1 00:00:00,870 --> 00:00:02,490 PROFESSOR: So, adiabatic results. 2 00:00:02,490 --> 00:00:07,380 So last time we just followed and tried 3 00:00:07,380 --> 00:00:10,560 to use an instantaneous eigenstate 4 00:00:10,560 --> 00:00:13,890 to construct the solution of the Schrodinger equation. 5 00:00:13,890 --> 00:00:16,140 Our result was that we couldn't quite 6 00:00:16,140 --> 00:00:19,510 construct the solution of the Schrodinger equation. 7 00:00:19,510 --> 00:00:24,210 What we wrote didn't exactly solve the Schrodinger equation. 8 00:00:24,210 --> 00:00:28,320 But we claimed that it was important and interesting. 9 00:00:28,320 --> 00:00:32,250 And therefore let me remind you of what we said. 10 00:00:32,250 --> 00:00:39,990 So we showed that the wave function, psi of t, 11 00:00:39,990 --> 00:00:48,720 could be written as a constant here, e to the i theta of t, e 12 00:00:48,720 --> 00:00:57,170 to the i gamma of t times this wave function. 13 00:00:57,170 --> 00:01:01,540 And that wave function here was what 14 00:01:01,540 --> 00:01:06,460 we called an instantaneous eigenstate of the Hamiltonian. 15 00:01:06,460 --> 00:01:19,036 So H of t acting on psi of t was, at any instant of time, 16 00:01:19,036 --> 00:01:20,310 an eigenstate. 17 00:01:24,190 --> 00:01:27,750 Nevertheless, we said that these eigenstates are not 18 00:01:27,750 --> 00:01:30,600 solutions of the Schrodinger equation in general. 19 00:01:30,600 --> 00:01:37,500 They solve this funny time-- 20 00:01:37,500 --> 00:01:41,880 inspired by the time-independent Schrodinger equation, 21 00:01:41,880 --> 00:01:44,400 this instantaneous eigenstate condition. 22 00:01:44,400 --> 00:01:48,030 But when you try to solve the Schrodinger equation, 23 00:01:48,030 --> 00:01:50,950 this psi of t would not solve it. 24 00:01:50,950 --> 00:01:53,490 So we tried to add things, and we 25 00:01:53,490 --> 00:01:57,780 constructed what seemed to be close to a solution. 26 00:01:57,780 --> 00:02:00,420 And there it is. 27 00:02:00,420 --> 00:02:03,850 What was theta of t? 28 00:02:03,850 --> 00:02:07,190 It was a dynamical phase, it's called, 29 00:02:07,190 --> 00:02:14,560 and is defined by this integral. 30 00:02:14,560 --> 00:02:21,580 If E of t was a constant, it would be a minus E times t 31 00:02:21,580 --> 00:02:23,420 over H bar. 32 00:02:23,420 --> 00:02:26,410 And this would be the familiar phase with which 33 00:02:26,410 --> 00:02:29,620 you evolve energy eigenstates. 34 00:02:29,620 --> 00:02:34,260 The second term, this gamma of t, was a little more intricate. 35 00:02:34,260 --> 00:02:36,980 We define an intermediate thing called 36 00:02:36,980 --> 00:02:43,720 nu of t, which was i times the inner product 37 00:02:43,720 --> 00:02:47,980 of the instantaneous eigenstate with the derivative 38 00:02:47,980 --> 00:02:51,790 with respect to time of the instantaneous eigenstate. 39 00:02:51,790 --> 00:02:56,920 We argued that this factor over here was imaginary. 40 00:02:56,920 --> 00:03:01,600 Therefore we put an i so that nu is real. 41 00:03:01,600 --> 00:03:05,680 And the gamma of t-- so these were definitions. 42 00:03:05,680 --> 00:03:11,170 It's defined as 0 to t dt prime nu of t prime. 43 00:03:17,230 --> 00:03:18,850 OK. 44 00:03:18,850 --> 00:03:25,620 So the claim was that if you happen 45 00:03:25,620 --> 00:03:31,350 to have a wave function that, at time equals 0, 46 00:03:31,350 --> 00:03:35,190 it's in one of those instantaneous eigenstates, 47 00:03:35,190 --> 00:03:40,980 it would remain in such instantaneous eigenstate up 48 00:03:40,980 --> 00:03:45,421 to phases that are calculable. 49 00:03:45,421 --> 00:03:45,920 OK. 50 00:03:45,920 --> 00:03:51,580 So let's make this a little more explicit, 51 00:03:51,580 --> 00:03:54,740 in the sense of an adiabatic theorem. 52 00:03:54,740 --> 00:04:02,280 So I'll also put here that this is not an exact solution. 53 00:04:02,280 --> 00:04:05,920 So I would say the wave function at time t 54 00:04:05,920 --> 00:04:08,470 is roughly given by that quantity. 55 00:04:08,470 --> 00:04:12,310 It's not exactly, because it's not an exact solution 56 00:04:12,310 --> 00:04:14,450 of the Schrodinger equation. 57 00:04:14,450 --> 00:04:18,310 So if we want to state the adiabatic theorem a little more 58 00:04:18,310 --> 00:04:27,340 precisely, we consider a set of instantaneous eigenstates. 59 00:04:27,340 --> 00:04:32,065 Instantaneous eigenstates. 60 00:04:35,420 --> 00:04:47,903 And that is H of t psi n of t equal E n of t psi n of t. 61 00:04:52,340 --> 00:04:58,700 And here n will go from 1 up to possibly infinity. 62 00:04:58,700 --> 00:05:00,980 It just doesn't have to stop. 63 00:05:00,980 --> 00:05:04,340 It can go on forever. 64 00:05:04,340 --> 00:05:04,840 OK. 65 00:05:04,840 --> 00:05:07,170 Equipped with the instantaneous eigenstates, 66 00:05:07,170 --> 00:05:10,500 you might decide that you initially 67 00:05:10,500 --> 00:05:12,990 want to be in a state. 68 00:05:12,990 --> 00:05:24,090 So psi at t equals 0 is given by psi K at 0. 69 00:05:24,090 --> 00:05:27,040 That's your initial condition. 70 00:05:27,040 --> 00:05:29,140 Now, you look at this and say, OK, 71 00:05:29,140 --> 00:05:32,340 when is the adiabatic result that you're 72 00:05:32,340 --> 00:05:35,450 going to stay roughly in that energy eigenstate going 73 00:05:35,450 --> 00:05:36,810 to be true? 74 00:05:36,810 --> 00:05:44,640 This is going to require that, as you have the energy E 75 00:05:44,640 --> 00:05:50,240 K as a function of time-- 76 00:05:50,240 --> 00:05:54,730 here is the energy E K as a function of time. 77 00:05:54,730 --> 00:05:56,541 0. 78 00:05:56,541 --> 00:05:57,600 So I'll write it here. 79 00:06:00,110 --> 00:06:03,500 You should have that this doesn't get mixed, 80 00:06:03,500 --> 00:06:07,070 or doesn't coincide, with some other energy, 81 00:06:07,070 --> 00:06:10,430 like something like that, the crossing, 82 00:06:10,430 --> 00:06:13,610 or that they touch with another one. 83 00:06:13,610 --> 00:06:15,710 You should keep them separate. 84 00:06:15,710 --> 00:06:18,020 You know that the general perturbation 85 00:06:18,020 --> 00:06:20,610 theory makes life complicated. 86 00:06:20,610 --> 00:06:25,080 And if you find another state that gets very close, 87 00:06:25,080 --> 00:06:28,400 the adiabatic theorem or the adiabatic approximation 88 00:06:28,400 --> 00:06:29,490 might go wrong. 89 00:06:29,490 --> 00:06:32,640 So we want other energy eigenstates. 90 00:06:32,640 --> 00:06:40,790 Here is E K minus 1, and here is E K plus 1. 91 00:06:40,790 --> 00:06:45,590 So you have all these energy eigenvalues 92 00:06:45,590 --> 00:06:47,390 as a function of time. 93 00:06:47,390 --> 00:06:51,480 And you want that, for example, E K-- 94 00:06:51,480 --> 00:06:56,300 you order all your energies, and you want that E K of t 95 00:06:56,300 --> 00:06:59,690 is definitely less than E K plus 1 96 00:06:59,690 --> 00:07:04,860 of t, which is less than or equal to the other ones. 97 00:07:04,860 --> 00:07:08,660 And this is definitely greater than E K minus 1 98 00:07:08,660 --> 00:07:12,690 of t, which is greater or equal than the other one. 99 00:07:12,690 --> 00:07:16,700 So the instantaneous energy eigenstates 100 00:07:16,700 --> 00:07:20,870 that you are focused in should be well separated 101 00:07:20,870 --> 00:07:21,950 from the other ones. 102 00:07:21,950 --> 00:07:24,530 Otherwise you could run into difficulties. 103 00:07:24,530 --> 00:07:31,710 So that's definitely necessary for this to hold. 104 00:07:31,710 --> 00:07:37,530 Then the adiabatic theorem says that psi of t 105 00:07:37,530 --> 00:07:43,450 will be approximately equal to e to the i theta 106 00:07:43,450 --> 00:07:52,780 K of t, e to the i gamma K of t times psi K of t. 107 00:07:55,550 --> 00:07:58,240 So I'm keeping a little difference of notation, 108 00:07:58,240 --> 00:08:00,200 trying to be careful. 109 00:08:00,200 --> 00:08:06,310 These wave functions, at all times, I put them with a line 110 00:08:06,310 --> 00:08:08,020 below the psi. 111 00:08:08,020 --> 00:08:12,070 And these instantaneous energy eigenstates, I don't put that. 112 00:08:12,070 --> 00:08:17,470 So a little difference that should help you determine this. 113 00:08:17,470 --> 00:08:21,400 Now, what are these theta K or gamma K? 114 00:08:21,400 --> 00:08:25,360 Are just the same quantities. 115 00:08:25,360 --> 00:08:28,240 I might as well write them for completeness. 116 00:08:28,240 --> 00:08:31,600 Theta K of t is what you had before. 117 00:08:31,600 --> 00:08:34,960 Minus 1 over H bar 0 to t. 118 00:08:34,960 --> 00:08:40,630 But this time E K of the t prime. 119 00:08:40,630 --> 00:08:43,990 Then you have nu of t. 120 00:08:43,990 --> 00:08:54,610 Nu K is equal to i psi K of t psi K dot of t. 121 00:08:54,610 --> 00:09:01,150 And finally the gamma K of t is the integral from 0 122 00:09:01,150 --> 00:09:09,670 to t of nu of t prime dt prime K. Everything with K, 123 00:09:09,670 --> 00:09:13,000 corresponding to the Kth eigenstate. 124 00:09:13,000 --> 00:09:16,240 So this is a more precise version 125 00:09:16,240 --> 00:09:25,120 already of the statement of the adiabatic approximation. 126 00:09:25,120 --> 00:09:29,890 You want to make it even more precise? 127 00:09:29,890 --> 00:09:35,680 We'll say something about the error in this formula. 128 00:09:35,680 --> 00:09:40,630 In a sense, the hard work in the adiabatic approximation 129 00:09:40,630 --> 00:09:44,530 is telling you how much error there is. 130 00:09:44,530 --> 00:09:49,400 So we will not go through proof of the error. 131 00:09:49,400 --> 00:09:51,910 We'll just motivate it. 132 00:09:51,910 --> 00:09:54,970 And perhaps this will be discussed in recitation. 133 00:09:54,970 --> 00:09:59,200 It's an interesting subject, and goes back 134 00:09:59,200 --> 00:10:03,430 to work of Born, Max Born, the one that 135 00:10:03,430 --> 00:10:06,040 gave the probabilistic interpretation of quantum 136 00:10:06,040 --> 00:10:10,210 mechanics, and Fock, of Fock space states 137 00:10:10,210 --> 00:10:12,730 of the harmonic oscillator. 138 00:10:12,730 --> 00:10:14,890 They did the first work doing that. 139 00:10:14,890 --> 00:10:19,740 Then a Japanese fellow, Kato, in the middle '50s-- 140 00:10:19,740 --> 00:10:23,530 so Born and Fock was 1928, I believe. 141 00:10:23,530 --> 00:10:28,180 And in the '50s, Kato improved the analysis 142 00:10:28,180 --> 00:10:29,970 of the adiabatic theorem. 143 00:10:29,970 --> 00:10:35,890 And this whole thing has many applications 144 00:10:35,890 --> 00:10:41,560 to the theory of molecules and spin states and systems. 145 00:10:41,560 --> 00:10:46,190 We will begin to see some of this today. 146 00:10:46,190 --> 00:10:52,420 And had the big revival with the discovery of Berry 147 00:10:52,420 --> 00:10:58,840 that there's quite a lot of physics in this phase. 148 00:10:58,840 --> 00:11:01,330 This phase here-- this is a normal phase 149 00:11:01,330 --> 00:11:04,100 that you know for energy eigenstates, 150 00:11:04,100 --> 00:11:05,560 slightly generalized. 151 00:11:05,560 --> 00:11:07,820 But this phase is very different. 152 00:11:07,820 --> 00:11:12,200 And that's what Barry elaborated and explained 153 00:11:12,200 --> 00:11:16,360 and showed that it could be observable in some cases. 154 00:11:16,360 --> 00:11:19,420 And it was a pretty nice discovery. 155 00:11:19,420 --> 00:11:24,640 So basically, the adiabatic statement here 156 00:11:24,640 --> 00:11:29,790 says that you don't jump to another instantaneous energy 157 00:11:29,790 --> 00:11:34,030 eigenstate, you remain in that instantaneous energy 158 00:11:34,030 --> 00:11:34,810 eigenstate. 159 00:11:39,460 --> 00:11:40,530 OK. 160 00:11:40,530 --> 00:11:45,240 Another thing that is important is that sometimes you say, 161 00:11:45,240 --> 00:11:47,880 well, these are phases. 162 00:11:47,880 --> 00:11:50,940 When you have states, the phases are 163 00:11:50,940 --> 00:11:54,120 unobservable over all phases of a state. 164 00:11:54,120 --> 00:11:56,650 You calculate the state after a while. 165 00:11:56,650 --> 00:11:57,480 It has a phase. 166 00:11:57,480 --> 00:12:00,180 Well, that phase of your physical state 167 00:12:00,180 --> 00:12:03,360 doesn't make any difference. 168 00:12:03,360 --> 00:12:04,500 Well, that's true. 169 00:12:04,500 --> 00:12:07,950 The overall phase of a state doesn't make any difference. 170 00:12:07,950 --> 00:12:13,650 But if you have a system that is in a superposition of two 171 00:12:13,650 --> 00:12:16,470 quantum states, one corresponding 172 00:12:16,470 --> 00:12:19,980 to one instantaneous energy eigenstate and one 173 00:12:19,980 --> 00:12:21,880 corresponding to another-- 174 00:12:21,880 --> 00:12:29,160 so there's psi equal to psi 1 and psi 2, one for each-- 175 00:12:29,160 --> 00:12:32,080 psi 1, by the linearity of quantum mechanics, 176 00:12:32,080 --> 00:12:35,160 is going to develop its own phase. 177 00:12:35,160 --> 00:12:38,260 Psi 2 is going to develop its own phase. 178 00:12:38,260 --> 00:12:42,840 And now the relative phase is observable. 179 00:12:42,840 --> 00:12:44,870 When you have a superposition of states, 180 00:12:44,870 --> 00:12:47,940 the relative phase is observable. 181 00:12:47,940 --> 00:12:53,070 And therefore, if the two states evolve with different phases, 182 00:12:53,070 --> 00:12:56,100 you can have observable consequences. 183 00:12:56,100 --> 00:12:59,500 So there is something that can happen here, 184 00:12:59,500 --> 00:13:02,540 and something that can be measured.