1 00:00:03,560 --> 00:00:06,020 We can consider a given coordinate system 2 00:00:06,020 --> 00:00:08,520 as a reference frame within which we can describe 3 00:00:08,520 --> 00:00:10,330 the kinematics of an object. 4 00:00:10,330 --> 00:00:13,120 By "the kinematics," I mean the position, the velocity, 5 00:00:13,120 --> 00:00:15,230 and the acceleration as a function of time, 6 00:00:15,230 --> 00:00:18,170 basically a geometric description of the motion. 7 00:00:18,170 --> 00:00:20,549 Some aspects of these kinematics will look different 8 00:00:20,549 --> 00:00:22,090 in different reference frames and I'd 9 00:00:22,090 --> 00:00:23,740 like to examine that now. 10 00:00:23,740 --> 00:00:27,151 First, I want to define what I mean by an "inertial reference 11 00:00:27,151 --> 00:00:27,650 frame." 12 00:00:27,650 --> 00:00:29,066 An inertial reference frame is one 13 00:00:29,066 --> 00:00:33,160 in which an isolated body, one with no net force acting on it, 14 00:00:33,160 --> 00:00:35,730 moves at constant velocity, where that constant velocity 15 00:00:35,730 --> 00:00:37,347 might be zero. 16 00:00:37,347 --> 00:00:39,680 Another way of saying this is that an inertial reference 17 00:00:39,680 --> 00:00:43,270 frame is one in which Newton's laws of motion apply. 18 00:00:43,270 --> 00:00:45,110 Recall that Newton's first law of motion 19 00:00:45,110 --> 00:00:48,160 states that an isolated object with no forces acting on it 20 00:00:48,160 --> 00:00:50,530 moves at constant velocity. 21 00:00:50,530 --> 00:00:53,117 So let's begin by considering an observer 22 00:00:53,117 --> 00:00:54,450 in a particular reference frame. 23 00:00:54,450 --> 00:00:57,040 We'll call that reference frame S and denote it 24 00:00:57,040 --> 00:01:00,900 by coordinate axes x and y. 25 00:01:00,900 --> 00:01:06,500 And let's consider an object that in that reference frame 26 00:01:06,500 --> 00:01:09,450 is at a position vector small r. 27 00:01:09,450 --> 00:01:11,730 We can then consider a second reference frame, which 28 00:01:11,730 --> 00:01:13,950 I'll call the frame S prime, and I'll 29 00:01:13,950 --> 00:01:18,020 denote that with coordinate axes x prime and y prime. 30 00:01:18,020 --> 00:01:20,310 In my example here, I'm going to assume 31 00:01:20,310 --> 00:01:24,640 that the coordinate axes in frame S prime are parallel to 32 00:01:24,640 --> 00:01:29,370 but displaced away from the coordinate axes in frame 33 00:01:29,370 --> 00:01:33,840 S. More generally, we could have the S prime coordinate axes 34 00:01:33,840 --> 00:01:36,554 rotated with respect to the frame S axes. 35 00:01:36,554 --> 00:01:38,470 That's a complication I'm not going to add now 36 00:01:38,470 --> 00:01:40,650 but conceptually, it's not really different. 37 00:01:40,650 --> 00:01:45,539 For simplicity, we'll stick to parallel axes in this example. 38 00:01:45,539 --> 00:01:48,120 So imagine we have two observers, one 39 00:01:48,120 --> 00:01:51,960 in frame S at the origin and one at the origin of frame S prime, 40 00:01:51,960 --> 00:01:54,330 both looking at the same object. 41 00:01:54,330 --> 00:01:59,289 Observer S will measure a position vector little r. 42 00:01:59,289 --> 00:02:05,090 Observer S prime will measure a position vector little r prime. 43 00:02:05,090 --> 00:02:08,650 The two observers have a relative position vector, 44 00:02:08,650 --> 00:02:12,670 capital R, which is the position of S prime relative 45 00:02:12,670 --> 00:02:14,980 to the origin of frame S. 46 00:02:14,980 --> 00:02:18,120 So what we'd like to see is how are these different position 47 00:02:18,120 --> 00:02:19,030 vectors related. 48 00:02:19,030 --> 00:02:21,950 Well, from the geometry of the diagram, 49 00:02:21,950 --> 00:02:26,710 we can see that the position measured by observer S, which 50 00:02:26,710 --> 00:02:34,700 is just little r, is equal to the position of observer S 51 00:02:34,700 --> 00:02:36,950 prime relative to observer S, which 52 00:02:36,950 --> 00:02:42,500 is capital R, plus the position vector measured 53 00:02:42,500 --> 00:02:48,010 by the observer at S prime, which is little r prime. 54 00:02:48,010 --> 00:02:52,160 I can rewrite that if I'd like to write the position measured 55 00:02:52,160 --> 00:02:55,160 by the observer at S prime in terms of what's 56 00:02:55,160 --> 00:02:57,290 measured by the observer at S. I could just 57 00:02:57,290 --> 00:02:59,530 rearrange this and write that little r 58 00:02:59,530 --> 00:03:07,620 prime is equal to little r minus capital R. 59 00:03:07,620 --> 00:03:10,350 Now let's add a further complication 60 00:03:10,350 --> 00:03:14,620 and assume that the observer S prime is not 61 00:03:14,620 --> 00:03:17,320 just at a different location from the observer of S 62 00:03:17,320 --> 00:03:20,990 but is moving at constant velocity relative to frame S. 63 00:03:20,990 --> 00:03:25,120 So we'll assume that frame S prime is moving 64 00:03:25,120 --> 00:03:26,820 at constant velocity with respect 65 00:03:26,820 --> 00:03:31,690 to frame S at a constant velocity vector V. 66 00:03:31,690 --> 00:03:41,070 So V vector is a constant. 67 00:03:41,070 --> 00:03:45,740 And in that case, my offset of observer 68 00:03:45,740 --> 00:03:49,470 S prime relative to observer S, which is the vector capital R, 69 00:03:49,470 --> 00:03:52,910 is a function of time. 70 00:03:52,910 --> 00:03:55,730 So capital R is a function of time 71 00:03:55,730 --> 00:03:59,310 and it's given by the offset at time 0, which 72 00:03:59,310 --> 00:04:07,820 I will call capital R0, plus the elapsed motion 73 00:04:07,820 --> 00:04:14,620 due to the constant velocity, which is capital V times time. 74 00:04:14,620 --> 00:04:18,160 So since capital R is a function of time, that tells me 75 00:04:18,160 --> 00:04:22,950 that in this equation, little r prime, the position vector 76 00:04:22,950 --> 00:04:26,580 measured by the observer in frame S prime, 77 00:04:26,580 --> 00:04:28,600 is also going to be a function of time, 78 00:04:28,600 --> 00:04:33,770 even if capital-- sorry-- even if little r is a constant. 79 00:04:33,770 --> 00:04:34,880 So notice what that means. 80 00:04:34,880 --> 00:04:40,310 If the object is at rest in frame S, 81 00:04:40,310 --> 00:04:43,280 the object will appear to be moving. 82 00:04:43,280 --> 00:04:47,300 Its position vector will be time-dependent in frame S prime 83 00:04:47,300 --> 00:04:51,390 because capital R, the location of S prime relative to S 84 00:04:51,390 --> 00:04:53,159 is changing. 85 00:04:53,159 --> 00:04:57,200 So this relation tells us how the position vectors in the two 86 00:04:57,200 --> 00:04:58,820 frames are related. 87 00:04:58,820 --> 00:05:01,520 What about the velocities? 88 00:05:01,520 --> 00:05:04,390 Well, to compute how the velocities are related, 89 00:05:04,390 --> 00:05:07,100 we can just take the time derivative of the relation 90 00:05:07,100 --> 00:05:08,620 of the position vectors. 91 00:05:08,620 --> 00:05:10,740 So in this particular case, we have 92 00:05:10,740 --> 00:05:15,930 that the time derivative of the S prime position, 93 00:05:15,930 --> 00:05:18,870 d little r prime dt, is equal to the time 94 00:05:18,870 --> 00:05:24,270 derivative of the position in frame S, which is d little r 95 00:05:24,270 --> 00:05:30,060 dt, minus the time derivative of the offset of S prime relative 96 00:05:30,060 --> 00:05:36,480 to S. So that's minus d capital R dt. 97 00:05:36,480 --> 00:05:40,070 And I can rewrite that in terms of symbols for the velocity. 98 00:05:40,070 --> 00:05:44,659 So I have here the velocity little v prime, which 99 00:05:44,659 --> 00:05:47,750 is the velocity measured by an observer in frame S prime, 100 00:05:47,750 --> 00:05:51,040 and that's equal to the velocity of little v, which 101 00:05:51,040 --> 00:05:54,030 is the velocity measured by frame S, 102 00:05:54,030 --> 00:05:57,480 minus d capital R dt, which we see 103 00:05:57,480 --> 00:06:03,950 is just capital V vector, which is the velocity of S 104 00:06:03,950 --> 00:06:08,060 prime relative to S. So this is how the velocities are related. 105 00:06:08,060 --> 00:06:12,360 And again, notice that if the object is stationary in one 106 00:06:12,360 --> 00:06:17,515 frame-- so if it's 0 in one frame, 107 00:06:17,515 --> 00:06:20,140 it will be nonzero in the other frame. 108 00:06:20,140 --> 00:06:23,370 So in general, you will measure different velocities 109 00:06:23,370 --> 00:06:28,240 in the different frames, even if one of those velocities is 0. 110 00:06:28,240 --> 00:06:30,740 Now, how are the accelerations related? 111 00:06:30,740 --> 00:06:33,159 Well, again, we can just take the time derivative 112 00:06:33,159 --> 00:06:36,140 of the velocities to figure out what 113 00:06:36,140 --> 00:06:38,360 the relationship of the accelerations is. 114 00:06:38,360 --> 00:06:40,280 So differentiating this equation, 115 00:06:40,280 --> 00:06:45,300 I have that d little v prime dt is 116 00:06:45,300 --> 00:06:54,905 equal to d little v dt minus d capital V dt. 117 00:06:54,905 --> 00:06:57,280 But here, something interesting happens because remember, 118 00:06:57,280 --> 00:07:01,080 we said that capital V is a constant vector. 119 00:07:01,080 --> 00:07:04,120 And remember, capital V is the velocity 120 00:07:04,120 --> 00:07:08,760 that frame S prime has relative to frame S. 121 00:07:08,760 --> 00:07:11,820 So since capital V is a constant, that 122 00:07:11,820 --> 00:07:15,530 means that this term goes to 0. 123 00:07:15,530 --> 00:07:19,630 And so we see that the acceleration in frame S prime 124 00:07:19,630 --> 00:07:23,900 is equal to the acceleration in frame a. 125 00:07:23,900 --> 00:07:27,410 So if I have two reference frames, one moving 126 00:07:27,410 --> 00:07:31,980 at a constant velocity relative to the other, in general, 127 00:07:31,980 --> 00:07:34,450 I will measure different positions 128 00:07:34,450 --> 00:07:37,710 and different velocities for an object as 129 00:07:37,710 --> 00:07:39,380 measured by the two frames. 130 00:07:39,380 --> 00:07:43,180 However, the accelerations measured in both frames 131 00:07:43,180 --> 00:07:44,212 will be identical. 132 00:07:46,990 --> 00:07:49,580 Because the accelerations are identical, 133 00:07:49,580 --> 00:07:52,380 we'll see that Newton's laws will look identical 134 00:07:52,380 --> 00:07:54,770 in the two frames. 135 00:07:54,770 --> 00:07:57,370 And we can see that in the following way. 136 00:07:57,370 --> 00:08:01,960 In frame S, we have that the force 137 00:08:01,960 --> 00:08:05,520 is equal to the mass times the acceleration. 138 00:08:05,520 --> 00:08:10,050 In frame S prime, the force F prime 139 00:08:10,050 --> 00:08:13,275 is equal to the mass times a prime. 140 00:08:16,530 --> 00:08:25,710 But a prime is equal to a, as we calculated here. 141 00:08:25,710 --> 00:08:28,970 So we see that the forces in the two frames 142 00:08:28,970 --> 00:08:33,039 are identical, even though the positions and velocities 143 00:08:33,039 --> 00:08:35,789 in general will be different, as measured in the two 144 00:08:35,789 --> 00:08:38,289 frames for the same object. 145 00:08:38,289 --> 00:08:40,799 But the accelerations will be identical 146 00:08:40,799 --> 00:08:43,289 and so the forces will be identical. 147 00:08:43,289 --> 00:08:45,840 So if one of these reference frames 148 00:08:45,840 --> 00:08:48,740 is an inertial frame, one in which 149 00:08:48,740 --> 00:08:52,840 an isolated body moves at constant velocity, 150 00:08:52,840 --> 00:08:55,910 then any other frame moving at constant velocity with respect 151 00:08:55,910 --> 00:09:00,980 to the first frame will also be an inertial frame. 152 00:09:00,980 --> 00:09:03,450 What this means is that you're always 153 00:09:03,450 --> 00:09:08,105 free to transform from one inertial frame to another. 154 00:09:11,080 --> 00:09:13,200 And what that means is that you can always 155 00:09:13,200 --> 00:09:15,720 transform to another frame that is moving 156 00:09:15,720 --> 00:09:17,940 at constant velocity with respect 157 00:09:17,940 --> 00:09:20,470 to an original inertial frame.