1 00:00:04,420 --> 00:00:08,850 If you're driving down the highway and want to see how fast you're going, you look down 2 00:00:08,850 --> 00:00:13,450 at your speedometer. If you're in a lab and want to see how fast a chemical reaction is 3 00:00:13,450 --> 00:00:18,380 going, it's a little more complicated. In this video we'll look at a few factors that 4 00:00:18,380 --> 00:00:21,730 influence the speed of chemical reactions. 5 00:00:21,730 --> 00:00:26,039 This video is part of the Equilibrium video series. It is often important to determine 6 00:00:26,039 --> 00:00:30,680 whether or not a system is at equilibrium, to do this we must understand how a system's 7 00:00:30,680 --> 00:00:34,720 equilibrium state is constrained by its boundary and surroundings. 8 00:00:34,720 --> 00:00:39,970 Hi, my name is George Zaidan and I'm a graduate of the chemistry department here at MIT. 9 00:00:39,970 --> 00:00:45,070 Before watching this video, you should have a basic understanding of chemical equilibrium. 10 00:00:45,070 --> 00:00:48,390 After watching this video, you will be able to: 11 00:00:48,390 --> 00:00:52,820 Understand how reaction rate is influenced by reactant concentration 12 00:00:52,820 --> 00:00:57,309 Explain how reaction rates change as a system establishes equilibrium, AND 13 00:00:57,309 --> 00:01:02,129 Predict relative equilibrium concentrations of reactant and product, based on rates of 14 00:01:02,129 --> 00:01:09,129 forward and reverse processes. 15 00:01:09,880 --> 00:01:16,880 Suppose you have this general reaction where A, B, C, and D are molecules and lowercase 16 00:01:16,920 --> 00:01:23,920 a, b, c, d are their molar coefficients. As the reaction progresses, A and B will be 17 00:01:24,259 --> 00:01:27,119 consumed, and C and D will be formed. 18 00:01:27,119 --> 00:01:32,158 The speed at which any of these four processes happen multiplied by the reciprocal of the 19 00:01:32,158 --> 00:01:37,158 appropriate molar coefficient is called the rate of this reaction. 20 00:01:37,158 --> 00:01:42,149 If you want your car to go faster, you step on the gas, but speeding up a chemical reaction 21 00:01:42,149 --> 00:01:47,499 is not that simple. There are lots of different factors that affect reaction rate. Three common 22 00:01:47,499 --> 00:01:52,609 ones are: the concentration of reactants, the temperature of the reaction mixture and 23 00:01:52,609 --> 00:01:57,679 the presence of a catalyst. In this video we'll focus on the effect of concentration 24 00:01:57,679 --> 00:02:00,460 on homogenous reactions. 25 00:02:00,460 --> 00:02:04,670 Most chemical reactions are the result of two or more molecules colliding with each 26 00:02:04,670 --> 00:02:10,330 other... but not every collision leads to a reaction. The molecules must collide in 27 00:02:10,330 --> 00:02:15,510 the proper physical orientation, and they must do so with enough energy to break their 28 00:02:15,510 --> 00:02:17,040 bonds. 29 00:02:17,040 --> 00:02:22,200 Imagine a beaker with 100 mL of water, in which you dissolve 106 molecules of reactant 30 00:02:22,200 --> 00:02:29,200 A and 106 molecules of reactant B. How likely is the reaction to form C and D? Do a back 31 00:02:29,430 --> 00:02:36,430 of the envelope calculation to support your answer. Pause the video. 32 00:02:39,439 --> 00:02:46,439 So let's see. 100 mL of water is 100 grams of water, which is 100 over 18.02, about 5.5 33 00:02:46,610 --> 00:02:53,610 moles of water. That means there are about 3.3x1024 molecules of water in the beaker, 34 00:02:53,629 --> 00:03:00,629 and only 106 molecules of each reactant...So in any given volume of this solution, 3.3x1024 35 00:03:01,450 --> 00:03:08,450 over (3.3x1024 + 106 + 106), or 99.99999999999999994 %, of molecules are nonreactive water! 36 00:03:22,720 --> 00:03:28,370 Clearly, successful collisions between the reactants would be very rare in this situation. 37 00:03:28,370 --> 00:03:32,980 Intuitively, you would expect that the more concentrated the reactants, the faster the 38 00:03:32,980 --> 00:03:35,680 reaction, and this is generally true. 39 00:03:35,680 --> 00:03:42,680 Let's draw a reaction coordinate diagram to better understand our hypothetical reaction. 40 00:03:45,390 --> 00:03:52,390 Let's assume that the reaction is exothermic, in other words, that energy is given off as 41 00:03:55,709 --> 00:03:58,629 the reaction progresses, so we draw the curve like this. 42 00:03:58,629 --> 00:03:59,189 The x-axis is the progress of the reaction, and the y-axis is potential energy. 43 00:03:59,189 --> 00:03:59,560 Here are the reactants, and here are the products. 44 00:03:59,560 --> 00:04:05,870 This hump is the activation energy, the point of highest potential energy of the reaction. 45 00:04:05,870 --> 00:04:11,319 Two molecules must collide with at least this amount of energy in order to successfully 46 00:04:11,319 --> 00:04:12,120 react. 47 00:04:12,120 --> 00:04:17,798 Do you notice anything about this diagram? There's no indication of directionality; in 48 00:04:17,798 --> 00:04:22,650 other words, there's no reason that the reaction couldn't proceed backwards just as well as 49 00:04:22,650 --> 00:04:24,260 forwards. 50 00:04:24,260 --> 00:04:28,290 You're probably used to thinking of chemical reactions as processes that happen in only 51 00:04:28,290 --> 00:04:35,060 one direction (forward), but most reactions are actually reversible. There are a few exceptions, 52 00:04:35,060 --> 00:04:42,060 for example combustion. *You can't un-burn a match. But most reactions that chemists 53 00:04:42,620 --> 00:04:47,350 carry out in the lab or that happen in our bodies are reversible. 54 00:04:47,350 --> 00:04:51,250 Draw your own reaction coordinate diagram and label the forward and reverse reaction 55 00:04:51,250 --> 00:04:56,650 paths. Suggest what the relationship might be between the activation energy and the relative 56 00:04:56,650 --> 00:05:03,650 rates of the forward and reverse reactions. Pause the video. 57 00:05:07,360 --> 00:05:11,720 This is the activation energy for the forward reaction. The higher this activation energy, 58 00:05:11,720 --> 00:05:16,160 the slower the forward reaction, because the number of reactant molecules with sufficient 59 00:05:16,160 --> 00:05:20,360 energy to react when they collide will decrease. 60 00:05:20,360 --> 00:05:25,600 But now let's look at this picture in reverse. The reverse activation energy is not the same 61 00:05:25,600 --> 00:05:31,100 as the forward activation energy! In this case, it's higher. So that means that the 62 00:05:31,100 --> 00:05:35,140 reverse reaction will be slower than the forward reaction. 63 00:05:35,140 --> 00:05:40,700 If we were to somehow increase the activation energy, both the forward and the reverse rates 64 00:05:40,700 --> 00:05:46,500 would slow down, but the relationship between them -- namely that the forward rate is faster 65 00:05:46,500 --> 00:05:49,650 than the reverse rate -- would be preserved. 66 00:05:49,650 --> 00:05:54,850 Here are four other diagrams, each for a different hypothetical reaction. Predict the relative 67 00:05:54,850 --> 00:06:01,850 rates of the forward and reverse reactions in each of these cases. Pause the video. 68 00:06:06,520 --> 00:06:13,520 In 69 00:06:29,720 --> 00:06:33,930 real life chemical processes, the rates of the forward and reverse reactions are often 70 00:06:33,930 --> 00:06:39,520 very different. Many of the reactions that you may have previously thought of as "irreversible"actually 71 00:06:39,520 --> 00:06:44,750 just have wildly different forward and reverse rates. For example, you've probably seen the 72 00:06:44,750 --> 00:06:48,720 dissociation of a strong acid in water written like this. 73 00:06:48,720 --> 00:06:55,180 But really, it's this. In this case, the forward reaction is many orders of magnitude faster 74 00:06:55,180 --> 00:07:02,180 than the reverse reaction, so we write it as just the forward reaction. 75 00:07:04,940 --> 00:07:10,300 So far we've seen that concentration and activation energy can each independently affect the rate 76 00:07:10,300 --> 00:07:15,150 of a chemical reaction. The higher the concentration of a reactant, the faster the reaction; and 77 00:07:15,150 --> 00:07:20,490 the lower the activation energy, the faster the reaction. But there's a twist... Thinking 78 00:07:20,490 --> 00:07:27,490 about the hypothetical reaction A and B yields C and D. Suggest what that twist might be. 79 00:07:29,810 --> 00:07:36,810 Pause the video. 80 00:07:37,620 --> 00:07:42,050 There's no reason that the activation energy of this reaction would change as the reaction 81 00:07:42,050 --> 00:07:49,050 progresses. But that's not true for the concentrations: as A and B are converted to C and D, the concentration 82 00:07:49,300 --> 00:07:56,300 of all four species change! And as the concentrations change, the reaction rate also changes. 83 00:07:56,810 --> 00:08:01,710 To see if we can understand how the reaction rate changes as the reaction progresses, let's 84 00:08:01,710 --> 00:08:06,930 go back to the reaction coordinate diagram. Let's start by considering both the forward 85 00:08:06,930 --> 00:08:11,210 and reverse reactions as if they're completely separate. 86 00:08:11,210 --> 00:08:18,210 Here are A and B reacting to form C and D. Let's assume this forward reaction is relatively 87 00:08:18,270 --> 00:08:24,490 fast. As more and more A and B get converted to products, their concentrations decrease, 88 00:08:24,490 --> 00:08:30,950 and the initially fast reaction rate slows over time. Here are C and D reacting to form 89 00:08:30,950 --> 00:08:37,950 A and B. This reaction would be slower than this one, but as C and D react, their concentrations 90 00:08:38,649 --> 00:08:43,099 decrease with time and the reaction becomes even slower. 91 00:08:43,099 --> 00:08:50,099 Except that in reality, these aren't two separate reactions. The products of one reaction are 92 00:08:50,970 --> 00:08:55,649 the reactants for the other. Let's now consider the forward and reverse 93 00:08:55,649 --> 00:09:01,600 reactions at the same time. At the very very beginning, only A and B are present -- no 94 00:09:01,600 --> 00:09:06,680 C or D. So the initial rate of the forward reaction will be relatively high, since the 95 00:09:06,680 --> 00:09:12,740 concentrations of A and B are high. The reverse reaction can't happen at all yet, because 96 00:09:12,740 --> 00:09:17,279 there is no C and D present, so its initial rate is zero. 97 00:09:17,279 --> 00:09:23,629 As the reaction proceeds, two things happen: the concentrations of A and B decrease, and 98 00:09:23,629 --> 00:09:29,920 the concentrations of C and D increase. So the forward reaction rate slows, and the reverse 99 00:09:29,920 --> 00:09:34,319 reaction rate speeds up. Eventually, we reach a point where the rates 100 00:09:34,319 --> 00:09:39,839 of the forward and reverse reactions are the same: this is the definition of a dynamic 101 00:09:39,839 --> 00:09:46,670 chemical equilibrium. When this happens, the concentrations of A, B, C, and D stop changing 102 00:09:46,670 --> 00:09:53,670 with time. Be careful not to confuse equilibrium with "no reaction."A and B are still reacting 103 00:09:54,500 --> 00:10:00,290 to form C and D; and C and D are still reacting to form A and B. But the rate of formation 104 00:10:00,290 --> 00:10:05,100 of products equals the rate of disappearance of reactants and vice versa. That means that 105 00:10:05,100 --> 00:10:10,310 the concentrations of A, B, C, and D don't change with time. 106 00:10:10,310 --> 00:10:15,180 Let's go back to our reaction coordinate diagrams for our four hypothetical reactions. We've 107 00:10:15,180 --> 00:10:20,459 already worked out the relative rates of the forward and reverse reactions in each case. 108 00:10:20,459 --> 00:10:24,730 Using these relative rates, see if you can predict the relative concentrations of the 109 00:10:24,730 --> 00:10:31,730 reactants and products at equilibrium. Pause the video. 110 00:10:36,279 --> 00:10:43,220 -Endo, high Ea: lots of reactant, not much product 111 00:10:43,220 --> 00:10:47,379 -Exo, high Ea: lots of product, not much reactant 112 00:10:47,379 --> 00:10:54,149 -(In both of these cases, the forward rate is the same as the reverse rate...)Same energy, 113 00:10:54,149 --> 00:11:01,149 high Ea: ratio of product/reactant will depend on specific reaction Same energy, low Ea: 114 00:11:08,569 --> 00:11:11,680 ratio of product/reactant will depend on specific reaction 115 00:11:11,680 --> 00:11:16,819 Now what's the difference between the last two scenarios? In each case, the forward reaction 116 00:11:16,819 --> 00:11:21,050 rate will be the same as the reverse reaction rate. But the rates for this scenario will 117 00:11:21,050 --> 00:11:27,480 be much faster than for this one... so equilibrium will be reached much more quickly here than 118 00:11:27,480 --> 00:11:31,180 here! The most important thing to understand about 119 00:11:31,180 --> 00:11:35,769 reaction rates and equilibrium is that just because the forward and reverse rates are 120 00:11:35,769 --> 00:11:42,629 the same DOES NOT mean that the concentrations of the reactants and products are the same. 121 00:11:42,629 --> 00:11:47,129 Some equilibria, like the dissociation of a strong acid in water, strongly favor the 122 00:11:47,129 --> 00:11:53,740 products. Others strongly favor the reactants. Many of the reactions that keep us alive are 123 00:11:53,740 --> 00:11:57,449 equilibria, and our body goes to a great deal of effort to make sure that the position of 124 00:11:57,449 --> 00:12:04,449 equilibrium heavily favors one side or the other. 125 00:12:07,089 --> 00:12:10,749 We hope this video has helped you understand the relationship between reaction rates and 126 00:12:10,749 --> 00:12:17,009 equilibrium. We saw that, in general, the rate of a reaction decreases as reactant concentration 127 00:12:17,009 --> 00:12:18,040 decreases. 128 00:12:18,040 --> 00:12:23,079 And while we may think of reactions as irreversible, most are actually reversible, it's just that 129 00:12:23,079 --> 00:12:25,620 we "see"the faster of the two. 130 00:12:25,620 --> 00:12:30,899 As the forward reaction rate decreases, the reverse reaction rate increases until equilibrium 131 00:12:30,899 --> 00:12:35,949 is established. At equilibrium, the rate of the forward reaction equals the rate of the 132 00:12:35,949 --> 00:12:41,059 reverse reaction, but this does not imply anything about the equilibrium concentrations 133 00:12:41,059 --> 00:12:44,399 of the products and reactants.