1 00:00:07,000 --> 00:00:13,000 The real topic is how to solve inhomogeneous systems, 2 00:00:11,000 --> 00:00:17,000 but the subtext is what I wrote on the board. 3 00:00:14,000 --> 00:00:20,000 I think you will see that really thinking in terms of 4 00:00:18,000 --> 00:00:24,000 matrices makes certain things a lot easier than they would be 5 00:00:23,000 --> 00:00:29,000 otherwise. And I hope to give you a couple 6 00:00:26,000 --> 00:00:32,000 of examples of that today in connection with solving systems 7 00:00:30,000 --> 00:00:36,000 of inhomogeneous equations. Now, there is a little problem. 8 00:00:36,000 --> 00:00:42,000 We have to have a little bit of theory ahead of time before 9 00:00:41,000 --> 00:00:47,000 that, which I thought rather than interrupt the presentation 10 00:00:47,000 --> 00:00:53,000 as I try to talk about the inhomogeneous systems it would 11 00:00:51,000 --> 00:00:57,000 be better to put a little theory in the beginning. 12 00:00:56,000 --> 00:01:02,000 I think you will find it harmless. 13 00:01:00,000 --> 00:01:06,000 And about half of it you know already. 14 00:01:03,000 --> 00:01:09,000 The theory I am talking about is, in general, 15 00:01:07,000 --> 00:01:13,000 the theory of the systems x prime equal a x. 16 00:01:11,000 --> 00:01:17,000 I will just state it when n is equal to two. 17 00:01:15,000 --> 00:01:21,000 A two-by-two system likely you have had up until now. 18 00:01:19,000 --> 00:01:25,000 It is also true for end-by-end. It is just a little more 19 00:01:24,000 --> 00:01:30,000 tedious to write out and to give the definitions. 20 00:01:30,000 --> 00:01:36,000 Here is a little two-by-two system. 21 00:01:33,000 --> 00:01:39,000 It is homogeneous. There are no zeros. 22 00:01:37,000 --> 00:01:43,000 And it is not necessary to assume this, but since the 23 00:01:42,000 --> 00:01:48,000 matrix is going to be constant until the end of the term let's 24 00:01:48,000 --> 00:01:54,000 assume it in and not go for a spurious generality. 25 00:01:53,000 --> 00:01:59,000 So constant matrices like you will have on your homework. 26 00:02:00,000 --> 00:02:06,000 Now, there are two theorems, or maybe three that I want you 27 00:02:05,000 --> 00:02:11,000 to know, that you need to know in order to understand what is 28 00:02:10,000 --> 00:02:16,000 going on. The first one, 29 00:02:13,000 --> 00:02:19,000 fortunately, is already in your bloodstream, 30 00:02:16,000 --> 00:02:22,000 I hope. Let's call it theorem A. 31 00:02:19,000 --> 00:02:25,000 It is simply the one that says that the general solution to the 32 00:02:25,000 --> 00:02:31,000 system, that system I wrote on the board, the two-by-two system 33 00:02:31,000 --> 00:02:37,000 is what you know it to be. Namely, from all the examples 34 00:02:36,000 --> 00:02:42,000 that you have calculated. It is a linear combination with 35 00:02:40,000 --> 00:02:46,000 arbitrary constants for the coefficients of two solutions. 36 00:02:44,000 --> 00:02:50,000 In other words, to solve it, 37 00:02:46,000 --> 00:02:52,000 to find the general solution you put all your energy into 38 00:02:49,000 --> 00:02:55,000 finding two independent solutions. 39 00:02:52,000 --> 00:02:58,000 And then, as soon as you found them, the general one is gotten 40 00:02:56,000 --> 00:03:02,000 by combining those with arbitrary constants. 41 00:03:00,000 --> 00:03:06,000 The only thing to specify is what the x1 and the x2 are. 42 00:03:04,000 --> 00:03:10,000 "Where," I guess, would be the right word to use. 43 00:03:08,000 --> 00:03:14,000 Where x1 and x2 are two solutions, but neither must be a 44 00:03:12,000 --> 00:03:18,000 constant multiple of the other. That is the only thing I want 45 00:03:17,000 --> 00:03:23,000 to stress, they have to be independent. 46 00:03:20,000 --> 00:03:26,000 Or, as it is better to say, linearly independent. 47 00:03:24,000 --> 00:03:30,000 Are two linearly independent solutions. 48 00:03:34,000 --> 00:03:40,000 And department of fuller explanation, i.e., 49 00:03:37,000 --> 00:03:43,000 neither is a constant multiple of the other. 50 00:03:50,000 --> 00:03:56,000 That is what it means to be linearly independent. 51 00:03:52,000 --> 00:03:58,000 Now, this theorem I am not going to prove. 52 00:03:55,000 --> 00:04:01,000 I am just going to say that the proof is a lot like the one for 53 00:03:59,000 --> 00:04:05,000 second order equations. It has an easy part and a hard 54 00:04:03,000 --> 00:04:09,000 part. The easy part is to show that 55 00:04:05,000 --> 00:04:11,000 all of these guys are solutions. And, in fact, 56 00:04:08,000 --> 00:04:14,000 that is almost self-evident by looking at the equation. 57 00:04:12,000 --> 00:04:18,000 For example, if x1 and x2, 58 00:04:14,000 --> 00:04:20,000 each of those solve that equation so does their sum 59 00:04:17,000 --> 00:04:23,000 because, when you plug it in, you differentiate the sum by 60 00:04:21,000 --> 00:04:27,000 differentiating each term and adding. 61 00:04:24,000 --> 00:04:30,000 And here A times x1 plus x2 is Ax1 plus Ax2. 62 00:04:28,000 --> 00:04:34,000 In other words, 63 00:04:31,000 --> 00:04:37,000 you are using the linearity and the superposition principle. 64 00:04:36,000 --> 00:04:42,000 It is easy to show that all of these, well, maybe I should 65 00:04:42,000 --> 00:04:48,000 actually write something down instead of just talking. 66 00:04:47,000 --> 00:04:53,000 Easy that all these are solutions. 67 00:04:50,000 --> 00:04:56,000 Every one of those guys, regardless of what c1 and c2 68 00:04:55,000 --> 00:05:01,000 is, is a solution. That is linearity, 69 00:04:59,000 --> 00:05:05,000 if I use that buzz word, plus the superposition 70 00:05:02,000 --> 00:05:08,000 principle, that the sum of two solutions is a solution. 71 00:05:12,000 --> 00:05:18,000 The hard thing is not to show that these are solutions but to 72 00:05:16,000 --> 00:05:22,000 show that these are all the solutions, that there are no 73 00:05:21,000 --> 00:05:27,000 other solutions. No matter how you do that it is 74 00:05:24,000 --> 00:05:30,000 hard. The hard thing is that there 75 00:05:27,000 --> 00:05:33,000 are no other solutions. These are all. 76 00:05:31,000 --> 00:05:37,000 Now, you could sort of say, well, it has two arbitrary 77 00:05:35,000 --> 00:05:41,000 constants in it. That is sort of a rough and 78 00:05:38,000 --> 00:05:44,000 ready reason, but it is not considered 79 00:05:41,000 --> 00:05:47,000 adequate by mathematicians. And, in fact, 80 00:05:44,000 --> 00:05:50,000 I could go into a song and dance as to just why it is 81 00:05:48,000 --> 00:05:54,000 inadequate. But we have other things to do, 82 00:05:52,000 --> 00:05:58,000 bigger fish to fry, as they say. 83 00:05:54,000 --> 00:06:00,000 Let's fry a fish. No, we have another theorem 84 00:05:58,000 --> 00:06:04,000 first. This one it is mostly the words 85 00:06:04,000 --> 00:06:10,000 that I am interested in. Once again, we have our old 86 00:06:11,000 --> 00:06:17,000 friend the Wronskian back. The Wronskian of what? 87 00:06:18,000 --> 00:06:24,000 Of two solutions. It is the Wronskian of the 88 00:06:25,000 --> 00:06:31,000 solution x1 and x2. They don't, by the way, 89 00:06:30,000 --> 00:06:36,000 have to be independent. Just two solutions to the 90 00:06:34,000 --> 00:06:40,000 system. And what is it? 91 00:06:36,000 --> 00:06:42,000 Hey, didn't we already have a Wronskian? 92 00:06:39,000 --> 00:06:45,000 Yeah. Forget about that one for the 93 00:06:42,000 --> 00:06:48,000 moment. Postpone it for a minute. 94 00:06:45,000 --> 00:06:51,000 This is a determinant, just like the old one way. 95 00:07:00,000 --> 00:07:06,000 This is going to be a great lecture. 96 00:07:03,000 --> 00:07:09,000 (x1, x2). Now what is this? 97 00:07:06,000 --> 00:07:12,000 x1 is a column vector, right? 98 00:07:08,000 --> 00:07:14,000 x2 is a column vector. Two things in it. 99 00:07:12,000 --> 00:07:18,000 Two things in it. Together they make a square 100 00:07:17,000 --> 00:07:23,000 matrix. And this means it is 101 00:07:19,000 --> 00:07:25,000 determinant. It is the determinant of this. 102 00:07:24,000 --> 00:07:30,000 It is a determinant, in other words, 103 00:07:27,000 --> 00:07:33,000 of a square matrix. And that is what it is. 104 00:07:32,000 --> 00:07:38,000 I will change this equality. To indicate it is a definition, 105 00:07:37,000 --> 00:07:43,000 I will put the colon there, which is what you add, 106 00:07:41,000 --> 00:07:47,000 to indicate this is only equal because I say so. 107 00:07:44,000 --> 00:07:50,000 It is a definition, in other words. 108 00:07:47,000 --> 00:07:53,000 Now, there is a connection between this and the earlier 109 00:07:51,000 --> 00:07:57,000 Wronskian which I, unfortunately, 110 00:07:54,000 --> 00:08:00,000 cannot explain to you because you are going to explain it to 111 00:07:58,000 --> 00:08:04,000 me. I gave it to you as part one of 112 00:08:02,000 --> 00:08:08,000 your homework problem. Make sure you do it. 113 00:08:05,000 --> 00:08:11,000 And, if you cannot remember what the old Wronskian is, 114 00:08:08,000 --> 00:08:14,000 please look it up in the book. Don't look it up in the 115 00:08:12,000 --> 00:08:18,000 solution to the problem. If you do that you will learn 116 00:08:16,000 --> 00:08:22,000 something. Then you will see how, 117 00:08:18,000 --> 00:08:24,000 in a certain sense, this is a more general 118 00:08:21,000 --> 00:08:27,000 definition than I gave you before. 119 00:08:23,000 --> 00:08:29,000 The one I gave you before is, in a certain sense, 120 00:08:27,000 --> 00:08:33,000 a special case of it. Now that is just the 121 00:08:31,000 --> 00:08:37,000 definition. There is a theorem. 122 00:08:34,000 --> 00:08:40,000 And the theorem is going to look just like the one we had 123 00:08:39,000 --> 00:08:45,000 for second order equations, if you can remember back that 124 00:08:43,000 --> 00:08:49,000 far. The theorem is that if these 125 00:08:46,000 --> 00:08:52,000 are two solutions there are only two possibilities for the 126 00:08:51,000 --> 00:08:57,000 Wronskian. So either or. 127 00:08:53,000 --> 00:08:59,000 Either the Wronskian is -- Now, the Wronskian, 128 00:08:58,000 --> 00:09:04,000 these are functions, the column vectors are the 129 00:09:03,000 --> 00:09:09,000 solutions, so those are functions of the variable t, 130 00:09:08,000 --> 00:09:14,000 so are these. The Wronskian as a whole is a 131 00:09:12,000 --> 00:09:18,000 function of the independent variable t after you have 132 00:09:18,000 --> 00:09:24,000 calculated out that determinant. I will write it now this way to 133 00:09:24,000 --> 00:09:30,000 indicate that it s a function of t. 134 00:09:28,000 --> 00:09:34,000 Either the Wronskian is -- One possibility is identically 135 00:09:35,000 --> 00:09:41,000 zero. That is zero for all values of 136 00:09:39,000 --> 00:09:45,000 t, in other words. And this happens if x1 and x2 137 00:09:45,000 --> 00:09:51,000 are not linearly independent. Usually people just say 138 00:09:51,000 --> 00:09:57,000 dependent and hope they are interpreted correctly. 139 00:09:57,000 --> 00:10:03,000 Are dependent. But since I did not explain 140 00:10:03,000 --> 00:10:09,000 what dependent means, I will say it. 141 00:10:07,000 --> 00:10:13,000 Not linearly independent. I know that is horrible, 142 00:10:12,000 --> 00:10:18,000 but nobody has figured out another way to say it. 143 00:10:18,000 --> 00:10:24,000 That is one possibility, or the opposite of this is 144 00:10:23,000 --> 00:10:29,000 never zero for any t value. I mean a normal function is 145 00:10:29,000 --> 00:10:35,000 zero here and there, and the rest of the time not 146 00:10:33,000 --> 00:10:39,000 zero. Well, not this Wronskian. 147 00:10:35,000 --> 00:10:41,000 You only have two choices. Either it is zero all the time 148 00:10:38,000 --> 00:10:44,000 or it is never zero. It is like the function e to 149 00:10:42,000 --> 00:10:48,000 the t. In other words, 150 00:10:43,000 --> 00:10:49,000 an exponential which is never zero, always positive and never 151 00:10:48,000 --> 00:10:54,000 zero. Or, it could be a constant. 152 00:10:50,000 --> 00:10:56,000 Anyway, it has to be a function which is never zero. 153 00:10:53,000 --> 00:10:59,000 And this happens in the other case, so this is -- 154 00:10:58,000 --> 00:11:04,000 There is no place to write it. This is the case if x1 and x2 155 00:11:05,000 --> 00:11:11,000 are independent, by which I mean linearly 156 00:11:11,000 --> 00:11:17,000 independent. It is just I didn't have room 157 00:11:16,000 --> 00:11:22,000 to write it. That is pretty much the end of 158 00:11:22,000 --> 00:11:28,000 the theory. And now, let's start in on the 159 00:11:27,000 --> 00:11:33,000 matrices. The basic new matrix we are 160 00:11:31,000 --> 00:11:37,000 going to be talking about this period and next one on Monday 161 00:11:35,000 --> 00:11:41,000 also is the way that most people who work with systems actually 162 00:11:40,000 --> 00:11:46,000 look at the solutions to systems, so it is important you 163 00:11:43,000 --> 00:11:49,000 learn this word and this way of looking at it. 164 00:11:47,000 --> 00:11:53,000 What they do is look not at each solution separately, 165 00:11:50,000 --> 00:11:56,000 as we have been doing up until now. 166 00:11:52,000 --> 00:11:58,000 They put them all together in a single matrix. 167 00:11:57,000 --> 00:12:03,000 And it is the properties of that matrix that they study and 168 00:12:02,000 --> 00:12:08,000 try to do the calculations using. 169 00:12:04,000 --> 00:12:10,000 And that matrix is called the fundamental matrix for the 170 00:12:09,000 --> 00:12:15,000 system. 171 00:12:17,000 --> 00:12:23,000 Sometimes people don't bother writing in the whole system. 172 00:12:20,000 --> 00:12:26,000 They just say it is a fundamental matrix for A 173 00:12:23,000 --> 00:12:29,000 because, after all, A is the only thing that is 174 00:12:25,000 --> 00:12:31,000 varying there. Once you know A, 175 00:12:27,000 --> 00:12:33,000 you know what the system is. So what is this guy? 176 00:12:31,000 --> 00:12:37,000 Well, it is a two-by-two matrix. 177 00:12:33,000 --> 00:12:39,000 And it is the most harmless thing. 178 00:12:35,000 --> 00:12:41,000 It is the precursor of the Wronskian. 179 00:12:38,000 --> 00:12:44,000 It is what the Wronskian was before the determinant was 180 00:12:42,000 --> 00:12:48,000 taken. In other words, 181 00:12:44,000 --> 00:12:50,000 it is the matrix whose two columns are those two solutions. 182 00:12:48,000 --> 00:12:54,000 The other question is what we are going to call it. 183 00:12:52,000 --> 00:12:58,000 I kept trying everything and settled on calling it capital X 184 00:12:56,000 --> 00:13:02,000 because I think that is the one that guides you in the 185 00:13:00,000 --> 00:13:06,000 calculations the best. This is definition two, 186 00:13:06,000 --> 00:13:12,000 so colon equality. Notice I am not using vertical 187 00:13:10,000 --> 00:13:16,000 lines now because that would mean a determinant. 188 00:13:15,000 --> 00:13:21,000 It is the matrix whose columns are two independent solutions. 189 00:13:34,000 --> 00:13:40,000 Is that all? Yeah. 190 00:13:35,000 --> 00:13:41,000 You just put them side-by-side. Why? 191 00:13:38,000 --> 00:13:44,000 That will come out. Why should one do this? 192 00:13:41,000 --> 00:13:47,000 Well, first of all, in order not to interrupt the 193 00:13:45,000 --> 00:13:51,000 basic calculation that I want to make with this during the 194 00:13:50,000 --> 00:13:56,000 period, it has two basic properties that we are going to 195 00:13:54,000 --> 00:14:00,000 need during this period. These are the properties. 196 00:14:00,000 --> 00:14:06,000 Just two. And one is obvious and the 197 00:14:02,000 --> 00:14:08,000 other you will think, I hope, is a little less 198 00:14:06,000 --> 00:14:12,000 familiar. I think you will see there is 199 00:14:09,000 --> 00:14:15,000 nothing to it. It is just a way of talking, 200 00:14:13,000 --> 00:14:19,000 really. The first is the one that is 201 00:14:16,000 --> 00:14:22,000 already embedded in the theorem, namely that the determinant of 202 00:14:21,000 --> 00:14:27,000 the fundamental matrix is not zero for any t. 203 00:14:24,000 --> 00:14:30,000 Why? Well, I just told you it 204 00:14:27,000 --> 00:14:33,000 wasn't. This is the Wronskian. 205 00:14:31,000 --> 00:14:37,000 The Wronskian is never zero? Why is it never zero? 206 00:14:35,000 --> 00:14:41,000 Well, because I said these columns had to be independent 207 00:14:40,000 --> 00:14:46,000 solutions. So this is not just not zero, 208 00:14:44,000 --> 00:14:50,000 it is never zero. It is not zero for any value of 209 00:14:48,000 --> 00:14:54,000 t. That is good. 210 00:14:50,000 --> 00:14:56,000 As you will see, we are going to need that 211 00:14:54,000 --> 00:15:00,000 property. But the other one is a little 212 00:14:57,000 --> 00:15:03,000 stranger. The only thing I can say is, 213 00:15:02,000 --> 00:15:08,000 get used to it. Namely that X prime equals AX. 214 00:15:06,000 --> 00:15:12,000 Now, why is that strange? That is not the same as this. 215 00:15:11,000 --> 00:15:17,000 This is a column vector. That is a square matrix and 216 00:15:15,000 --> 00:15:21,000 this is a column vector. This is not a column vector. 217 00:15:20,000 --> 00:15:26,000 This is a square matrix. This is what is called a matrix 218 00:15:26,000 --> 00:15:32,000 differential equation where the variable is not a single x or a 219 00:15:32,000 --> 00:15:38,000 column vector of a set of x's like the x and the y. 220 00:15:37,000 --> 00:15:43,000 It is a whole matrix. 221 00:15:50,000 --> 00:15:56,000 Well, first of all, I should say what is it saying? 222 00:15:53,000 --> 00:15:59,000 This is a two-by-two matrix. When I multiply them I get a 223 00:15:58,000 --> 00:16:04,000 two-by-two matrix. What is this? 224 00:16:00,000 --> 00:16:06,000 This is a two-by-two matrix, every entry of which has been 225 00:16:04,000 --> 00:16:10,000 differentiated. That is what it means to put 226 00:16:08,000 --> 00:16:14,000 that prime there. To differentiate a matrix means 227 00:16:11,000 --> 00:16:17,000 nothing fancy. It just means differentiate 228 00:16:14,000 --> 00:16:20,000 every entry. It is just like to 229 00:16:16,000 --> 00:16:22,000 differentiate a vector (x, y), to make a velocity vector 230 00:16:20,000 --> 00:16:26,000 you differentiate the x and the y. 231 00:16:22,000 --> 00:16:28,000 Well, a column vector is a special kind of matrix. 232 00:16:26,000 --> 00:16:32,000 The definition applies to any matrix. 233 00:16:30,000 --> 00:16:36,000 Well, why is that so? I state it as a property, 234 00:16:33,000 --> 00:16:39,000 but I will continue it by giving you, so to speak, 235 00:16:37,000 --> 00:16:43,000 the proof of it. In fact, there is nothing in 236 00:16:40,000 --> 00:16:46,000 this. It is nothing more than a 237 00:16:42,000 --> 00:16:48,000 little matrix calculation of the most primitive kind. 238 00:16:46,000 --> 00:16:52,000 Namely, what does this mean? Let's try to undo that. 239 00:16:50,000 --> 00:16:56,000 What does the left-hand side really mean? 240 00:16:53,000 --> 00:16:59,000 Well, if that is what x means, the left-hand side must mean 241 00:16:58,000 --> 00:17:04,000 the derivative of the first column. 242 00:17:02,000 --> 00:17:08,000 That is its first column. And the derivative of the 243 00:17:05,000 --> 00:17:11,000 second column. That is what it means to 244 00:17:07,000 --> 00:17:13,000 differentiate the matrix X. You differentiate each column 245 00:17:11,000 --> 00:17:17,000 separately. And to differentiate the column 246 00:17:14,000 --> 00:17:20,000 you need to differentiate every function in it. 247 00:17:17,000 --> 00:17:23,000 Well, what does the right-hand side mean? 248 00:17:19,000 --> 00:17:25,000 Well, I am supposed to take A and multiply that 249 00:17:23,000 --> 00:17:29,000 by [x1,x2]. Now, I don't know how to prove 250 00:17:26,000 --> 00:17:32,000 this, except ask you to think about it. 251 00:17:30,000 --> 00:17:36,000 Or, I could write it all out here. 252 00:17:34,000 --> 00:17:40,000 But think of this as a bing, bing, bing, bing. 253 00:17:39,000 --> 00:17:45,000 And this is a bing, bing. 254 00:17:42,000 --> 00:17:48,000 And this is a bong, bong. 255 00:17:45,000 --> 00:17:51,000 How do I do the multiplication? In other words, 256 00:17:50,000 --> 00:17:56,000 what is in the first column of the matrix? 257 00:17:55,000 --> 00:18:01,000 Well, it is dah, dah, and the lower thing is 258 00:18:01,000 --> 00:18:07,000 dah, dah. In other words, 259 00:18:03,000 --> 00:18:09,000 it is A times x1. 260 00:18:15,000 --> 00:18:21,000 Shut your eyes and visualize it. 261 00:18:17,000 --> 00:18:23,000 Got it? Dah, dah is the top entry, 262 00:18:19,000 --> 00:18:25,000 and dah, dah is the bottom entry. 263 00:18:22,000 --> 00:18:28,000 It is what you get by multiplying A by the column 264 00:18:25,000 --> 00:18:31,000 vector x1. And the same way the other guy 265 00:18:28,000 --> 00:18:34,000 is -- -- what you get by multiplying 266 00:18:33,000 --> 00:18:39,000 A by the column vector x2. This is just matrix 267 00:18:37,000 --> 00:18:43,000 multiplication. That is the law of matrix 268 00:18:41,000 --> 00:18:47,000 multiplication. That is how you multiply 269 00:18:45,000 --> 00:18:51,000 matrices. Well, good, but where does this 270 00:18:49,000 --> 00:18:55,000 get us? What does it mean for those two 271 00:18:53,000 --> 00:18:59,000 guys to be equal? That is going to happen, 272 00:18:57,000 --> 00:19:03,000 if and only if x1 prime is equal to A x1. 273 00:19:02,000 --> 00:19:08,000 This guy equals that guy. And similarly for the x2's. 274 00:19:14,000 --> 00:19:20,000 The end result is that this matrix, saying that the 275 00:19:18,000 --> 00:19:24,000 fundamental matrix satisfies this matrix differential 276 00:19:22,000 --> 00:19:28,000 equation is only a way of saying, in one breath, 277 00:19:26,000 --> 00:19:32,000 that its two columns are both solutions to the original 278 00:19:30,000 --> 00:19:36,000 system. It is, so to speak, 279 00:19:33,000 --> 00:19:39,000 an efficient way of turning these two equations into a 280 00:19:38,000 --> 00:19:44,000 single equation by making a matrix. 281 00:19:41,000 --> 00:19:47,000 I guess it is time, finally, to come to the topic 282 00:19:46,000 --> 00:19:52,000 of the lecture. I said the thing the matrices 283 00:19:50,000 --> 00:19:56,000 were going to be used for is solving inhomogeneous systems, 284 00:19:55,000 --> 00:20:01,000 so let's take a look at those. I thought I would give you an 285 00:20:00,000 --> 00:20:06,000 example. Inhomogeneous systems. 286 00:20:10,000 --> 00:20:16,000 Well, what is one going to look like? 287 00:20:12,000 --> 00:20:18,000 So far what we have done is, up until now has been solving, 288 00:20:17,000 --> 00:20:23,000 we spent essentially two weeks solving and plotting the 289 00:20:21,000 --> 00:20:27,000 solutions to homogeneous systems. 290 00:20:23,000 --> 00:20:29,000 There was nothing over there. And homogeneous systems, 291 00:20:27,000 --> 00:20:33,000 in fact, with constant coefficients. 292 00:20:31,000 --> 00:20:37,000 Stuff that looked like that that we abbreviated with 293 00:20:34,000 --> 00:20:40,000 matrices. Now, to make the system 294 00:20:36,000 --> 00:20:42,000 inhomogeneous what I do is add the extra term on the right-hand 295 00:20:41,000 --> 00:20:47,000 side, which is some function of t. 296 00:20:43,000 --> 00:20:49,000 Except, I will have to have two functions of t because I have 297 00:20:47,000 --> 00:20:53,000 two equations. Now it is inhomogeneous. 298 00:20:50,000 --> 00:20:56,000 And what makes it inhomogeneous is the fact that these are not 299 00:20:54,000 --> 00:21:00,000 zero anymore. There is something there. 300 00:20:57,000 --> 00:21:03,000 Functions of t are there. These are given functions of t 301 00:21:02,000 --> 00:21:08,000 like exponentials, polynomials, 302 00:21:04,000 --> 00:21:10,000 the usual stuff you have on the right-hand side of the 303 00:21:08,000 --> 00:21:14,000 differential equation. What is confusing here is that 304 00:21:11,000 --> 00:21:17,000 when we studied second order equations it was homogeneous if 305 00:21:15,000 --> 00:21:21,000 the right-hand side was zero, and if there was something else 306 00:21:20,000 --> 00:21:26,000 there it was inhomogeneous. Unfortunately, 307 00:21:23,000 --> 00:21:29,000 I have stuck this stuff on the right-hand side so it is not 308 00:21:27,000 --> 00:21:33,000 quite so clear anymore. It has got to look like that, 309 00:21:32,000 --> 00:21:38,000 in other words. How would the matrix 310 00:21:34,000 --> 00:21:40,000 abbreviation look? Well, the left-hand side is x 311 00:21:37,000 --> 00:21:43,000 prime. The homogenous part is ax, 312 00:21:40,000 --> 00:21:46,000 just as it has always been. The only extra part is those 313 00:21:43,000 --> 00:21:49,000 functions r. And this is a column vector, 314 00:21:46,000 --> 00:21:52,000 after the multiplication this is a column vector, 315 00:21:50,000 --> 00:21:56,000 what is left is column vector. Now, explicitly it is a 316 00:21:53,000 --> 00:21:59,000 function of t, given by explicit functions of 317 00:21:56,000 --> 00:22:02,000 t, again, like exponentials. Or, they could be fancy 318 00:22:02,000 --> 00:22:08,000 functions. That is the thing we are trying 319 00:22:06,000 --> 00:22:12,000 to solve. Why don't I put it up in green? 320 00:22:10,000 --> 00:22:16,000 Our new and better and improved system. 321 00:22:13,000 --> 00:22:19,000 Think back to what we did when we studied inhomogeneous 322 00:22:18,000 --> 00:22:24,000 equations. We are not talking about 323 00:22:22,000 --> 00:22:28,000 systems but just a single equation. 324 00:22:25,000 --> 00:22:31,000 What we did was the main theorem -- 325 00:22:30,000 --> 00:22:36,000 I guess there are going to be three theorems today, 326 00:22:36,000 --> 00:22:42,000 not just two. Theorem C. 327 00:22:39,000 --> 00:22:45,000 Is that right? Yes, A, B. 328 00:22:42,000 --> 00:22:48,000 We are up to C. Theorem C says that the general 329 00:22:48,000 --> 00:22:54,000 solution, that is, the general solution to the 330 00:22:54,000 --> 00:23:00,000 system, is equal to the complimentary function, 331 00:23:00,000 --> 00:23:06,000 which is the general solution to x prime equals Ax, 332 00:23:06,000 --> 00:23:12,000 -- -- the homogeneous equation, 333 00:23:11,000 --> 00:23:17,000 in other words, plus, what am I going to call 334 00:23:15,000 --> 00:23:21,000 it? (x)p, right you are, 335 00:23:17,000 --> 00:23:23,000 a particular solution. But the principle is the same 336 00:23:22,000 --> 00:23:28,000 and is proved exactly the same way. 337 00:23:25,000 --> 00:23:31,000 It is just linearity and superposition. 338 00:23:35,000 --> 00:23:41,000 The linearity of the original system and the superposition 339 00:23:40,000 --> 00:23:46,000 principle. The essence is that to solve 340 00:23:43,000 --> 00:23:49,000 this inhomogeneous system, what we have to do is find a 341 00:23:48,000 --> 00:23:54,000 particular solution. This part I already know how to 342 00:23:52,000 --> 00:23:58,000 do. We have been doing that for two 343 00:23:55,000 --> 00:24:01,000 weeks. The new thing is to find this. 344 00:24:05,000 --> 00:24:11,000 Now, if you remember back before spring break, 345 00:24:08,000 --> 00:24:14,000 most of the work in solving the second order equation was in 346 00:24:12,000 --> 00:24:18,000 finding that particular solution. 347 00:24:15,000 --> 00:24:21,000 You quickly enough learned how to solve the homogeneous 348 00:24:19,000 --> 00:24:25,000 equation, but there was no real general method for finding this. 349 00:24:24,000 --> 00:24:30,000 We had an exponential input theorem with some modifications 350 00:24:28,000 --> 00:24:34,000 to it. We took a week's detour in 351 00:24:32,000 --> 00:24:38,000 Fourier series to see how to do it for periodic functions or 352 00:24:37,000 --> 00:24:43,000 functions defined on finite intervals. 353 00:24:40,000 --> 00:24:46,000 There were other techniques which I did not get around to 354 00:24:45,000 --> 00:24:51,000 showing you, techniques involving the so-called method 355 00:24:50,000 --> 00:24:56,000 of undetermined coefficients. Although, some of you peaked in 356 00:24:55,000 --> 00:25:01,000 your book and learned it from there. 357 00:25:00,000 --> 00:25:06,000 But the work is in finding (x)p. 358 00:25:03,000 --> 00:25:09,000 The miracle that occurs here, by contrast, 359 00:25:07,000 --> 00:25:13,000 is that it turns out to be easy to find (x)p. 360 00:25:11,000 --> 00:25:17,000 And easy in this further sense that I do not have to restrict 361 00:25:17,000 --> 00:25:23,000 the kind of function I use. For example, 362 00:25:21,000 --> 00:25:27,000 the second homework problem I have given you, 363 00:25:26,000 --> 00:25:32,000 the second part two homework problem. 364 00:25:36,000 --> 00:25:42,000 You will see how to use systems. 365 00:25:38,000 --> 00:25:44,000 For example, to solve this simple equation, 366 00:25:42,000 --> 00:25:48,000 I will write it out for you, consider that equation, 367 00:25:46,000 --> 00:25:52,000 tangent t. What technique will you apply 368 00:25:50,000 --> 00:25:56,000 to solve that? In other words, 369 00:25:52,000 --> 00:25:58,000 suppose you wanted to find a particular solution to that. 370 00:25:57,000 --> 00:26:03,000 The right-hand side is not an exponential. 371 00:26:00,000 --> 00:26:06,000 It is not a polynomial. It is not like sine or cosine 372 00:26:06,000 --> 00:26:12,000 of bt. I could use the Laplace 373 00:26:10,000 --> 00:26:16,000 transform. No, because you don't know how 374 00:26:14,000 --> 00:26:20,000 to take the Laplace transform of tangent t. 375 00:26:19,000 --> 00:26:25,000 Neither, for that matter, do I. 376 00:26:21,000 --> 00:26:27,000 Fourier series. Not a good choice for a 377 00:26:25,000 --> 00:26:31,000 function that goes to infinity at pi over two. 378 00:26:35,000 --> 00:26:41,000 So you cannot do this until you do your homework. 379 00:26:39,000 --> 00:26:45,000 Now you will be able to do it. In other words, 380 00:26:44,000 --> 00:26:50,000 one of the big things is not only will I give you a formula 381 00:26:50,000 --> 00:26:56,000 for the Xp but that formula will work even for tangent t, 382 00:26:56,000 --> 00:27:02,000 any function at all. Well, I thought I would try to 383 00:27:00,000 --> 00:27:06,000 put a little meat on the bones of the inhomogeneous systems by 384 00:27:04,000 --> 00:27:10,000 actually giving you a physical problem so we would actually be 385 00:27:08,000 --> 00:27:14,000 able to solve a physical problem instead of just demonstrate a 386 00:27:12,000 --> 00:27:18,000 solution method. Here is a mixing problem. 387 00:27:23,000 --> 00:27:29,000 Just to illustrate what makes a system of equations 388 00:27:27,000 --> 00:27:33,000 inhomogeneous, here at two ugly tanks. 389 00:27:31,000 --> 00:27:37,000 I am not going to draw these carefully, but they are both 1 390 00:27:37,000 --> 00:27:43,000 liter. And they are connected by 391 00:27:40,000 --> 00:27:46,000 pipes. And I won't bother opening 392 00:27:43,000 --> 00:27:49,000 holes in them. There is a pipe with fluids 393 00:27:47,000 --> 00:27:53,000 flowing back there and this direction it is flowing this 394 00:27:52,000 --> 00:27:58,000 way, but that is not the end. The end is there is stuff 395 00:28:00,000 --> 00:28:06,000 coming in to both of them. And I think I will just make it 396 00:28:08,000 --> 00:28:14,000 coming out of this one. There is something realistic. 397 00:28:15,000 --> 00:28:21,000 The numbers 2, 3, 2. 398 00:28:18,000 --> 00:28:24,000 Let's start there and see what the others have to be. 399 00:28:25,000 --> 00:28:31,000 So these are flow rates. One liter tanks. 400 00:28:31,000 --> 00:28:37,000 The flow rates are in, let's say, liters per hour. 401 00:28:38,000 --> 00:28:44,000 And I have some dissolved substance in, 402 00:28:42,000 --> 00:28:48,000 so here is going to be x salt in there and the same chemical 403 00:28:50,000 --> 00:28:56,000 in there, whatever it is. x is the amount of salt, 404 00:28:56,000 --> 00:29:02,000 let's say, in tank one. And y, the same thing in tank 405 00:29:02,000 --> 00:29:08,000 two. Now, if you have stuff flowing 406 00:29:06,000 --> 00:29:12,000 unequally this way, you must have balance. 407 00:29:09,000 --> 00:29:15,000 You have to make sure that neither tank is getting emptied 408 00:29:15,000 --> 00:29:21,000 or bursting and exploding. What is flowing in? 409 00:29:19,000 --> 00:29:25,000 What is x? Three is going out, 410 00:29:22,000 --> 00:29:28,000 two is coming in, so this has to be one in order 411 00:29:27,000 --> 00:29:33,000 that tank x stay full and not explode. 412 00:29:32,000 --> 00:29:38,000 And how about y? How much is going out? 413 00:29:35,000 --> 00:29:41,000 Two there and two here. Four is going out, 414 00:29:39,000 --> 00:29:45,000 three is coming in. This also has to be one. 415 00:29:43,000 --> 00:29:49,000 Those are just the flow rates of water or the liquid that is 416 00:29:48,000 --> 00:29:54,000 coming in. Now, the only thing I am going 417 00:29:52,000 --> 00:29:58,000 to specify is the concentration of what is coming in. 418 00:29:58,000 --> 00:30:04,000 Here the concentration is 5 e to the minus t. 419 00:30:02,000 --> 00:30:08,000 And that is what makes the problem inhomogeneous. 420 00:30:07,000 --> 00:30:13,000 Here the concentration is going to be zero. 421 00:30:10,000 --> 00:30:16,000 In other words, pure water is flowing in here 422 00:30:14,000 --> 00:30:20,000 to create the liquid balance. Here, on the other hand, 423 00:30:18,000 --> 00:30:24,000 salt solution is flowing in but with a steadily declining 424 00:30:23,000 --> 00:30:29,000 concentration. So, what is the system? 425 00:30:28,000 --> 00:30:34,000 Well, you have set it up exactly the way you did when you 426 00:30:34,000 --> 00:30:40,000 studied first order equations. It is inflow minus outflow. 427 00:30:41,000 --> 00:30:47,000 What is the outflow? The outflow is all in this 428 00:30:46,000 --> 00:30:52,000 pipe. The flow rates are liters per 429 00:30:50,000 --> 00:30:56,000 hour. Three liters per hour flowing 430 00:30:54,000 --> 00:31:00,000 out. How much salt does that 431 00:30:57,000 --> 00:31:03,000 represent? It is negative three times the 432 00:31:02,000 --> 00:31:08,000 concentration of salt. But the concentration, 433 00:31:06,000 --> 00:31:12,000 notice, equals x divided by one. 434 00:31:10,000 --> 00:31:16,000 In other words, x represents both the 435 00:31:13,000 --> 00:31:19,000 concentration and the amount. So I don't have to distinguish. 436 00:31:18,000 --> 00:31:24,000 If I had made it two liter tanks then I would have had to 437 00:31:23,000 --> 00:31:29,000 divide this by two. I am cheating, 438 00:31:26,000 --> 00:31:32,000 but it is enough already. x prime equals minus 3x. 439 00:31:32,000 --> 00:31:38,000 That is what is going out. What is coming in? 440 00:31:36,000 --> 00:31:42,000 Well, 2y is coming in. Concentration here. 441 00:31:39,000 --> 00:31:45,000 What is coming in? Is it y 2 liter? 442 00:31:43,000 --> 00:31:49,000 Plus what is coming in from the outside. 443 00:31:46,000 --> 00:31:52,000 We have to add that in, and that will be plus 5 e to 444 00:31:51,000 --> 00:31:57,000 the negative t. How about y? 445 00:31:54,000 --> 00:32:00,000 y prime is changing. What comes in from x? 446 00:32:00,000 --> 00:32:06,000 That is 3x. What goes out? 447 00:32:01,000 --> 00:32:07,000 Well, two is leaving here and two is leaving here. 448 00:32:05,000 --> 00:32:11,000 It doesn't matter that they are going out through separate 449 00:32:10,000 --> 00:32:16,000 pipes. They are both going out. 450 00:32:12,000 --> 00:32:18,000 It is minus 4, 2 and 2. 451 00:32:14,000 --> 00:32:20,000 How about the inhomogeneous term? 452 00:32:16,000 --> 00:32:22,000 There is one coming in, but there is no salt in it. 453 00:32:20,000 --> 00:32:26,000 Therefore, that is not changing. 454 00:32:23,000 --> 00:32:29,000 What is coming through that pipe is necessary for the liquid 455 00:32:27,000 --> 00:32:33,000 balance. But it has no effect 456 00:32:31,000 --> 00:32:37,000 whatsoever. I will put a zero here but, 457 00:32:35,000 --> 00:32:41,000 of course, you don't have to put that in. 458 00:32:38,000 --> 00:32:44,000 This is now an inhomogeneous system. 459 00:32:42,000 --> 00:32:48,000 In other words, the system is x prime equals 460 00:32:46,000 --> 00:32:52,000 this matrix, negative 3, the same sort of stuff we 461 00:32:50,000 --> 00:32:56,000 always had, plus the inhomogeneous term which is the 462 00:32:55,000 --> 00:33:01,000 column vector 5 e to the minus t and zero. 463 00:33:00,000 --> 00:33:06,000 It is the presence of this term 464 00:33:04,000 --> 00:33:10,000 that makes this system inhomogeneous. 465 00:33:06,000 --> 00:33:12,000 And what that corresponds to is this little closed system being 466 00:33:11,000 --> 00:33:17,000 attacked from the outside by these external pipes which are 467 00:33:15,000 --> 00:33:21,000 bringing salt in. Without those, 468 00:33:17,000 --> 00:33:23,000 of course the balance would be all wrong. 469 00:33:20,000 --> 00:33:26,000 I would have to change this to three and cut that out, 470 00:33:24,000 --> 00:33:30,000 I guess. But then, it would be just a 471 00:33:27,000 --> 00:33:33,000 simple homogenous system. It is these pipes that make it 472 00:33:32,000 --> 00:33:38,000 inhomogeneous. Now, I should start to solve 473 00:33:35,000 --> 00:33:41,000 that. I did this just to illustrate 474 00:33:38,000 --> 00:33:44,000 where a system might come from. Before I solve that, 475 00:33:42,000 --> 00:33:48,000 what I want to do is, of course, is solve it in 476 00:33:45,000 --> 00:33:51,000 general. In other words, 477 00:33:47,000 --> 00:33:53,000 how do you solve this in general? 478 00:33:49,000 --> 00:33:55,000 Because I promised you that you would be able to do in general, 479 00:33:54,000 --> 00:34:00,000 regardless of what sort of functions were in the r of t, 480 00:33:58,000 --> 00:34:04,000 that column vector. So let's do it. 481 00:34:10,000 --> 00:34:16,000 First of all, you have to learn the name of 482 00:34:15,000 --> 00:34:21,000 the method. This method is for solving x 483 00:34:20,000 --> 00:34:26,000 prime equals Ax. It is a method for finding a 484 00:34:26,000 --> 00:34:32,000 particular solution. 485 00:34:36,000 --> 00:34:42,000 Of course, to actually solve it then you have to add the 486 00:34:39,000 --> 00:34:45,000 complimentary function. We are looking for a particular 487 00:34:43,000 --> 00:34:49,000 solution for this system. Now, the whole cleverness of 488 00:34:47,000 --> 00:34:53,000 the method, which I think was discovered a couple hundred 489 00:34:51,000 --> 00:34:57,000 years ago by, I think, Lagrange, 490 00:34:53,000 --> 00:34:59,000 I am not sure. The method is called variation 491 00:34:57,000 --> 00:35:03,000 of parameters. I am giving you that so that 492 00:35:00,000 --> 00:35:06,000 when you forget you will be able to look it up and be indexes to 493 00:35:05,000 --> 00:35:11,000 some advanced engineering mathematics book or something, 494 00:35:08,000 --> 00:35:14,000 whatever is on your shelf. But, if course, 495 00:35:11,000 --> 00:35:17,000 you won't remember the name either so maybe this won't work. 496 00:35:15,000 --> 00:35:21,000 Variation of parameters, I will explain to you why it is 497 00:35:19,000 --> 00:35:25,000 called that. All the cleverness is in the 498 00:35:22,000 --> 00:35:28,000 very first line. If you could remember the very 499 00:35:25,000 --> 00:35:31,000 first line then I trust you to do the rest yourself. 500 00:35:30,000 --> 00:35:36,000 I don't know any motivation for this first step, 501 00:35:34,000 --> 00:35:40,000 but mathematics is supposed to be mysterious anyway. 502 00:35:40,000 --> 00:35:46,000 It keeps me eating. It says, look for a solution 503 00:35:45,000 --> 00:35:51,000 and there will be one of the following form. 504 00:35:49,000 --> 00:35:55,000 Now, it will look exactly like -- 505 00:36:00,000 --> 00:36:06,000 Look carefully because it is going to be gone in a moment. 506 00:36:04,000 --> 00:36:10,000 It will look exactly like this. But, of course, 507 00:36:08,000 --> 00:36:14,000 it cannot be this because this solves the homogeneous system. 508 00:36:13,000 --> 00:36:19,000 If I plug this in with these as constants it cannot possibly be 509 00:36:18,000 --> 00:36:24,000 a particular solution to this because it will stop there and 510 00:36:23,000 --> 00:36:29,000 satisfy that with r equals zero. The whole trick is you think of 511 00:36:29,000 --> 00:36:35,000 these are parameters which are now variable. 512 00:36:32,000 --> 00:36:38,000 Constants that are varying. That is why it is called 513 00:36:35,000 --> 00:36:41,000 variation of parameters. You think of these, 514 00:36:38,000 --> 00:36:44,000 in other words, as functions of t. 515 00:36:41,000 --> 00:36:47,000 We are going to look for a solution which has the form, 516 00:36:45,000 --> 00:36:51,000 since they are functions of t, I don't want to call them c1 517 00:36:49,000 --> 00:36:55,000 and c2 anymore. I will call them v because that 518 00:36:52,000 --> 00:36:58,000 is what most people call them, v or u, sometimes. 519 00:37:02,000 --> 00:37:08,000 The method says look for a solution of that form. 520 00:37:06,000 --> 00:37:12,000 The variation parameters, these are the parameters that 521 00:37:10,000 --> 00:37:16,000 are now varying instead of being constants. 522 00:37:14,000 --> 00:37:20,000 Now, if you take it in that form and start trying to 523 00:37:18,000 --> 00:37:24,000 substitute into the equation you are going to get a mess. 524 00:37:23,000 --> 00:37:29,000 I think I was wrong in saying I could trust you from this point 525 00:37:28,000 --> 00:37:34,000 on. I will take the first step from 526 00:37:32,000 --> 00:37:38,000 you, and then I could trust you to do the rest after that first 527 00:37:38,000 --> 00:37:44,000 step. The first step is to change the 528 00:37:42,000 --> 00:37:48,000 way this looks by using the fundamental matrix. 529 00:37:46,000 --> 00:37:52,000 Remember what the fundamental matrix was? 530 00:37:50,000 --> 00:37:56,000 Its entries were the two columns of solutions. 531 00:37:54,000 --> 00:38:00,000 These are solutions to the homogeneous system. 532 00:38:00,000 --> 00:38:06,000 And I am going to write it using the fundamental matrix as, 533 00:38:05,000 --> 00:38:11,000 now thinks about it. The fundamental matrix has 534 00:38:09,000 --> 00:38:15,000 columns x1 and x2. Your instinct might be using 535 00:38:13,000 --> 00:38:19,000 matrix multiplication to put the v1 and the v2 here, 536 00:38:18,000 --> 00:38:24,000 but that won't work. You have to put them here. 537 00:38:30,000 --> 00:38:36,000 This says the same thing as that. 538 00:38:33,000 --> 00:38:39,000 Let's just take a second out to calculate. 539 00:38:37,000 --> 00:38:43,000 The x is going to look like (x1, y1). 540 00:38:40,000 --> 00:38:46,000 That is my first solution. My second solution, 541 00:38:44,000 --> 00:38:50,000 here is the fundamental matrix, is (x2, y2). 542 00:38:49,000 --> 00:38:55,000 And I am multiplying this on the right by (v1, 543 00:38:53,000 --> 00:38:59,000 v2). Does it come out right? 544 00:38:56,000 --> 00:39:02,000 Look. What is it? 545 00:38:59,000 --> 00:39:05,000 The top is x1 v1 plus x2 v2. 546 00:39:02,000 --> 00:39:08,000 The top, x1 v1 plus x2 v2. 547 00:39:06,000 --> 00:39:12,000 It is in the wrong order, but multiplication is 548 00:39:10,000 --> 00:39:16,000 commutative, fortunately. And the same way the bottom 549 00:39:14,000 --> 00:39:20,000 thing will be v1 y1 plus v2 y2. 550 00:39:18,000 --> 00:39:24,000 If I had written it on the other side instead, 551 00:39:22,000 --> 00:39:28,000 which is tempting because the v's occur on the left here, 552 00:39:27,000 --> 00:39:33,000 that won't work. What will I get? 553 00:39:31,000 --> 00:39:37,000 I will get v1 x1 plus v2 y1, 554 00:39:35,000 --> 00:39:41,000 which is not at all what I want. 555 00:39:37,000 --> 00:39:43,000 You must put it on the right. But this is a very important 556 00:39:42,000 --> 00:39:48,000 thing. This is going to plague us on 557 00:39:45,000 --> 00:39:51,000 Monday, too. It must be written on the right 558 00:39:49,000 --> 00:39:55,000 and not on the left as a column vector. 559 00:39:52,000 --> 00:39:58,000 The rest of the program is very simple. 560 00:39:55,000 --> 00:40:01,000 I will write it out as a program. 561 00:40:00,000 --> 00:40:06,000 Substitute into the system, into that, in other words, 562 00:40:04,000 --> 00:40:10,000 and see what v has to be. That is what we are looking 563 00:40:08,000 --> 00:40:14,000 for. We know what the x1 and x2 are. 564 00:40:11,000 --> 00:40:17,000 It is a question of what those coefficients are. 565 00:40:14,000 --> 00:40:20,000 And see what v is. Let's do it. 566 00:40:32,000 --> 00:40:38,000 Let's substitute. Let's see. 567 00:40:35,000 --> 00:40:41,000 The system is x prime equals Ax plus r. 568 00:40:41,000 --> 00:40:47,000 I want to put in (x)p, this proposed particular 569 00:40:46,000 --> 00:40:52,000 solution. And it is a fundamental matrix, 570 00:40:50,000 --> 00:40:56,000 and the v is unknown. How do I differentiate the 571 00:40:56,000 --> 00:41:02,000 product of two matrices? You differentiate the product 572 00:41:02,000 --> 00:41:08,000 of two matrices using the product rule that you learned 573 00:41:07,000 --> 00:41:13,000 the first day of 18.01. Trust me. 574 00:41:10,000 --> 00:41:16,000 Let's do it. I am going to substitute in. 575 00:41:14,000 --> 00:41:20,000 In other words, here is my (x)p, 576 00:41:17,000 --> 00:41:23,000 (x)p, and I am going to write in what that is. 577 00:41:21,000 --> 00:41:27,000 The left-hand side is the derivative of, 578 00:41:25,000 --> 00:41:31,000 X prime times v, plus X times the derivative of 579 00:41:29,000 --> 00:41:35,000 v. Notice that one of these is a 580 00:41:34,000 --> 00:41:40,000 column vector and the other is a square matrix. 581 00:41:37,000 --> 00:41:43,000 That is perfectly Okay. Any two matrices which are the 582 00:41:39,000 --> 00:41:45,000 rate shape so you can multiply them together, 583 00:41:42,000 --> 00:41:48,000 if you want to differentiate their product, 584 00:41:44,000 --> 00:41:50,000 in other words, if the entries are functions of 585 00:41:46,000 --> 00:41:52,000 t it is the product rule. The derivative of this times 586 00:41:49,000 --> 00:41:55,000 time plus that times the derivative of this. 587 00:41:52,000 --> 00:41:58,000 You have to keep them in the right order. 588 00:41:54,000 --> 00:42:00,000 You are not allowed to shuffle them around carelessly. 589 00:41:57,000 --> 00:42:03,000 So that is that. What is it equal to? 590 00:42:00,000 --> 00:42:06,000 Well, the right-hand side is A. And now I substitute just (x)p 591 00:42:08,000 --> 00:42:14,000 in, so that is X times v plus r. Is this progress? 592 00:42:14,000 --> 00:42:20,000 What is v? It looks like a mess but it is 593 00:42:20,000 --> 00:42:26,000 not. Why not? 594 00:42:22,000 --> 00:42:28,000 It is because this is not any old matrix X. 595 00:42:29,000 --> 00:42:35,000 This is a matrix whose columns are solutions to the system. 596 00:42:34,000 --> 00:42:40,000 And what does that do? That means X prime satisfies 597 00:42:39,000 --> 00:42:45,000 that matrix differential equation. 598 00:42:42,000 --> 00:42:48,000 X prime is the same as Ax. 599 00:42:45,000 --> 00:42:51,000 And, by a little miracle, the v is tagging along in both 600 00:42:50,000 --> 00:42:56,000 cases. This cancels that and now there 601 00:42:54,000 --> 00:43:00,000 is very little left. The conclusion, 602 00:42:58,000 --> 00:43:04,000 therefore, is that Xv is equal to r. 603 00:43:02,000 --> 00:43:08,000 What is v? It is v that we are looking 604 00:43:05,000 --> 00:43:11,000 for, right? You have to solve a matrix 605 00:43:09,000 --> 00:43:15,000 equation, now. This is a square matrix so you 606 00:43:13,000 --> 00:43:19,000 have to do it by inverting the matrix. 607 00:43:16,000 --> 00:43:22,000 You don't just sloppily divide. You multiply on which side by 608 00:43:21,000 --> 00:43:27,000 what matrix? Choice of left or right. 609 00:43:25,000 --> 00:43:31,000 You multiply by the inverse matrix on the left or on the 610 00:43:29,000 --> 00:43:35,000 right? It has to be on the left. 611 00:43:35,000 --> 00:43:41,000 Multiply both sides of the equation by X inverse on the 612 00:43:42,000 --> 00:43:48,000 left, and then you will get v is equal to X inverse r. 613 00:43:50,000 --> 00:43:56,000 How do I know the X inverse 614 00:43:55,000 --> 00:44:01,000 exists? Does X inverse exist? 615 00:44:00,000 --> 00:44:06,000 For a matrix inverse to exist, the matrix's determinant must 616 00:44:05,000 --> 00:44:11,000 be not zero. Why is the determinant of this 617 00:44:10,000 --> 00:44:16,000 not zero? Because its columns are 618 00:44:13,000 --> 00:44:19,000 independent solutions. 619 00:44:22,000 --> 00:44:28,000 Of course this is not right. I forgot the prime here. 620 00:44:31,000 --> 00:44:37,000 I am not failing this course after all. 621 00:44:34,000 --> 00:44:40,000 v prime equals that. 622 00:44:43,000 --> 00:44:49,000 This is done by differentiating each entry in the column vector. 623 00:44:47,000 --> 00:44:53,000 And, therefore, we should integrate it. 624 00:44:50,000 --> 00:44:56,000 It will be the integral, just the ordinary 625 00:44:53,000 --> 00:44:59,000 anti-derivative of x inverse times r. 626 00:44:57,000 --> 00:45:03,000 This is a column vector. The entries are functions of t. 627 00:45:02,000 --> 00:45:08,000 You simply integrate each of those functions in turn. 628 00:45:06,000 --> 00:45:12,000 So integrate each entry. 629 00:45:12,000 --> 00:45:18,000 There is my v. Sorry, you cannot tell the v's 630 00:45:19,000 --> 00:45:25,000 from the r's here. And so, finally, 631 00:45:25,000 --> 00:45:31,000 the particular solution is (x)p is equal to -- 632 00:45:34,000 --> 00:45:40,000 It is really not bad at all. It is equal to X times v. 633 00:45:37,000 --> 00:45:43,000 It's equal to X times the integral of X inverse r dt. 634 00:45:40,000 --> 00:45:46,000 Now, actually, 635 00:45:43,000 --> 00:45:49,000 there is not much work to doing that. 636 00:45:45,000 --> 00:45:51,000 Once you have solved the homogeneous system and gotten 637 00:45:49,000 --> 00:45:55,000 the fundamental matrix, taking the inverse of a 638 00:45:52,000 --> 00:45:58,000 two-by-two matrix is almost trivial. 639 00:45:54,000 --> 00:46:00,000 You flip those two and you change the signs of these two 640 00:45:57,000 --> 00:46:03,000 and you divide by the determinant. 641 00:46:01,000 --> 00:46:07,000 You multiply it by r. And the hard part is if you can 642 00:46:04,000 --> 00:46:10,000 do the integration. If not, you just leave the 643 00:46:07,000 --> 00:46:13,000 integral sign the way you have learned to do in this silly 644 00:46:11,000 --> 00:46:17,000 course and you still have the answer. 645 00:46:14,000 --> 00:46:20,000 What about the arbitrary constant of integration? 646 00:46:17,000 --> 00:46:23,000 The answer is you don't need to put it in. 647 00:46:20,000 --> 00:46:26,000 Just find one particular solution. 648 00:46:22,000 --> 00:46:28,000 It is good enough. You don't have to put in the 649 00:46:25,000 --> 00:46:31,000 arbitrary constants of integration. 650 00:46:29,000 --> 00:46:35,000 Because they are already in the complimentary function here. 651 00:46:33,000 --> 00:46:39,000 Therefore, you don't have to add them. 652 00:46:35,000 --> 00:46:41,000 I am sorry I didn't get a chance to actually solve that. 653 00:46:39,000 --> 00:46:45,000 I will have to let it go. The recitations will do it on 654 00:46:42,000 --> 00:46:48,000 Tuesday, will solve that particular problem, 655 00:46:45,000 --> 00:46:51,000 which means you will, in effect.