1 0:00:01 --> 00:00:07 LEWIN: You did very well on your first exam. 2 00:00:05 --> 00:00:11 I was hoping for an average of about 75; 3 00:00:10 --> 00:00:16 the class average was 89. 4 00:00:12 --> 00:00:18 So that leaves us with two possibilities: 5 00:00:15 --> 00:00:21 either you are very smart, this is an exceptional class, 6 00:00:20 --> 00:00:26 or the exam was too easy. 7 00:00:22 --> 00:00:28 Now, this exam was taken by three instructors 8 00:00:27 --> 00:00:33 way before you took it. 9 00:00:29 --> 00:00:35 None of them thought it was too easy, 10 00:00:31 --> 00:00:37 so I'd like to think that you are really an exceptional class 11 00:00:34 --> 00:00:40 and I'd like to congratulate you that you did so well. 12 00:00:38 --> 00:00:44 Here is a histogram of the scores. 13 00:00:44 --> 00:00:50 If we had to decide on this test alone-- 14 00:00:46 --> 00:00:52 forgetting your quizzes, forgetting your homework, 15 00:00:50 --> 00:00:56 on this test alone-- 16 00:00:51 --> 00:00:57 the dividing line between pass and fail would be 65. 17 00:00:55 --> 00:01:01 That means that five percent of the class would fail, 18 00:01:00 --> 00:01:06 which is unusually low. 19 00:01:02 --> 00:01:08 Normally that is around 15%. 20 00:01:04 --> 00:01:10 But time will tell 21 00:01:06 --> 00:01:12 whether you are indeed exceptionally smart 22 00:01:09 --> 00:01:15 or whether the exam was too easy. 23 00:01:12 --> 00:01:18 The good news also is-- two pieces of good news-- 24 00:01:16 --> 00:01:22 that we promise that the books will arrive at the Coop today. 25 00:01:21 --> 00:01:27 Today we're going to talk about springs, about pendulums 26 00:01:26 --> 00:01:32 and about simple harmonic oscillators-- 27 00:01:30 --> 00:01:36 one of the key topics in 801. 28 00:01:33 --> 00:01:39 If I have a spring... 29 00:01:35 --> 00:01:41 30 00:01:38 --> 00:01:44 and this is the relaxed length of the string... spring, 31 00:01:42 --> 00:01:48 I call that x equals zero. 32 00:01:44 --> 00:01:50 And I extend the string... the spring, with a "p," 33 00:01:49 --> 00:01:55 then there is a force that wants to drive this spring 34 00:01:54 --> 00:02:00 back to equilibrium. 35 00:01:57 --> 00:02:03 And it is an experimental fact that many springs-- 36 00:02:01 --> 00:02:07 we call them ideal springs-- for many springs, 37 00:02:06 --> 00:02:12 this force is proportional to the displacement, x. 38 00:02:11 --> 00:02:17 So if this is x, if you make x three times larger, 39 00:02:16 --> 00:02:22 that restoring force is three times larger. 40 00:02:21 --> 00:02:27 This is a one-dimensional problem, 41 00:02:23 --> 00:02:29 so to avoid the vector notation, we can simply say 42 00:02:27 --> 00:02:33 that the force, therefore, is minus a certain constant, 43 00:02:31 --> 00:02:37 which we call the spring constant-- 44 00:02:33 --> 00:02:39 this is called the spring constant-- 45 00:02:36 --> 00:02:42 and the spring constant has units newtons per meter. 46 00:02:40 --> 00:02:46 So the minus sign takes care of the direction. 47 00:02:43 --> 00:02:49 When x is positive, 48 00:02:44 --> 00:02:50 then the force is in the negative direction; 49 00:02:48 --> 00:02:54 when F is negative, the force is in the positive direction. 50 00:02:52 --> 00:02:58 It is a restoring force. 51 00:02:54 --> 00:03:00 Whenever this linear relation between F and x holds, 52 00:02:59 --> 00:03:05 that is referred to as Hooke's Law. 53 00:03:02 --> 00:03:08 54 00:03:05 --> 00:03:11 How can we measure the spring constant? 55 00:03:08 --> 00:03:14 That's actually not too difficult. 56 00:03:12 --> 00:03:18 I can use gravity. 57 00:03:15 --> 00:03:21 Here is the spring in its relaxed situation. 58 00:03:19 --> 00:03:25 I hang on the spring a mass, m, and I make use of the fact 59 00:03:24 --> 00:03:30 that gravity now exerts a force on the spring, 60 00:03:28 --> 00:03:34 and when you find your new equilibrium-- 61 00:03:30 --> 00:03:36 this is the new equilibrium position-- 62 00:03:33 --> 00:03:39 then the spring force, of course, 63 00:03:35 --> 00:03:41 must be exactly the same as mg. 64 00:03:37 --> 00:03:43 No acceleration when the thing is at rest. 65 00:03:40 --> 00:03:46 And so I could now make a plot 66 00:03:42 --> 00:03:48 whereby I could have here x and I could have here this force F, 67 00:03:47 --> 00:03:53 which I know because I know the masses. 68 00:03:49 --> 00:03:55 I can change the masses. 69 00:03:51 --> 00:03:57 I can go through a whole lot of them. 70 00:03:54 --> 00:04:00 And you will see data points 71 00:03:56 --> 00:04:02 which scatter around a straight line. 72 00:04:01 --> 00:04:07 And the spring constant follows, then, if you take... 73 00:04:06 --> 00:04:12 if you call this delta F and you call this delta x, 74 00:04:11 --> 00:04:17 then the spring constant, k, is delta F divided by delta x. 75 00:04:17 --> 00:04:23 So you can even measure it. 76 00:04:19 --> 00:04:25 You don't have to start necessarily 77 00:04:20 --> 00:04:26 at this point where the spring is relaxed. 78 00:04:23 --> 00:04:29 You could already start when the spring is already under tension. 79 00:04:28 --> 00:04:34 That is not a problem. 80 00:04:31 --> 00:04:37 You'll be surprised how many springs 81 00:04:34 --> 00:04:40 really behave very nicely according to Hooke's Law. 82 00:04:38 --> 00:04:44 Uh, I have one here. 83 00:04:40 --> 00:04:46 It's not a very expensive spring. 84 00:04:42 --> 00:04:48 You see it here. 85 00:04:44 --> 00:04:50 And there is here a holder on to it 86 00:04:46 --> 00:04:52 so it's already a little bit under stress. 87 00:04:49 --> 00:04:55 That doesn't make any difference. 88 00:04:51 --> 00:04:57 These marks here are 13 centimeters apart, 89 00:04:54 --> 00:05:00 and every time that I put one kilogram on, 90 00:04:57 --> 00:05:03 you will see that it goes down by roughly 13 centimeters. 91 00:05:01 --> 00:05:07 It goes down to this mark. 92 00:05:03 --> 00:05:09 I put another kilogram on, it goes down to this mark. 93 00:05:09 --> 00:05:15 I put another kilogram on and it goes back to this mark, 94 00:05:13 --> 00:05:19 all the way down. 95 00:05:15 --> 00:05:21 And if I take them all off... so what I've done is 96 00:05:18 --> 00:05:24 I effectively went along this curve, and if I take them off, 97 00:05:21 --> 00:05:27 if it is an ideal spring, 98 00:05:22 --> 00:05:28 then it goes back to its original length, which it does. 99 00:05:28 --> 00:05:34 That's a requirement, of course, for an ideal spring 100 00:05:31 --> 00:05:37 if it behaves according to Hooke's Law. 101 00:05:34 --> 00:05:40 Now, I can, of course, overdo things. 102 00:05:37 --> 00:05:43 I can take a spring like this one and stretch it 103 00:05:40 --> 00:05:46 to the point that it no longer behaves like Hooke's Law. 104 00:05:44 --> 00:05:50 I can damage it. 105 00:05:46 --> 00:05:52 Uh, I can do permanent deformation. 106 00:05:51 --> 00:05:57 Look, that's easy. 107 00:05:53 --> 00:05:59 For sure, Hooke's Law is no longer active. 108 00:05:56 --> 00:06:02 Look how much longer this spring is than it was before. 109 00:05:59 --> 00:06:05 So there comes, of course, a limit how far you can go 110 00:06:03 --> 00:06:09 before you permanently deform your spring. 111 00:06:06 --> 00:06:12 What I have done now with that spring, 112 00:06:09 --> 00:06:15 probably in the beginning I went up along a straight line 113 00:06:12 --> 00:06:18 and then something like this must have happened. 114 00:06:15 --> 00:06:21 I got a huge extension. 115 00:06:17 --> 00:06:23 My force did not increase very much. 116 00:06:19 --> 00:06:25 And then when I relaxed, when I took my force off, 117 00:06:22 --> 00:06:28 the spring was longer at the ends 118 00:06:24 --> 00:06:30 than it was at the beginning. 119 00:06:26 --> 00:06:32 So I have a net extension which will always be there, 120 00:06:29 --> 00:06:35 and that's not very nice, of course, to do that to a spring. 121 00:06:33 --> 00:06:39 So Hooke's Law holds only within certain limitations. 122 00:06:37 --> 00:06:43 You have to, uh, obey a certain amount of discipline. 123 00:06:41 --> 00:06:47 There are ways that you can also measure the spring constant 124 00:06:46 --> 00:06:52 in a dynamic way, which is actually very interesting. 125 00:06:50 --> 00:06:56 Um, I have here a spring, and this spring... 126 00:06:57 --> 00:07:03 this is x equals 0, and I attach now to the spring a mass, m. 127 00:07:03 --> 00:07:09 This has to be on a frictionless surface, 128 00:07:08 --> 00:07:14 and you will see, when I extend it over a distance x, 129 00:07:13 --> 00:07:19 that you get your force, 130 00:07:15 --> 00:07:21 your spring force that drives it back. 131 00:07:18 --> 00:07:24 We have, of course, gravity, mg, 132 00:07:21 --> 00:07:27 and we have the normal force from the surface. 133 00:07:24 --> 00:07:30 So there is in the... in the y direction, 134 00:07:26 --> 00:07:32 there is no acceleration, so I don't have to worry 135 00:07:30 --> 00:07:36 about the forces in the y direction at all. 136 00:07:33 --> 00:07:39 If I let this thing oscillate, I let... I release it, 137 00:07:36 --> 00:07:42 it will start to oscillate about this point, back and forth, 138 00:07:39 --> 00:07:45 then as I will show you now, 139 00:07:41 --> 00:07:47 you will find that the period of oscillation, 140 00:07:45 --> 00:07:51 the time for one whole oscillation 141 00:07:48 --> 00:07:54 is 2 pi times the square root of the mass m 142 00:07:51 --> 00:07:57 divided by the spring constant k. 143 00:07:54 --> 00:08:00 I will derive that-- you will see that shortly. 144 00:07:57 --> 00:08:03 In other words, if you measured the period 145 00:07:59 --> 00:08:05 and you knew the math, then you can calculate k. 146 00:08:02 --> 00:08:08 Alternatively, if you knew k and you measure the period, 147 00:08:06 --> 00:08:12 you can calculate the mass, even in the absence of gravity. 148 00:08:10 --> 00:08:16 I don't use gravity here. 149 00:08:12 --> 00:08:18 So a spring always allows you to measure, uh, a mass 150 00:08:16 --> 00:08:22 even in the absence of gravity. 151 00:08:18 --> 00:08:24 The period that you see, the time that it takes 152 00:08:22 --> 00:08:28 for this object to oscillate once back and forth, 153 00:08:27 --> 00:08:33 is completely independent of how far I move it out, 154 00:08:29 --> 00:08:35 which is very nonintuitive, 155 00:08:31 --> 00:08:37 but you will see that that comes out of the derivation. 156 00:08:34 --> 00:08:40 There is no dependence on how far I move it out. 157 00:08:37 --> 00:08:43 So whether I oscillate it like this 158 00:08:39 --> 00:08:45 or whether I oscillate it like this, 159 00:08:42 --> 00:08:48 as long as Hooke's Law holds, you will see 160 00:08:45 --> 00:08:51 that the period is independent of what we call that amplitude. 161 00:08:50 --> 00:08:56 So I'm going to derive the situation now for an ideal case. 162 00:08:54 --> 00:09:00 Ideal case means Hooke's Law must hold. 163 00:08:57 --> 00:09:03 There's no friction, and the spring itself 164 00:09:00 --> 00:09:06 has negligible mass compared to this one. 165 00:09:03 --> 00:09:09 Let's call it a massless spring. 166 00:09:06 --> 00:09:12 So now I'm going to write down Newton's Second Law: 167 00:09:10 --> 00:09:16 ma, which is all in the x direction, equals minus kx. 168 00:09:16 --> 00:09:22 a is the second derivative of position, 169 00:09:19 --> 00:09:25 for which I will write x double-dot, mx double-dot-- 170 00:09:23 --> 00:09:29 one dot is the first derivative, that's the velocity; 171 00:09:27 --> 00:09:33 two dots is the acceleration-- plus kx equals zero. 172 00:09:31 --> 00:09:37 I divide by m 173 00:09:33 --> 00:09:39 and I get x double-dot plus k over m times x equals zero. 174 00:09:38 --> 00:09:44 And this is arguably 175 00:09:40 --> 00:09:46 the most important equation in all of physics. 176 00:09:46 --> 00:09:52 It's a differential equation. 177 00:09:48 --> 00:09:54 Some of you may already have solved differential equations. 178 00:09:52 --> 00:09:58 The outcome of this, you will see, is very simple. 179 00:09:54 --> 00:10:00 x is, of course, changing in some way as a function of time, 180 00:09:58 --> 00:10:04 and when you have the correct solution 181 00:10:01 --> 00:10:07 for x as a function of time 182 00:10:02 --> 00:10:08 and you substitute that back into that differential equation, 183 00:10:07 --> 00:10:13 that equation will have to be satisfied. 184 00:10:10 --> 00:10:16 What would a solution be to this differential equation? 185 00:10:15 --> 00:10:21 I'm going to make you see this oscillation first. 186 00:10:19 --> 00:10:25 I'm going to make you see x as a function, 187 00:10:22 --> 00:10:28 and I'm going to do that in the following way. 188 00:10:27 --> 00:10:33 I have here a spray paint can 189 00:10:30 --> 00:10:36 which is suspended between two springs, 190 00:10:34 --> 00:10:40 and I can oscillate it vertically, 191 00:10:37 --> 00:10:43 which is your x direction, like that. 192 00:10:41 --> 00:10:47 So x changes with time. 193 00:10:43 --> 00:10:49 The time axis I will introduce by pulling on the string. 194 00:10:47 --> 00:10:53 When the spray paint is going to spray, 195 00:10:50 --> 00:10:56 I'm going to pull on that string, 196 00:10:52 --> 00:10:58 and if I can do that at a constant speed, 197 00:10:54 --> 00:11:00 then you get horizontally a time axis and of course vertally... 198 00:10:58 --> 00:11:04 vertically you will get the position of x. 199 00:11:01 --> 00:11:07 So I want you to just see qualitatively 200 00:11:03 --> 00:11:09 what kind of a weird curve x as a function of time is, 201 00:11:07 --> 00:11:13 which then will have to satisfy that differential equation. 202 00:11:11 --> 00:11:17 All right. 203 00:11:12 --> 00:11:18 It's always a messy experiment because the paint is dripping, 204 00:11:16 --> 00:11:22 but I will try to get the spray paint going. 205 00:11:19 --> 00:11:25 There we go. 206 00:11:21 --> 00:11:27 Okay. 207 00:11:22 --> 00:11:28 Now I'll pull... 208 00:11:24 --> 00:11:30 209 00:11:28 --> 00:11:34 All right. 210 00:11:28 --> 00:11:34 Will you give me a hand? 211 00:11:31 --> 00:11:37 212 00:11:32 --> 00:11:38 Yeah, could you, please? 213 00:11:34 --> 00:11:40 I will cut it here and then you... 214 00:11:36 --> 00:11:42 215 00:11:39 --> 00:11:45 Be very careful, because it's... it is messy. 216 00:11:43 --> 00:11:49 Oh, let's put it... let's take it out this way. 217 00:11:46 --> 00:11:52 Aah... 218 00:11:47 --> 00:11:53 Okay, just walk back. 219 00:11:49 --> 00:11:55 Just walk-- yeah, great. 220 00:11:51 --> 00:11:57 221 00:11:53 --> 00:11:59 I'll hold up the top so that we can see it fine. 222 00:11:56 --> 00:12:02 223 00:11:58 --> 00:12:04 Okay. 224 00:12:00 --> 00:12:06 225 00:12:02 --> 00:12:08 What is... what does it remind you of? 226 00:12:04 --> 00:12:10 (student responds ) 227 00:12:05 --> 00:12:11 LEWIN: Sinusoids-- reminds me of a cosinusoid, by the way. 228 00:12:09 --> 00:12:15 Sinusoid or a cosine-- same thing. 229 00:12:12 --> 00:12:18 All right. 230 00:12:13 --> 00:12:19 Let's try to substitute in that equation 231 00:12:16 --> 00:12:22 a sinusoid's or a cosine solution, 232 00:12:19 --> 00:12:25 whichever one you prefer. 233 00:12:22 --> 00:12:28 Makes no difference. 234 00:12:23 --> 00:12:29 So I'm going to substitute in this equation-- 235 00:12:27 --> 00:12:33 this is my trial function-- 236 00:12:28 --> 00:12:34 that x as a function of time is a constant, A-- 237 00:12:31 --> 00:12:37 I will get back to that in a minute-- 238 00:12:34 --> 00:12:40 times cosine omega t plus phi. 239 00:12:38 --> 00:12:44 This A we call the amplitude. 240 00:12:42 --> 00:12:48 Notice the cosine function is... the highest value is plus one 241 00:12:47 --> 00:12:53 and the lowest value is minus one, so the amplitude indicates 242 00:12:51 --> 00:12:57 that is... the farthest displacement from zero 243 00:12:54 --> 00:13:00 on this side would be plus A and on this side would be minus A. 244 00:12:57 --> 00:13:03 So that's in meters. 245 00:13:00 --> 00:13:06 This omega we call the angular frequency. 246 00:13:07 --> 00:13:13 Don't confuse it with angular velocity. 247 00:13:10 --> 00:13:16 We call it angular frequency, and the units are the same. 248 00:13:13 --> 00:13:19 The units are in radians per second, 249 00:13:17 --> 00:13:23 the same as angular velocity. 250 00:13:19 --> 00:13:25 If I advance this time little t-- 251 00:13:24 --> 00:13:30 if I advance that by 2 pi divided by omega... 252 00:13:31 --> 00:13:37 if I advance this time by 2 pi divided by omega, 253 00:13:35 --> 00:13:41 then this angle here increases here by 2 pi radians, 254 00:13:39 --> 00:13:45 which is 360 degrees, and so that's the time that it takes 255 00:13:43 --> 00:13:49 for the oscillation to repeat itself. 256 00:13:45 --> 00:13:51 So this is the period of the oscillation, 257 00:13:49 --> 00:13:55 and that is in seconds. 258 00:13:51 --> 00:13:57 And you can determine... if you want to, 259 00:13:53 --> 00:13:59 you can define the frequency of the oscillations 260 00:13:56 --> 00:14:02 which is one over T, 261 00:13:58 --> 00:14:04 which we express always in terms of hertz. 262 00:14:01 --> 00:14:07 And then here we have what we call the phase angle, 263 00:14:05 --> 00:14:11 and I will return to that. 264 00:14:08 --> 00:14:14 That's in radians. 265 00:14:09 --> 00:14:15 And this trial function I'm going to substitute now 266 00:14:13 --> 00:14:19 into this equation. 267 00:14:15 --> 00:14:21 So the first thing I have to do, I have to find 268 00:14:19 --> 00:14:25 what the second derivative is of x as a function of time. 269 00:14:24 --> 00:14:30 Well, that's my function. 270 00:14:27 --> 00:14:33 I have here first the first derivative, x dot. 271 00:14:33 --> 00:14:39 That becomes minus A omega. 272 00:14:35 --> 00:14:41 I get an omega out because there's a time here, and now 273 00:14:38 --> 00:14:44 I have to take the derivative of the function itself 274 00:14:42 --> 00:14:48 so I get the sine of omega t plus phi. 275 00:14:45 --> 00:14:51 Of course I could have started off here with a sine curve; 276 00:14:49 --> 00:14:55 I hope you realize that. 277 00:14:51 --> 00:14:57 I just picked the cosine one. 278 00:14:52 --> 00:14:58 x double-dot. 279 00:14:55 --> 00:15:01 Now I get another omega out, so I get minus A omega squared. 280 00:15:00 --> 00:15:06 The derivative of the sine is the cosine. 281 00:15:03 --> 00:15:09 Cosine omega t plus phi. 282 00:15:07 --> 00:15:13 And that is also minus omega squared times x, 283 00:15:11 --> 00:15:17 because notice I have A cosine omega t plus phi, 284 00:15:15 --> 00:15:21 which itself is x. 285 00:15:17 --> 00:15:23 So now I'm ready to substitute this result 286 00:15:20 --> 00:15:26 into that differential equation. 287 00:15:23 --> 00:15:29 This must always hold for any value of x, 288 00:15:27 --> 00:15:33 for any moment in time. 289 00:15:29 --> 00:15:35 And therefore, 290 00:15:30 --> 00:15:36 the only way that this can work is if omega squared is k over m. 291 00:15:34 --> 00:15:40 So omega squared must be k over m. 292 00:15:38 --> 00:15:44 And therefore, we now have the solution to this problem. 293 00:15:43 --> 00:15:49 So we have omega equals the square root of k over m 294 00:15:49 --> 00:15:55 and the period is 2 pi times the square root of m over k. 295 00:15:55 --> 00:16:01 And what is striking, really remarkable, 296 00:15:59 --> 00:16:05 that this is independent of the amplitude, 297 00:16:02 --> 00:16:08 and it's also independent 298 00:16:04 --> 00:16:10 of this angle phi, this phase angle. 299 00:16:06 --> 00:16:12 What is this business of this phase angle? 300 00:16:09 --> 00:16:15 It's a peculiar thing that we have there. 301 00:16:11 --> 00:16:17 Well, you can think about the physics, actually. 302 00:16:14 --> 00:16:20 When I start this oscillation, I have a choice of two things. 303 00:16:19 --> 00:16:25 I can start it off at a certain position which I can choose. 304 00:16:23 --> 00:16:29 I can give it a certain displacement from zero 305 00:16:26 --> 00:16:32 and simply let it go. 306 00:16:27 --> 00:16:33 But I can also, when I let it go, give it a certain velocity. 307 00:16:31 --> 00:16:37 That's my choice. 308 00:16:32 --> 00:16:38 So I have two choices: 309 00:16:33 --> 00:16:39 where I let it go and what velocity I give it. 310 00:16:36 --> 00:16:42 And that is reflected in my solution: 311 00:16:39 --> 00:16:45 namely, that ultimately in the solution 312 00:16:41 --> 00:16:47 I got the result of A and the result of phi, 313 00:16:44 --> 00:16:50 which doesn't determine the period, 314 00:16:46 --> 00:16:52 but it results from what we call my initial conditions. 315 00:16:51 --> 00:16:57 And I want to do an example whereby you see how A and phi 316 00:16:56 --> 00:17:02 immediately follow from the initial conditions. 317 00:16:59 --> 00:17:05 So in this example, 318 00:17:01 --> 00:17:07 I release the object at x equals zero and t equals zero. 319 00:17:06 --> 00:17:12 So I release it at the equilibrium. 320 00:17:09 --> 00:17:15 At that moment in time, 321 00:17:11 --> 00:17:17 I give it a velocity, which is minus three meters per second. 322 00:17:15 --> 00:17:21 My units are always in MKS units. 323 00:17:18 --> 00:17:24 The spring constant k equals ten newtons per meter, 324 00:17:22 --> 00:17:28 and the mass of the object is 0.1 kilograms. 325 00:17:26 --> 00:17:32 And now I can ask you what now is x as a function of time, 326 00:17:30 --> 00:17:36 including the amplitude A, including the phase angle phi? 327 00:17:34 --> 00:17:40 Well, let's first calculate omega. 328 00:17:38 --> 00:17:44 That is the square root of k over m. 329 00:17:42 --> 00:17:48 That would be ten radians per second. 330 00:17:46 --> 00:17:52 The period T, which is 2 pi divided by omega, 331 00:17:53 --> 00:17:59 would be roughly 6.28 seconds. 332 00:17:57 --> 00:18:03 And the frequency f would be about 0.16 hertz, 333 00:18:04 --> 00:18:10 just to get some numbers. 334 00:18:07 --> 00:18:13 1.6 hertz-- sorry. 335 00:18:08 --> 00:18:14 336 00:18:10 --> 00:18:16 This is not my day. 337 00:18:12 --> 00:18:18 This is 0.628, and this is 1.6 hertz. 338 00:18:20 --> 00:18:26 2 pi divided by omega; you can see this is ten. 339 00:18:24 --> 00:18:30 Six divided by ten is about 0.6. 340 00:18:27 --> 00:18:33 All right, so now I know that at t equals zero, x equals zero. 341 00:18:33 --> 00:18:39 So I see my solution right there. 342 00:18:36 --> 00:18:42 Right here I put in t equals zero, 343 00:18:39 --> 00:18:45 and I know that x is zero. 344 00:18:41 --> 00:18:47 So I get zero equals A times the cosine of phi. 345 00:18:47 --> 00:18:53 Well, A is not zero. 346 00:18:48 --> 00:18:54 If I release that thing at equilibrium 347 00:18:50 --> 00:18:56 and I give it a velocity of three meters per second, 348 00:18:53 --> 00:18:59 it's going to oscillate. 349 00:18:55 --> 00:19:01 So A is not zero. 350 00:18:56 --> 00:19:02 So the only solution is that cosine phi is zero, 351 00:19:00 --> 00:19:06 and so that leaves me with phi is pi over two, 352 00:19:03 --> 00:19:09 or phi is 3 pi... phi is 3 pi over two. 353 00:19:06 --> 00:19:12 That's the only two possibilities. 354 00:19:09 --> 00:19:15 Now I go to my next initial condition, 355 00:19:11 --> 00:19:17 that the velocity is minus 3. 356 00:19:14 --> 00:19:20 Now, here you see the equation for the velocity. 357 00:19:17 --> 00:19:23 This is minus 3 at t equals zero. 358 00:19:21 --> 00:19:27 So minus 3 equals minus A, and A is... we don't know yet. 359 00:19:27 --> 00:19:33 Minus A, and then we have omega squared. 360 00:19:31 --> 00:19:37 Omega-- sorry-- which is ten. 361 00:19:34 --> 00:19:40 t is zero. 362 00:19:36 --> 00:19:42 I get the sine of phi. 363 00:19:38 --> 00:19:44 364 00:19:40 --> 00:19:46 If I pick pi over 2, then the sine of phi is 1. 365 00:19:45 --> 00:19:51 And so you find immediately that A equals plus 0.3 366 00:19:50 --> 00:19:56 And so the solution now, which includes now phi and A, 367 00:19:56 --> 00:20:02 is that x equals plus 0.3 times the cosine of omega, 368 00:20:02 --> 00:20:08 which is 10t plus pi over 2. 369 00:20:06 --> 00:20:12 So you see that the initial conditions... 370 00:20:09 --> 00:20:15 what the conditions are at t equals zero, 371 00:20:11 --> 00:20:17 they determine my A and they determine my phase angle. 372 00:20:15 --> 00:20:21 If you had chosen this as the phase angle-- 3 pi over 2-- 373 00:20:20 --> 00:20:26 that would have been fine. 374 00:20:22 --> 00:20:28 You would have found a minus sign here, 375 00:20:25 --> 00:20:31 and that's exactly the same. 376 00:20:26 --> 00:20:32 So you would have found nothing different. 377 00:20:29 --> 00:20:35 378 00:20:31 --> 00:20:37 I want to demonstrate to you that the period of oscillations, 379 00:20:36 --> 00:20:42 nonintuitive as that may be, 380 00:20:39 --> 00:20:45 is independent of the amplitude that I give the object. 381 00:20:44 --> 00:20:50 And I want to do that here with this air track. 382 00:20:48 --> 00:20:54 I have a... an object here. 383 00:20:50 --> 00:20:56 This object has a mass-- 186 plus or minus 1 gram. 384 00:20:58 --> 00:21:04 385 00:21:03 --> 00:21:09 Call it m1. 386 00:21:04 --> 00:21:10 387 00:21:07 --> 00:21:13 I'm going to oscillate it 388 00:21:09 --> 00:21:15 and we're going to measure the periods. 389 00:21:11 --> 00:21:17 But instead of measuring one period, 390 00:21:13 --> 00:21:19 I'm going to measure ten periods, 391 00:21:15 --> 00:21:21 because that gives me a smaller uncertainty, 392 00:21:18 --> 00:21:24 a smaller relative error in my measurements. 393 00:21:21 --> 00:21:27 So I'm going to do it as an amplitude, 394 00:21:24 --> 00:21:30 which is 15 centimeters. 395 00:21:26 --> 00:21:32 Let's make it 20 centimeters. 396 00:21:28 --> 00:21:34 So I get 10T, I get a certain number, 397 00:21:31 --> 00:21:37 and I get an error which is my reaction error, 398 00:21:34 --> 00:21:40 which is about a tenth of a second. 399 00:21:37 --> 00:21:43 That's about the reaction error that we all have, roughly. 400 00:21:40 --> 00:21:46 Then I will do it at 40 centimeters. 401 00:21:41 --> 00:21:47 We get a 10T, and we get, again, plus or minus 0.1 seconds. 402 00:21:48 --> 00:21:54 403 00:21:49 --> 00:21:55 And we'll see how much they differ. 404 00:21:52 --> 00:21:58 They should be the same, if this is an ideal spring, 405 00:21:55 --> 00:22:01 within the uncertainty of my measurements. 406 00:21:58 --> 00:22:04 You see the timing there. 407 00:22:00 --> 00:22:06 I'm going to give it a 20-centimeter offset, 408 00:22:03 --> 00:22:09 which is here, 409 00:22:04 --> 00:22:10 and then I will start it when it comes back here. 410 00:22:07 --> 00:22:13 So I will allow it one oscillation first. 411 00:22:09 --> 00:22:15 That's easier for me to see it stand still when I start it. 412 00:22:12 --> 00:22:18 There we go. 413 00:22:13 --> 00:22:19 414 00:22:15 --> 00:22:21 One... two... three... four... five... 415 00:22:23 --> 00:22:29 six... seven... eight... nine... ten. 416 00:22:31 --> 00:22:37 What do we see? 417 00:22:33 --> 00:22:39 15.16. 418 00:22:38 --> 00:22:44 15.16 seconds. 419 00:22:39 --> 00:22:45 By the way, you can derive the spring constant from this now 420 00:22:43 --> 00:22:49 because you know the mass and you know the time. 421 00:22:46 --> 00:22:52 Now I'm going to give it a displacement, an amplitude 422 00:22:50 --> 00:22:56 which is twice as high. 423 00:22:52 --> 00:22:58 So I make it 40 centimeters. 424 00:22:54 --> 00:23:00 So this is ten. 425 00:22:56 --> 00:23:02 40 centimeters-- a huge displacement. 426 00:23:00 --> 00:23:06 Now... one... two... three... four... 427 00:23:08 --> 00:23:14 five... six... seven... eight... nine... ten. 428 00:23:17 --> 00:23:23 15.13. 429 00:23:19 --> 00:23:25 430 00:23:24 --> 00:23:30 Fantastic agreement within the uncertainty of my measurements. 431 00:23:28 --> 00:23:34 They're within 3/100 of a second. 432 00:23:30 --> 00:23:36 Of course if you try it many times, 433 00:23:32 --> 00:23:38 you won't always get that close, because my reaction time 434 00:23:35 --> 00:23:41 is really not much better than a tenth of a second. 435 00:23:37 --> 00:23:43 Now I will show you something else which is quite interesting, 436 00:23:42 --> 00:23:48 and that is how the behavior of the period is on the... 437 00:23:46 --> 00:23:52 on the mass of the object. 438 00:23:49 --> 00:23:55 I have here another car which weighs roughly the same. 439 00:23:54 --> 00:24:00 Uh, I'm going to add the two together, 440 00:23:58 --> 00:24:04 and so we get m2 is about 372 plus or minus 1 gram. 441 00:24:02 --> 00:24:08 The plus or minus 1 comes in 442 00:24:04 --> 00:24:10 because our scale is no more accurate than one gram. 443 00:24:07 --> 00:24:13 So we put them both on the scale 444 00:24:10 --> 00:24:16 and we find this to be the uncertainty. 445 00:24:12 --> 00:24:18 So now I'm going to measure 446 00:24:15 --> 00:24:21 the ten periods of this object with mass m2, so twice the mass. 447 00:24:22 --> 00:24:28 So that should be 448 00:24:24 --> 00:24:30 the square root of m2 divided by m1 449 00:24:28 --> 00:24:34 times 10 times the period of m1. 450 00:24:33 --> 00:24:39 And so I can make a prediction 451 00:24:35 --> 00:24:41 because this is the square root of two, and I know what this is. 452 00:24:39 --> 00:24:45 So I will take my calculator 453 00:24:41 --> 00:24:47 and I will take the square root of two, and I multiply that 454 00:24:46 --> 00:24:52 by, uh, let's take 15.15. 455 00:24:50 --> 00:24:56 456 00:24:51 --> 00:24:57 And so that comes out to be 21.42. 457 00:24:57 --> 00:25:03 21.42. 458 00:24:58 --> 00:25:04 It's not clear that this two is meaningful. 459 00:25:00 --> 00:25:06 And now comes the $64 question: What is the uncertainty? 460 00:25:04 --> 00:25:10 This is a prediction. 461 00:25:06 --> 00:25:12 462 00:25:09 --> 00:25:15 And this now becomes a little tricky. 463 00:25:11 --> 00:25:17 So what I'm telling you now may confuse you a bit. 464 00:25:14 --> 00:25:20 It's not meant to be, 465 00:25:15 --> 00:25:21 but I really won't hold you responsible for it. 466 00:25:18 --> 00:25:24 You may now think 467 00:25:19 --> 00:25:25 that the uncertainty in these measurements follows 468 00:25:22 --> 00:25:28 from the uncertainty in this, which is true, 469 00:25:24 --> 00:25:30 which is about 0.6%, and from the uncertainty in this, 470 00:25:28 --> 00:25:34 so this has about an uncertainty of 0.6%. 471 00:25:31 --> 00:25:37 I got it low because I measured ten oscillations, you see? 472 00:25:35 --> 00:25:41 The uncertainty is only one out of 150, which is low. 473 00:25:39 --> 00:25:45 You may think that the uncertainty in there 474 00:25:43 --> 00:25:49 equals the square root of 372 plus or minus 1 475 00:25:46 --> 00:25:52 divided by 186 plus or minus 1. 476 00:25:49 --> 00:25:55 And now you may argue, 477 00:25:50 --> 00:25:56 and it's completely reasonable that you would argue that way-- 478 00:25:54 --> 00:26:00 you would say, "Well, this is roughly 479 00:25:56 --> 00:26:02 "a quarter of a percent error here under the square root 480 00:25:59 --> 00:26:05 and this is roughly half a percent error." 481 00:26:02 --> 00:26:08 One out of 200 is about half. 482 00:26:03 --> 00:26:09 So you would add up the two errors-- 483 00:26:05 --> 00:26:11 a quarter plus half, that's about 0.7-- 484 00:26:08 --> 00:26:14 and because of the square roots, that becomes 0.35%, 485 00:26:12 --> 00:26:18 and that's wrong. 486 00:26:14 --> 00:26:20 And the reason why that is completely wrong-- 487 00:26:16 --> 00:26:22 that has to do with the fact 488 00:26:18 --> 00:26:24 that these two errors are coupled to each other. 489 00:26:21 --> 00:26:27 See, we... the 186 is included in the 372. 490 00:26:26 --> 00:26:32 The best way I can show you this-- 491 00:26:28 --> 00:26:34 suppose I measured m1 divided by m1, which would be 492 00:26:31 --> 00:26:37 186 plus or minus 1 divided by 186 plus or minus 1. 493 00:26:37 --> 00:26:43 That number is one with a hundred zeros. 494 00:26:39 --> 00:26:45 This number is one. 495 00:26:40 --> 00:26:46 You have the mass of one object; 496 00:26:42 --> 00:26:48 you divide it by the same object. 497 00:26:43 --> 00:26:49 Whereas if you would say, "Ah, this is a half a percent error 498 00:26:46 --> 00:26:52 and this is a half a percent error," you would say 499 00:26:49 --> 00:26:55 the ratio has an error of 1%, and that's not the case. 500 00:26:51 --> 00:26:57 So I will not bother you with that. 501 00:26:53 --> 00:26:59 I will not hold you responsible for that, 502 00:26:55 --> 00:27:01 but it turns out that if you do it correctly 503 00:26:58 --> 00:27:04 and you take the error of this into account, of about 0.6%, 504 00:27:02 --> 00:27:08 that the error in this ratio is really much less than .2%. 505 00:27:07 --> 00:27:13 You can almost forget about it. 506 00:27:09 --> 00:27:15 I will allow, generously, for a 1% error in the final answer, 507 00:27:13 --> 00:27:19 and so I stick to my prediction 508 00:27:16 --> 00:27:22 that the 10T of double the mass is going to be like this. 509 00:27:22 --> 00:27:28 510 00:27:24 --> 00:27:30 And now we're going to get the observation: 511 00:27:28 --> 00:27:34 10T times m2, which is double the mass, and that, of course, 512 00:27:33 --> 00:27:39 always has my uncertainty of my reaction time. 513 00:27:38 --> 00:27:44 There's nothing I can do about that. 514 00:27:40 --> 00:27:46 And we will compare these two numbers. 515 00:27:42 --> 00:27:48 So I will put the other mass on top of it. 516 00:27:45 --> 00:27:51 Goes here. 517 00:27:47 --> 00:27:53 518 00:27:48 --> 00:27:54 Tape them together so that they won't fall off. 519 00:27:52 --> 00:27:58 There we go. 520 00:27:54 --> 00:28:00 521 00:27:56 --> 00:28:02 So, I hope I did that correctly. 522 00:28:00 --> 00:28:06 The square root of two times 15.15. 523 00:28:03 --> 00:28:09 We'll give it a... amplitude, 524 00:28:05 --> 00:28:11 something like 30, maybe 35 centimeters. 525 00:28:08 --> 00:28:14 There we go. 526 00:28:09 --> 00:28:15 527 00:28:12 --> 00:28:18 One... two-- much slower, eh? You see that. 528 00:28:16 --> 00:28:22 Three... four... five... six... 529 00:28:24 --> 00:28:30 seven... eight... nine-- I'm not looking-- ten. 530 00:28:33 --> 00:28:39 21.36. 531 00:28:35 --> 00:28:41 532 00:28:38 --> 00:28:44 21.36. 533 00:28:42 --> 00:28:48 You can round it off if you want to, 534 00:28:44 --> 00:28:50 and you see that the agreement is spectacular. 535 00:28:47 --> 00:28:53 Within the uncertainty of my measurements, 536 00:28:49 --> 00:28:55 it comes out amazingly well. 537 00:28:51 --> 00:28:57 You could have removed this two, of course, 538 00:28:53 --> 00:28:59 because if you have an uncertainty of .2 here, 539 00:28:55 --> 00:29:01 it's a little silly to have that little two hanging there. 540 00:28:58 --> 00:29:04 But you see that indeed 541 00:28:59 --> 00:29:05 this spring is very close to an ideal spring. 542 00:29:02 --> 00:29:08 It obeys Hooke's Law, and it is also nearly massless. 543 00:29:07 --> 00:29:13 Here is the pendulum. 544 00:29:10 --> 00:29:16 Here is the mass, and it's offset at an angle, theta. 545 00:29:15 --> 00:29:21 The length of the pendulum is l, the length of the string. 546 00:29:20 --> 00:29:26 There is gravity here, mg, and the other force on the object, 547 00:29:25 --> 00:29:31 the only other force, is the tension, T. 548 00:29:29 --> 00:29:35 Don't confuse that with period T; this is tension T. 549 00:29:34 --> 00:29:40 It's in newtons. 550 00:29:35 --> 00:29:41 Those are the only two forces. 551 00:29:37 --> 00:29:43 There is nothing else. 552 00:29:39 --> 00:29:45 The thing is going to arc around like this 553 00:29:44 --> 00:29:50 and it's going to oscillate. 554 00:29:47 --> 00:29:53 I call this the y direction and I call this the x direction, 555 00:29:52 --> 00:29:58 and here x equals 0. 556 00:29:57 --> 00:30:03 Well, I'm going to decompose the tension into the y 557 00:30:03 --> 00:30:09 and into the x direction as we have done before. 558 00:30:08 --> 00:30:14 So this is going to be the y component. 559 00:30:12 --> 00:30:18 This is the x component. 560 00:30:15 --> 00:30:21 So this y component equals T cosine theta 561 00:30:21 --> 00:30:27 and the x component equals T sine theta. 562 00:30:28 --> 00:30:34 And now I'm going to write down 563 00:30:30 --> 00:30:36 the differential equations of motion, 564 00:30:33 --> 00:30:39 first in the x direction. 565 00:30:35 --> 00:30:41 Second... Newton's Second Law: ma equals... 566 00:30:41 --> 00:30:47 this is the only force in the x direction. 567 00:30:44 --> 00:30:50 It's a restoring force, just like with the spring. 568 00:30:46 --> 00:30:52 I therefore have to give it a minus sign. 569 00:30:49 --> 00:30:55 So equals minus T times the sine of theta. 570 00:30:54 --> 00:31:00 T itself could easily be a function of theta. 571 00:30:57 --> 00:31:03 So I have to allow for that. 572 00:30:59 --> 00:31:05 The sine of theta equals x 573 00:31:02 --> 00:31:08 if it's here at position x divided by l, 574 00:31:06 --> 00:31:12 and so I can write for this minus T-- 575 00:31:08 --> 00:31:14 which may be a function of theta-- times x divided by l. 576 00:31:13 --> 00:31:19 That is my differential equation in the x direction, 577 00:31:17 --> 00:31:23 and I prefer always for this a to write down x double-dot. 578 00:31:24 --> 00:31:30 Now the y direction. 579 00:31:26 --> 00:31:32 In the y direction, I have m y double-dot equals... 580 00:31:32 --> 00:31:38 this is my plus direction, so I have T cosine theta minus mg. 581 00:31:41 --> 00:31:47 This is equation one and this is equation two. 582 00:31:44 --> 00:31:50 And so now we have to solve two coupled differential equations, 583 00:31:49 --> 00:31:55 which is a hopeless task. 584 00:31:51 --> 00:31:57 It looks like a zoo, and it is a zoo. 585 00:31:54 --> 00:32:00 And now we're going to make some approximations, 586 00:31:58 --> 00:32:04 and the approximations that we will make 587 00:32:02 --> 00:32:08 which we will often see in physics 588 00:32:05 --> 00:32:11 when something oscillates-- 589 00:32:07 --> 00:32:13 what we call the small-angle approximations. 590 00:32:11 --> 00:32:17 Small-angle-- we will not allow theta to become too large. 591 00:32:16 --> 00:32:22 I'll be quantitative, what I mean by too large. 592 00:32:19 --> 00:32:25 When theta, which is in radians, equals much, much less than one, 593 00:32:24 --> 00:32:30 we call that a small angle. 594 00:32:27 --> 00:32:33 If that's the case, the cosine of theta is very close to 1. 595 00:32:32 --> 00:32:38 You will say, "Well, blah, blah, blah-- how close to 1?" 596 00:32:37 --> 00:32:43 Okay, five degrees-- the cosine is 0.996. 597 00:32:43 --> 00:32:49 That's close to 1. 598 00:32:45 --> 00:32:51 Ten degrees-- the cosine is 0.985. 599 00:32:50 --> 00:32:56 That's only 1½% different from one. 600 00:32:53 --> 00:32:59 So even at ten degrees, you're doing extremely well. 601 00:32:57 --> 00:33:03 So, this is consequence number one 602 00:33:00 --> 00:33:06 of the small-angle approximation. 603 00:33:03 --> 00:33:09 But there is a second consequence 604 00:33:05 --> 00:33:11 of the small-angle approximation. 605 00:33:08 --> 00:33:14 Look at the excursion that this object made 606 00:33:11 --> 00:33:17 from equilibrium in the x direction. 607 00:33:13 --> 00:33:19 That's this big. 608 00:33:15 --> 00:33:21 Look at the excursion it makes in the y direction. 609 00:33:18 --> 00:33:24 It's this small. 610 00:33:20 --> 00:33:26 It's way smaller than the excursion in the x direction, 611 00:33:24 --> 00:33:30 provided that your angle is small. 612 00:33:27 --> 00:33:33 I'll give you an example. 613 00:33:29 --> 00:33:35 At five degrees, this excursion is only 4% of this excursion. 614 00:33:36 --> 00:33:42 At ten degrees, this excursion is only 9% of this excursion. 615 00:33:40 --> 00:33:46 And since the excursion in the y direction 616 00:33:43 --> 00:33:49 is so much smaller than in the x direction, 617 00:33:46 --> 00:33:52 we say that the acceleration in the y direction 618 00:33:50 --> 00:33:56 can be approximated to be roughly zero. 619 00:33:53 --> 00:33:59 There is almost no acceleration in the y direction. 620 00:33:58 --> 00:34:04 With these two conclusions, 621 00:34:00 --> 00:34:06 which follow from the small-angle approximation, 622 00:34:03 --> 00:34:09 I go back to my equation number two, and I find 623 00:34:08 --> 00:34:14 that zero equals T, which could be a function of theta. 624 00:34:13 --> 00:34:19 The cosine of theta is one minus mg. 625 00:34:17 --> 00:34:23 So I find that T equals mg. 626 00:34:20 --> 00:34:26 Notice it's no longer even a function of theta. 627 00:34:24 --> 00:34:30 So I simply have, in my small-angle approximation, 628 00:34:29 --> 00:34:35 that I can make T the same as mg. 629 00:34:32 --> 00:34:38 It's approximately, but I still put an equals sign there. 630 00:34:35 --> 00:34:41 I substitute this back in my equation number one. 631 00:34:39 --> 00:34:45 And so now I get that m times x double-dot-- 632 00:34:43 --> 00:34:49 and now I bring this on the other side-- 633 00:34:47 --> 00:34:53 plus-- T is now mg-- 634 00:34:50 --> 00:34:56 mg times x divided by l equals zero. 635 00:34:57 --> 00:35:03 And now comes the wonderful result: 636 00:35:01 --> 00:35:07 x double-dot plus g over l times x equals zero. 637 00:35:06 --> 00:35:12 And this is such a beautiful result 638 00:35:09 --> 00:35:15 that it almost makes me cry. 639 00:35:11 --> 00:35:17 This is a simple harmonic oscillation. 640 00:35:16 --> 00:35:22 This equation looks 641 00:35:18 --> 00:35:24 like a carbon copy of the one that we have there. 642 00:35:23 --> 00:35:29 Here we have k over m, and there we have g over l. 643 00:35:28 --> 00:35:34 That's all. 644 00:35:29 --> 00:35:35 Other than that, there is no difference. 645 00:35:31 --> 00:35:37 So you can write down immediately 646 00:35:34 --> 00:35:40 the solution to this differential equation. 647 00:35:37 --> 00:35:43 x will be some amplitude times the cosine of omega t plus phi, 648 00:35:43 --> 00:35:49 just as we had before, 649 00:35:46 --> 00:35:52 and omega will now be the square root of g over l. 650 00:35:51 --> 00:35:57 And so the period of the pendulum will be 651 00:35:53 --> 00:35:59 2 pi times the square root of l over g. 652 00:35:57 --> 00:36:03 653 00:35:59 --> 00:36:05 Just falls into our lap, because we did all the work. 654 00:36:04 --> 00:36:10 I want you to realize that these results for a pendulum 655 00:36:07 --> 00:36:13 have their restrictions. 656 00:36:09 --> 00:36:15 Small angles, and we discussed quantitatively 657 00:36:11 --> 00:36:17 how small you would like to allow, 658 00:36:13 --> 00:36:19 and also the mass has to be exclusively in here 659 00:36:17 --> 00:36:23 and not in the string. 660 00:36:19 --> 00:36:25 We call that a massless string. 661 00:36:22 --> 00:36:28 To give you some rough idea of what these periods will be, 662 00:36:28 --> 00:36:34 substitute for l, one meter. 663 00:36:30 --> 00:36:36 Now, you take for g 9.8, take the square root 664 00:36:34 --> 00:36:40 and you multiply by 2 pi, 665 00:36:36 --> 00:36:42 and what you find is that the period is about two seconds. 666 00:36:40 --> 00:36:46 So a pendulum one meter long has a period of about two seconds. 667 00:36:45 --> 00:36:51 668 00:36:47 --> 00:36:53 One... two... three... four... five... six. 669 00:36:53 --> 00:36:59 So to go from here to here is about one second. 670 00:36:57 --> 00:37:03 If I make it four times shorter-- l four times shorter-- 671 00:37:01 --> 00:37:07 the square root of four is two. 672 00:37:03 --> 00:37:09 Then the period is ch... the period is changing. 673 00:37:06 --> 00:37:12 Four times shorter, the period must be two times shorter. 674 00:37:11 --> 00:37:17 To make roughly 25 centimeters. 675 00:37:13 --> 00:37:19 I'm not trying to be very quantitative here. 676 00:37:15 --> 00:37:21 Now the whole period must be about one second. 677 00:37:18 --> 00:37:24 One... two... three... four... five... six. 678 00:37:24 --> 00:37:30 Roughly one second. 679 00:37:25 --> 00:37:31 So, you see that the period is extremely sensitive 680 00:37:31 --> 00:37:37 to the length of the string. 681 00:37:34 --> 00:37:40 682 00:37:37 --> 00:37:43 I now want to compare with you 683 00:37:39 --> 00:37:45 the results that we have for the spring 684 00:37:42 --> 00:37:48 with the results that we have from the pendulum 685 00:37:46 --> 00:37:52 to give you some further insight. 686 00:37:49 --> 00:37:55 We have the string, and we have the pendulum. 687 00:37:53 --> 00:37:59 And I'm only going to look at the period T, 688 00:37:56 --> 00:38:02 which here is 2 pi divided by the square root of m over k, 689 00:38:01 --> 00:38:07 and here is 2 pi times the square root of l over g. 690 00:38:06 --> 00:38:12 691 00:38:07 --> 00:38:13 If I look here, there is a mass in here. 692 00:38:11 --> 00:38:17 If I look here, it's independent of the mass. 693 00:38:15 --> 00:38:21 Why is there a mass in here? 694 00:38:18 --> 00:38:24 That is very easy to see. 695 00:38:20 --> 00:38:26 If I take a spring 696 00:38:22 --> 00:38:28 and I extend the spring over a certain distance, 697 00:38:26 --> 00:38:32 then there is a certain force that I feel. 698 00:38:29 --> 00:38:35 That force is independent 699 00:38:31 --> 00:38:37 of the mass that I put at the end of the spring. 700 00:38:33 --> 00:38:39 The spring doesn't know what the mass is you're going to put on. 701 00:38:36 --> 00:38:42 All it knows is "I am too long 702 00:38:38 --> 00:38:44 and I want to go back to equilibrium." 703 00:38:40 --> 00:38:46 That force is a fixed force. 704 00:38:42 --> 00:38:48 If I double the mass, that fixed force will give, 705 00:38:45 --> 00:38:51 on double the mass, half the acceleration. 706 00:38:47 --> 00:38:53 If the acceleration goes down, 707 00:38:49 --> 00:38:55 the period of oscillation goes up. 708 00:38:51 --> 00:38:57 It's very clear. 709 00:38:52 --> 00:38:58 So you can immediately see that with the spring, 710 00:38:56 --> 00:39:02 the mass must enter into the period. 711 00:38:58 --> 00:39:04 Now go to the pendulum. 712 00:39:00 --> 00:39:06 If I double the mass of my bob at the end of a pendulum, 713 00:39:04 --> 00:39:10 then the vertical component of the tension will also double. 714 00:39:10 --> 00:39:16 That means this restoring force, 715 00:39:12 --> 00:39:18 which is proportional with the tension, will also double. 716 00:39:15 --> 00:39:21 So now the restoring force doubles and the mass doubles, 717 00:39:18 --> 00:39:24 the acceleration remains the same, 718 00:39:20 --> 00:39:26 the period remains the same. 719 00:39:22 --> 00:39:28 So you can simply argue 720 00:39:24 --> 00:39:30 that there should be no mass in here, and there isn't. 721 00:39:28 --> 00:39:34 How about this k? 722 00:39:30 --> 00:39:36 If k is high, then a spring is stiff. 723 00:39:33 --> 00:39:39 What does that mean, a stiff spring? 724 00:39:35 --> 00:39:41 It means that if I give it a small extension, 725 00:39:38 --> 00:39:44 that the spring force is huge. 726 00:39:40 --> 00:39:46 If I have a huge spring force, 727 00:39:42 --> 00:39:48 the acceleration on a given mass will be high. 728 00:39:45 --> 00:39:51 If I have a high acceleration, the period will be short, 729 00:39:48 --> 00:39:54 and that's exactly what you see. 730 00:39:50 --> 00:39:56 If k is high, the period will be short. 731 00:39:54 --> 00:40:00 g. 732 00:39:56 --> 00:40:02 Imagine that you have a pendulum in outer space, 733 00:39:58 --> 00:40:04 that there is no gravity, nothing. 734 00:40:00 --> 00:40:06 The pendulum will not swing. 735 00:40:03 --> 00:40:09 The period of the pendulum will be infinitely long. 736 00:40:07 --> 00:40:13 Going to the shuttle 737 00:40:09 --> 00:40:15 where the perceived gravity in their frame of reference-- 738 00:40:12 --> 00:40:18 perceived; they're weightless, remember-- 739 00:40:15 --> 00:40:21 their perceived gravity is zero. 740 00:40:17 --> 00:40:23 You take a pendulum in the shuttle 741 00:40:18 --> 00:40:24 and you put it at this angle, you let it go, 742 00:40:20 --> 00:40:26 it will stay there forever and ever and ever. 743 00:40:22 --> 00:40:28 The period is infinitely long. 744 00:40:24 --> 00:40:30 But take a spring in the shuttle and let the spring oscillate, 745 00:40:28 --> 00:40:34 and it does. 746 00:40:30 --> 00:40:36 So you can actually measure the mass of an object using a spring 747 00:40:34 --> 00:40:40 on the shuttle 748 00:40:35 --> 00:40:41 and let it oscillate if you know the spring constant, 749 00:40:37 --> 00:40:43 and that's the way it's actually done. 750 00:40:38 --> 00:40:44 So, you see indeed that these things make sense 751 00:40:44 --> 00:40:50 when you think about it in a rational way. 752 00:40:49 --> 00:40:55 We have here in 26-100 the mother of all pendulums. 753 00:40:56 --> 00:41:02 It is a pendulum... 754 00:40:57 --> 00:41:03 (object clangs ) 755 00:40:58 --> 00:41:04 Oops. 756 00:41:00 --> 00:41:06 It is a pendulum which is 5.1 meters long, 757 00:41:06 --> 00:41:12 and there is a mass at the end of it which is 15 kilograms. 758 00:41:12 --> 00:41:18 759 00:41:18 --> 00:41:24 The length is 5.18 meters 760 00:41:25 --> 00:41:31 and the uncertainty is about five centimeters. 761 00:41:28 --> 00:41:34 We can't measure it any better. 762 00:41:31 --> 00:41:37 And the mass at the end of it, 763 00:41:34 --> 00:41:40 which doesn't enter into the period, is about 15 kilograms. 764 00:41:38 --> 00:41:44 765 00:41:40 --> 00:41:46 The period, which is 2 pi times the square root of l over g, 766 00:41:46 --> 00:41:52 if you substitute in your length of 5.1 meters, 767 00:41:51 --> 00:41:57 you will find 4.57 seconds. 768 00:41:56 --> 00:42:02 4.5 second... seven. 769 00:41:59 --> 00:42:05 Since you have a 1% error in l, 770 00:42:01 --> 00:42:07 you're going to have a half a percent error in your period, 771 00:42:04 --> 00:42:10 so that is about 0.02 seconds. 772 00:42:09 --> 00:42:15 So this is my prediction. 773 00:42:11 --> 00:42:17 774 00:42:19 --> 00:42:25 And now I'm going to oscillate it for you 775 00:42:22 --> 00:42:28 and I'm going to do it from two different angles. 776 00:42:27 --> 00:42:33 I'm going to do at a five-degree angle 777 00:42:30 --> 00:42:36 and I'm going to do it at a ten-degree angle. 778 00:42:33 --> 00:42:39 In order to get my relative error down, 779 00:42:37 --> 00:42:43 I will oscillate ten times. 780 00:42:39 --> 00:42:45 So I'm going to get 781 00:42:41 --> 00:42:47 at an angle theta maximum of roughly five degrees. 782 00:42:46 --> 00:42:52 I get ten T equals something plus or minus my reaction time, 783 00:42:52 --> 00:42:58 which is 0.1 of a second. 784 00:42:54 --> 00:43:00 And then I will do it from ten degrees 785 00:42:57 --> 00:43:03 and I will do again ten T, 786 00:42:59 --> 00:43:05 and again my reaction time is not much better than 0.1 second. 787 00:43:04 --> 00:43:10 So, let's do that first. 788 00:43:06 --> 00:43:12 I will move this out of the way 789 00:43:09 --> 00:43:15 because if that 15-kilogram object hits this, 790 00:43:13 --> 00:43:19 that is not funny. 791 00:43:16 --> 00:43:22 All right. 792 00:43:18 --> 00:43:24 Zero. 793 00:43:19 --> 00:43:25 794 00:43:22 --> 00:43:28 I have a mark here on the floor. 795 00:43:24 --> 00:43:30 This is about five degrees, and this is about ten degrees. 796 00:43:28 --> 00:43:34 I will first do it from five degrees. 797 00:43:30 --> 00:43:36 I will let it swing one oscillation, 798 00:43:32 --> 00:43:38 and when it comes to a halt here, I will start the timer. 799 00:43:35 --> 00:43:41 That's, for me, the easiest. 800 00:43:37 --> 00:43:43 But I count on you when it comes to counting. 801 00:43:40 --> 00:43:46 You ready? You ready? 802 00:43:42 --> 00:43:48 You're sure? 803 00:43:43 --> 00:43:49 I'm ready, too. 804 00:43:44 --> 00:43:50 805 00:43:47 --> 00:43:53 Okay. 806 00:43:49 --> 00:43:55 Now, keep counting and don't confuse me again, now. 807 00:43:52 --> 00:43:58 You're completely responsible for the counting. 808 00:43:56 --> 00:44:02 So you only have to tell me is when... 809 00:43:58 --> 00:44:04 when eight or nine is coming up. 810 00:44:00 --> 00:44:06 That's all I want to know. 811 00:44:01 --> 00:44:07 Don't even bother me with three. 812 00:44:03 --> 00:44:09 Don't even bother me with four. 813 00:44:05 --> 00:44:11 Just let me know 814 00:44:06 --> 00:44:12 when I have to get in position for the final kill. 815 00:44:09 --> 00:44:15 816 00:44:15 --> 00:44:21 Notice there's almost no denting on this pendulum. 817 00:44:18 --> 00:44:24 The amplitude remains almost the same, whereas with the... 818 00:44:20 --> 00:44:26 with the air track you could actually see 819 00:44:22 --> 00:44:28 that there was already some kind of friction... Where are we now? 820 00:44:25 --> 00:44:31 STUDENTS: Nine. 821 00:44:27 --> 00:44:33 LEWIN: Nine? Nine, right? 822 00:44:30 --> 00:44:36 823 00:44:32 --> 00:44:38 STUDENTS: Ten. 824 00:44:34 --> 00:44:40 825 00:44:36 --> 00:44:42 STUDENT: Oh, my God! 826 00:44:37 --> 00:44:43 LEWIN: 45.70. 827 00:44:39 --> 00:44:45 828 00:44:43 --> 00:44:49 45.70. 829 00:44:44 --> 00:44:50 Where is my chalk? 830 00:44:47 --> 00:44:53 45.70. 831 00:44:52 --> 00:44:58 What was my prediction? 832 00:44:54 --> 00:45:00 (students responding ) 833 00:44:57 --> 00:45:03 (applause ) 834 00:44:59 --> 00:45:05 LEWIN: Yeah! 835 00:45:00 --> 00:45:06 Yeah! 836 00:45:01 --> 00:45:07 Yeah, exactly. 837 00:45:03 --> 00:45:09 You get the picture. 838 00:45:05 --> 00:45:11 That is pure luck, 839 00:45:07 --> 00:45:13 because my accuracy is no better than a tenth of a second. 840 00:45:10 --> 00:45:16 Now we do from ten... 841 00:45:11 --> 00:45:17 ten degrees, and I want to show you now 842 00:45:14 --> 00:45:20 that the effect on the angle-- you go from five to ten-- 843 00:45:17 --> 00:45:23 is small, so small that you cannot measure it 844 00:45:20 --> 00:45:26 within the accuracy of your measurement. 845 00:45:23 --> 00:45:29 846 00:45:27 --> 00:45:33 Yeah! 847 00:45:29 --> 00:45:35 Okay. 848 00:45:31 --> 00:45:37 Again, relax and count. 849 00:45:34 --> 00:45:40 850 00:45:47 --> 00:45:53 Aah, nerve-wracking! 851 00:45:50 --> 00:45:56 Ooh! 852 00:45:52 --> 00:45:58 853 00:45:56 --> 00:46:02 Where are we now? 854 00:45:57 --> 00:46:03 STUDENTS: Seven. 855 00:45:59 --> 00:46:05 LEWIN: Seven. 856 00:46:00 --> 00:46:06 857 00:46:03 --> 00:46:09 STUDENTS: Eight. 858 00:46:05 --> 00:46:11 859 00:46:07 --> 00:46:13 Nine. 860 00:46:09 --> 00:46:15 861 00:46:12 --> 00:46:18 Ten. 862 00:46:14 --> 00:46:20 Oh! 863 00:46:15 --> 00:46:21 (applause ) 864 00:46:16 --> 00:46:22 865 00:46:19 --> 00:46:25 LEWIN: Did you expect anything else? 866 00:46:21 --> 00:46:27 (students laugh ) 867 00:46:22 --> 00:46:28 LEWIN: 45.75. 868 00:46:27 --> 00:46:33 One of the most remarkable things I just mentioned to you 869 00:46:32 --> 00:46:38 is that the period of the oscillations 870 00:46:35 --> 00:46:41 is independent of the mass of the object. 871 00:46:38 --> 00:46:44 That would mean 872 00:46:40 --> 00:46:46 if I joined the bob and I swing down with the bob 873 00:46:44 --> 00:46:50 that you should get that same period. 874 00:46:47 --> 00:46:53 Or should you not? 875 00:46:49 --> 00:46:55 I'm asking you a question before we do this awful experiment. 876 00:46:55 --> 00:47:01 Would the period come out to be the same or not? 877 00:47:00 --> 00:47:06 (students respond ) 878 00:47:01 --> 00:47:07 LEWIN: Some of you think it's the same. 879 00:47:04 --> 00:47:10 Have you thought about it, 880 00:47:05 --> 00:47:11 that I'm a little bit taller than this object 881 00:47:08 --> 00:47:14 and that therefore maybe effectively 882 00:47:11 --> 00:47:17 the length of the string has become a little less 883 00:47:14 --> 00:47:20 if I sit up like this? 884 00:47:16 --> 00:47:22 And if the length of the string is a little less, 885 00:47:19 --> 00:47:25 the period would be a little shorter. 886 00:47:22 --> 00:47:28 Yeah? 887 00:47:23 --> 00:47:29 Be prepared for that. 888 00:47:24 --> 00:47:30 On the other hand, I'm also pre... 889 00:47:25 --> 00:47:31 well, I'm not quite prepared for it. 890 00:47:27 --> 00:47:33 (students laughing ) 891 00:47:29 --> 00:47:35 LEWIN: I will try to hold my body as horizontal as I possibly can 892 00:47:34 --> 00:47:40 in order to be at the same level as the bob. 893 00:47:37 --> 00:47:43 I will start when I come to a halt here. 894 00:47:41 --> 00:47:47 There we go. 895 00:47:43 --> 00:47:49 (students laughing ) 896 00:47:44 --> 00:47:50 897 00:47:46 --> 00:47:52 LEWIN: Now! 898 00:47:47 --> 00:47:53 899 00:47:49 --> 00:47:55 You count! 900 00:47:52 --> 00:47:58 This hurts! 901 00:47:54 --> 00:48:00 Aah! 902 00:47:55 --> 00:48:01 (students counting in background ) 903 00:47:58 --> 00:48:04 (laughter continues ) 904 00:47:59 --> 00:48:05 LEWIN: I want to hear you loud! 905 00:48:04 --> 00:48:10 STUDENTS: Four! 906 00:48:06 --> 00:48:12 LEWIN (groaning ): Oh... 907 00:48:08 --> 00:48:14 STUDENTS: Five! 908 00:48:10 --> 00:48:16 YOUNG MAN: Halfway! 909 00:48:12 --> 00:48:18 LEWIN: Thank you! 910 00:48:13 --> 00:48:19 STUDENTS: Six... 911 00:48:14 --> 00:48:20 LEWIN (groaning ): Oh... 912 00:48:17 --> 00:48:23 STUDENTS: Seven... 913 00:48:22 --> 00:48:28 Eight. 914 00:48:23 --> 00:48:29 LEWIN (groaning ): Aah... 915 00:48:26 --> 00:48:32 STUDENTS: Nine... 916 00:48:28 --> 00:48:34 917 00:48:31 --> 00:48:37 Ten! 918 00:48:32 --> 00:48:38 LEWIN: Ah! 919 00:48:33 --> 00:48:39 STUDENTS: Oh! 920 00:48:34 --> 00:48:40 (cheering and applause ) 921 00:48:37 --> 00:48:43 922 00:48:42 --> 00:48:48 LEWIN: Ten T with Walter Lewin. 923 00:48:47 --> 00:48:53 45.6 plus or minus 0.1 second. 924 00:48:53 --> 00:48:59 Physics works, I'm telling you! 925 00:48:56 --> 00:49:02 I'll see you Monday. 926 00:48:57 --> 00:49:03 Have a good weekend. 927 00:48:59 --> 00:49:05 (applause ) 928 00:49:01 --> 00:49:07 929 00:49:28 --> 00:49:34.000