1 00:00:00,500 --> 00:00:02,580 PROFESSOR: Important thing to do is to just try 2 00:00:02,580 --> 00:00:05,410 to understand one more thing. 3 00:00:05,410 --> 00:00:08,800 The creation and annihilation operators-- what do they 4 00:00:08,800 --> 00:00:12,030 do to those states? 5 00:00:12,030 --> 00:00:17,490 You see, a creation operator will I add one more a dagger, 6 00:00:17,490 --> 00:00:24,750 so somehow must change phi n into phi n plus 1. 7 00:00:24,750 --> 00:00:31,920 A destruction operator with an a will kill one of these factors, 8 00:00:31,920 --> 00:00:36,950 and therefore it will give you a state with lower number 9 00:00:36,950 --> 00:00:38,600 of phi n minus 1. 10 00:00:38,600 --> 00:00:45,290 And we would like to know the precise relations. 11 00:00:45,290 --> 00:00:46,310 So look at this. 12 00:00:46,310 --> 00:00:50,270 Let's do with an A on phi n. 13 00:00:50,270 --> 00:00:56,171 And we know it should be roughly phi n minus 1. 14 00:00:56,171 --> 00:01:01,080 This is one destruction operator, but we can do it. 15 00:01:01,080 --> 00:01:08,620 Look-- this is 1 over square root of n. 16 00:01:08,620 --> 00:01:16,340 A times a dagger to the n phi 0. 17 00:01:20,570 --> 00:01:25,041 A with a dagger to the n phi 0, we can replace by a commutator 18 00:01:25,041 --> 00:01:25,540 again. 19 00:01:28,050 --> 00:01:35,450 Commutator of a, a dagger to the n phi 0. 20 00:01:35,450 --> 00:01:38,630 This is 1 over square root of n factorial, 21 00:01:38,630 --> 00:01:43,700 and here we get a factor of n times 22 00:01:43,700 --> 00:01:49,300 a dagger to the n minus 1 phi 0. 23 00:01:51,830 --> 00:01:54,700 You know, it's all a matter of those commutators we 24 00:01:54,700 --> 00:01:55,960 on the left blackboard. 25 00:02:00,870 --> 00:02:10,190 But this state-- by definition, we 26 00:02:10,190 --> 00:02:13,350 have n square root of n factorial. 27 00:02:13,350 --> 00:02:19,280 That's state, by definition, is phi n minus 1 times 28 00:02:19,280 --> 00:02:22,160 square root of n minus 1 factorial. 29 00:02:29,400 --> 00:02:33,360 See, by looking at this definition and saying, 30 00:02:33,360 --> 00:02:38,230 suppose I have n minus 1, n minus 1, this is phi n minus 1. 31 00:02:38,230 --> 00:02:42,980 So n minus 1 a daggers on phi 0 is 32 00:02:42,980 --> 00:02:49,610 n minus 1 factorial square root multiplied phi n minus 1. 33 00:02:49,610 --> 00:02:52,750 And now we can simplify this-- 34 00:02:52,750 --> 00:02:55,660 square root of n factorial and square root 35 00:02:55,660 --> 00:02:58,450 of n minus 1 factorial gives you just a factor 36 00:02:58,450 --> 00:03:01,090 of square root of n that with this n 37 00:03:01,090 --> 00:03:07,206 here, this square root of n, phi n minus 1. 38 00:03:07,206 --> 00:03:09,220 Sop there we go-- 39 00:03:09,220 --> 00:03:11,830 here is the first relation. 40 00:03:11,830 --> 00:03:17,320 A is really a lowering operator. 41 00:03:17,320 --> 00:03:22,600 It gives you an eigenstate 1 less energy, 42 00:03:22,600 --> 00:03:28,510 but it gives it with a factor of square root of n, 43 00:03:28,510 --> 00:03:31,180 that if you care about normalizations, 44 00:03:31,180 --> 00:03:33,490 you better keep it. 45 00:03:33,490 --> 00:03:39,640 That factor is there because the overall normalization 46 00:03:39,640 --> 00:03:44,050 of this equation was designed to make the states normalized. 47 00:03:48,020 --> 00:03:54,530 Similarly, we can do the other operation, 48 00:03:54,530 --> 00:04:00,470 which is what is a dagger acting on phi n. 49 00:04:00,470 --> 00:04:03,590 This would be 1 over square root of n factorial, 50 00:04:03,590 --> 00:04:10,045 but this time a dagger to the n plus 1 on phi n, phi 0. 51 00:04:12,790 --> 00:04:15,730 Because you had already a dagger to the n, 52 00:04:15,730 --> 00:04:18,220 and you put one more a dagger. 53 00:04:18,220 --> 00:04:23,790 But this thing is equal to what? 54 00:04:23,790 --> 00:04:29,490 This is equal to square root of n plus 1 factorial times 55 00:04:29,490 --> 00:04:31,270 phi n plus 1. 56 00:04:34,200 --> 00:04:35,640 From the definition-- 57 00:04:41,310 --> 00:04:45,210 I hope you're not getting dizzy. 58 00:04:45,210 --> 00:04:50,120 Lots of factors here. 59 00:04:50,120 --> 00:04:57,400 But now you see that the n part of the factorial cancels, 60 00:04:57,400 --> 00:05:01,640 and you get that a hat dagger phi 61 00:05:01,640 --> 00:05:07,810 n is equal to square root of n plus 1 phi n plus 1. 62 00:05:12,530 --> 00:05:16,310 OK let's do an application. 63 00:05:16,310 --> 00:05:21,020 Suppose somebody asks you to calculate example. 64 00:05:23,830 --> 00:05:26,770 The expectation value of the operator 65 00:05:26,770 --> 00:05:34,880 x on phi n, the expectation value of p on phi n. 66 00:05:34,880 --> 00:05:35,960 How much are they? 67 00:05:40,580 --> 00:05:43,330 OK. 68 00:05:43,330 --> 00:05:47,440 This, of course, in conventional language, at first sight 69 00:05:47,440 --> 00:05:48,790 looks prohibitive. 70 00:05:52,480 --> 00:05:58,060 I would have to get those phi n [? in ?] some Hermit polynomial 71 00:05:58,060 --> 00:06:03,050 hn, for which I don't know the closed form expression. 72 00:06:03,050 --> 00:06:06,000 It's a very large polynomial, jumps 2 by 2, 73 00:06:06,000 --> 00:06:10,900 there is exponentials, I will have to do an integral. 74 00:06:10,900 --> 00:06:14,090 That's something that we don't want to do. 75 00:06:16,990 --> 00:06:21,710 So how can we do it without doing integrals? 76 00:06:21,710 --> 00:06:27,030 Well, this one's-- actually, you can do without doing anything. 77 00:06:27,030 --> 00:06:29,950 You don't have to do integrals, you don't have to calculate. 78 00:06:29,950 --> 00:06:34,940 The answers are kind of obvious, if you 79 00:06:34,940 --> 00:06:38,000 think about it the right way. 80 00:06:38,000 --> 00:06:42,620 That's not the obvious part, to think about the right way. 81 00:06:42,620 --> 00:06:43,840 But here it is. 82 00:06:43,840 --> 00:06:45,830 Look, what is this integral? 83 00:06:45,830 --> 00:06:53,780 This is the integral of x times phi and of x, those are real, 84 00:06:53,780 --> 00:06:54,800 quantity squared. 85 00:06:58,978 --> 00:07:05,330 And the phi n's are either even or odd, but the fight n squared 86 00:07:05,330 --> 00:07:07,950 are even. 87 00:07:07,950 --> 00:07:10,220 And x is odd. 88 00:07:10,220 --> 00:07:15,182 So this integral should be 0, and we shouldn't even bother. 89 00:07:15,182 --> 00:07:17,500 That's it. 90 00:07:17,500 --> 00:07:18,970 Momentum. 91 00:07:18,970 --> 00:07:22,570 Expectation value of the momentum. 92 00:07:22,570 --> 00:07:25,480 All these are stationary states. 93 00:07:25,480 --> 00:07:26,920 Cannot have momentum. 94 00:07:26,920 --> 00:07:30,340 If it had momentum, here is the harmonic oscillator, 95 00:07:30,340 --> 00:07:31,660 here is the wave function. 96 00:07:31,660 --> 00:07:34,980 If it has momentum, half an hour later it's here. 97 00:07:34,980 --> 00:07:36,310 It's impossible. 98 00:07:36,310 --> 00:07:38,050 This thing cannot have momentum. 99 00:07:38,050 --> 00:07:40,510 This must be 0 as well. 100 00:07:40,510 --> 00:07:42,250 OK. 101 00:07:42,250 --> 00:07:44,590 Now this one is something you actually 102 00:07:44,590 --> 00:07:46,990 proved in the first test-- 103 00:07:46,990 --> 00:07:51,000 the expectation value of the momentum operator 104 00:07:51,000 --> 00:07:55,340 on a bound state with a real wave function was 0. 105 00:07:55,340 --> 00:07:58,840 And you did it by integration-- but in fact you proved it 106 00:07:58,840 --> 00:08:02,530 in two ways, in momentum space, in coordinate space, 107 00:08:02,530 --> 00:08:04,970 is [? back ?] the same thing. 108 00:08:04,970 --> 00:08:06,680 OK. 109 00:08:06,680 --> 00:08:10,410 So these ones were too easy. 110 00:08:10,410 --> 00:08:12,110 So let's try to see if we can find 111 00:08:12,110 --> 00:08:16,130 something more difficult to do. 112 00:08:16,130 --> 00:08:21,020 Well, actually, before doing that I will do them anyway 113 00:08:21,020 --> 00:08:22,500 with this notation. 114 00:08:22,500 --> 00:08:24,830 So what would I have here? 115 00:08:24,830 --> 00:08:34,235 I would have phi n x phi n. 116 00:08:34,235 --> 00:08:37,330 And I say, oh, I don't know how to do things with x. 117 00:08:37,330 --> 00:08:38,720 That's a terrible thing. 118 00:08:38,720 --> 00:08:40,539 I would have to do integrals. 119 00:08:40,539 --> 00:08:43,309 But then you say, no. 120 00:08:43,309 --> 00:08:48,630 X-- I can write in terms of a and a daggers. 121 00:08:48,630 --> 00:08:51,520 And a and a daggers you know how to manipulate. 122 00:08:51,520 --> 00:08:55,740 So this is a formula we wrote last time, 123 00:08:55,740 --> 00:09:03,410 and it's that x is equal to square root of h over 2m omega, 124 00:09:03,410 --> 00:09:07,200 a plus a dagger. 125 00:09:07,200 --> 00:09:11,860 So x is proportional to a plus a dagger. 126 00:09:11,860 --> 00:09:18,910 So here is a square root of h, 2m omega, phi n, 127 00:09:18,910 --> 00:09:23,135 a plus a dagger, on phi n. 128 00:09:30,260 --> 00:09:38,210 Now, this is 0, and why is that? 129 00:09:38,210 --> 00:09:46,270 Because this term is a acting on phi n. 130 00:09:46,270 --> 00:09:47,860 Well, we have it there-- 131 00:09:47,860 --> 00:09:52,930 is square root of n, phi n minus 1. 132 00:09:52,930 --> 00:09:59,270 And a dagger acting on phi n is square root of n 133 00:09:59,270 --> 00:10:02,450 plus 1, phi n plus 1. 134 00:10:05,680 --> 00:10:14,790 But the overlap of phi n minus 1 with phi n 135 00:10:14,790 --> 00:10:19,410 is 0, because all these states with different energies 136 00:10:19,410 --> 00:10:21,210 are orthogonal. 137 00:10:21,210 --> 00:10:23,160 It's probably a property I should 138 00:10:23,160 --> 00:10:26,370 have written somewhere here. 139 00:10:26,370 --> 00:10:30,510 Which is-- not only they're well-normalized, 140 00:10:30,510 --> 00:10:36,735 but phi n phi m is delta nm. 141 00:10:43,920 --> 00:10:48,560 If the numbers are different, it's zero. 142 00:10:48,560 --> 00:10:52,880 And you see this is something intuitively clear. 143 00:10:52,880 --> 00:10:57,110 If you wish, I'll just say here-- these are 0, 144 00:10:57,110 --> 00:11:00,650 and this is 0 because the numbers are different. 145 00:11:00,650 --> 00:11:05,600 If you have, for example, a phi 2 146 00:11:05,600 --> 00:11:13,960 and phi 3, or let's do the phi 3 and a phi 2, 147 00:11:13,960 --> 00:11:21,730 then you have roughly a dagger, a dagger, a dagger, phi 0, 148 00:11:21,730 --> 00:11:26,430 a dagger, a dagger, phi 0. 149 00:11:26,430 --> 00:11:33,005 And then is equal to phi 0, three a's, and two a daggers. 150 00:11:36,690 --> 00:11:39,050 Correct? 151 00:11:39,050 --> 00:11:43,840 And now you say, OK, this a is ready to kill 152 00:11:43,840 --> 00:11:46,880 what is on the right hand side. 153 00:11:46,880 --> 00:11:49,090 On the right side to it. 154 00:11:49,090 --> 00:11:51,190 But it can't because there are a daggers. 155 00:11:51,190 --> 00:11:55,250 But that a is going to kill at least one of the a daggers. 156 00:11:55,250 --> 00:11:58,150 So an a kills an a dagger. 157 00:11:58,150 --> 00:12:03,810 The second a will kill the only a dagger that is left. 158 00:12:03,810 --> 00:12:07,250 And now you have an a that is ready to go here, 159 00:12:07,250 --> 00:12:10,690 no obstacle whatsoever, and kills the phi 0, 160 00:12:10,690 --> 00:12:12,310 so this is zero. 161 00:12:12,310 --> 00:12:16,120 So each time there are some different number 162 00:12:16,120 --> 00:12:21,280 of eight daggers on the left input and the right input, 163 00:12:21,280 --> 00:12:23,090 you get 0. 164 00:12:23,090 --> 00:12:29,020 If you have more a daggers on the right, 165 00:12:29,020 --> 00:12:31,915 then move them to the left, and now you 166 00:12:31,915 --> 00:12:34,990 will have more a's than a daggers and the same problem 167 00:12:34,990 --> 00:12:36,100 will happen. 168 00:12:36,100 --> 00:12:40,060 The only way to get something to work is they are the same. 169 00:12:40,060 --> 00:12:44,440 But this of course is guaranteed by our older theorems 170 00:12:44,440 --> 00:12:46,840 that the-- 171 00:12:46,840 --> 00:12:49,030 eigenstates, if Hermitian operators 172 00:12:49,030 --> 00:12:51,890 with different eigenvalues are orthogonal. 173 00:12:51,890 --> 00:12:58,420 So this is nice to check things, but it's not something 174 00:12:58,420 --> 00:13:02,170 that you need to check. 175 00:13:02,170 --> 00:13:02,830 All right. 176 00:13:02,830 --> 00:13:07,210 So now let's say you want to calculate 177 00:13:07,210 --> 00:13:16,780 the the uncertainty of x in phi n. 178 00:13:16,780 --> 00:13:21,280 Well, the uncertainty of x squared 179 00:13:21,280 --> 00:13:23,980 is the expectation value of x squared 180 00:13:23,980 --> 00:13:29,840 and phi n minus the expectation value of x on phi n. 181 00:13:29,840 --> 00:13:34,720 On this already we know is 0, but now we have a computation 182 00:13:34,720 --> 00:13:37,300 worth our tools. 183 00:13:37,300 --> 00:13:45,160 Let's calculate the expectation value of x squared in phi n. 184 00:13:45,160 --> 00:13:50,470 And if you had to do it with Hermit polynomials, 185 00:13:50,470 --> 00:13:55,890 it's essentially a whole days work. 186 00:13:55,890 --> 00:13:57,870 Maybe a little less if you started 187 00:13:57,870 --> 00:14:02,160 using recursion relations and invent all kinds of things 188 00:14:02,160 --> 00:14:03,330 to do it. 189 00:14:03,330 --> 00:14:05,220 It's a nightmare, this calculation. 190 00:14:05,220 --> 00:14:07,440 But look how we do it here. 191 00:14:07,440 --> 00:14:19,110 We say, all right, this is phi n x hat squared phi n. 192 00:14:19,110 --> 00:14:28,140 But x hat squared would be h bar over 2m omega, phi n times 193 00:14:28,140 --> 00:14:34,620 a plus a dagger time a plus a dagger phi n. 194 00:14:41,080 --> 00:14:50,890 Now I must decide what to do, and one possibility 195 00:14:50,890 --> 00:14:56,540 is to try to be clever and do all kinds of things. 196 00:14:56,540 --> 00:14:58,420 Now, you could do several things here, 197 00:14:58,420 --> 00:15:02,540 and none is a lot better than the other. 198 00:15:02,540 --> 00:15:06,120 And all of them take little time. 199 00:15:06,120 --> 00:15:10,650 You have to develop a strategy here, 200 00:15:10,650 --> 00:15:20,710 but this is sufficiently doable that we can do it directly. 201 00:15:20,710 --> 00:15:22,830 So what does it mean doing directly? 202 00:15:22,830 --> 00:15:25,200 Just multiply those operators. 203 00:15:25,200 --> 00:15:33,810 So you have phi n times a a plus a dagger a dagger 204 00:15:33,810 --> 00:15:40,660 plus a a dagger plus a dagger a. 205 00:15:40,660 --> 00:15:44,676 All that on phi n. 206 00:15:44,676 --> 00:15:50,415 I just multiplied, and now I try to think again. 207 00:15:53,460 --> 00:16:00,150 And I say oh, the first term is to annihilation operators 208 00:16:00,150 --> 00:16:01,500 acting on phi n. 209 00:16:01,500 --> 00:16:05,440 The first is go give you phi n minus 1. 210 00:16:05,440 --> 00:16:11,420 Second is going to give me a phi n minus 2 by the time it acts. 211 00:16:11,420 --> 00:16:19,290 And a phi n minus 2 is orthogonal to a phi n. 212 00:16:19,290 --> 00:16:23,730 So this term cannot contribute. 213 00:16:23,730 --> 00:16:29,740 You know, this term has two more a's than this one. 214 00:16:29,740 --> 00:16:32,790 So as we just sort of illustrated, 215 00:16:32,790 --> 00:16:35,190 but it just doesn't match. 216 00:16:35,190 --> 00:16:39,810 These two terms acting on phi n would give you a phi n minus 2. 217 00:16:39,810 --> 00:16:42,250 And that's orthogonal. 218 00:16:42,250 --> 00:16:45,790 So this term cannot do anything. 219 00:16:45,790 --> 00:16:49,210 Nor can this, because both raise. 220 00:16:49,210 --> 00:16:52,570 So this will end up as phi n plus two, 221 00:16:52,570 --> 00:16:58,410 for example, using that top property over there. 222 00:16:58,410 --> 00:17:00,900 Over there-- the box equation there. 223 00:17:00,900 --> 00:17:04,290 If you have two a daggers acting on phi n, 224 00:17:04,290 --> 00:17:07,050 you will end up with a phi n plus 2. 225 00:17:07,050 --> 00:17:11,160 So this term also doesn't contribute. 226 00:17:11,160 --> 00:17:14,609 And that's progress-- the calculation became half as 227 00:17:14,609 --> 00:17:18,280 difficult. 228 00:17:18,280 --> 00:17:21,099 OK, that-- now we-- 229 00:17:21,099 --> 00:17:24,740 maybe it's a little more interesting. 230 00:17:24,740 --> 00:17:27,200 But again, you should you should refuse 231 00:17:27,200 --> 00:17:29,030 to do a [? long ?] computation. 232 00:17:29,030 --> 00:17:31,160 Whenever you're looking at those things, 233 00:17:31,160 --> 00:17:33,380 you have the temptation to calculate-- 234 00:17:33,380 --> 00:17:35,990 refuse that temptation. 235 00:17:35,990 --> 00:17:41,100 Look at things and let it become clear what's going on. 236 00:17:41,100 --> 00:17:42,680 There are two terms here-- 237 00:17:42,680 --> 00:17:45,320 a dagger and a dagger a. 238 00:17:45,320 --> 00:17:47,720 That's not even a commutator, it's sort of 239 00:17:47,720 --> 00:17:49,380 like an anti-commutator. 240 00:17:49,380 --> 00:17:52,470 That's strange. 241 00:17:52,470 --> 00:17:57,460 But this, a dagger a, is familiar. 242 00:17:57,460 --> 00:17:59,115 That's n. 243 00:17:59,115 --> 00:18:00,650 The operator n. 244 00:18:00,650 --> 00:18:05,620 And we know the n eigenvalue, so this is going to be very easy. 245 00:18:05,620 --> 00:18:06,954 This is n hat. 246 00:18:09,800 --> 00:18:12,440 The other one is not n hat, because it's 247 00:18:12,440 --> 00:18:14,720 in the wrong order. 248 00:18:14,720 --> 00:18:18,005 N hat has a dagger a. 249 00:18:22,350 --> 00:18:31,290 But this operator can be written as the commutator 250 00:18:31,290 --> 00:18:33,660 plus the thing in reverse order-- 251 00:18:33,660 --> 00:18:36,990 that equation we had on top-- ab is 252 00:18:36,990 --> 00:18:39,660 equal to ab commutator plus ba. 253 00:18:39,660 --> 00:18:47,310 So this is equal to a a dagger plus a dagger a. 254 00:18:50,538 --> 00:18:55,640 And this is 1. 255 00:18:55,640 --> 00:18:58,800 Plus another n hat. 256 00:18:58,800 --> 00:19:03,150 So look-- when you have a and a dagger multiply, 257 00:19:03,150 --> 00:19:07,561 it's either n hat or it's 1 plus n hat. 258 00:19:10,267 --> 00:19:17,470 And Therefore x squared expectation value has become 259 00:19:17,470 --> 00:19:24,970 h bar over 2mw phi m, and this whole parenthesis 260 00:19:24,970 --> 00:19:31,280 is 1 plus 2 n hat phi n. 261 00:19:34,200 --> 00:19:42,210 And this is h bar over 2mw, phi n, and this is a number. 262 00:19:42,210 --> 00:19:45,960 Because phi in is an n hat eigenstate. 263 00:19:45,960 --> 00:19:52,300 So it's 1 plus two little n, phi n phi times 1 264 00:19:52,300 --> 00:19:55,544 plus two [? little ?] n. 265 00:19:55,544 --> 00:19:58,290 And here is our final answer-- 266 00:19:58,290 --> 00:20:02,130 expectation value of x squared is 267 00:20:02,130 --> 00:20:11,980 equal to h bar over and m omega, n plus 1/2 phi n. 268 00:20:15,730 --> 00:20:18,010 This is a fairly non-trivial computation. 269 00:20:21,310 --> 00:20:28,110 And that is, of course, because the expectation value of x 270 00:20:28,110 --> 00:20:33,420 is equal to zero, is the uncertainty or x squared. 271 00:20:33,420 --> 00:20:41,800 It grows, the state is bigger, as the quantum number n grows. 272 00:20:41,800 --> 00:20:44,710 By a similar computation, you can calculate 273 00:20:44,710 --> 00:20:46,320 that you will do in the homework, 274 00:20:46,320 --> 00:20:50,650 the expectation value of b squared and phi n, 275 00:20:50,650 --> 00:20:56,980 and then you will see how much is delta x, delta p, 276 00:20:56,980 --> 00:21:01,120 on the [INAUDIBLE] on phi n. 277 00:21:01,120 --> 00:21:03,240 How much it is.