1 00:00:01,040 --> 00:00:03,900 PROFESSOR: I'm going to write this e to the ikz 2 00:00:03,900 --> 00:00:09,770 somewhat differently so that you appreciate more what it is. 3 00:00:09,770 --> 00:00:17,600 So e to the ikz, I'll write it as square root of 4 pi over k. 4 00:00:20,420 --> 00:00:24,090 You say, where does that k come from? 5 00:00:24,090 --> 00:00:26,960 We'll see in a second. 6 00:00:26,960 --> 00:00:38,060 Sum over l, square root of 2l plus 1, i to the l, yl0, 7 00:00:38,060 --> 00:00:39,770 1 over 2i. 8 00:00:39,770 --> 00:00:43,790 Basically what I'm going to do is I'm expanding 9 00:00:43,790 --> 00:00:48,800 this jl function for large x. 10 00:00:48,800 --> 00:00:51,350 So I'm going to take this equation 11 00:00:51,350 --> 00:00:57,120 and I'm going to expand it so that the argument is large, 12 00:00:57,120 --> 00:00:58,880 which means r is large. 13 00:00:58,880 --> 00:01:02,630 I want to describe for you those waves that 14 00:01:02,630 --> 00:01:04,560 are really going on here. 15 00:01:04,560 --> 00:01:08,960 So since the argument is kr and you have a kr here, 16 00:01:08,960 --> 00:01:15,440 that's the origin of the k that I pulled out in here. 17 00:01:15,440 --> 00:01:23,900 And then you have e to the i kr minus l pi over 2 over r, 18 00:01:23,900 --> 00:01:34,510 minus e to the minus i kr minus l pi over 2 over r. 19 00:01:34,510 --> 00:01:42,110 And this is valid for r much bigger than a. 20 00:01:42,110 --> 00:01:46,190 It's an approximate thing, because we approximated 21 00:01:46,190 --> 00:01:47,450 the Bessel function. 22 00:01:47,450 --> 00:01:49,130 This is exact. 23 00:01:49,130 --> 00:01:56,360 This equation is exact for all r. 24 00:02:00,410 --> 00:02:04,460 But that equation, now, is not. 25 00:02:04,460 --> 00:02:08,570 That equation is showing you that you 26 00:02:08,570 --> 00:02:18,140 have here an outgoing wave because is e to the i kr times 27 00:02:18,140 --> 00:02:22,560 e to the minus i et, the energy terms time. 28 00:02:22,560 --> 00:02:24,450 So that's an outgoing wave. 29 00:02:24,450 --> 00:02:27,090 This is an ongoing wave. 30 00:02:27,090 --> 00:02:32,160 So this is ingoing and this is outgoing. 31 00:02:44,950 --> 00:02:46,840 So I'm going to say a couple of things 32 00:02:46,840 --> 00:02:51,100 about this that are going to play some role later. 33 00:02:51,100 --> 00:02:52,660 It's a series of comments. 34 00:02:55,420 --> 00:03:05,100 Because this is a particular expansion and due to the fact 35 00:03:05,100 --> 00:03:09,150 that this is a general expansion, 36 00:03:09,150 --> 00:03:14,310 you could say that this is an approximate solution 37 00:03:14,310 --> 00:03:18,070 of the Schrodinger equation far away. 38 00:03:18,070 --> 00:03:23,820 But in fact, each term, each value of l 39 00:03:23,820 --> 00:03:25,660 is an approximate solution. 40 00:03:25,660 --> 00:03:27,840 This is not an approximate solution 41 00:03:27,840 --> 00:03:32,130 because we added over many ls and somehow they 42 00:03:32,130 --> 00:03:34,840 helped to create an approximate solution. 43 00:03:34,840 --> 00:03:40,230 This is an approximate solution because each l 44 00:03:40,230 --> 00:03:44,280 is an approximate solution, because to get a solution, 45 00:03:44,280 --> 00:03:47,370 you could have said l is equal to 50, 46 00:03:47,370 --> 00:03:49,390 and that's all that I'm going to use, 47 00:03:49,390 --> 00:03:51,810 and that's an exact solution. 48 00:03:51,810 --> 00:03:54,240 And therefore when I look far away 49 00:03:54,240 --> 00:03:57,210 it will look like that with l equal 50, 50 00:03:57,210 --> 00:04:00,720 and that would be an approximate solution that can 51 00:04:00,720 --> 00:04:04,080 be extended to a full solution. 52 00:04:04,080 --> 00:04:11,380 So each l term here is actually independent. 53 00:04:11,380 --> 00:04:16,420 If you tell me a wave looks like that far away, I 54 00:04:16,420 --> 00:04:19,630 would say good, yes, that's possible 55 00:04:19,630 --> 00:04:21,940 and that comes from a solution. 56 00:04:21,940 --> 00:04:25,040 You're getting an approximate solution. 57 00:04:25,040 --> 00:04:28,360 And you could make it exact by turning the exponentials 58 00:04:28,360 --> 00:04:29,770 into Bessel functions. 59 00:04:32,410 --> 00:04:36,580 Even more, we will show-- 60 00:04:36,580 --> 00:04:39,820 we'll discuss it a little later-- 61 00:04:39,820 --> 00:04:44,440 I could get a solution that is approximate by considering 62 00:04:44,440 --> 00:04:47,260 either this wave or that wave. 63 00:04:50,290 --> 00:04:52,330 Suppose we just have the outgoing wave. 64 00:04:52,330 --> 00:04:54,490 The fact that the Schrodinger equation 65 00:04:54,490 --> 00:04:57,370 works for this one approximately doesn't 66 00:04:57,370 --> 00:05:01,360 require the ingoing wave. 67 00:05:01,360 --> 00:05:05,220 The Schrodinger equation doesn't mix, really, the ingoing waves 68 00:05:05,220 --> 00:05:06,840 and the outgoing waves. 69 00:05:06,840 --> 00:05:08,590 It keeps them separate. 70 00:05:08,590 --> 00:05:11,300 So this is an approximate solution 71 00:05:11,300 --> 00:05:15,840 and this is an approximate solution as well. 72 00:05:15,840 --> 00:05:20,380 Every term here, independently, every l and every ingoing 73 00:05:20,380 --> 00:05:26,880 and every outgoing wave is a good approximate solution 74 00:05:26,880 --> 00:05:29,250 of the Schrodinger equation. 75 00:05:29,250 --> 00:05:35,610 Now this is important to emphasize because this 76 00:05:35,610 --> 00:05:37,500 is called partial wave. 77 00:05:37,500 --> 00:05:54,330 So the term partial wave, waves, refers to the various l's 78 00:05:54,330 --> 00:05:59,560 that work independently. 79 00:06:07,960 --> 00:06:13,300 Now to motivate what we're going to do, 80 00:06:13,300 --> 00:06:17,020 I'm going to go back to the case of one dimension 81 00:06:17,020 --> 00:06:21,740 so that you need the map to orient yourself 82 00:06:21,740 --> 00:06:24,140 in the argument we're going to do now. 83 00:06:24,140 --> 00:06:27,580 So in order to understand partial waves 84 00:06:27,580 --> 00:06:32,200 and how they work, let's think about the one-dimensional case 85 00:06:32,200 --> 00:06:32,980 for a minute. 86 00:06:36,160 --> 00:06:38,650 I used to do that in 804. 87 00:06:38,650 --> 00:06:42,940 I don't know if that has been done by other instructors, 88 00:06:42,940 --> 00:06:47,210 but we've done in 804 that stuff. 89 00:06:47,210 --> 00:06:50,950 So let me tell you about it and how it works in that case. 90 00:06:50,950 --> 00:06:59,750 So this is an aside 1D case of scattering. 91 00:06:59,750 --> 00:07:01,970 So in scattering in one dimension, 92 00:07:01,970 --> 00:07:07,040 one usually puts a hard wall at x equals 0. 93 00:07:07,040 --> 00:07:15,046 There is some potential up to x equals a, 94 00:07:15,046 --> 00:07:17,930 and then there's nothing. 95 00:07:17,930 --> 00:07:22,400 It's a finite range potential. 96 00:07:22,400 --> 00:07:28,520 So even in the case of d equals 1, you look for a solution 97 00:07:28,520 --> 00:07:30,180 when there is no potential. 98 00:07:30,180 --> 00:07:33,080 This is the v of x. 99 00:07:33,080 --> 00:07:34,070 This is the x-axis. 100 00:07:37,040 --> 00:07:45,100 If v is equal to 0, you would have a solution. 101 00:07:45,100 --> 00:07:54,137 Phi of x would be a solution, energy eigenstate, 102 00:07:54,137 --> 00:07:58,170 and would be sine of kx. 103 00:08:01,140 --> 00:08:06,750 This is the analog of our e to the ikz, that we call it, 104 00:08:06,750 --> 00:08:08,790 phi of r. 105 00:08:08,790 --> 00:08:14,850 Here you have a phi of x, which is the sine of kx, 106 00:08:14,850 --> 00:08:16,680 and it's your energy eigenstate. 107 00:08:16,680 --> 00:08:19,500 That's the solution if v is equal to 0. 108 00:08:19,500 --> 00:08:24,060 If v is equal to 0, the wave must vanish at the hard wall, 109 00:08:24,060 --> 00:08:25,530 at x equals 0. 110 00:08:25,530 --> 00:08:28,720 So that's your solution. 111 00:08:28,720 --> 00:08:30,480 On the other hand-- 112 00:08:30,480 --> 00:08:41,190 or, well, we can also write it as 1 over 2i e to the ikx minus 113 00:08:41,190 --> 00:08:42,870 e to the minus ikx. 114 00:08:46,680 --> 00:08:52,550 And this wave is the incoming wave, 115 00:08:52,550 --> 00:08:54,600 and this is the outgoing wave. 116 00:08:57,330 --> 00:09:01,530 Very analogous to above, because this x 117 00:09:01,530 --> 00:09:07,050 is defined to be positive and plays the role of radius. 118 00:09:07,050 --> 00:09:12,690 In this problem, incoming means going down in x. 119 00:09:12,690 --> 00:09:17,550 Incoming in spherical dimensions means going down in r. 120 00:09:17,550 --> 00:09:21,120 So we're doing something very analogous. 121 00:09:21,120 --> 00:09:24,930 That's why the study of scattering in one dimension 122 00:09:24,930 --> 00:09:28,410 is a good preparation for the study of scattering 123 00:09:28,410 --> 00:09:29,580 in three dimensions. 124 00:09:32,890 --> 00:09:35,820 So you have an incoming wave and an outgoing wave, 125 00:09:35,820 --> 00:09:42,960 also because, again, there's an e to the minus iet over h bar. 126 00:09:42,960 --> 00:09:44,760 So here it is. 127 00:09:44,760 --> 00:09:50,460 What we try to do is to write a scattering solution 128 00:09:50,460 --> 00:09:52,730 corresponding to the same physics-- 129 00:09:52,730 --> 00:09:59,660 so the scattering solution, psi of x, is the full solution-- 130 00:10:03,070 --> 00:10:08,810 is going to have the same incoming wave 131 00:10:08,810 --> 00:10:12,080 because that's the physics that we're trying to understand. 132 00:10:17,200 --> 00:10:24,750 We put the same incoming wave and we try to see what happens. 133 00:10:24,750 --> 00:10:26,700 That's what do we do when we do scattering. 134 00:10:26,700 --> 00:10:32,000 So if we want to compare our solution to the case 135 00:10:32,000 --> 00:10:37,070 when v is equal to 0, we put the same incoming wave. 136 00:10:37,070 --> 00:10:41,720 But then solving the scattering problem 137 00:10:41,720 --> 00:10:49,760 means finding the outgoing wave, which now may be different. 138 00:10:49,760 --> 00:10:53,700 Because, sadly, when you have a potential, 139 00:10:53,700 --> 00:10:57,800 you have something in, that you have control what you send in, 140 00:10:57,800 --> 00:11:00,380 but you have no control what comes out. 141 00:11:00,380 --> 00:11:03,560 That's solving the scattering problem. 142 00:11:03,560 --> 00:11:07,070 So the thing that you have here must 143 00:11:07,070 --> 00:11:17,490 be an outgoing wave, e to the ikx, with the same energy 144 00:11:17,490 --> 00:11:19,320 because energy is conserved. 145 00:11:19,320 --> 00:11:22,830 We're talking about an energy eigenstate anyway, 146 00:11:22,830 --> 00:11:26,990 so it must have the same energy, and it 147 00:11:26,990 --> 00:11:31,760 must have the same probability flux as the incoming wave. 148 00:11:31,760 --> 00:11:35,630 So the magnitude of this wave and the magnitude of this wave 149 00:11:35,630 --> 00:11:36,600 must be the same. 150 00:11:39,950 --> 00:11:43,100 It almost seems that you'd have to write the same thing that I 151 00:11:43,100 --> 00:11:44,840 wrote here, but no. 152 00:11:44,840 --> 00:11:48,830 I can add one more little factor. 153 00:11:48,830 --> 00:11:56,210 It's conventionally written as 2i delta of k. 154 00:11:56,210 --> 00:12:04,760 A phase shift, delta of k, an extra phase, and that's 155 00:12:04,760 --> 00:12:05,390 the claim. 156 00:12:05,390 --> 00:12:08,630 That's the whole thing. 157 00:12:08,630 --> 00:12:11,330 You have to solve what's going on here. 158 00:12:11,330 --> 00:12:19,190 But outside-- and this is only valid for x greater than a-- 159 00:12:19,190 --> 00:12:23,570 outside, where the potential is zero, 160 00:12:23,570 --> 00:12:26,960 you must have the solution is of this form. 161 00:12:29,550 --> 00:12:33,980 Here, this is for 0 potential everywhere. 162 00:12:33,980 --> 00:12:37,170 So this was valid everywhere, but in particular is also 163 00:12:37,170 --> 00:12:39,960 valid for x greater than a, and here we 164 00:12:39,960 --> 00:12:41,310 compare these two things. 165 00:12:45,810 --> 00:12:50,030 So this is the general solution for scattering here. 166 00:12:50,030 --> 00:12:56,180 And now we can also add another definition. 167 00:12:56,180 --> 00:12:59,720 We can say that psi of x is going 168 00:12:59,720 --> 00:13:05,600 to be equal to phi of x plus the scattered wave. 169 00:13:08,150 --> 00:13:14,360 Our intuition is that this wave here 170 00:13:14,360 --> 00:13:22,280 has the same incoming component as the reference wave, 171 00:13:22,280 --> 00:13:26,450 but nevertheless, it has the different outgoing component 172 00:13:26,450 --> 00:13:29,570 and that's the scattered wave. 173 00:13:29,570 --> 00:13:35,840 It is exactly analogous to what we did here, 174 00:13:35,840 --> 00:13:41,750 in which we have the total wave being a reference 175 00:13:41,750 --> 00:13:45,000 incoming wave. 176 00:13:45,000 --> 00:13:48,710 Well, actually, incoming and outgoing wave. 177 00:13:48,710 --> 00:13:53,360 The e to the ikz has incoming and outgoing wave 178 00:13:53,360 --> 00:13:57,740 and needs a solution when the potential is equal to 0, 179 00:13:57,740 --> 00:14:01,160 just like this one, this phi. 180 00:14:01,160 --> 00:14:06,020 So psi is equal to 5 plus scattering wave. 181 00:14:06,020 --> 00:14:08,750 Here it is the scattering wave. 182 00:14:08,750 --> 00:14:16,010 It's purely outgoing, because the incoming part is already 183 00:14:16,010 --> 00:14:17,420 taken care of. 184 00:14:20,370 --> 00:14:22,770 So completely analogous thing. 185 00:14:22,770 --> 00:14:27,940 So let's solve for the scattered wave here. 186 00:14:27,940 --> 00:14:28,980 The scatter wave. 187 00:14:31,650 --> 00:14:36,120 So in this equation, we have 1 over 2i, 188 00:14:36,120 --> 00:14:46,620 e to the ikx plus 2i delta k, minus e to the minus ikx 189 00:14:46,620 --> 00:14:55,980 is equal to 1 over 21, e to the ikx minus e to the minus ikx 190 00:14:55,980 --> 00:15:00,220 plus psi s of x. 191 00:15:00,220 --> 00:15:02,820 Well, these two terms cancel. 192 00:15:02,820 --> 00:15:08,140 It is the fact that they are ingoing waves are the same. 193 00:15:08,140 --> 00:15:11,840 And then I can subtract this other two 194 00:15:11,840 --> 00:15:19,290 to find psi s is equal to 1 over 2i. 195 00:15:19,290 --> 00:15:22,740 I can factor the e to the ikx. 196 00:15:22,740 --> 00:15:26,580 That tells me it's an outgoing wave. 197 00:15:26,580 --> 00:15:33,030 And then I have e to the 2i delta k minus 1. 198 00:15:36,320 --> 00:15:37,370 That's a term there. 199 00:15:37,370 --> 00:15:40,990 I think I got everything there. 200 00:15:40,990 --> 00:15:43,790 It's written-- I'll write it here, 201 00:15:43,790 --> 00:15:45,980 there's a little bit of space-- 202 00:15:45,980 --> 00:16:03,790 psi s as e to the ikx, e to the i delta k, sine of delta k. 203 00:16:07,420 --> 00:16:15,190 I factor out 1 times i delta k, so this becomes 204 00:16:15,190 --> 00:16:20,740 e to the i delta k minus e to the minus i delta k, the form 205 00:16:20,740 --> 00:16:26,410 together with a 2i in front, a sign of delta k. 206 00:16:26,410 --> 00:16:32,920 So this is your outgoing scattered wave. 207 00:16:32,920 --> 00:16:37,030 That's the shape of the outgoing scattered wave 208 00:16:37,030 --> 00:16:39,460 in terms of the phase shift. 209 00:16:42,530 --> 00:16:48,610 OK, so now we have to redo this in the slightly more 210 00:16:48,610 --> 00:16:52,900 complicated case of three dimensions and get it right. 211 00:16:52,900 --> 00:16:54,250 So that is our task. 212 00:16:54,250 --> 00:16:58,040 That's what we have to figure out how to do.