1 00:00:00,500 --> 00:00:03,110 PROFESSOR: This definition in which 2 00:00:03,110 --> 00:00:06,892 the uncertainty of the permission operator 3 00:00:06,892 --> 00:00:10,860 Q in the state psi. 4 00:00:10,860 --> 00:00:14,150 It's always important to have a state associated 5 00:00:14,150 --> 00:00:16,530 with measuring the uncertainty. 6 00:00:16,530 --> 00:00:19,760 Because the uncertainty will be different in different states. 7 00:00:19,760 --> 00:00:22,790 So the state should always be there. 8 00:00:22,790 --> 00:00:24,580 Sometimes we write it, sometimes we 9 00:00:24,580 --> 00:00:28,183 get a little tired of writing it and we don't write it. 10 00:00:28,183 --> 00:00:31,890 But it's always implicit. 11 00:00:31,890 --> 00:00:33,840 So here it is. 12 00:00:33,840 --> 00:00:37,650 From the analogous discussion of random variables, 13 00:00:37,650 --> 00:00:40,190 we were led to this definition, in which we 14 00:00:40,190 --> 00:00:42,260 would have the expectation value of the square 15 00:00:42,260 --> 00:00:46,862 of the operator minus the square of the expectation value. 16 00:00:46,862 --> 00:00:53,820 This was always-- well, this is always a positive quantity. 17 00:00:53,820 --> 00:01:01,050 Because, as claim 1 goes, it can be rewritten as the expectation 18 00:01:01,050 --> 00:01:07,964 value of the square of the difference between the operator 19 00:01:07,964 --> 00:01:10,490 and its expectation value. 20 00:01:10,490 --> 00:01:13,050 This may seem a little strange. 21 00:01:13,050 --> 00:01:16,230 You're subtracting from an operator a number, 22 00:01:16,230 --> 00:01:22,806 but we know that numbers can be thought as operators as well. 23 00:01:22,806 --> 00:01:28,305 Operator of minus a number acting on a state 24 00:01:28,305 --> 00:01:29,440 is well defined. 25 00:01:29,440 --> 00:01:32,780 The operator acts on the state, the number multiplies a state. 26 00:01:32,780 --> 00:01:34,533 So this is well defined. 27 00:01:34,533 --> 00:01:39,050 And claim 1 is proven by direct computation. 28 00:01:39,050 --> 00:01:44,400 You certainly indeed prove. 29 00:01:44,400 --> 00:01:48,070 You can expand what is inside the expectation value, 30 00:01:48,070 --> 00:01:52,000 so it's Q hat squared. 31 00:01:52,000 --> 00:01:58,270 And then the double product of this Q hat and this number. 32 00:01:58,270 --> 00:02:01,560 Now, the number and Q hat commute, 33 00:02:01,560 --> 00:02:04,280 so it is really the double product. 34 00:02:04,280 --> 00:02:09,595 If you have A plus B times A plus B, you have AB plus BA, 35 00:02:09,595 --> 00:02:12,120 but if they commute it's 2AB, so this 36 00:02:12,120 --> 00:02:20,488 is minus 2 Q hat Q. Like that. 37 00:02:20,488 --> 00:02:24,100 And then, the last term is the number squared, 38 00:02:24,100 --> 00:02:28,856 so it's plus Q squared. 39 00:02:28,856 --> 00:02:34,235 And sometimes I don't put the hats as well. 40 00:02:34,235 --> 00:02:37,020 And all this is the expectation value 41 00:02:37,020 --> 00:02:39,964 of the sum of all these things. 42 00:02:39,964 --> 00:02:43,130 The expectation value of a sum of things 43 00:02:43,130 --> 00:02:44,882 is the expectation value of the first 44 00:02:44,882 --> 00:02:46,590 plus the expectation value of the second, 45 00:02:46,590 --> 00:02:49,170 plus the expectation value of the next. 46 00:02:49,170 --> 00:02:54,586 So we can go ahead and do this, and this is therefore 47 00:02:54,586 --> 00:03:00,696 expectation value of Q squared minus the expectation 48 00:03:00,696 --> 00:03:02,620 value of this whole thing. 49 00:03:05,260 --> 00:03:10,386 But now the expectation value of a number times an operator, 50 00:03:10,386 --> 00:03:11,730 the number can go out. 51 00:03:11,730 --> 00:03:14,185 And this is a number, and this is a number. 52 00:03:14,185 --> 00:03:21,292 So it's minus 2 expectation value of Q, number went out. 53 00:03:21,292 --> 00:03:29,148 And then you're left with expectation value of another Q. 54 00:03:29,148 --> 00:03:33,282 And the expectation value of a number 55 00:03:33,282 --> 00:03:35,782 is just the number, because then you're 56 00:03:35,782 --> 00:03:39,930 left within the world of psi star psi, which is equal to 1. 57 00:03:39,930 --> 00:03:48,700 So here is plus Q hat squared. 58 00:03:48,700 --> 00:03:52,880 And these two terms, the second and the third, 59 00:03:52,880 --> 00:03:54,700 are the same really. 60 00:03:54,700 --> 00:03:59,090 They are both equal to expectation value of Q squared. 61 00:03:59,090 --> 00:04:03,212 They cancel a little bit, and they give you this. 62 00:04:03,212 --> 00:04:08,280 So indeed, this is equal to expectation value 63 00:04:08,280 --> 00:04:13,293 of Q squared minus expectation value of Q squared. 64 00:04:13,293 --> 00:04:16,290 So claim 1 is true. 65 00:04:16,290 --> 00:04:22,089 And claim 1 shows in particular that this number, delta Q 66 00:04:22,089 --> 00:04:28,180 squared, in the expectation value of a square of something, 67 00:04:28,180 --> 00:04:29,450 is positive. 68 00:04:29,450 --> 00:04:32,910 We'll see more clearly in a second 69 00:04:32,910 --> 00:04:38,156 when we have claim number 2. 70 00:04:38,156 --> 00:04:42,638 And claim number 2 is easily proven. 71 00:04:42,638 --> 00:04:48,660 That's another expression for uncertainty. 72 00:04:48,660 --> 00:04:57,350 For claim number 2, we will start with the expectation 73 00:04:57,350 --> 00:05:08,298 value of Q minus Q squared, like this, which is the integral dx 74 00:05:08,298 --> 00:05:19,676 psi star of x and t, Q minus expectation value of Q, Q 75 00:05:19,676 --> 00:05:23,787 minus expectation value of Q, on psi. 76 00:05:32,860 --> 00:05:36,010 The expectation value of this thing squared 77 00:05:36,010 --> 00:05:39,614 is psi star, the operator, and this. 78 00:05:39,614 --> 00:05:49,503 And now, think of this as an operator acting on all of that. 79 00:05:49,503 --> 00:05:51,938 This is a Hermitian operator. 80 00:06:03,650 --> 00:06:15,550 Because Q hat is Hermitian, and expectation value of Q is real. 81 00:06:15,550 --> 00:06:19,710 So actually this real number multiplying something 82 00:06:19,710 --> 00:06:23,200 can be moved from the wave function 83 00:06:23,200 --> 00:06:26,830 to the starred wave function without any cost. 84 00:06:26,830 --> 00:06:31,145 So even though you might not think of a real number 85 00:06:31,145 --> 00:06:35,386 as a Hermitian operator, it is. 86 00:06:35,386 --> 00:06:39,370 And therefore this whole thing is Hermitian. 87 00:06:39,370 --> 00:06:42,730 So it can be written as dx. 88 00:06:42,730 --> 00:06:47,206 And now you have this whole operator, Q minus Q 89 00:06:47,206 --> 00:06:52,695 hat, acting on psi of x and t. 90 00:06:52,695 --> 00:06:56,480 And conjugate. 91 00:06:56,480 --> 00:06:59,784 Remember, the operator, the Hermitian operator, 92 00:06:59,784 --> 00:07:04,924 moves to act on psi, and the whole thing [INAUDIBLE]. 93 00:07:04,924 --> 00:07:10,682 And then we have here the other term left over. 94 00:07:14,948 --> 00:07:21,940 But now, you see that you have whatever that state is 95 00:07:21,940 --> 00:07:24,438 and the state complex conjugated. 96 00:07:27,860 --> 00:07:31,083 So that is equal to this integral. 97 00:07:31,083 --> 00:07:38,472 This is the integral dx of the norm squared of Q hat minus Q 98 00:07:38,472 --> 00:07:46,785 hat psi of x and t squared, which means that thing, that's 99 00:07:46,785 --> 00:07:50,430 its complex conjugate. 100 00:07:50,430 --> 00:07:55,315 So this completes our verification 101 00:07:55,315 --> 00:07:58,780 that these claims are true, and allow us 102 00:07:58,780 --> 00:08:04,270 to do the last step on this analysis, which 103 00:08:04,270 --> 00:08:12,450 is to show that if you have an eigenstate of Q, 104 00:08:12,450 --> 00:08:18,190 if a state psi is an eigenstate of Q, there is no uncertainty. 105 00:08:18,190 --> 00:08:21,586 This goes along with our measurement postulate that 106 00:08:21,586 --> 00:08:29,270 says an eigenstate of Q, you measure Q 107 00:08:29,270 --> 00:08:34,653 and you get the eigenvalue of Q and there's no uncertainty. 108 00:08:34,653 --> 00:08:37,480 In particular, we'll do it here I think. 109 00:08:37,480 --> 00:08:52,974 If psi is an eigenstate of Q, so you'll 110 00:08:52,974 --> 00:09:04,790 have Q psi equal lambda psi, where lambda is the eigenvalue. 111 00:09:04,790 --> 00:09:11,580 Now, this is a nice thing. 112 00:09:11,580 --> 00:09:17,550 It's stating that the state psi is an eigenstate of Q 113 00:09:17,550 --> 00:09:21,505 and this is the eigenvalue, but there is a little bit more 114 00:09:21,505 --> 00:09:23,273 than can be said. 115 00:09:23,273 --> 00:09:26,280 And it is. 116 00:09:26,280 --> 00:09:29,480 It should not surprise you that the eigenvalue 117 00:09:29,480 --> 00:09:36,720 happens to be the expectation value of Q on the state psi. 118 00:09:36,720 --> 00:09:37,500 Why? 119 00:09:37,500 --> 00:09:42,310 Because you can take this equation and integrate dx times 120 00:09:42,310 --> 00:09:43,710 psi star. 121 00:09:43,710 --> 00:09:47,120 If you bring that in into both sides of the equation 122 00:09:47,120 --> 00:09:58,984 then you have Q psi equals integral dx psi star psi, 123 00:09:58,984 --> 00:10:02,900 and the lambda goes up. 124 00:10:02,900 --> 00:10:08,260 Since my assumption whenever you do expectation values, 125 00:10:08,260 --> 00:10:12,990 your states are normalized, this is just lambda. 126 00:10:12,990 --> 00:10:21,470 And by definition, this is the expectation value of Q. 127 00:10:21,470 --> 00:10:26,130 So lambda happens to be equal to the expectation value of Q, 128 00:10:26,130 --> 00:10:31,280 so sometimes we can say that this equation really 129 00:10:31,280 --> 00:10:40,490 implies that Q hat psi is equal to expectation value of Q psi 130 00:10:40,490 --> 00:10:41,957 times psi. 131 00:10:53,210 --> 00:10:55,460 It looks a little strange in this form. 132 00:10:55,460 --> 00:10:57,530 Very few people write it in this form, 133 00:10:57,530 --> 00:11:01,580 but it's important to recognize that the eigenvalue is 134 00:11:01,580 --> 00:11:03,700 nothing else but the expectation value 135 00:11:03,700 --> 00:11:06,486 of the operator of that state. 136 00:11:06,486 --> 00:11:10,620 But if you recognize that, you realize 137 00:11:10,620 --> 00:11:21,945 that the state satisfies precisely Q hat minus Q on psi 138 00:11:21,945 --> 00:11:25,670 is equal to 0. 139 00:11:25,670 --> 00:11:31,470 Therefore, if Q hat minus Q on psi is equal to 0, 140 00:11:31,470 --> 00:11:33,684 delta Q is equal to 0. 141 00:11:38,960 --> 00:11:42,800 By claim 2. 142 00:11:45,460 --> 00:11:50,390 Q hat minus Q expectation value kills the state, 143 00:11:50,390 --> 00:11:52,954 and therefore this is 0. 144 00:11:56,300 --> 00:11:57,880 OK then. 145 00:11:57,880 --> 00:11:59,840 The other way is also true. 146 00:11:59,840 --> 00:12:12,210 If delta Q is equal to 0, by claim 2, this integral is 0. 147 00:12:12,210 --> 00:12:15,310 And since it's the sum of squares 148 00:12:15,310 --> 00:12:22,882 that are always positive, this state must be 0 by claim 2. 149 00:12:27,072 --> 00:12:35,866 And you get that Q minus Q hat psi is equal to 0. 150 00:12:35,866 --> 00:12:46,700 And this means that psi is an eigenstate of Q. 151 00:12:46,700 --> 00:12:49,250 So the other way around it also works. 152 00:12:49,250 --> 00:12:54,500 So the final conclusion is delta Q 153 00:12:54,500 --> 00:12:59,930 is equal to 0 is completely equivalent of-- 154 00:12:59,930 --> 00:13:02,460 I'll put in the psi. 155 00:13:02,460 --> 00:13:16,720 Psi is an eigenstate of Q. 156 00:13:16,720 --> 00:13:20,730 So this is the main conclusion. 157 00:13:27,440 --> 00:13:32,056 Also, we learned some computational tricks. 158 00:13:32,056 --> 00:13:34,945 Remember you have to compute an expectation 159 00:13:34,945 --> 00:13:38,750 value of a number, uncertainty, you 160 00:13:38,750 --> 00:13:43,020 have these various formulas you can use. 161 00:13:43,020 --> 00:13:45,770 You could use the first definition. 162 00:13:45,770 --> 00:13:48,150 Sometimes it may be the simplest. 163 00:13:48,150 --> 00:13:52,420 In particular, if the expectation value of Q 164 00:13:52,420 --> 00:13:56,190 is simple, it's the easiest way. 165 00:13:56,190 --> 00:14:00,344 So for example, you can have a Gaussian wave function, 166 00:14:00,344 --> 00:14:05,311 and people ask you, what is delta of x of the Gaussian wave 167 00:14:05,311 --> 00:14:05,810 function? 168 00:14:08,760 --> 00:14:11,980 Well, on this Gaussian wave function, 169 00:14:11,980 --> 00:14:14,060 you could say that delta x squared 170 00:14:14,060 --> 00:14:17,760 is the expectation value of x squared minus the expectation 171 00:14:17,760 --> 00:14:19,414 value of x squared. 172 00:14:22,080 --> 00:14:25,140 What is the expectation value of x? 173 00:14:25,140 --> 00:14:29,150 Well, it would seem reasonable that the expectation value of x 174 00:14:29,150 --> 00:14:29,833 is 0. 175 00:14:29,833 --> 00:14:32,560 It's a Gaussian centered at the origin. 176 00:14:32,560 --> 00:14:33,960 And it's true. 177 00:14:33,960 --> 00:14:38,015 For a Gaussian it would be 0, the expectation value of x. 178 00:14:38,015 --> 00:14:40,420 So this term is 0. 179 00:14:40,420 --> 00:14:43,140 You can also see 0 because of the integral. 180 00:14:43,140 --> 00:14:47,530 You're integrating x against psi squared. 181 00:14:47,530 --> 00:14:51,890 Psi squared is even, x is odd with respect 182 00:14:51,890 --> 00:14:54,880 to x going to minus x. 183 00:14:54,880 --> 00:14:57,686 So that integral is going to be 0. 184 00:14:57,686 --> 00:15:02,140 So in this case, the uncertainty is just 185 00:15:02,140 --> 00:15:04,920 the calculation of the expectation value of x squared, 186 00:15:04,920 --> 00:15:06,952 and that's easily done. 187 00:15:06,952 --> 00:15:10,600 It's a Gaussian integral. 188 00:15:10,600 --> 00:15:14,230 The other good thing about this is that 189 00:15:14,230 --> 00:15:17,033 even though we have not proven the uncertainty 190 00:15:17,033 --> 00:15:20,265 principle in all generality. 191 00:15:20,265 --> 00:15:22,740 We've only [? multivated ?] it. 192 00:15:22,740 --> 00:15:25,400 It's precise with this definition. 193 00:15:25,400 --> 00:15:29,940 So when you have the delta x, delta p 194 00:15:29,940 --> 00:15:34,570 is greater than or equal to h bar over 2, 195 00:15:34,570 --> 00:15:38,868 these things are computed with those definitions. 196 00:15:38,868 --> 00:15:42,000 And then it's precise. 197 00:15:42,000 --> 00:15:44,490 It's a mathematically rigorous result. 198 00:15:44,490 --> 00:15:46,800 It's not just hand waving. 199 00:15:46,800 --> 00:15:49,530 The hand waving is good. 200 00:15:49,530 --> 00:15:53,030 But the precise result is more powerful.