 --> 00:08:25,000 example, and because the track is horizontal, 123 00:08:23,000 --> 00:08:29,000 it seems more natural to call it x. 124 00:08:27,000 --> 00:08:33,000 There's some equilibrium position somewhere, 125 00:08:30,000 --> 00:08:36,000 let's say, here. That's the position at which 126 00:08:34,000 --> 00:08:40,000 the mass wants to be, if the spring is not pulling on 127 00:08:38,000 --> 00:08:44,000 it or pushing on it, and the dashpot is happy. 128 00:08:42,000 --> 00:08:48,000 I guess we'd better have a longer dashpot here. 129 00:08:46,000 --> 00:08:52,000 So, this is the equilibrium position where nothing is 130 00:08:50,000 --> 00:08:56,000 happening. When you depart from that 131 00:08:53,000 --> 00:08:59,000 position, then the spring, if you go that way, 132 00:08:57,000 --> 00:09:03,000 the spring tries to pull the mass back. 133 00:09:02,000 --> 00:09:08,000 If it goes on the site, the spring tries to push the 134 00:09:07,000 --> 00:09:13,000 mass away. The dashpot, 135 00:09:09,000 --> 00:09:15,000 meanwhile, is doing its thing. And so, the force on the, 136 00:09:14,000 --> 00:09:20,000 m x double prime. That's by Newton's law, 137 00:09:19,000 --> 00:09:25,000 the force, comes from where? Well, there's the spring 138 00:09:24,000 --> 00:09:30,000 pushing and pulling on it. That force is opposed. 139 00:09:29,000 --> 00:09:35,000 If x gets to be beyond zero, then the spring tries to pull 140 00:09:34,000 --> 00:09:40,000 it back. If it gets to the left of zero, 141 00:09:39,000 --> 00:09:45,000 if x gets to be negative, that that spring force is 142 00:09:42,000 --> 00:09:48,000 pushing it this way, wants to get rid of the mass. 143 00:09:46,000 --> 00:09:52,000 So, it should be minus kx, and this is from the spring, 144 00:09:50,000 --> 00:09:56,000 the fact that is proportional to the amount by which x varies. 145 00:09:54,000 --> 00:10:00,000 So, that's called Hooke's Law. Never mind that. 146 00:09:58,000 --> 00:10:04,000 This is a law. That's a law, 147 00:10:01,000 --> 00:10:07,000 Newton's law, okay, Newton, 148 00:10:03,000 --> 00:10:09,000 Hooke with an E, and the dashpot damping is 149 00:10:06,000 --> 00:10:12,000 proportional to the velocity. It's not doing anything if the 150 00:10:11,000 --> 00:10:17,000 mass is not moving, even if it's stretched way out 151 00:10:15,000 --> 00:10:21,000 of its equilibrium position. So, it resists the velocity. 152 00:10:19,000 --> 00:10:25,000 If the thing is trying to go that way, the dashpot resists 153 00:10:24,000 --> 00:10:30,000 it. It's trying to go this way, 154 00:10:26,000 --> 00:10:32,000 the dashpot resists that, too. 155 00:10:30,000 --> 00:10:36,000 It's always opposed to the velocity. 156 00:10:32,000 --> 00:10:38,000 And so, this is a dash pot damping. 157 00:10:35,000 --> 00:10:41,000 I don't know whose law this is. So, it's the force coming from 158 00:10:39,000 --> 00:10:45,000 the dashpot. And, when you write this out, 159 00:10:42,000 --> 00:10:48,000 the final result, therefore, is it's m x double 160 00:10:45,000 --> 00:10:51,000 prime plus c x prime, it's important to see where the 161 00:10:49,000 --> 00:10:55,000 various terms are, plus kx equals zero. 162 00:10:52,000 --> 00:10:58,000 And now, that's still not in 163 00:10:56,000 --> 00:11:02,000 standard form. To put it in standard form, 164 00:10:59,000 --> 00:11:05,000 you must divide through by the mass. 165 00:11:03,000 --> 00:11:09,000 And, it will now read like this, plus k divided by m times 166 00:11:07,000 --> 00:11:13,000 x equals zero. And, that's the equation 167 00:11:10,000 --> 00:11:16,000 governing the motion of the spring. 168 00:11:13,000 --> 00:11:19,000 I'm doing this because your problem set, problems three and 169 00:11:17,000 --> 00:11:23,000 four, ask you to look at a little computer visual which 170 00:11:21,000 --> 00:11:27,000 illustrates a lot of things. And, I didn't see how it would 171 00:11:26,000 --> 00:11:32,000 make, you can do it without this interpretation of 172 00:11:30,000 --> 00:11:36,000 spring-mass-dashpot, -- 173 00:11:33,000 --> 00:11:39,000 -- but, I think thinking of it of these constants as, 174 00:11:37,000 --> 00:11:43,000 this is the damping constant, and this is the spring, 175 00:11:41,000 --> 00:11:47,000 the constant which represents the force being exerted by the 176 00:11:46,000 --> 00:11:52,000 spring, the spring constant, as it's called, 177 00:11:50,000 --> 00:11:56,000 makes it much more vivid. So, you will note is that those 178 00:11:54,000 --> 00:12:00,000 problems are labeled Friday or Monday. 179 00:11:57,000 --> 00:12:03,000 Make it Friday. You can do them after today if 180 00:12:01,000 --> 00:12:07,000 you have the vaguest idea of what I'm talking about. 181 00:12:07,000 --> 00:12:13,000 If not, go back and repeat 8.01. 182 00:12:10,000 --> 00:12:16,000 So, all this was just an example, a typical model. 183 00:12:16,000 --> 00:12:22,000 But, by far, the most important simple 184 00:12:20,000 --> 00:12:26,000 model. Okay, now what I'd like to talk 185 00:12:25,000 --> 00:12:31,000 about is the solution. What is it I have to do to 186 00:12:30,000 --> 00:12:36,000 solve the equation? So, to solve the equation that 187 00:12:37,000 --> 00:12:43,000 I outlined in orange on the board, the ODE, 188 00:12:41,000 --> 00:12:47,000 our task is to find two solutions. 189 00:12:44,000 --> 00:12:50,000 Now, don't make it too trivial. There is a condition. 190 00:12:49,000 --> 00:12:55,000 The solution should be independent. 191 00:12:53,000 --> 00:12:59,000 All that means is that y2 should not be a constant 192 00:12:58,000 --> 00:13:04,000 multiple of y1. I mean, if you got y1, 193 00:13:02,000 --> 00:13:08,000 then two times y1 is not an acceptable value for this 194 00:13:06,000 --> 00:13:12,000 because, as you can see, you really only got one there. 195 00:13:10,000 --> 00:13:16,000 You're not going to be able to make up a two parameter family. 196 00:13:15,000 --> 00:13:21,000 So, the solutions have to be independent, which means, 197 00:13:19,000 --> 00:13:25,000 to repeat, that neither should be a constant multiple of the 198 00:13:24,000 --> 00:13:30,000 other. They should look different. 199 00:13:26,000 --> 00:13:32,000 That's an adequate explanation. Okay, now, what's the basic 200 00:13:32,000 --> 00:13:38,000 method to finding those solutions? 201 00:13:34,000 --> 00:13:40,000 Well, that's what we're going to use all term long, 202 00:13:38,000 --> 00:13:44,000 essentially, studying equations of this 203 00:13:41,000 --> 00:13:47,000 type, even systems of this type, with constant coefficients. 204 00:13:46,000 --> 00:13:52,000 The basic method is to try y equals an exponential. 205 00:13:50,000 --> 00:13:56,000 Now, the only way you can fiddle with an exponential is in 206 00:13:54,000 --> 00:14:00,000 the constant that you put up on top. 207 00:13:57,000 --> 00:14:03,000 So, I'm going to try y equals e to the rt. 208 00:14:03,000 --> 00:14:09,000 Notice you can't tell from that what I'm using as the 209 00:14:08,000 --> 00:14:14,000 independent variable. But, this tells you I'm using 210 00:14:13,000 --> 00:14:19,000 t. And, I'm switching back to 211 00:14:16,000 --> 00:14:22,000 using t as the dependent variable. 212 00:14:19,000 --> 00:14:25,000 So, T is the independent variable. 213 00:14:22,000 --> 00:14:28,000 Why do I do that? The answer is because somebody 214 00:14:27,000 --> 00:14:33,000 thought of doing it, probably Euler, 215 00:14:31,000 --> 00:14:37,000 and it's been a tradition that's handed down for the last 216 00:14:36,000 --> 00:14:42,000 300 or 400 years. Some things we just know. 217 00:14:42,000 --> 00:14:48,000 All right, so if I do that, as you learned from the exam, 218 00:14:46,000 --> 00:14:52,000 it's very easy to differentiate exponentials. 219 00:14:50,000 --> 00:14:56,000 That's why people love them. It's also very easy to 220 00:14:54,000 --> 00:15:00,000 integrate exponentials. And, half of you integrated 221 00:14:58,000 --> 00:15:04,000 instead of differentiating. So, we will try this and see if 222 00:15:03,000 --> 00:15:09,000 we can pick r so that it's a solution. 223 00:15:07,000 --> 00:15:13,000 Okay, well, I will plug in, then. 224 00:15:09,000 --> 00:15:15,000 Substitute, in other words, and what do we get? 225 00:15:12,000 --> 00:15:18,000 Well, for y double prime, I get r squared e to the rt. 226 00:15:16,000 --> 00:15:22,000 That's y double prime 227 00:15:19,000 --> 00:15:25,000 because each time you differentiate it, 228 00:15:22,000 --> 00:15:28,000 you put an extra power of r out in front. 229 00:15:25,000 --> 00:15:31,000 But otherwise, do nothing. 230 00:15:27,000 --> 00:15:33,000 The next term will be r times, sorry, I forgot the constant. 231 00:15:33,000 --> 00:15:39,000 Capital A times r e to the rt, 232 00:15:36,000 --> 00:15:42,000 and then there's the last term, B times y itself, 233 00:15:39,000 --> 00:15:45,000 which is B e to the rt. 234 00:15:41,000 --> 00:15:47,000 And, that's supposed to be equal to zero. 235 00:15:44,000 --> 00:15:50,000 So, I have to choose r so that this becomes equal to zero. 236 00:15:48,000 --> 00:15:54,000 Now, you see, the e to the rt 237 00:15:51,000 --> 00:15:57,000 occurs as a factor in every term, and the e to the rt 238 00:15:54,000 --> 00:16:00,000 is never zero. And therefore, 239 00:15:57,000 --> 00:16:03,000 you can divide it out because it's always a positive number, 240 00:16:01,000 --> 00:16:07,000 regardless of the value of t. So, I can cancel out from each 241 00:16:07,000 --> 00:16:13,000 term. And, what I'm left with is the 242 00:16:10,000 --> 00:16:16,000 equation r squared plus ar plus b equals zero. 243 00:16:16,000 --> 00:16:22,000 We are trying to find values of 244 00:16:19,000 --> 00:16:25,000 r that satisfy that equation. And that, dear hearts, 245 00:16:24,000 --> 00:16:30,000 is why you learn to solve quadratic equations in high 246 00:16:29,000 --> 00:16:35,000 school, in order that in this moment, you would be now ready 247 00:16:34,000 --> 00:16:40,000 to find how spring-mass systems behave when they are damped. 248 00:16:41,000 --> 00:16:47,000 This is called the characteristic equation. 249 00:16:45,000 --> 00:16:51,000 The characteristic equation of the ODE, or of the system of the 250 00:16:52,000 --> 00:16:58,000 spring mass system, which it's modeling, 251 00:16:57,000 --> 00:17:03,000 the characteristic equation of the system, okay? 252 00:17:02,000 --> 00:17:08,000 Okay, now, we solve it, but now, from high school you 253 00:17:08,000 --> 00:17:14,000 know there are several cases. And, each of those cases 254 00:17:14,000 --> 00:17:20,000 corresponds to a different behavior. 255 00:17:17,000 --> 00:17:23,000 And, the cases depend upon what the roots look like. 256 00:17:22,000 --> 00:17:28,000 The possibilities are the roots could be real, 257 00:17:25,000 --> 00:17:31,000 and distinct. That's the easiest case to 258 00:17:29,000 --> 00:17:35,000 handle. The roots might be a pair of 259 00:17:31,000 --> 00:17:37,000 complex conjugate numbers. That's harder to handle, 260 00:17:36,000 --> 00:17:42,000 but we are ready to do it. And, the third case, 261 00:17:40,000 --> 00:17:46,000 which is the one most in your problem set is the most 262 00:17:45,000 --> 00:17:51,000 puzzling: when the roots are real, and equal. 263 00:17:48,000 --> 00:17:54,000 And, I'm going to talk about those three cases in that order. 264 00:17:53,000 --> 00:17:59,000 So, the first case is the roots are real and unequal. 265 00:17:57,000 --> 00:18:03,000 If I tell you they are unequal, and I will put down real to 266 00:18:02,000 --> 00:18:08,000 make that clear. Well, that is by far the 267 00:18:07,000 --> 00:18:13,000 simplest case because immediately, one sees we have 268 00:18:11,000 --> 00:18:17,000 two roots. They are different, 269 00:18:13,000 --> 00:18:19,000 and therefore, we get our two solutions 270 00:18:17,000 --> 00:18:23,000 immediately. So, the solutions are, 271 00:18:19,000 --> 00:18:25,000 the general solution to the equation, I write down without 272 00:18:24,000 --> 00:18:30,000 further ado as y equals c1 e to the r1 t plus c2 e to the r2 t. 273 00:18:34,000 --> 00:18:40,000 There's our solution. Now, because that was so easy, 274 00:18:38,000 --> 00:18:44,000 and we didn't have to do any work, I'd like to extend this 275 00:18:42,000 --> 00:18:48,000 case a little bit by using it as an example of how you put in the 276 00:18:48,000 --> 00:18:54,000 initial conditions, how to put in the c. 277 00:18:51,000 --> 00:18:57,000 So, let me work a specific numerical example, 278 00:18:54,000 --> 00:19:00,000 since we are not going to try to do this theoretically until 279 00:18:59,000 --> 00:19:05,000 next Wednesday. Let's just do a numerical 280 00:19:04,000 --> 00:19:10,000 example. So, suppose I take the 281 00:19:07,000 --> 00:19:13,000 constants to be the damping constant to be a four, 282 00:19:11,000 --> 00:19:17,000 and the spring constant, I'll take the mass to be one, 283 00:19:16,000 --> 00:19:22,000 and the spring constant to be three. 284 00:19:19,000 --> 00:19:25,000 So, there's more damping here, damping force here. 285 00:19:24,000 --> 00:19:30,000 You can't really talk that way since the units are different. 286 00:19:31,000 --> 00:19:37,000 But, this number is bigger than that one. 287 00:19:33,000 --> 00:19:39,000 That seems clear, at any rate. 288 00:19:35,000 --> 00:19:41,000 Okay, now, what was the characteristic equation? 289 00:19:39,000 --> 00:19:45,000 Look, now watch. Please do what I do. 290 00:19:41,000 --> 00:19:47,000 I've found in the past, even by the middle of the term, 291 00:19:45,000 --> 00:19:51,000 there are still students who feel that they must substitute y 292 00:19:50,000 --> 00:19:56,000 equals e to the rt, and go through that whole 293 00:19:53,000 --> 00:19:59,000 little derivation to find that you don't do that. 294 00:19:57,000 --> 00:20:03,000 It's a waste of time. I did it that you might not 295 00:20:02,000 --> 00:20:08,000 ever have to do it again. Immediately write down the 296 00:20:06,000 --> 00:20:12,000 characteristic equation. That's not very hard. 297 00:20:10,000 --> 00:20:16,000 r squared plus 4r plus three equals zero. 298 00:20:14,000 --> 00:20:20,000 And, if you can write down its 299 00:20:17,000 --> 00:20:23,000 roots immediately, splendid. 300 00:20:20,000 --> 00:20:26,000 But, let's not assume that level of competence. 301 00:20:23,000 --> 00:20:29,000 So, it's r plus three times r plus one equals zero. 302 00:20:29,000 --> 00:20:35,000 Okay, you factor it. 303 00:20:33,000 --> 00:20:39,000 This being 18.03, a lot of the times the roots 304 00:20:36,000 --> 00:20:42,000 will be integers when they are not, God forbid, 305 00:20:39,000 --> 00:20:45,000 you will have to use the quadratic formula. 306 00:20:42,000 --> 00:20:48,000 But here, the roots were integers. 307 00:20:44,000 --> 00:20:50,000 It is, after all, only the first example. 308 00:20:47,000 --> 00:20:53,000 So, the solution, the general solution is y 309 00:20:50,000 --> 00:20:56,000 equals c1 e to the negative, notice the root is minus three 310 00:20:54,000 --> 00:21:00,000 and minus one, minus 3t plus c2 e to the 311 00:20:56,000 --> 00:21:02,000 negative t. 312 00:21:01,000 --> 00:21:07,000 Now, suppose it's an initial value problem. 313 00:21:04,000 --> 00:21:10,000 So, I gave you an initial condition. 314 00:21:06,000 --> 00:21:12,000 Suppose the initial conditions were that y of zero were one. 315 00:21:11,000 --> 00:21:17,000 So, at the start, 316 00:21:13,000 --> 00:21:19,000 the mass has been moved over to the position, 317 00:21:16,000 --> 00:21:22,000 one, here. Well, we expected it, 318 00:21:18,000 --> 00:21:24,000 then, to start doing that. But, this is fairly heavily 319 00:21:22,000 --> 00:21:28,000 damped. This is heavily damped. 320 00:21:25,000 --> 00:21:31,000 I'm going to assume that the mass starts at rest. 321 00:21:30,000 --> 00:21:36,000 So, the spring is distended. The masses over here. 322 00:21:33,000 --> 00:21:39,000 But, there's no motion at times zero this way or that way. 323 00:21:37,000 --> 00:21:43,000 In other words, I'm not pushing it. 324 00:21:40,000 --> 00:21:46,000 I'm just releasing it and letting it do its thing after 325 00:21:44,000 --> 00:21:50,000 that. Okay, so y prime of zero, 326 00:21:46,000 --> 00:21:52,000 I'll assume, is zero. 327 00:21:49,000 --> 00:21:55,000 So, it starts at rest, but in the extended position, 328 00:21:53,000 --> 00:21:59,000 one unit to the right of the equilibrium position. 329 00:21:56,000 --> 00:22:02,000 Now, all you have to do is use these two conditions. 330 00:22:02,000 --> 00:22:08,000 Notice I have to have two conditions because there are two 331 00:22:06,000 --> 00:22:12,000 constants I have to find the value of. 332 00:22:09,000 --> 00:22:15,000 All right, so, let's substitute, 333 00:22:11,000 --> 00:22:17,000 well, we're going to have to calculate the derivative. 334 00:22:15,000 --> 00:22:21,000 So, why don't we do that right away? 335 00:22:18,000 --> 00:22:24,000 So, this is minus three c1 e to the minus 3t minus c2 e to the 336 00:22:22,000 --> 00:22:28,000 negative t. 337 00:22:27,000 --> 00:22:33,000 And now, if I substitute in at zero, when t equals zero, 338 00:22:31,000 --> 00:22:37,000 what do I get? Well, the first equation, 339 00:22:34,000 --> 00:22:40,000 the left says that y of zero should be one. 340 00:22:38,000 --> 00:22:44,000 And, the right says this is one. 341 00:22:41,000 --> 00:22:47,000 So, it's c1 plus c2. 342 00:22:43,000 --> 00:22:49,000 That's the result of substituting t equals zero. 343 00:22:47,000 --> 00:22:53,000 How about substituting? 344 00:22:49,000 --> 00:22:55,000 What should I substitute in the second equation? 345 00:22:53,000 --> 00:22:59,000 Well, y prime of zero is zero. 346 00:22:56,000 --> 00:23:02,000 So, if the second equation, when I put in t equals zero, 347 00:23:01,000 --> 00:23:07,000 the left side is zero according to that initial value, 348 00:23:05,000 --> 00:23:11,000 and the right side is negative three c1 minus c2. 349 00:23:12,000 --> 00:23:18,000 You see what you end up with, therefore, is a pair of 350 00:23:15,000 --> 00:23:21,000 simultaneous linear equations. And, this is why you learn to 351 00:23:19,000 --> 00:23:25,000 study linear set of pairs of simultaneous linear equations in 352 00:23:24,000 --> 00:23:30,000 high school. These are among the most 353 00:23:26,000 --> 00:23:32,000 important. Solving problems of this type 354 00:23:29,000 --> 00:23:35,000 are among the most important applications of that kind of 355 00:23:33,000 --> 00:23:39,000 algebra, and this kind of algebra. 356 00:23:37,000 --> 00:23:43,000 All right, what's the answer finally? 357 00:23:40,000 --> 00:23:46,000 Well, if I add the two of them, I get minus 2c1 equals one. 358 00:23:45,000 --> 00:23:51,000 So, c1 is equal to minus one half. 359 00:23:49,000 --> 00:23:55,000 And, if c1 is minus a half, 360 00:23:54,000 --> 00:24:00,000 then c2 is minus 3c1. 361 00:23:57,000 --> 00:24:03,000 So, c2 is three halves. 362 00:24:10,000 --> 00:24:16,000 The final question is, what does that look like as a 363 00:24:13,000 --> 00:24:19,000 solution? Well, in general, 364 00:24:14,000 --> 00:24:20,000 these combinations of two exponentials aren't very easy to 365 00:24:17,000 --> 00:24:23,000 plot by yourself. That's one of the reasons you 366 00:24:20,000 --> 00:24:26,000 are being given this little visual which plots them for you. 367 00:24:24,000 --> 00:24:30,000 All you have to do is, as you'll see, 368 00:24:26,000 --> 00:24:32,000 set the damping constant, set the constants, 369 00:24:28,000 --> 00:24:34,000 set the initial conditions, and by magic, 370 00:24:31,000 --> 00:24:37,000 the curve appears on the screen. 371 00:24:34,000 --> 00:24:40,000 And, if you change either of the constants, 372 00:24:40,000 --> 00:24:46,000 the curve will change nicely right along with it. 373 00:24:48,000 --> 00:24:54,000 So, the solution is y equals minus one half e to the minus 3t 374 00:24:57,000 --> 00:25:03,000 plus three halves e to the negative t. 375 00:25:06,000 --> 00:25:12,000 How does it look? 376 00:25:11,000 --> 00:25:17,000 Well, I don't expect you to be able to plot that by yourself, 377 00:25:16,000 --> 00:25:22,000 but you can at least get started. 378 00:25:19,000 --> 00:25:25,000 It does have to satisfy the initial conditions. 379 00:25:23,000 --> 00:25:29,000 That means it should start at one, and its starting slope is 380 00:25:28,000 --> 00:25:34,000 zero. So, it starts like that. 381 00:25:32,000 --> 00:25:38,000 These are both declining exponentials. 382 00:25:35,000 --> 00:25:41,000 This declines very rapidly, this somewhat more slowly. 383 00:25:40,000 --> 00:25:46,000 It does something like that. If this term were a lot, 384 00:25:44,000 --> 00:25:50,000 lot more negative, I mean, that's the way that 385 00:25:49,000 --> 00:25:55,000 particular solution looks. How might other solutions look? 386 00:25:54,000 --> 00:26:00,000 I'll draw a few other possibilities. 387 00:25:57,000 --> 00:26:03,000 If the initial term, if, for example, 388 00:26:00,000 --> 00:26:06,000 the initial slope were quite negative, well, 389 00:26:04,000 --> 00:26:10,000 that would have start like this. 390 00:26:09,000 --> 00:26:15,000 Now, just your experience of physics, or of the real world 391 00:26:12,000 --> 00:26:18,000 suggests that if I give, if I start the thing at one, 392 00:26:15,000 --> 00:26:21,000 but give it a strongly negative push, it's going to go beyond 393 00:26:19,000 --> 00:26:25,000 the equilibrium position, and then come back again. 394 00:26:22,000 --> 00:26:28,000 But, because the damping is big, it's not going to be able 395 00:26:26,000 --> 00:26:32,000 to get through that. The equilibrium position, 396 00:26:29,000 --> 00:26:35,000 a second time, is going to look something like 397 00:26:31,000 --> 00:26:37,000 that. Or, if I push it in that 398 00:26:34,000 --> 00:26:40,000 direction, the positive direction, that it starts off 399 00:26:37,000 --> 00:26:43,000 with a positive slope. But it loses its energy because 400 00:26:41,000 --> 00:26:47,000 the spring is pulling it. It comes and does something 401 00:26:44,000 --> 00:26:50,000 like that. So, in other words, 402 00:26:46,000 --> 00:26:52,000 it might go down. Cut across the equilibrium 403 00:26:49,000 --> 00:26:55,000 position, come back again, it do that? 404 00:26:52,000 --> 00:26:58,000 No, that it cannot do. I was considering giving you a 405 00:26:55,000 --> 00:27:01,000 problem to prove that, but I got tired of making out 406 00:26:58,000 --> 00:27:04,000 the problems set, and decided I tortured you 407 00:27:01,000 --> 00:27:07,000 enough already, as you will see. 408 00:27:05,000 --> 00:27:11,000 So, anyway, these are different possibilities for the way that 409 00:27:11,000 --> 00:27:17,000 can look. This case, where it just 410 00:27:14,000 --> 00:27:20,000 returns in the long run is called the over-damped case, 411 00:27:20,000 --> 00:27:26,000 over-damped. Now, there is another case 412 00:27:24,000 --> 00:27:30,000 where the thing oscillates back and forth. 413 00:27:30,000 --> 00:27:36,000 We would expect to get that case if the damping is very 414 00:27:33,000 --> 00:27:39,000 little or nonexistent. Then, there's very little 415 00:27:37,000 --> 00:27:43,000 preventing the mass from doing that, although we do expect if 416 00:27:41,000 --> 00:27:47,000 there's any damping at all, we expect it ultimately to get 417 00:27:45,000 --> 00:27:51,000 nearer and nearer to the equilibrium position. 418 00:27:48,000 --> 00:27:54,000 Mathematically, what does that correspond to? 419 00:27:51,000 --> 00:27:57,000 Well, that's going to correspond to case two, 420 00:27:55,000 --> 00:28:01,000 where the roots are complex. The roots are complex, 421 00:27:59,000 --> 00:28:05,000 and this is why, let's call the roots, 422 00:28:03,000 --> 00:28:09,000 in that case we know that the roots are of the form a plus or 423 00:28:08,000 --> 00:28:14,000 minus bi. There are two roots, 424 00:28:10,000 --> 00:28:16,000 and they are a complex conjugate. 425 00:28:13,000 --> 00:28:19,000 All right, let's take one of them. 426 00:28:16,000 --> 00:28:22,000 What does a correspond to in terms of the exponential? 427 00:28:20,000 --> 00:28:26,000 Well, remember, the function of the r was, 428 00:28:24,000 --> 00:28:30,000 it's this r when we tried our exponential solution. 429 00:28:30,000 --> 00:28:36,000 So, what we formally, this means we get a complex 430 00:28:34,000 --> 00:28:40,000 solution. The complex solution y equals e 431 00:28:38,000 --> 00:28:44,000 to this, let's use one of them, let's say, (a plus bi) times t. 432 00:28:43,000 --> 00:28:49,000 The question is, 433 00:28:47,000 --> 00:28:53,000 what do we do that? We are not really interested, 434 00:28:51,000 --> 00:28:57,000 I don't know what a complex solution to that thing means. 435 00:28:56,000 --> 00:29:02,000 It doesn't have any meaning. What I want to know is how y 436 00:29:01,000 --> 00:29:07,000 behaves or how x behaves in that picture. 437 00:29:07,000 --> 00:29:13,000 And, that better be a real function because otherwise I 438 00:29:10,000 --> 00:29:16,000 don't know what to do with it. So, we are looking for two real 439 00:29:14,000 --> 00:29:20,000 functions, the y1 and the y2. But, in fact, 440 00:29:17,000 --> 00:29:23,000 what we've got is one complex function. 441 00:29:20,000 --> 00:29:26,000 All right, now, a theorem to the rescue: 442 00:29:22,000 --> 00:29:28,000 this, I'm not going to save for Wednesday because it's so 443 00:29:26,000 --> 00:29:32,000 simple. So, the theorem is that if you 444 00:29:30,000 --> 00:29:36,000 have a complex solution, u plus iv, so each of these is 445 00:29:36,000 --> 00:29:42,000 a function of time, u plus iv is the complex 446 00:29:40,000 --> 00:29:46,000 solution to a real differential equation with constant 447 00:29:45,000 --> 00:29:51,000 coefficients. Well, it doesn't have to have 448 00:29:49,000 --> 00:29:55,000 constant coefficients. It has to be linear. 449 00:29:53,000 --> 00:29:59,000 Let me just write it out to y double prime plus A y prime plus 450 00:29:59,000 --> 00:30:05,000 B y equals zero. 451 00:30:04,000 --> 00:30:10,000 Suppose you got a complex solution to that equation. 452 00:30:08,000 --> 00:30:14,000 These are understood to be real numbers. 453 00:30:11,000 --> 00:30:17,000 They are the damping constant and the spring constant. 454 00:30:15,000 --> 00:30:21,000 Then, the conclusion is that u and v are real solutions. 455 00:30:20,000 --> 00:30:26,000 In other words, having found a complex 456 00:30:23,000 --> 00:30:29,000 solution, all you have to do is take its real and imaginary 457 00:30:28,000 --> 00:30:34,000 parts, and voila, you've got your two solutions 458 00:30:31,000 --> 00:30:37,000 you were looking for for the original equation. 459 00:30:37,000 --> 00:30:43,000 Now, that might seem like magic, but it's easy. 460 00:30:39,000 --> 00:30:45,000 It's so easy it's the sort of theorem I could spend one minute 461 00:30:43,000 --> 00:30:49,000 proving for you now. What's the reason for it? 462 00:30:46,000 --> 00:30:52,000 Well, the main thing I want you to get out of this argument is 463 00:30:50,000 --> 00:30:56,000 to see that it absolutely depends upon these coefficients 464 00:30:54,000 --> 00:31:00,000 being real. You have to have a real 465 00:30:56,000 --> 00:31:02,000 differential equation for this to be true. 466 00:30:59,000 --> 00:31:05,000 Otherwise, it's certainly not. So, the proof is, 467 00:31:03,000 --> 00:31:09,000 what does it mean to be a solution? 468 00:31:06,000 --> 00:31:12,000 It means when you plug in A (u plus iv) plus, 469 00:31:10,000 --> 00:31:16,000 prime, plus B times u plus iv, 470 00:31:14,000 --> 00:31:20,000 what am I supposed to get? 471 00:31:17,000 --> 00:31:23,000 Zero. Well, now, separate these into 472 00:31:20,000 --> 00:31:26,000 the real and imaginary parts. What does it say? 473 00:31:24,000 --> 00:31:30,000 It says u double prime plus A u prime plus B u, 474 00:31:29,000 --> 00:31:35,000 that's the real part of this expression when I expand it 475 00:31:35,000 --> 00:31:41,000 out. And, I've got an imaginary 476 00:31:39,000 --> 00:31:45,000 part, too, which all have the coefficient i. 477 00:31:43,000 --> 00:31:49,000 So, from here, I get v double prime plus i 478 00:31:46,000 --> 00:31:52,000 times A v prime plus i times B v. 479 00:31:51,000 --> 00:31:57,000 So, this is the imaginary part. Now, here I have something with 480 00:31:57,000 --> 00:32:03,000 a real part plus the imaginary part, i, times the imaginary 481 00:32:02,000 --> 00:32:08,000 part is zero. Well, the only way that can 482 00:32:05,000 --> 00:32:11,000 happen is if the real part is zero, and the imaginary part is 483 00:32:11,000 --> 00:32:17,000 separately zero. So, the conclusion is that 484 00:32:15,000 --> 00:32:21,000 therefore this part must be zero, and therefore this part 485 00:32:19,000 --> 00:32:25,000 must be zero because the two of them together make the complex 486 00:32:23,000 --> 00:32:29,000 number zero plus zero i. Now, what does it mean for the 487 00:32:27,000 --> 00:32:33,000 real part to be zero? It means that u is a solution. 488 00:32:31,000 --> 00:32:37,000 This, the imaginary part zero means v is a solution, 489 00:32:34,000 --> 00:32:40,000 and therefore, just what I said. 490 00:32:36,000 --> 00:32:42,000 u and v are solutions to the real equation. 491 00:32:39,000 --> 00:32:45,000 Where did I use the fact that A and B were real numbers and not 492 00:32:44,000 --> 00:32:50,000 complex numbers? In knowing that this is the 493 00:32:47,000 --> 00:32:53,000 real part, I had to know that A was a real number. 494 00:32:51,000 --> 00:32:57,000 If A were something like one plus i, 495 00:32:54,000 --> 00:33:00,000 I'd be screwed, I mean, because then I couldn't 496 00:32:57,000 --> 00:33:03,000 say that this was the real part anymore. 497 00:33:02,000 --> 00:33:08,000 So, saying that's the real part, and this is the imaginary 498 00:33:07,000 --> 00:33:13,000 part, I was using the fact that these two numbers, 499 00:33:12,000 --> 00:33:18,000 constants, were real constants: very important. 500 00:33:17,000 --> 00:33:23,000 So, what is the case two solution? 501 00:33:20,000 --> 00:33:26,000 Well, what are the real and imaginary parts 502 00:33:26,000 --> 00:33:32,000 of (a plus b i) t? Well, y equals e to the at + 503 00:33:31,000 --> 00:33:37,000 ibt. Okay, you've had experience. 504 00:33:37,000 --> 00:33:43,000 You know how to do this now. That's e to the at 505 00:33:42,000 --> 00:33:48,000 times, well, the real part is, well, let's write it this way. 506 00:33:47,000 --> 00:33:53,000 The real part is e to the at times cosine b t. 507 00:33:51,000 --> 00:33:57,000 Notice how the a and b enter 508 00:33:54,000 --> 00:34:00,000 into the expression. That's the real part. 509 00:33:58,000 --> 00:34:04,000 And, the imaginary part is e to the at times the sine of bt. 510 00:34:03,000 --> 00:34:09,000 And therefore, 511 00:34:07,000 --> 00:34:13,000 the solution, both of these must, 512 00:34:10,000 --> 00:34:16,000 therefore, be solutions to the equation. 513 00:34:13,000 --> 00:34:19,000 And therefore, the general solution to the ODE 514 00:34:18,000 --> 00:34:24,000 is y equals, now, you've got to put in the 515 00:34:21,000 --> 00:34:27,000 arbitrary constants. It's a nice thing to do to 516 00:34:26,000 --> 00:34:32,000 factor out the e to the at. 517 00:34:29,000 --> 00:34:35,000 It makes it look a little better. 518 00:34:32,000 --> 00:34:38,000 And so, the constants are c1 cosine bt and c2 sine bt. 519 00:34:39,000 --> 00:34:45,000 Yeah, but what does that look like? 520 00:34:41,000 --> 00:34:47,000 Well, you know that too. This is an exponential, 521 00:34:45,000 --> 00:34:51,000 which controls the amplitude. But this guy, 522 00:34:49,000 --> 00:34:55,000 which is a combination of two sinusoidal oscillations with 523 00:34:53,000 --> 00:34:59,000 different amplitudes, but with the same frequency, 524 00:34:57,000 --> 00:35:03,000 the b's are the same in both of them, and therefore, 525 00:35:01,000 --> 00:35:07,000 this is, itself, a purely sinusoidal 526 00:35:04,000 --> 00:35:10,000 oscillation. So, in other words, 527 00:35:09,000 --> 00:35:15,000 I don't have room to write it, but it's equal to, 528 00:35:15,000 --> 00:35:21,000 you know. It's a good example of where 529 00:35:20,000 --> 00:35:26,000 you'd use that trigonometric identity I spent time on before 530 00:35:27,000 --> 00:35:33,000 the exam. Okay, let's work a quick 531 00:35:31,000 --> 00:35:37,000 example just to see how this works out. 532 00:35:33,000 --> 00:35:39,000 Well, let's get rid of this. Okay, let's now make the 533 00:35:36,000 --> 00:35:42,000 damping, since this is showing oscillations, 534 00:35:39,000 --> 00:35:45,000 it must correspond to the case where the damping is less strong 535 00:35:42,000 --> 00:35:48,000 compared with the spring constant. 536 00:35:44,000 --> 00:35:50,000 So, the theorem is that if you have a complex solution, 537 00:35:47,000 --> 00:35:53,000 u plus iv, so each of these is a function of time, 538 00:35:50,000 --> 00:35:56,000 u plus iv is the complex solution to a real 539 00:35:53,000 --> 00:35:59,000 differential equation with constant coefficients. 540 00:35:56,000 --> 00:36:02,000 A stiff spring, one that pulls with hard force 541 00:35:58,000 --> 00:36:04,000 is going to make that thing go back and forth, 542 00:36:01,000 --> 00:36:07,000 particularly at the dipping is weak. 543 00:36:05,000 --> 00:36:11,000 So, let's use almost the same equation as I've just concealed. 544 00:36:09,000 --> 00:36:15,000 But, do you remember a used four here? 545 00:36:12,000 --> 00:36:18,000 Okay, before we used three and we got the solution to look like 546 00:36:17,000 --> 00:36:23,000 that. Now, we will give it a little 547 00:36:19,000 --> 00:36:25,000 more energy by putting some moxie in the springs. 548 00:36:23,000 --> 00:36:29,000 So now, the spring is pulling a little harder, 549 00:36:26,000 --> 00:36:32,000 bigger force, a stiffer spring. 550 00:36:30,000 --> 00:36:36,000 Okay, the characteristic equation is now going to be r 551 00:36:35,000 --> 00:36:41,000 squared plus 4r plus five is equal to zero. 552 00:36:40,000 --> 00:36:46,000 And therefore, if I solve for r, 553 00:36:43,000 --> 00:36:49,000 I'm not going to bother trying to factor this because I 554 00:36:49,000 --> 00:36:55,000 prepared for this lecture, and I know, quadratic formula 555 00:36:54,000 --> 00:37:00,000 time, minus four plus or minus the square root of b squared, 556 00:37:00,000 --> 00:37:06,000 16, minus four times five, 16 minus 20 is negative four 557 00:37:05,000 --> 00:37:11,000 all over two. And therefore, 558 00:37:09,000 --> 00:37:15,000 that makes negative two plus or minus, this makes, 559 00:37:13,000 --> 00:37:19,000 simply, i. 2i divided by two, 560 00:37:15,000 --> 00:37:21,000 which is i. So, the exponential solution is 561 00:37:19,000 --> 00:37:25,000 e to the negative two, you don't have to write this 562 00:37:23,000 --> 00:37:29,000 in. You can get the thing directly. 563 00:37:26,000 --> 00:37:32,000 t, let's use the one with the plus sign, and that's going to 564 00:37:31,000 --> 00:37:37,000 give, as the real solutions, e to the negative two t times 565 00:37:36,000 --> 00:37:42,000 cosine t, and e to the negative 2t times 566 00:37:41,000 --> 00:37:47,000 the sine of t. 567 00:37:46,000 --> 00:37:52,000 And therefore, the solution is going to be y 568 00:37:51,000 --> 00:37:57,000 equals e to the negative 2t times 569 00:37:58,000 --> 00:38:04,000 (c1 cosine t plus c2 sine t). 570 00:38:04,000 --> 00:38:10,000 If you want to put initial conditions, you can put them in 571 00:38:08,000 --> 00:38:14,000 the same way I did them before. Suppose we use the same initial 572 00:38:12,000 --> 00:38:18,000 conditions: y of zero equals one, 573 00:38:15,000 --> 00:38:21,000 and y prime of zero equals one, equals zero, 574 00:38:19,000 --> 00:38:25,000 let's say, wait, blah, blah, blah, 575 00:38:22,000 --> 00:38:28,000 zero, yeah. Okay, I'd like to take time to 576 00:38:24,000 --> 00:38:30,000 actually do the calculation, but there's nothing new in it. 577 00:38:30,000 --> 00:38:36,000 I'd have to take, calculate the derivative here, 578 00:38:35,000 --> 00:38:41,000 and then I would substitute in, solve equations, 579 00:38:40,000 --> 00:38:46,000 and when you do all that, just as before, 580 00:38:44,000 --> 00:38:50,000 the answer that you get is y equals e to the negative 2t, 581 00:38:50,000 --> 00:38:56,000 so, choose the constants c1 and c2 582 00:38:55,000 --> 00:39:01,000 by solving linear equations, and the answer is cosine t, 583 00:39:01,000 --> 00:39:07,000 so, c1 turns out to be one, and c2 turns out to be two, 584 00:39:07,000 --> 00:39:13,000 I hope. Okay, I want to know, 585 00:39:11,000 --> 00:39:17,000 but what does that look like? Well, use that trigonometric 586 00:39:15,000 --> 00:39:21,000 identity. The e to the negative 2t 587 00:39:18,000 --> 00:39:24,000 is just a real factor which is going to 588 00:39:21,000 --> 00:39:27,000 reproduce itself. The question is, 589 00:39:24,000 --> 00:39:30,000 what is cosine t plus 2 sine t look like? 590 00:39:28,000 --> 00:39:34,000 What's its amplitude as a pure oscillation? 591 00:39:31,000 --> 00:39:37,000 It's the square root of one plus two squared. 592 00:39:35,000 --> 00:39:41,000 Remember, it depends on looking 593 00:39:39,000 --> 00:39:45,000 at that little triangle, which is one, 594 00:39:41,000 --> 00:39:47,000 two, this is a different scale than that. 595 00:39:44,000 --> 00:39:50,000 And here is the square root of five, right? 596 00:39:47,000 --> 00:39:53,000 And, here is phi, the phase lag. 597 00:39:50,000 --> 00:39:56,000 So, it's equal to the square root of five. 598 00:39:53,000 --> 00:39:59,000 So, it's the square root of five times e to 599 00:39:57,000 --> 00:40:03,000 the negative 2t, and the stuff inside is the 600 00:40:00,000 --> 00:40:06,000 cosine of, the frequency is one. Circular frequency is one, 601 00:40:06,000 --> 00:40:12,000 so it's t minus phi, where phi is this angle. 602 00:40:10,000 --> 00:40:16,000 How big is that, one and two? 603 00:40:13,000 --> 00:40:19,000 Well, if this were the square root of three, 604 00:40:16,000 --> 00:40:22,000 which is a little less than two, it would be 60 infinity. 605 00:40:20,000 --> 00:40:26,000 So, this must be 70 infinity. So, phi is 70 infinity plus or minus 606 00:40:24,000 --> 00:40:30,000 five, let's say. So, it looks like a slightly 607 00:40:29,000 --> 00:40:35,000 delayed cosine curve, but the amplitude is falling. 608 00:40:32,000 --> 00:40:38,000 So, it has to start. So, if I draw it, 609 00:40:35,000 --> 00:40:41,000 here's one, here is, let's say, the square root of 610 00:40:39,000 --> 00:40:45,000 five up about here. Then, the square root of five 611 00:40:43,000 --> 00:40:49,000 times e to the negative 2t looks maybe 612 00:40:47,000 --> 00:40:53,000 something like this. So, that's square root of five 613 00:40:51,000 --> 00:40:57,000 e to the negative 2t. 614 00:40:54,000 --> 00:41:00,000 This is cosine t, but shoved over by not quite pi 615 00:40:59,000 --> 00:41:05,000 over two. It starts at one, 616 00:41:02,000 --> 00:41:08,000 and with the slope zero. So, the solution starts like 617 00:41:06,000 --> 00:41:12,000 this. It has to be guided in its 618 00:41:08,000 --> 00:41:14,000 amplitude by this function out there, and in between it's the 619 00:41:13,000 --> 00:41:19,000 cosine curve. But it's moved over. 620 00:41:15,000 --> 00:41:21,000 So, if this is pi over two, the first time it crosses, 621 00:41:20,000 --> 00:41:26,000 it's 72 infinity to the right of that. So, if this is pi 622 00:41:24,000 --> 00:41:30,000 over two, it's pi over two plus 70 infinity where it crosses. 623 00:41:27,000 --> 00:41:33,000 So, it must be doing something like this. 624 00:41:32,000 --> 00:41:38,000 And now, on the other side, it's got to stay within the 625 00:41:36,000 --> 00:41:42,000 same amplitude. So, it must be doing something 626 00:41:40,000 --> 00:41:46,000 like this. Okay, that gets us to, 627 00:41:43,000 --> 00:41:49,000 if this is the under-damped case, because if you're trying 628 00:41:48,000 --> 00:41:54,000 to do this with a swinging door, it means the door's going to be 629 00:41:54,000 --> 00:42:00,000 swinging back and forth. Or, our little mass now hidden, 630 00:41:59,000 --> 00:42:05,000 but you could see it behind that board, is going to be doing 631 00:42:04,000 --> 00:42:10,000 this. But, it never stops. 632 00:42:07,000 --> 00:42:13,000 It never stops. It doesn't realize, 633 00:42:11,000 --> 00:42:17,000 but not in theoretical life. So, this is the under-damped. 634 00:42:16,000 --> 00:42:22,000 All right, so it's like Goldilocks and the Three Bears. 635 00:42:21,000 --> 00:42:27,000 That's too hot, and this is too cold. 636 00:42:25,000 --> 00:42:31,000 What is the thing which is just right? 637 00:42:30,000 --> 00:42:36,000 Well, that's the thing you're going to study on the problem 638 00:42:37,000 --> 00:42:43,000 set. So, just right is called 639 00:42:40,000 --> 00:42:46,000 critically damped. It's what people aim for in 640 00:42:46,000 --> 00:42:52,000 trying to damp motion that they don't want. 641 00:42:51,000 --> 00:42:57,000 Now, what's critically damped? It must be the case just in 642 00:42:58,000 --> 00:43:04,000 between these two. Neither complex, 643 00:43:03,000 --> 00:43:09,000 nor the roots different. It's the case of two equal 644 00:43:08,000 --> 00:43:14,000 roots. So, r squared plus Ar plus B 645 00:43:11,000 --> 00:43:17,000 equals zero has two equal roots. 646 00:43:17,000 --> 00:43:23,000 Now, that's a very special equation. 647 00:43:20,000 --> 00:43:26,000 Suppose we call the root, since all of these, 648 00:43:24,000 --> 00:43:30,000 notice these roots in this physical case. 649 00:43:30,000 --> 00:43:36,000 The roots always turn out to be negative numbers, 650 00:43:33,000 --> 00:43:39,000 or have a negative real part. I'm going to call the root a. 651 00:43:37,000 --> 00:43:43,000 So, r equals negative a, the root. 652 00:43:40,000 --> 00:43:46,000 a is understood to be a positive number. 653 00:43:43,000 --> 00:43:49,000 I want that root to be really negative. 654 00:43:45,000 --> 00:43:51,000 Then, the equation looks like, the characteristic equation is 655 00:43:50,000 --> 00:43:56,000 going to be r plus a, right, if the root is negative 656 00:43:53,000 --> 00:43:59,000 a, squared because it's a double root. 657 00:43:57,000 --> 00:44:03,000 And, that means the equation is of the form r squared plus two 658 00:44:01,000 --> 00:44:07,000 times a r plus a squared equals zero. 659 00:44:07,000 --> 00:44:13,000 In other words, the ODE looked like this. 660 00:44:10,000 --> 00:44:16,000 The ODE looked like y double prime plus 2a y prime 661 00:44:15,000 --> 00:44:21,000 plus, in other words, 662 00:44:18,000 --> 00:44:24,000 the damping and the spring constant were related in this 663 00:44:22,000 --> 00:44:28,000 special wake, that for a given value of the 664 00:44:26,000 --> 00:44:32,000 spring constant, there was exactly one value of 665 00:44:30,000 --> 00:44:36,000 the damping which produced this in between case. 666 00:44:36,000 --> 00:44:42,000 Now, what's the problem connected with it? 667 00:44:39,000 --> 00:44:45,000 Well, the problem, unfortunately, 668 00:44:42,000 --> 00:44:48,000 is staring us in the face when we want to solve it. 669 00:44:46,000 --> 00:44:52,000 The problem is that we have a solution, but it is y equals e 670 00:44:51,000 --> 00:44:57,000 to the minus at. I don't have another root to 671 00:44:56,000 --> 00:45:02,000 get another solution with. And, the question is, 672 00:45:01,000 --> 00:45:07,000 where do I get that other solution from? 673 00:45:04,000 --> 00:45:10,000 Now, there are three ways to get it. 674 00:45:06,000 --> 00:45:12,000 Well, there are four ways to get it. 675 00:45:09,000 --> 00:45:15,000 You look it up in Euler. That's the fourth way. 676 00:45:12,000 --> 00:45:18,000 That's the real way to do it. But, I've given you one way as 677 00:45:16,000 --> 00:45:22,000 problem number one on the problem set. 678 00:45:19,000 --> 00:45:25,000 I've given you another way as problem number two on the 679 00:45:23,000 --> 00:45:29,000 problem set. And, the third way you will 680 00:45:26,000 --> 00:45:32,000 have to wait for about a week and a half. 681 00:45:28,000 --> 00:45:34,000 And, I will give you a third way, too. 682 00:45:33,000 --> 00:45:39,000 By that time, you won't want to see any more 683 00:45:36,000 --> 00:45:42,000 ways. But, I'd like to introduce you 684 00:45:39,000 --> 00:45:45,000 to the way on the problem set. And, it is this, 685 00:45:43,000 --> 00:45:49,000 that if you know one solution to an equation, 686 00:45:47,000 --> 00:45:53,000 which looks like a linear equation, in fact, 687 00:45:51,000 --> 00:45:57,000 the piece can be functions of t. 688 00:45:54,000 --> 00:46:00,000 They don't have to be constant, so I'll use the books notation 689 00:45:59,000 --> 00:46:05,000 with p's and q's. y prime plus q y equals zero. 690 00:46:05,000 --> 00:46:11,000 If you know one solution, there's an absolute, 691 00:46:08,000 --> 00:46:14,000 ironclad guarantee, if you'll know that it's true 692 00:46:13,000 --> 00:46:19,000 because I'm asking you to prove it for yourself. 693 00:46:17,000 --> 00:46:23,000 There's another of the form, having this as a factor, 694 00:46:21,000 --> 00:46:27,000 one solution y one, let's call it, 695 00:46:24,000 --> 00:46:30,000 y equals y1 u is another solution. 696 00:46:28,000 --> 00:46:34,000 And, you will be able to find u, I swear. 697 00:46:33,000 --> 00:46:39,000 Now, let's, in the remaining couple of minutes carry that out 698 00:46:37,000 --> 00:46:43,000 just for this case because I want you to see how to arrange 699 00:46:41,000 --> 00:46:47,000 the work nicely. And, I want you to arrange your 700 00:46:44,000 --> 00:46:50,000 work when you do the problem sets in the same way. 701 00:46:48,000 --> 00:46:54,000 So, the way to do it is, the solution we know is e to 702 00:46:52,000 --> 00:46:58,000 the minus at. So, we are going to look for a 703 00:46:56,000 --> 00:47:02,000 solution to this differential equation. 704 00:47:00,000 --> 00:47:06,000 That's the differential equation. 705 00:47:02,000 --> 00:47:08,000 And, the solution we are going to look for is of the form e to 706 00:47:08,000 --> 00:47:14,000 the negative at times u. 707 00:47:12,000 --> 00:47:18,000 Now, you're going to have to make calculation like this 708 00:47:17,000 --> 00:47:23,000 several times in the course of the term. 709 00:47:20,000 --> 00:47:26,000 Do it this way. y prime equals, 710 00:47:23,000 --> 00:47:29,000 differentiate, minus a e to the minus a t u 711 00:47:27,000 --> 00:47:33,000 plus e to the minus a t u prime. 712 00:47:33,000 --> 00:47:39,000 And then, differentiate again. 713 00:47:37,000 --> 00:47:43,000 The answer will be a squared. 714 00:47:39,000 --> 00:47:45,000 You differentiate this: a squared e to the negative at 715 00:47:43,000 --> 00:47:49,000 u. I'll have to do this a little 716 00:47:47,000 --> 00:47:53,000 fast, but the next term will be, okay, minus, 717 00:47:50,000 --> 00:47:56,000 so this times u prime, and from this are you going to 718 00:47:53,000 --> 00:47:59,000 get another minus. So, combining what you get from 719 00:47:57,000 --> 00:48:03,000 here, and here, you're going to get minus 2a e 720 00:48:00,000 --> 00:48:06,000 to the minus a t u prime. 721 00:48:05,000 --> 00:48:11,000 And then, there is a final term, which comes from this, 722 00:48:08,000 --> 00:48:14,000 e to the minus a t u double prime. 723 00:48:11,000 --> 00:48:17,000 Two of these, because of a piece here and a 724 00:48:15,000 --> 00:48:21,000 piece here combine to make that. And now, to plug into the 725 00:48:19,000 --> 00:48:25,000 equation, you multiply this by one. 726 00:48:21,000 --> 00:48:27,000 In other words, you don't do anything to it. 727 00:48:24,000 --> 00:48:30,000 You multiply this line by 2a, and you multiply that line by a 728 00:48:28,000 --> 00:48:34,000 squared, and you add them. 729 00:48:32,000 --> 00:48:38,000 On the left-hand side, I get zero. 730 00:48:34,000 --> 00:48:40,000 What do I get on the right? Notice how I've arrange the 731 00:48:39,000 --> 00:48:45,000 work so it adds nicely. This has a squared times this, 732 00:48:43,000 --> 00:48:49,000 plus 2a times that, plus one times that makes zero. 733 00:48:47,000 --> 00:48:53,000 2a times this plus one times this makes zero. 734 00:48:50,000 --> 00:48:56,000 All that survives is e to the a t u double prime, 735 00:48:56,000 --> 00:49:02,000 and therefore, e to the minus a t u double 736 00:48:59,000 --> 00:49:05,000 prime is equal to zero. 737 00:49:04,000 --> 00:49:10,000 So, please tell me, what's u double prime? 738 00:49:06,000 --> 00:49:12,000 It's zero. So, please tell me, 739 00:49:09,000 --> 00:49:15,000 what's u? It's c1 t plus c2. 740 00:49:11,000 --> 00:49:17,000 Now, that gives me a whole 741 00:49:14,000 --> 00:49:20,000 family of solutions. Just t would be enough because 742 00:49:17,000 --> 00:49:23,000 all I am doing is looking for one solution that's different 743 00:49:22,000 --> 00:49:28,000 from e to the minus a t. 744 00:49:24,000 --> 00:49:30,000 And, that solution, therefore, is y equals e to the 745 00:49:28,000 --> 00:49:34,000 minus a t times t. 746 00:49:32,000 --> 00:49:38,000 And, there's my second solution. 747 00:49:34,000 --> 00:49:40,000 So, this is a solution of the critically damped case. 748 00:49:37,000 --> 00:49:43,000 And, you are going to use it in three or four of the different 749 00:49:42,000 --> 00:49:48,000 problems on the problem set. But, I think you can deal with 750 00:49:46,000 --> 00:49:52,000 virtually the whole problem set, except for the last problem, 751 00:49:50,000 --> 00:49:56,000 now.