1 00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:00,950 PROFESSOR: Great. 2 00:00:00,950 --> 00:00:03,800 So I will begin with phase shifts 3 00:00:03,800 --> 00:00:09,920 and do the introduction of how to make sure we can really-- 4 00:00:09,920 --> 00:00:14,450 so this is the important part of this. 5 00:00:14,450 --> 00:00:18,050 Just like when we added the reflected and transmitted wave 6 00:00:18,050 --> 00:00:20,570 we could find the solution I'm going 7 00:00:20,570 --> 00:00:25,760 to try to explain why with this things 8 00:00:25,760 --> 00:00:27,740 we can find solutions in general. 9 00:00:30,360 --> 00:00:35,840 So this is the subject of partial waves, 10 00:00:35,840 --> 00:00:43,130 and it's a nice subject, a little technical. 11 00:00:43,130 --> 00:00:47,480 There might seem to be a lot of formulas here, 12 00:00:47,480 --> 00:00:54,590 but the ideas are relatively simple once one keeps in mind 13 00:00:54,590 --> 00:00:57,020 the one dimensional analogies. 14 00:00:57,020 --> 00:01:00,950 The one dimensional analogies are very valuable here, 15 00:01:00,950 --> 00:01:05,269 and we will emphasize them a lot. 16 00:01:05,269 --> 00:01:10,640 So we will discuss partial waves and face shifts. 17 00:01:32,540 --> 00:01:36,635 So it's time to simplify this matters a little bit. 18 00:01:40,310 --> 00:01:43,550 And to do that I will assume from now 19 00:01:43,550 --> 00:01:55,830 on that the potential is central so v of r is equal to v of r. 20 00:01:55,830 --> 00:02:00,330 That will simplify the azimuthal dependence. 21 00:02:00,330 --> 00:02:03,510 There will be no azimuthal dependencies. 22 00:02:03,510 --> 00:02:06,210 You see, the thing is spherical is symmetric, 23 00:02:06,210 --> 00:02:10,680 but still you're coming from a particular direction, the z. 24 00:02:10,680 --> 00:02:14,520 So you can expect now that the scatter wave depends 25 00:02:14,520 --> 00:02:18,540 on the angle of the particle with respect 26 00:02:18,540 --> 00:02:20,610 to z because it's spherically symmetrical. 27 00:02:20,610 --> 00:02:23,790 But it shouldn't depend on five, the angle five, 28 00:02:23,790 --> 00:02:27,160 should just depend on theta. 29 00:02:27,160 --> 00:02:34,710 So expect f of theta. 30 00:02:40,646 --> 00:02:45,430 Now, a free particle is something 31 00:02:45,430 --> 00:02:50,380 we all know how to solve, e to the ikx. 32 00:02:50,380 --> 00:02:55,390 Why do we bother with the free particle in so many ways? 33 00:02:55,390 --> 00:02:58,900 Because free particle is very important. 34 00:02:58,900 --> 00:03:01,810 Part of the solution is free particles. 35 00:03:01,810 --> 00:03:06,470 To some degree far away it is free particles as well. 36 00:03:06,470 --> 00:03:08,800 And we need to understand free particles 37 00:03:08,800 --> 00:03:11,540 in spherical coordinates. 38 00:03:11,540 --> 00:03:19,360 So it's something we've done in 805 and sometimes in 804, 39 00:03:19,360 --> 00:03:22,570 and we look at the radial equation which 40 00:03:22,570 --> 00:03:25,330 is associated to spherical coordinates 41 00:03:25,330 --> 00:03:26,770 for a free particle. 42 00:03:26,770 --> 00:03:33,400 So we'll consider free particle and we'd say, well, 43 00:03:33,400 --> 00:03:36,040 that's very simple but it's not all that 44 00:03:36,040 --> 00:03:39,250 simple in spherical coordinates, and you'd say, OK, 45 00:03:39,250 --> 00:03:41,530 if it's not simple, it's spherical coordinates, 46 00:03:41,530 --> 00:03:43,020 why do we bother? 47 00:03:43,020 --> 00:03:45,250 We bother because scattering is happening 48 00:03:45,250 --> 00:03:46,450 in spherical coordinates. 49 00:03:46,450 --> 00:03:51,040 So we can't escape having to do the free particle 50 00:03:51,040 --> 00:03:52,140 in spherical coordinates. 51 00:03:52,140 --> 00:03:54,670 It is something you have to do. 52 00:03:54,670 --> 00:03:57,550 So what are solutions in spherical coordinates? 53 00:03:57,550 --> 00:04:00,940 We'll have solution SI of r. 54 00:04:00,940 --> 00:04:03,280 Remember the language with coordinates 55 00:04:03,280 --> 00:04:11,710 was a U of r divided by r and of Ylm of omega. 56 00:04:11,710 --> 00:04:17,540 That was a typical solution, a single solution of the showing 57 00:04:17,540 --> 00:04:20,550 our equation will-- 58 00:04:20,550 --> 00:04:26,080 the U only depends on l, the m disappears, so this is r. 59 00:04:26,080 --> 00:04:30,250 This r's are r's without the vector because you're already 60 00:04:30,250 --> 00:04:35,150 talking about the radial equations, 61 00:04:35,150 --> 00:04:37,690 and depend on the energy and depend 62 00:04:37,690 --> 00:04:43,040 on the value of the l quantum number. 63 00:04:43,040 --> 00:04:44,920 So what is the Schrodinger equation? 64 00:04:44,920 --> 00:04:50,060 The radial equation is minus h squared over 2m, 65 00:04:50,060 --> 00:04:54,220 the second the r squared plus. 66 00:04:54,220 --> 00:05:00,660 h squared over 2m l times l plus 1 over r squared. 67 00:05:00,660 --> 00:05:04,750 Remember the potential centrifugal barrier 68 00:05:04,750 --> 00:05:08,950 in the effective potential, then you would have v of r here, 69 00:05:08,950 --> 00:05:13,960 but it's free particle, so v of r is equal to 0. 70 00:05:13,960 --> 00:05:20,305 So if nothing else, U of El of little r 71 00:05:20,305 --> 00:05:22,820 is equal to the energy, which is h 72 00:05:22,820 --> 00:05:29,290 squared k squared over 2m UEl. 73 00:05:29,290 --> 00:05:31,720 And that's a parliamentary session 74 00:05:31,720 --> 00:05:40,040 of the energy in terms of the k squared, like that. 75 00:05:43,090 --> 00:05:47,370 Well, there's lots of h squared, k squared, 76 00:05:47,370 --> 00:05:51,150 and 2m's, so we can get rid of them. 77 00:05:51,150 --> 00:05:53,310 Cancel the h squared over 2m. 78 00:05:53,310 --> 00:05:59,640 You get minus d second dr squared plus l times l 79 00:05:59,640 --> 00:06:03,270 plus 1 over r. 80 00:06:03,270 --> 00:06:10,170 UEl is equal to k squared UEl. 81 00:06:15,780 --> 00:06:17,130 It's a nice equation. 82 00:06:17,130 --> 00:06:19,860 It's the equation of the free particle 83 00:06:19,860 --> 00:06:23,770 in spherical coordinates. 84 00:06:23,770 --> 00:06:26,140 Now, this is like the Schrodinger equation. 85 00:06:30,080 --> 00:06:39,110 And I think when you look at that you could get puzzled 86 00:06:39,110 --> 00:06:43,280 whether or not the value of k squared or the energy 87 00:06:43,280 --> 00:06:48,020 might end up being quantized. 88 00:06:48,020 --> 00:06:50,420 With the Schrodinger equation many times 89 00:06:50,420 --> 00:06:55,170 quantized is the energy, but here it shouldn't happen. 90 00:06:55,170 --> 00:06:56,420 This is a free particle. 91 00:06:56,420 --> 00:06:59,040 All values of k should be allowed, 92 00:06:59,040 --> 00:07:01,970 so there should be no quantization. 93 00:07:01,970 --> 00:07:03,800 This is an r squared here. 94 00:07:09,680 --> 00:07:12,380 You can see one reason, at least analytically, 95 00:07:12,380 --> 00:07:17,750 that there is no quantization is that you can define 96 00:07:17,750 --> 00:07:23,360 a new variable row equal kr and then 97 00:07:23,360 --> 00:07:25,700 this whole differential equation becomes 98 00:07:25,700 --> 00:07:33,200 minus the second the row squared plus l times l 99 00:07:33,200 --> 00:07:37,030 plus 1 over row squared. 100 00:07:40,730 --> 00:07:43,180 Well, I can put the other number in there as well, 101 00:07:43,180 --> 00:07:44,120 or should I not? 102 00:07:44,120 --> 00:07:46,780 No, it's not done here. 103 00:07:46,780 --> 00:07:58,880 UEl is equal to UEl, and the k squared disappeared completely. 104 00:07:58,880 --> 00:08:02,120 That tells you that the case will kind of get quantized. 105 00:08:02,120 --> 00:08:05,340 If there is a solution of this differential equation 106 00:08:05,340 --> 00:08:09,500 it holds for all values of k. 107 00:08:09,500 --> 00:08:11,960 And these are going to be like plane waves, 108 00:08:11,960 --> 00:08:14,180 and maybe that's another reason you 109 00:08:14,180 --> 00:08:17,030 can think that k doesn't get quantized 110 00:08:17,030 --> 00:08:21,500 because these solutions are not normalizable anyway, 111 00:08:21,500 --> 00:08:25,160 so it shouldn't get quantized. 112 00:08:25,160 --> 00:08:34,049 So with this equation in here we get the two main solutions. 113 00:08:34,049 --> 00:08:36,630 The solutions of this differential equation 114 00:08:36,630 --> 00:08:41,299 are vessel functions, spherical vessel functions. 115 00:08:41,299 --> 00:08:50,940 UEl is equal to a constant Al times row times the vessel 116 00:08:50,940 --> 00:08:57,710 function lowercase j of row. 117 00:08:57,710 --> 00:08:59,840 There's a row times that function. 118 00:08:59,840 --> 00:09:03,350 That's the way it shows up. 119 00:09:03,350 --> 00:09:04,770 It's kind of interesting. 120 00:09:04,770 --> 00:09:09,440 It's because in fact you have to divide U by r, 121 00:09:09,440 --> 00:09:12,980 so that would mean dividing U by row, 122 00:09:12,980 --> 00:09:16,100 and it means that the radial function is just the vessel 123 00:09:16,100 --> 00:09:18,890 function without anything else. 124 00:09:18,890 --> 00:09:21,980 And then there's the other vessel function, 125 00:09:21,980 --> 00:09:30,790 the n of l a row times of n of l of row. 126 00:09:34,200 --> 00:09:39,110 So those are spherical vessel functions. 127 00:09:39,110 --> 00:09:41,250 As you're familiar from the notation 128 00:09:41,250 --> 00:09:44,490 that j is the one that this healthy at row 129 00:09:44,490 --> 00:09:49,020 equals 0 doesn't diverge the n is the solution 130 00:09:49,020 --> 00:09:52,440 that diverges at the origin. 131 00:09:52,440 --> 00:09:57,690 And both of them behave nicely far away. 132 00:09:57,690 --> 00:10:11,850 So Jl of x goes like 1 over x sine of x minus l pi over 2, 133 00:10:11,850 --> 00:10:17,250 and ADA l of x behaves like minus 1 134 00:10:17,250 --> 00:10:25,060 over x cosine of x minus l pi over 2. 135 00:10:25,060 --> 00:10:32,220 This is for x big, x much greater than 1, 136 00:10:32,220 --> 00:10:33,195 you have this behavior. 137 00:10:40,760 --> 00:10:45,610 So these are our solutions, and here is 138 00:10:45,610 --> 00:10:48,790 the thing that we have to do. 139 00:10:48,790 --> 00:10:56,520 We have to rewrite our solutions in terms of spherical waves 140 00:10:56,520 --> 00:11:01,020 because this was the spherical wave so we should even write 141 00:11:01,020 --> 00:11:04,060 this part as a spherical wave. 142 00:11:04,060 --> 00:11:08,160 And this is a very interesting and in some way 143 00:11:08,160 --> 00:11:15,840 strange representation of E to the ikz You have E to the ikz 144 00:11:15,840 --> 00:11:18,270 that you have an intuition for it 145 00:11:18,270 --> 00:11:20,710 as a plane wave in the z direction 146 00:11:20,710 --> 00:11:26,250 represent it as an infinite sum of incoming and outgoing 147 00:11:26,250 --> 00:11:27,610 spherical waves. 148 00:11:27,610 --> 00:11:28,860 That's what's going to happen. 149 00:11:36,290 --> 00:11:39,515 So this is the last thing we need do here. 150 00:11:48,820 --> 00:11:55,690 We have that e to the ikz is a plane wave solution, 151 00:11:55,690 --> 00:11:58,510 so it's a solution of a free particle, 152 00:11:58,510 --> 00:12:03,970 so I should be able to write the superpositions of the solutions 153 00:12:03,970 --> 00:12:06,460 that we have found. 154 00:12:06,460 --> 00:12:16,370 So it should be a superposition of solutions of this type. 155 00:12:16,370 --> 00:12:28,000 So it could be a sum of coefficients al times, 156 00:12:28,000 --> 00:12:37,700 well, alm you think of some a's times solutions. 157 00:12:37,700 --> 00:12:40,130 Remember, we're writing a full solution, 158 00:12:40,130 --> 00:12:44,140 so a full solution you divide by r. 159 00:12:44,140 --> 00:12:46,370 So you divide by this quantity. 160 00:12:46,370 --> 00:12:54,160 So you could have an alm Jl of row 161 00:12:54,160 --> 00:13:01,270 plus Blm ATA l of row times Ylm. 162 00:13:05,250 --> 00:13:08,240 So this should be a general solution, 163 00:13:08,240 --> 00:13:12,060 and that would be a sum over l's and m's of all 164 00:13:12,060 --> 00:13:14,130 those quantities. 165 00:13:14,130 --> 00:13:17,400 But that's a lot more than what you need. 166 00:13:17,400 --> 00:13:24,270 First, this does not diverge near r equals 0. 167 00:13:24,270 --> 00:13:30,460 It has no divergence anywhere and the ATAs or the n's, I 168 00:13:30,460 --> 00:13:35,530 think they're n such and not ATAs, the n's diverge for row 169 00:13:35,530 --> 00:13:36,360 equal to 0. 170 00:13:36,360 --> 00:13:42,600 So none of this are necessary, so I can erase those. 171 00:13:48,620 --> 00:13:50,600 l and m. 172 00:13:50,600 --> 00:13:51,920 But there is more. 173 00:13:51,920 --> 00:13:57,630 This function is invariant and there 174 00:13:57,630 --> 00:14:00,120 are some beautiful rotations. 175 00:14:00,120 --> 00:14:04,950 If you have your axis here, here's the z, 176 00:14:04,950 --> 00:14:08,130 and you have a point here and you rotate that the value of z 177 00:14:08,130 --> 00:14:09,090 doesn't change. 178 00:14:09,090 --> 00:14:13,210 It's independent of phi for a given theta, 179 00:14:13,210 --> 00:14:16,110 z just depends on r of cosine theta. 180 00:14:16,110 --> 00:14:20,860 So there's no phi dependence but all the Ylm's with m 181 00:14:20,860 --> 00:14:23,220 difference from 0 have phi dependent. 182 00:14:23,220 --> 00:14:26,040 So m cannot be here either. 183 00:14:26,040 --> 00:14:27,640 m must be 0. 184 00:14:27,640 --> 00:14:31,950 So you must be down to sum over l, 185 00:14:31,950 --> 00:14:41,450 al some coefficient, Jl of row, Yl0. 186 00:14:48,530 --> 00:14:53,960 And all of those would be perfectly good plane wave 187 00:14:53,960 --> 00:14:55,820 solutions. 188 00:14:55,820 --> 00:14:58,820 Whatever numbers you choose for the little al's, 189 00:14:58,820 --> 00:15:02,540 those are good solutions because we've build them 190 00:15:02,540 --> 00:15:06,770 by taking linear combinations of exact solutions 191 00:15:06,770 --> 00:15:08,960 of this equation. 192 00:15:08,960 --> 00:15:14,060 But to represent this quantity the al's 193 00:15:14,060 --> 00:15:17,160 must take particular values. 194 00:15:17,160 --> 00:15:18,770 So what is that formula? 195 00:15:18,770 --> 00:15:24,140 That formula is quite famous, and perhaps even you 196 00:15:24,140 --> 00:15:28,310 could discuss this in recitation. 197 00:15:28,310 --> 00:15:36,770 e to the ikz, which is e to the ikr cosine theta, 198 00:15:36,770 --> 00:15:40,490 is the sum 4 pi. 199 00:15:40,490 --> 00:15:43,070 Now you have to get all the constants right. 200 00:15:43,070 --> 00:15:46,700 Square root of 4 pi, sum from l equals 0 201 00:15:46,700 --> 00:15:52,430 to infinity, square root of 2l plus 1. 202 00:15:52,430 --> 00:15:56,070 Coefficients are pretty funny. 203 00:15:56,070 --> 00:15:59,500 They get worse very fast. 204 00:15:59,500 --> 00:16:10,780 Now you have of i to the I, i to the l, Yl0 of theta 205 00:16:10,780 --> 00:16:14,810 doesn't depend on phi, Jl of kr. 206 00:16:21,010 --> 00:16:22,880 This is the expansion that we need. 207 00:16:22,880 --> 00:16:26,470 There's no way we can make problems with this problem 208 00:16:26,470 --> 00:16:29,500 unless we have this expansion. 209 00:16:29,500 --> 00:16:34,240 But now if Y the intuition that I was telling you 210 00:16:34,240 --> 00:16:37,270 of these waves coming in and out, 211 00:16:37,270 --> 00:16:42,370 well, you have e to the ikz, you sum an infinite sum 212 00:16:42,370 --> 00:16:44,620 over partial waves. 213 00:16:44,620 --> 00:16:48,400 A partial wave is a different value of l. 214 00:16:48,400 --> 00:16:49,960 These are partial waves. 215 00:16:49,960 --> 00:16:54,730 As I was saying, any solution is a sum of partial waves 216 00:16:54,730 --> 00:16:56,530 is a sum over l. 217 00:16:56,530 --> 00:16:58,120 And where are the waves? 218 00:16:58,120 --> 00:17:10,569 Well, the Jl of kr far away is a sine, and the sine of x 219 00:17:10,569 --> 00:17:17,050 is an exponential ix minus e to the minus ix over 2. 220 00:17:17,050 --> 00:17:21,250 So here you have exponentials of e to the ikr 221 00:17:21,250 --> 00:17:24,849 and exponentials of e to the minus ikr, 222 00:17:24,849 --> 00:17:31,060 which are waves that are here like outgoing waves 223 00:17:31,060 --> 00:17:32,360 and incoming waves. 224 00:17:32,360 --> 00:17:38,080 So the E to the ikz's are sum of ingoing and outgoing spherical 225 00:17:38,080 --> 00:17:38,740 waves. 226 00:17:38,740 --> 00:17:42,790 And that's an intuition that we will exploit very clearly 227 00:17:42,790 --> 00:17:43,920 to solve this problem. 228 00:17:43,920 --> 00:17:47,580 So we will do that next.