1 00:00:00,500 --> 00:00:04,260 PROFESSOR: We're going to complete our study of WKB 2 00:00:04,260 --> 00:00:06,270 today. 3 00:00:06,270 --> 00:00:10,140 There's a lot of important things we haven't said yet. 4 00:00:10,140 --> 00:00:13,410 And in particular, we have not explained 5 00:00:13,410 --> 00:00:18,480 how it all works, really, in the sense of the connection 6 00:00:18,480 --> 00:00:19,890 formulas. 7 00:00:19,890 --> 00:00:24,490 That's the most non-trivial part of the WKB story. 8 00:00:24,490 --> 00:00:29,940 And in some ways it's some of the most interesting things 9 00:00:29,940 --> 00:00:32,220 that you have to learn from this. 10 00:00:32,220 --> 00:00:37,020 It's an opportunity to learn something about differential 11 00:00:37,020 --> 00:00:41,580 equation, Fourier transforms, and the limits 12 00:00:41,580 --> 00:00:43,875 of the quantities you can really compute. 13 00:00:46,650 --> 00:00:54,150 So we will begin our discussion with some reconsideration 14 00:00:54,150 --> 00:00:56,790 of these Airy functions. 15 00:00:56,790 --> 00:01:00,330 You've started to hear about, probably 16 00:01:00,330 --> 00:01:04,019 some in the homework, some in recitation. 17 00:01:04,019 --> 00:01:17,500 So this relates to this person, George Biddle 18 00:01:17,500 --> 00:01:24,970 Airy from the Airy functions, who 19 00:01:24,970 --> 00:01:32,780 lived in England for 90 years. 20 00:01:32,780 --> 00:01:37,720 He was the seventh Royal Astronomer. 21 00:01:37,720 --> 00:01:44,930 And he was an astronomer from 1835 to 1881. 22 00:01:44,930 --> 00:01:49,520 Was located, his work area, in Greenwich. 23 00:01:49,520 --> 00:01:51,415 It's a little bit outside of London. 24 00:01:54,000 --> 00:01:57,860 And that's where astronomers were working hard 25 00:01:57,860 --> 00:02:02,210 to establish all the data associated with the Prime 26 00:02:02,210 --> 00:02:04,490 Meridian. 27 00:02:04,490 --> 00:02:09,050 France also tried to make the their own meridian the most 28 00:02:09,050 --> 00:02:09,850 important one. 29 00:02:09,850 --> 00:02:11,660 But at the end of the day, it all 30 00:02:11,660 --> 00:02:14,630 depended of which astronomers did 31 00:02:14,630 --> 00:02:20,780 the most work in measuring precise, accurate determination 32 00:02:20,780 --> 00:02:25,400 of times, motion of the moon, Jupiter's satellites, 33 00:02:25,400 --> 00:02:28,570 all kinds of things that were pretty important at that time, 34 00:02:28,570 --> 00:02:31,130 especially also the manufacturing 35 00:02:31,130 --> 00:02:35,150 of good telescopes and good clocks. 36 00:02:35,150 --> 00:02:40,550 So Mr. Airy also worked in optics. 37 00:02:40,550 --> 00:02:44,630 And that's where he discovered these functions we're studying. 38 00:02:44,630 --> 00:02:51,170 And they're very relevant to the WKB approximation. 39 00:02:51,170 --> 00:02:55,550 So let me remind you a little of what you've 40 00:02:55,550 --> 00:02:59,570 been considering in the homework and extend some of those ideas 41 00:02:59,570 --> 00:03:02,180 as well. 42 00:03:02,180 --> 00:03:10,260 So you considered a differential equation, d 2nd PSI du 43 00:03:10,260 --> 00:03:12,900 squared equal u PSI. 44 00:03:16,500 --> 00:03:19,540 Pretty innocent looking differential equation. 45 00:03:19,540 --> 00:03:22,890 I'm always surprised how a differential equation that 46 00:03:22,890 --> 00:03:27,250 looks so simple can be so intricate. 47 00:03:27,250 --> 00:03:29,280 But anyway, it is. 48 00:03:29,280 --> 00:03:32,310 And that's the Airy equation. 49 00:03:32,310 --> 00:03:40,390 And it shows up for this problem that you have, for example, 50 00:03:40,390 --> 00:03:44,400 an infinite wall and a potential goes up like that. 51 00:03:44,400 --> 00:03:48,060 The bound states are controlled by solutions of this equation 52 00:03:48,060 --> 00:03:49,270 at the end of the day. 53 00:03:49,270 --> 00:03:55,770 This is after you clean up all the units and do all the work. 54 00:03:55,770 --> 00:03:59,040 But it shows in other places as well. 55 00:03:59,040 --> 00:04:06,600 And you probably found already that this PSI function, PSI 56 00:04:06,600 --> 00:04:12,180 of u, is given as a constant times an integral that 57 00:04:12,180 --> 00:04:16,320 came from Fourier transformations of e 58 00:04:16,320 --> 00:04:21,959 to the ik cubed over 3 e to the iku. 59 00:04:27,290 --> 00:04:30,190 And so this is our integral. 60 00:04:30,190 --> 00:04:35,080 This is our solution of this equation. 61 00:04:35,080 --> 00:04:37,450 And the nice thing is that this integral tells you 62 00:04:37,450 --> 00:04:40,030 a lot about the function. 63 00:04:40,030 --> 00:04:43,230 It's a perfectly nice definition of the function. 64 00:04:46,270 --> 00:04:48,730 You may have noticed, and I think 65 00:04:48,730 --> 00:04:51,280 it was discussed to some degree in recitation 66 00:04:51,280 --> 00:04:58,450 as well, that the Fourier transform converts 67 00:04:58,450 --> 00:05:02,080 this equation to first order differential equation. 68 00:05:02,080 --> 00:05:06,190 Because this becomes p squared times PSI. 69 00:05:06,190 --> 00:05:09,610 Well, you know from Schrodinger equations 70 00:05:09,610 --> 00:05:15,290 this part of the differential equation comes from p squared. 71 00:05:15,290 --> 00:05:17,980 On the other hand, multiplication by x 72 00:05:17,980 --> 00:05:23,050 is the same as dvp in Fourier space. 73 00:05:23,050 --> 00:05:26,830 Therefore, you get the dvp of PSI equal p 74 00:05:26,830 --> 00:05:29,840 squared PSI equation. 75 00:05:29,840 --> 00:05:34,690 And that equation is a first order differential equation. 76 00:05:34,690 --> 00:05:39,100 First order differential equations have one solution. 77 00:05:39,100 --> 00:05:44,880 So you would say, OK, I tried to do this by Fourier transform, 78 00:05:44,880 --> 00:05:47,290 and I'm getting just half of the solutions. 79 00:05:47,290 --> 00:05:50,560 And that's true. 80 00:05:50,560 --> 00:05:55,300 The reason is that the other solution of this differential 81 00:05:55,300 --> 00:05:58,720 equation doesn't quite have a Fourier transform, 82 00:05:58,720 --> 00:06:02,170 so it's a little more difficult to get at. 83 00:06:02,170 --> 00:06:09,160 But once you think of this integral, 84 00:06:09,160 --> 00:06:12,850 it is kind of useful to try to be a little more general 85 00:06:12,850 --> 00:06:17,001 and think of it in terms of the complex plane, the complex k 86 00:06:17,001 --> 00:06:17,500 plane. 87 00:06:20,300 --> 00:06:21,760 So here is the k plane. 88 00:06:24,340 --> 00:06:31,040 And this integral is over k from minus infinity to infinity. 89 00:06:31,040 --> 00:06:36,190 So this is the standard countour of integration. 90 00:06:40,110 --> 00:06:42,110 We can call it the countour c1. 91 00:06:45,240 --> 00:06:47,610 When you're doing this integral, and you're 92 00:06:47,610 --> 00:06:49,350 doing this in the complex plane you 93 00:06:49,350 --> 00:06:58,810 may want to consider that if you go off the real line, 94 00:06:58,810 --> 00:07:02,200 maybe things are even better. 95 00:07:02,200 --> 00:07:05,530 In particular, as you're integrating 96 00:07:05,530 --> 00:07:09,310 u is a fixed number, it's a fixed coordinate. 97 00:07:09,310 --> 00:07:11,650 We usually think of u as real, but we could 98 00:07:11,650 --> 00:07:14,500 think of u as complex as well. 99 00:07:14,500 --> 00:07:19,000 And this integral has these factories. 100 00:07:19,000 --> 00:07:23,260 It's an oscillatory factor that becomes faster and faster 101 00:07:23,260 --> 00:07:26,320 oscillating in time. 102 00:07:26,320 --> 00:07:32,050 But the magnitude of the integrand is 1 at every place. 103 00:07:32,050 --> 00:07:35,740 It oscillates very fast, but the magnitude is 1. 104 00:07:35,740 --> 00:07:39,750 Not the best situation possible. 105 00:07:39,750 --> 00:07:40,510 You know? 106 00:07:40,510 --> 00:07:42,520 When you're doing an integral, you 107 00:07:42,520 --> 00:07:46,180 have the feeling that eventually you 108 00:07:46,180 --> 00:07:49,720 get 0 because it's oscillating so fast. 109 00:07:49,720 --> 00:07:54,970 But it would be nicer if you had a decay. 110 00:07:54,970 --> 00:08:00,610 So for that, consider that this function 111 00:08:00,610 --> 00:08:15,610 would be k if k, if the imaginary part of k cube, 112 00:08:15,610 --> 00:08:22,770 is positive, the ky. 113 00:08:22,770 --> 00:08:27,540 If the imaginary part of k cube is positive, you have a k cube 114 00:08:27,540 --> 00:08:32,289 would be i times a positive number. i items i is minus 1, 115 00:08:32,289 --> 00:08:35,010 so you get the suppression factor, 116 00:08:35,010 --> 00:08:40,280 if the imaginary part of k cube is positive. 117 00:08:40,280 --> 00:08:43,370 So if you're integrating over a region 118 00:08:43,370 --> 00:08:46,870 where the imaginary part of k cube is positive, 119 00:08:46,870 --> 00:08:50,390 you will be in good shape. 120 00:08:50,390 --> 00:08:58,700 Now, if you think of k as a complex number, e 121 00:08:58,700 --> 00:09:09,020 to the i theta k, k cube would be this. 122 00:09:15,190 --> 00:09:26,750 An imaginary part of k cube is positive requires 123 00:09:26,750 --> 00:09:39,740 that this angle 3i theta k be between pi and 0. 124 00:09:39,740 --> 00:09:40,240 Why? 125 00:09:40,240 --> 00:09:43,840 Because if you have a complex number, any complex number, 126 00:09:43,840 --> 00:09:49,930 its imaginary part is positive if the argument of that angle 127 00:09:49,930 --> 00:09:51,610 goes between 0 and pi. 128 00:09:54,920 --> 00:10:01,310 Moreover, if you get an imaginary part 129 00:10:01,310 --> 00:10:11,450 positive for some angle theta k, if m of k cube 130 00:10:11,450 --> 00:10:20,700 is positive for some theta k, it is also 131 00:10:20,700 --> 00:10:29,130 positive for theta k plus 2pi over 3. 132 00:10:29,130 --> 00:10:34,710 Because if you add 2 pi over 3 to theta k, 133 00:10:34,710 --> 00:10:37,230 you change this by 2pi. 134 00:10:37,230 --> 00:10:41,420 And therefore, the exponential doesn't change. 135 00:10:41,420 --> 00:10:46,550 From this inequality, I'm sorry, I have an i too many here. 136 00:10:46,550 --> 00:10:48,560 The imaginary part of this requires 137 00:10:48,560 --> 00:10:52,490 that the argument of this be between 0 and pi, 138 00:10:52,490 --> 00:11:01,400 or theta k between pi over 3 and 0. 139 00:11:01,400 --> 00:11:07,700 So actually, here, I should draw 0 to pi over 3. 140 00:11:07,700 --> 00:11:09,015 This is at 60 degrees. 141 00:11:20,440 --> 00:11:25,680 And that's the region in k space where 142 00:11:25,680 --> 00:11:27,600 the integral is suppressed. 143 00:11:30,190 --> 00:11:35,680 Now, we also said that this region is unchanged 144 00:11:35,680 --> 00:11:39,230 if you add 2pi over 3. 145 00:11:39,230 --> 00:11:48,340 So if I add 2pi over 3, that's precisely 1/3 of a turn. 146 00:11:48,340 --> 00:11:49,990 This is 30 degrees. 147 00:11:49,990 --> 00:11:52,870 It goes this area into this. 148 00:11:59,680 --> 00:12:04,770 And finally, if I add, again, 2pi over 3, 149 00:12:04,770 --> 00:12:12,080 it goes into 30, 30, 30, and to this region. 150 00:12:20,340 --> 00:12:25,700 I guess the sign of nuclear material, hazardous materials 151 00:12:25,700 --> 00:12:27,450 or something that. 152 00:12:27,450 --> 00:12:30,510 It's not hazardous to our health. 153 00:12:30,510 --> 00:12:31,970 We'll survive this lecture. 154 00:12:34,520 --> 00:12:37,250 So what's happening here actually 155 00:12:37,250 --> 00:12:39,560 is something quite interesting. 156 00:12:43,820 --> 00:12:49,810 For example, you're doing this integral here. 157 00:12:49,810 --> 00:12:51,700 If you started doing this integral, 158 00:12:51,700 --> 00:12:56,760 once you are far, far away, you start going up, 159 00:12:56,760 --> 00:13:02,880 the integral over here is going to give nothing, 160 00:13:02,880 --> 00:13:05,490 because you're very far away. 161 00:13:05,490 --> 00:13:07,500 And therefore, you're in the region 162 00:13:07,500 --> 00:13:10,410 of absolute exponential suppression. 163 00:13:10,410 --> 00:13:15,667 We said this thing has a positive imaginary part. 164 00:13:15,667 --> 00:13:17,250 And therefore, you have a suppression. 165 00:13:17,250 --> 00:13:20,550 It's k cubed, so it's becoming like e 166 00:13:20,550 --> 00:13:22,860 to the minus radius cubed. 167 00:13:22,860 --> 00:13:24,180 It's killed. 168 00:13:24,180 --> 00:13:29,110 So it's no problem to go up here, and you get nothing. 169 00:13:29,110 --> 00:13:33,240 So what it means is that actually there's 170 00:13:33,240 --> 00:13:36,720 no singularities in the integrand either. 171 00:13:36,720 --> 00:13:39,300 This integral that we've done here 172 00:13:39,300 --> 00:13:42,210 could have been done over this contour like that. 173 00:13:42,210 --> 00:13:43,930 And then you could have gone like that. 174 00:13:46,620 --> 00:13:48,050 You could do it in Mathematica. 175 00:13:48,050 --> 00:13:50,240 The answer will be the same. 176 00:13:50,240 --> 00:13:52,980 Or you could have gone like that. 177 00:13:52,980 --> 00:13:55,140 Or you could have gone here like this, 178 00:13:55,140 --> 00:13:59,040 also you're suppressed over here. 179 00:13:59,040 --> 00:14:02,150 And you're suppressed over here. 180 00:14:02,150 --> 00:14:04,940 And actually, by contouring the formation, you could 181 00:14:04,940 --> 00:14:06,460 instead of doing this in theory, you 182 00:14:06,460 --> 00:14:09,610 could have come here and gone up like that. 183 00:14:09,610 --> 00:14:10,700 And done that. 184 00:14:10,700 --> 00:14:15,570 That also would have been the same result. There's nothing, 185 00:14:15,570 --> 00:14:17,810 the integrand is analytic here. 186 00:14:17,810 --> 00:14:22,310 So this you can push it down and nothing goes wrong. 187 00:14:22,310 --> 00:14:25,745 Or you could have done even this integral like that. 188 00:14:28,650 --> 00:14:32,520 Because the integral here is 0 and the integral here is 0, 189 00:14:32,520 --> 00:14:35,442 so you can bring them down. 190 00:14:35,442 --> 00:14:37,980 In fact, if you did this, I think, 191 00:14:37,980 --> 00:14:40,710 with Mathematica, Mathematica when 192 00:14:40,710 --> 00:14:44,430 you try to do this integral, kind of does it. 193 00:14:44,430 --> 00:14:46,050 But it complains a little. 194 00:14:46,050 --> 00:14:48,120 It's worried that, you know, it's 195 00:14:48,120 --> 00:14:53,021 not getting the answer right because the integrand is still 196 00:14:53,021 --> 00:14:53,520 big. 197 00:14:53,520 --> 00:14:55,890 It's oscillating very fast, but it's big. 198 00:14:55,890 --> 00:14:59,930 If you go here, I think Mathematica will complain less 199 00:14:59,930 --> 00:15:02,110 and will give you the same answer. 200 00:15:02,110 --> 00:15:04,800 So this is the power of complex analysis 201 00:15:04,800 --> 00:15:10,740 that allows you to do this integral in all kinds of ways. 202 00:15:10,740 --> 00:15:14,490 And there is something even more important about this 203 00:15:14,490 --> 00:15:17,520 that I will explain in the notes, 204 00:15:17,520 --> 00:15:20,475 but I can convey the idea here. 205 00:15:23,200 --> 00:15:30,030 When you prove that this is a solution, 206 00:15:30,030 --> 00:15:33,050 and when you went to Fourier space, 207 00:15:33,050 --> 00:15:37,600 you had to do an integration by parts. 208 00:15:37,600 --> 00:15:41,020 And an integration by parts is always dangerous. 209 00:15:41,020 --> 00:15:46,400 And if you're trying to find a true solution of your problem, 210 00:15:46,400 --> 00:15:48,625 you have to make sure it works. 211 00:15:48,625 --> 00:15:54,890 P, the operator P, is supposed to be her mission. 212 00:15:54,890 --> 00:15:59,990 And here what happens is that you turn this into dvp. 213 00:15:59,990 --> 00:16:04,700 And you have to fall back this factor. 214 00:16:04,700 --> 00:16:08,770 And here is where this discussion is very relevant. 215 00:16:08,770 --> 00:16:14,050 Because when you fold out this factor, you have to integrate. 216 00:16:14,050 --> 00:16:17,090 You couldn't get contributions from the boundary. 217 00:16:17,090 --> 00:16:20,590 And you have to make sure those contributions are 0. 218 00:16:20,590 --> 00:16:23,710 Otherwise, you're not solving the differential equation 219 00:16:23,710 --> 00:16:24,460 really. 220 00:16:24,460 --> 00:16:27,280 And the happy thing about these contours, 221 00:16:27,280 --> 00:16:29,920 and now that you understand these regions, 222 00:16:29,920 --> 00:16:32,620 is that, yes, the boundary contributions 223 00:16:32,620 --> 00:16:35,740 are going to be 0 from the two sides because 224 00:16:35,740 --> 00:16:36,985 of this suppression factor. 225 00:16:39,520 --> 00:16:47,560 So this analysis actually turns it into a rigorous analysis. 226 00:16:47,560 --> 00:16:51,370 And the part that has to do with the boundary 227 00:16:51,370 --> 00:16:55,930 conditions, the fact that the operations that you're doing 228 00:16:55,930 --> 00:16:58,720 are illegal when you try to solve the differential 229 00:16:58,720 --> 00:17:00,520 equation, require-- 230 00:17:00,520 --> 00:17:07,480 this is the details that I will not derive now-- 231 00:17:07,480 --> 00:17:16,390 require precisely that e to the i k cubed over 3 e to the iku 232 00:17:16,390 --> 00:17:28,020 vanish at the ends of the countour gamma that 233 00:17:28,020 --> 00:17:32,440 you're using to solve the problem. 234 00:17:32,440 --> 00:17:34,950 So if you're in the wave from here to here, 235 00:17:34,950 --> 00:17:38,100 it should vanish at this end and at that end. 236 00:17:38,100 --> 00:17:40,560 Rigorously speaking, this thing only 237 00:17:40,560 --> 00:17:44,760 vanishes if you're a little bit up. 238 00:17:44,760 --> 00:17:51,570 But this is what you really need for the equation 239 00:17:51,570 --> 00:17:54,374 to be a solution.