1 00:00:00,499 --> 00:00:03,280 PROFESSOR: So here is of something funny. 2 00:00:03,280 --> 00:00:05,950 You might say, OK, what is simpler? 3 00:00:05,950 --> 00:00:10,000 A theory that is linear or a theory that is not linear? 4 00:00:10,000 --> 00:00:13,750 And the answer, of course, a linear theory is much simpler. 5 00:00:13,750 --> 00:00:17,920 General-- Maxwell's equations are linear. 6 00:00:17,920 --> 00:00:21,790 Einstein's theory of relativity is very nonlinear, 7 00:00:21,790 --> 00:00:25,070 very complicated. 8 00:00:25,070 --> 00:00:27,590 How about classical mechanics? 9 00:00:27,590 --> 00:00:32,140 Is classical mechanics linear or nonlinear? 10 00:00:35,050 --> 00:00:36,010 What do we think? 11 00:00:39,050 --> 00:00:41,450 Can't hear anyone. 12 00:00:41,450 --> 00:00:45,080 Linear, OK. 13 00:00:45,080 --> 00:00:49,220 You may think it's linear because it's supposed 14 00:00:49,220 --> 00:00:51,160 to be simple, but it's not. 15 00:00:51,160 --> 00:00:54,680 It's actually is very nonlinear. 16 00:00:54,680 --> 00:00:57,560 Newton could solve the two body problem 17 00:00:57,560 --> 00:00:59,930 but he couldn't solve the three body problem. 18 00:00:59,930 --> 00:01:03,680 Already with three bodies, you cannot superpose solutions that 19 00:01:03,680 --> 00:01:05,720 you get with two bodies. 20 00:01:05,720 --> 00:01:08,330 It's extraordinarily complicated, 21 00:01:08,330 --> 00:01:10,400 classical mechanics. 22 00:01:10,400 --> 00:01:11,600 Let me show you. 23 00:01:11,600 --> 00:01:20,120 If you have motion in one dimension, in 1D, 24 00:01:20,120 --> 00:01:24,830 you have the equation of motion, motion in one dimension, 25 00:01:24,830 --> 00:01:30,290 and there are potential V of x, that this time independent-- 26 00:01:30,290 --> 00:01:34,400 a particle moving in one dimension x 27 00:01:34,400 --> 00:01:38,330 with under the influence of a potential, V of x. 28 00:01:38,330 --> 00:01:45,200 The second-- the dynamical variable is x of t. 29 00:01:45,200 --> 00:01:46,550 The dynamical variable. 30 00:01:46,550 --> 00:01:49,685 And the equation of motion is-- 31 00:01:55,430 --> 00:01:57,020 so let me explain this. 32 00:01:57,020 --> 00:02:00,660 This is force equal mass times acceleration. 33 00:02:00,660 --> 00:02:03,950 This is mass, this is acceleration, 34 00:02:03,950 --> 00:02:07,400 the second derivative of the position, 35 00:02:07,400 --> 00:02:14,580 and V force is minus the derivative of the potential 36 00:02:14,580 --> 00:02:17,310 evaluated at the position. 37 00:02:17,310 --> 00:02:20,480 You know, derivatives of potentials-- 38 00:02:20,480 --> 00:02:25,460 if you think of a potential, the derivative of the potential 39 00:02:25,460 --> 00:02:28,550 is here positive, and you know if you have a mass 40 00:02:28,550 --> 00:02:30,240 here, it tends to go to the left, 41 00:02:30,240 --> 00:02:33,400 so the force is on the left, so it's minus. 42 00:02:33,400 --> 00:02:48,375 So V prime is the derivative of V with respect to its argument. 43 00:02:53,110 --> 00:02:58,660 And the problem is that while this, taking derivatives, 44 00:02:58,660 --> 00:03:00,890 is a linear operation. 45 00:03:00,890 --> 00:03:04,250 If you take two derivatives of a sum of things, 46 00:03:04,250 --> 00:03:06,200 you take two derivatives of the first 47 00:03:06,200 --> 00:03:08,930 plus two derivatives of the second. 48 00:03:08,930 --> 00:03:12,020 But yes, its-- this side is linear, 49 00:03:12,020 --> 00:03:15,020 but this side may not be linear. 50 00:03:15,020 --> 00:03:20,010 Because a potential can be arbitrary. 51 00:03:20,010 --> 00:03:21,650 And that the reverse-- so suppose 52 00:03:21,650 --> 00:03:24,210 the potential is cubic in x. 53 00:03:24,210 --> 00:03:27,500 V of x goes like x cubed. 54 00:03:27,500 --> 00:03:31,000 Then the derivative of V goes like x squared, 55 00:03:31,000 --> 00:03:33,180 and x squared is not a linear function. 56 00:03:33,180 --> 00:03:39,810 So this, Newton's equation, is not a linear equation. 57 00:03:39,810 --> 00:03:43,290 And therefore, it's complicated to solve. 58 00:03:43,290 --> 00:03:45,990 Very complicated to solve. 59 00:03:45,990 --> 00:03:51,160 So finally, we can get to our case, quantum mechanics. 60 00:03:51,160 --> 00:03:54,930 So in quantum mechanics, what do we have? 61 00:03:54,930 --> 00:03:58,025 Quantum mechanics is linear. 62 00:04:01,120 --> 00:04:04,420 First, you need an equation, and whose equation is it? 63 00:04:04,420 --> 00:04:08,380 Schrodinger's equation, 1925. 64 00:04:08,380 --> 00:04:12,370 He writes an equation for the dynamical variable, 65 00:04:12,370 --> 00:04:14,530 and the dynamical variable is something 66 00:04:14,530 --> 00:04:16,030 called the wave function. 67 00:04:23,090 --> 00:04:27,350 This wave function can depend on t-- 68 00:04:27,350 --> 00:04:36,100 depends on time-- and it may depend on other things as well. 69 00:04:36,100 --> 00:04:40,600 And he describes the dynamics of the quantum system 70 00:04:40,600 --> 00:04:42,730 as it evolved in time. 71 00:04:42,730 --> 00:04:45,760 There is the wave function, and you have an equation 72 00:04:45,760 --> 00:04:47,570 for this wave function. 73 00:04:47,570 --> 00:04:49,940 And what is the equation for this wave function? 74 00:04:49,940 --> 00:04:54,250 It's a universal equation-- i hbar 75 00:04:54,250 --> 00:05:00,280 partial derivative with respect to time of psi 76 00:05:00,280 --> 00:05:14,690 is equal to H hat of psi, where H hat is called the Hamiltonian 77 00:05:14,690 --> 00:05:19,100 and it's a linear operator. 78 00:05:19,100 --> 00:05:21,870 That's why I had to explain a little bit what 79 00:05:21,870 --> 00:05:25,280 the linear operator is. 80 00:05:25,280 --> 00:05:30,210 This is the general structure of the Schrodinger equation-- 81 00:05:30,210 --> 00:05:35,150 time derivative and the linear operator. 82 00:05:35,150 --> 00:05:39,820 So if you wish to write the Schrodinger equation as an L 83 00:05:39,820 --> 00:05:50,980 psi equals 0, then L psi would be defined i hbar del/del 84 00:05:50,980 --> 00:05:55,730 t of psi minus H hat psi. 85 00:05:58,420 --> 00:06:02,710 Then this is the Schrodinger equation. 86 00:06:02,710 --> 00:06:04,685 This equation here is Schrodinger's equation. 87 00:06:07,425 --> 00:06:12,230 And as you can see, it's a linear equation. 88 00:06:12,230 --> 00:06:17,630 You can check it, check that L is a linear operator. 89 00:06:17,630 --> 00:06:21,280 Therefore, it is naturally linear, you can see, 90 00:06:21,280 --> 00:06:24,140 because you do it differently, because the derivative 91 00:06:24,140 --> 00:06:27,740 with respect to time is a linear operation. 92 00:06:27,740 --> 00:06:31,640 If you have the ddt of a number of times a function, 93 00:06:31,640 --> 00:06:34,930 the number goes out, you differentiate the function. 94 00:06:34,930 --> 00:06:38,450 ddt of the sum of two functions, you differentiate the first, 95 00:06:38,450 --> 00:06:39,380 you differentiate. 96 00:06:39,380 --> 00:06:42,590 So this is linear and H we said is linear, 97 00:06:42,590 --> 00:06:48,780 so L is going to be linear and the Schrodinger equation 98 00:06:48,780 --> 00:06:50,990 is going to be a linear equation, 99 00:06:50,990 --> 00:06:54,380 and therefore, you're going to have the great advantage 100 00:06:54,380 --> 00:06:58,040 that any time you find solutions, you can scale them, 101 00:06:58,040 --> 00:07:02,720 you can add them, you can put them together, combine them 102 00:07:02,720 --> 00:07:05,760 in superpositions, and find new solutions. 103 00:07:05,760 --> 00:07:09,410 So in that sense, it's remarkable 104 00:07:09,410 --> 00:07:12,770 that quantum mechanics is simpler 105 00:07:12,770 --> 00:07:14,240 than classical mechanics. 106 00:07:14,240 --> 00:07:17,450 And in fact, you will see throughout this semester 107 00:07:17,450 --> 00:07:20,570 how the mathematics and the things that we do 108 00:07:20,570 --> 00:07:23,120 are simpler in quantum mechanics, 109 00:07:23,120 --> 00:07:28,110 or more elegant, more beautiful, more coherent, 110 00:07:28,110 --> 00:07:31,400 it's simpler and very nice. 111 00:07:31,400 --> 00:07:37,520 OK, i is the square root of minus 1, is the imaginary unit, 112 00:07:37,520 --> 00:07:40,160 and that's what we're going to talk next 113 00:07:40,160 --> 00:07:43,070 on the necessity of complex numbers. 114 00:07:43,070 --> 00:07:45,860 hbar, yes, it's a number. 115 00:07:45,860 --> 00:07:50,570 It shows up in quantum mechanics early on. 116 00:07:50,570 --> 00:07:53,450 It it's called Planck's constant and it 117 00:07:53,450 --> 00:07:58,310 began when Planck tried to fit the black value spectrum 118 00:07:58,310 --> 00:08:01,430 and he found the need to put a constant in there, 119 00:08:01,430 --> 00:08:05,580 and then later, Einstein figured out that it was very relevant, 120 00:08:05,580 --> 00:08:08,540 so yes, it's a number. 121 00:08:08,540 --> 00:08:12,470 For any physical system that you have, 122 00:08:12,470 --> 00:08:15,050 you will have a wave function and you 123 00:08:15,050 --> 00:08:17,570 will have a Hamiltonian, and the Hamiltonian 124 00:08:17,570 --> 00:08:20,960 is for you to invent or for you to discover. 125 00:08:20,960 --> 00:08:24,170 So if you have a particle moving on a line, 126 00:08:24,170 --> 00:08:28,970 the wave function will depend on time and on x. 127 00:08:28,970 --> 00:08:32,780 If you have a particle moving in three dimensions, 128 00:08:32,780 --> 00:08:36,140 it will depend on x vector. 129 00:08:36,140 --> 00:08:38,690 It may depend on other things as well 130 00:08:38,690 --> 00:08:43,400 or it maybe, like, one particle has several wave functions 131 00:08:43,400 --> 00:08:46,340 and that happens when you have a particle with spin. 132 00:08:46,340 --> 00:08:51,170 So in general, always time, sometimes position, 133 00:08:51,170 --> 00:08:55,280 there may be cases where it doesn't depend on position. 134 00:08:55,280 --> 00:09:00,230 You think of an electron at some point in space and it's fixed-- 135 00:09:00,230 --> 00:09:02,270 you lock it there and you want understand 136 00:09:02,270 --> 00:09:06,230 the physics of that electron locked into place, 137 00:09:06,230 --> 00:09:08,250 and then position is not relevant. 138 00:09:08,250 --> 00:09:11,670 So what it does with its spin is relevant 139 00:09:11,670 --> 00:09:16,370 and then you may need more than one wave function-- what 140 00:09:16,370 --> 00:09:20,340 is one describing the spin up and one 141 00:09:20,340 --> 00:09:23,040 describing the spin down? 142 00:09:23,040 --> 00:09:28,410 So it was funny that Schrodinger wrote this equation 143 00:09:28,410 --> 00:09:32,040 and when asked, so what is the wave function? 144 00:09:32,040 --> 00:09:35,270 He said, I don't know. 145 00:09:35,270 --> 00:09:39,140 No physical interpretation for the wave function 146 00:09:39,140 --> 00:09:43,940 was obvious for the people that invented quantum mechanics. 147 00:09:43,940 --> 00:09:48,740 It took a few months until Max Born said 148 00:09:48,740 --> 00:09:52,842 it has to do with probabilities, and that's 149 00:09:52,842 --> 00:09:54,050 what we're going to get next. 150 00:09:54,050 --> 00:10:00,455 So our next point is the necessity of complex numbers 151 00:10:00,455 --> 00:10:02,920 in quantum mechanics.